Occupational low-dose irradiation and cancer risk among medical radiation workers.

BACKGROUND: Medical workers are the largest group of workers occupationally exposed to low doses of ionizing radiation (IR) worldwide. AIMS: This review presents all the cohorts of medical workers exposed in the world and summarizes cancer risks associated with radiation exposure in this population. METHODS: Epidemiological studies on health professionals exposed to IR published from 1975 to 2019 were reviewed. Strength of evidence was assessed according to the modified Royal College of General Practitioners three-star system. RESULTS: Among the 16 epidemiological studies focusing on cancers from 11 cohorts among medical staff exposed to radiation, higher risks of cancer were observed for pre-1950 exposure and for medical workers who performed fluoroscopically guided interventional procedures or radionuclides procedures compared to those who did not. However, strength of evidence supporting the associations remains moderate as several methodological limits including the lack of dosimetry data, lifestyle factors and recent updates may obscure the link between medical occupational exposure and cancer occurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Excess risk of cancer is suspected for high and former exposures. The more highly exposed professions, i.e. interventional physicians and nuclear medicine workers, should be monitored carefully. Collaborative projects aiming to increase the quantity and quality of information of the studied populations would be a key point.

External radiation dose and cancer mortality among French nuclear workers: considering potential confounding by internal radiation exposure.

OBJECTIVES: French nuclear workers have detailed records of their occupational exposure to external radiation that have been used to examine associations with subsequent cancer mortality. However, some workers were also exposed to internal contamination by radionuclides. This study aims to assess the potential for bias due to confounding by internal contamination of estimates of associations between external radiation exposure and cancer mortality. METHODS: A cohort of 59,004 workers employed for at least 1 year between 1950 and 1994 by CEA (Commissariat à l'Energie Atomique), AREVA NC, or EDF (Electricité de France) and badge-monitored for external radiation exposure were followed through 2004 to assess vital status and cause of death. A flag based on a workstation-exposure matrix defined four levels of potential for internal contamination. Standardized mortality ratios were assessed for each level of the internal contamination indicator. Poisson regression was used to quantify associations between external radiation exposure and cancer mortality, adjusting for potential internal contamination. RESULTS: For solid cancer, the mortality deficit tended to decrease as the levels of potential for internal contamination increased. For solid cancer and leukemia excluding chronic lymphocytic leukemia, adjusting the dose-response analysis on the internal contamination indicator did not markedly change the excess relative risk per Sievert of external radiation dose. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that in this cohort, neglecting information on internal dosimetry while studying the association between external dose and cancer mortality does not generate a substantial bias. To investigate more specifically the health effects of internal contamination, an effort is underway to estimate organ doses due to internal contamination.

Lung cancer mortality in the European uranium miners cohorts analyzed with a biologically based model taking into account radon measurement error.

The biologically based two-stage clonal expansion (TSCE) model is used to analyze lung cancer mortality of European miners from the Czech Republic, France, and Germany. All three cohorts indicate a highly significant action of exposure to radon and its progeny on promotion. The action on initiation is not significant in the French cohort. An action on transformation was tested but not found significant. In a pooled analysis, the results based on the French and German datasets do not differ significantly in any of the used parameters. For the Czech dataset, only lag time and two parameters that determine the clonal expansion without exposure and with low exposure rates (promotion) are consistent with the other studies. For low exposure rates, the resulting relative risks are quite similar. Exposure estimates for each calendar year are used. A model for random errors in each of these yearly exposures is presented. Depending on the used technique of exposure estimate, Berkson and classical errors are used. The consequences for the model parameters are calculated and found to be mostly of minor importance, except that the large difference in the exposure-induced initiation between the studies is decreased substantially.

Epidemiological studies of leukaemia in children and young adults around nuclear facilities: a critical review.

The existence of an increased risk of childhood leukaemia near nuclear installations is a recurrent issue. A review of the related epidemiological literature is presented here. Results for 198 nuclear sites throughout 10 countries were included in the review. In addition to local studies, 25 multi-site studies have been published for eight countries. A large variability was noticed in the quality of the data as well as in the definition of the study population and in the methods of analysis. Many studies present important limits that make the results difficult to interpret. The review confirms that some clusters of childhood leukaemia cases exist locally. However, results based on multi-site studies around nuclear installations do not indicate an increased risk globally. Many studies were launched to investigate possible origins of the observed clusters around specific sites, but up to now, none of the proposed hypotheses have explained them.

Dose Estimation for a Study of Nuclear Workers in France, the United Kingdom and the United States of America: Methods for the International Nuclear Workers Study (INWORKS).

In the framework of the International Nuclear Workers Study conducted in France, the UK and the U.S. (INWORKS), updated and expanded methods were developed to convert recorded doses of ionizing radiation to estimates of organ doses or individual personal dose equivalent [H(p)(10)] for a total number of 308,297 workers, including 40,035 women. This approach accounts for differences in dosimeter response to predominant workplace energy and geometry of exposure and for the recently published ICRP report on dose coefficients for men and women separately. The overall mean annual individual personal dose equivalent, including zero doses, is 1.73 mSv [median = 0.42; interquartile range (IQR): 0.07, 1.59]. Associated individual organ doses were estimated. INWORKS includes workers who had potential for exposure to neutrons. Therefore, we analyzed neutron dosimetry data to identify workers potentially exposed to neutrons. We created a time-varying indicator for each worker, classifying them according to whether they had a positive recorded neutron dose and if so, whether their neutron dose ever exceeded 10% of their total external penetrating radiation dose. The number of workers flagged as being exposed to neutrons was 13% for the full cohort, with 15% of the cohort in France, 12% of the cohort in the UK and 14% in the U.S. We also used available information on in vivo and bioassay monitoring to identify workers with known depositions or suspected internal contaminations. As a result of this work, information is now available that will allow various types of sensitivity analyses.

A comparison of several methods to test for the existence of a monotonic dose-response relationship in clinical and epidemiological studies.

The Mantel-extension chi-square test for overall trend and an asymptotically equivalent test based on logistic regression are commonly used to test for a monotonic dose-response relationship between exposure and disease in epidemiological and clinical studies. However, these tests present two important disadvantages, as they (i) make the restrictive assumption of a parametric model of linear form on the logit scale and (ii) impose the a priori choice of scores to code for the exposure categories. Indeed, the linear assumption, if made incorrectly, can lead to an invalid conclusion, and the choice of scores lends arbitrariness to the test results. Some alternative tests have been proposed in the literature. We have considered several of these tests, namely one based on isotonic regression, the T-test based on contrasts and a recently published test based on adjacent contrasts (Dosemeci-Benichou test). The aim of our study was to compare the statistical properties (type I error and power) of these tests and of the commonly used Mantel-extension test for overall trend. We generated cohort and case-control data and considered one- and two-sided versions of the tests. Moreover, we studied the tests under the null hypothesis of no relationship between exposure and disease and under various alternative patterns of monotonic or non-monotonic dose-response relationships. This study confirms that the commonly used trend tests can lead to erroneous conclusion of a monotonic dose-response relationship. The test based on isotonic regression does not represent a favourable alternative, as it tends to be too powerful in case of non-monotonic dose-response relationship patterns. The tests based on contrasts seem to possess more favourable properties by combining close to nominal type I error, high power for monotonic alternatives and low power for non-monotonic alternatives.