The systemic inflammation indexes after admission predict in-hospital mortality in patients with extensive burns.

PURPOSE: To explore the clinical value of various complete blood count (CBC)-derived inflammation indicators to predict in-hospital mortality in patients with extensive burns. METHODS: Systemic inflammation indexes, including lymphocyte-platelet ratio (LPR), neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), neutrophil-monocyte ratio (NMR), monocyte-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte * platelet (NLPR), systemic inflammation index (SII), and systemic inflammation response index (SIRI) on days 1, 3, and 7 after admission were calculated in 135 patients with extensive burns. RESULTS: We included 135 patients with extensive burns, including 97 survivors and 38 non-survivors. After adjusting for confounders, only the LPR on day 1, NLPR on days 3 and 7 were significantly associated with survival (OR= 1.237, 1.097, 1.104; 95 % CI: 1.055-1.451, 1.002-1.202, 1.005-1.212; respectively) in the analysis of multivariate logistic regression. The optimum cutoff values of the LPR on day 1 and NLPR on day 3 were 6.37 and 8.06, and the area under the curves (AUC) were 0.695 and 0.794, respectively. The AUC of NLPR on day 7 had the highest value, 0.814, and the optimum cut-off value was 3.84. The efficacy of LPR on day 1, NLPR on days 3 and 7 combined with the burn prognostic score index in predicting the prognosis of patients was higher than that of the burn index alone, and the three composite inflammatory indexes combined with PBI had the highest efficacy in predicting the prognosis (AUC = 0.994). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed poor prognosis in patients with higher LPR on day 1 and higher NLPR on days 3 and 7 (log-rank χ2 =9.623,31.564, 20.771, respectively; P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: LPR on day 1 and NLPR on days 3 and 7 after admission are reliable predictors of prognosis in patients with severe extensive burns. The combination of the burn prognostic score index, LPR on day 1, and NLPR on days 3 and 7 was superior to the burn indexes alone in predicting a patient's prognosis.

Single-cell sequencing analysis and bulk-seq identify IGFBP6 and TNFAIP6 as novel differential diagnosis markers for postburn pathological scarring.

BACKGROUND: If not accurately diagnosed and treated, postburn pathological scars, such as keloids and hypertrophic scars, can lead to negative clinical outcomes. However, differential diagnosis at the molecular level for postburn pathological scars remains limited. Using single-cell sequencing analysis, we investigated the genetic nuances of pathological scars at the cellular level. This study aimed to identify molecular diagnostic biomarkers to distinguish between postburn keloids and hypertrophic scars. METHODS: Single-cell sequencing, differential expression, and weighted co-expression network analyses were performed to identify potential key genes for discriminating between keloids and hypertrophic scars. Postburn clinical samples were collected from our centre to validate the expression levels of the identified key genes. RESULTS: Single-cell sequencing analysis unveiled 29 and 30 cell clusters in keloids and hypertrophic scars, respectively, predominantly composed of fibroblasts. Bulk differential gene analysis showed 96 highly expressed genes and 69 lowly expressed genes in keloids compared to hypertrophic scars. By incorporating previous research, Gene Set Enrichment Analysis was conducted to select fibroblasts as the focus of research. According to the single-cell data, 301 genes were stably expressed in fibroblasts from both types of pathological scars. Consistently, Weighted Gene Co-expression Network Analysis revealed that the blue module genes were mostly hub genes associated with fibroblasts. After intersecting fibroblast-related genes in single-cell data, Weighted Gene Co-expression Network Analysis-hub module genes, and bulk differential expression genes, insulin-like growth factor binding protein 6 and tumour necrosis factor alpha-induced protein 6 were identified as key genes to distinguish keloids from hypertrophic scars, resulting in diagnostic accuracies of 1.0 and 0.75, respectively. Immunohistochemical Staining and Quantitative Reverse Transcription PCR revealed that the expression levels of tumour necrosis factor alpha induced protein 6 and insulin-like growth factor binding protein 6 were significantly lower in postburn keloids than in hypertrophic scars- CONCLUSIONS: Tumour necrosis factor alpha induced protein 6 and insulin-like growth factor binding protein 6, exhibiting high diagnostic accuracy, provide valuable guidance for the differential diagnosis and treatment of postburn pathological scars.

Inflammatory response: The target for treating hyperpigmentation during the repair of a burn wound.

Hyperpigmentation is a common complication in patients with burn injuries during wound healing; however, the mechanisms underlying its occurrence and development remain unclear. Recently, postinflammatory hyperpigmentation (PIH) was found to result from overproduction of melanin. Local or systemic inflammatory responses are often observed in patients who develop hyperpigmentation. However, we lack studies on the relationship between PIH and burn injury. Therefore, we comprehensively reviewed the existing literature on the melanogenesis of the skin, inflammatory mechanisms in pigmentation, and local or systemic alteration in inflammatory cytokines in patients suffering from burn trauma to elucidate the relationship between PIH and burn injury. We believe that this review will guide further research on regulating melanin production in the burn management process.

Comparison of Two Circular-Stapled Techniques for Esophageal Cancer: A Propensity-Matched Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The optimal technique for the thoracoscopic construction of an intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis continues to be a subject of controversy. The aim of this study was to compare the perioperative outcomes of circular-stapled anastomosis using a transorally inserted anvil (Orvil™) with those of circular-stapled anastomosis using a transthoracically placed anvil (non-Orvil™) in totally minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy (Ivor Lewis TMIE). METHODS: The data of 272 patients who underwent Ivor Lewis TMIE for esophageal cancer at multiple centers were collected from January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2017. After propensity score matching (1:1) for patient baseline characteristics, 65 paired cases were selected for statistical analysis. Logistic regression analysis was performed to investigate the significant factors of anastomotic leakage. RESULTS: In the propensity score-matched analysis, compared with the non-Orvil™ group, the Orvil™ group was associated with a significantly shorter operation time (p=0.031), less intraoperative hemorrhage (p<0.001), lower need for intraoperative transfusions (p=0.009), earlier postoperative oral feeding time (p=0.010), longer chest tube duration (p<0.001), shorter postoperative hospital stays (p=0.001), lower total hospitalization costs (p<0.001) and a lower postoperative anastomotic leakage rate (p=0.033). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that anastomotic technique and pulmonary infection were independent factors for the development of postoperative anastomotic leakage (p< 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Orvil™ anastomosis exhibited better perioperative effects than non-Orvil™ anastomosis after the propensity score-matched analysis. Remarkably, the Orvil™ technique contributed to a lower postoperative anastomotic leakage rate than the non-Orvil™ technique.