Effect of EGFR amplification on the prognosis of EGFR-mutated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients: a prospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) amplification refers to the copy number increase of EGFR gene, and is often identified as a "bypass" way of Epidermal growth factor receptor Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKI) resistance. We aimed to explore the effect of EGFR amplification on EGFR mutation treatment-naive advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. METHODS: We conducted a prospective observational study in single center, enrolling advanced non-squamous NSCLC patients receiving Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) between March 3, 2019, and February 1, 2022. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) was used to detect genetic alterations in tumor tissue samples. Progression-free survival (PFS) curves were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to evaluate factors affecting the efficacy of TKIs. RESULTS: A total of 117 treatment-naive advanced NSCLC patients were identified in this study. EGFR amplification was found in 22 of 117 (18.8%) patients with EGFR mutations. Of 22 patients with EGFR amplification, 10 patients harbored EGFR 19 del, 11 patients with 21-L858R. The median follow-up time was 22.47 months. The median PFS of the patients with or without EGFR amplification was 8.25 months and 10.67 months, respectively (log-rank test, P = 0.63). In multivariate analysis, EGFR amplification was not an independent prognosis factor for the patients receiving first-line TKIs [HR = 1.38, 95%CI (0.73-2.58), P = 0.321]. Subgroup analysis revealed that EGFR amplification is a risk factor for progression in the brain metastasis population. [HR = 2.28, 95%CI (1.01, 5.14), P = 0.047]. CONCLUSION: EGFR amplification is not an independent prognosis factor for PFS in advanced non-squamous NSCLC patients receiving first-line TKIs. However, it is an independent risk factor for PFS in the brain metastasis population.

Efficacy and acquired resistance for EGFR-TKI plus thoracic SBRT in patients with advanced EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer: a propensity-matched retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and to elucidate potential mechanisms of acquired resistance. METHODS: Patients with advanced NSCLC harboring positive EGFR mutations after initial TKI therapy for at least 8 weeks were eligible for SBRT between August 2016 and August 2019. Eligible patients were treated with thoracic SBRT, and TKI was continued after SBRT until it was considered ineffective. The control group was treated with TKIs monotherapy. Propensity score matching (PSM, ratio of 1:2) was used to account for differences in baseline characteristics. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), treatment safety and resistance mechanisms were evaluated. RESULTS: Three hundred eight patients were included in the study population. Among them, 262 patients received TKIs alone, and 46 patients received TKIs with SBRT. Baseline characteristics were not significantly different between the two cohorts after PSM. The median PFS was 19.4 months in the TKIs +SBRT group compared to 13.7 months in the TKIs group (p = 0.034). An influence on OS has not yet been shown (p = 0.557). Of the 135 patients evaluated after PSM, 28 and 71 patients in the TKIs and TKIs +SBRT cohorts, respectively, had plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) next-generation sequencing (NGS) performed at baseline and disease progression. In the TKIs +SBRT cohort, the NGS results showed that T790M mutations were detected in 64.3% (18/28) of patients. Patients in the TKIs cohort exhibited fewer T790M-positive mutations (40.8%, p = 0.035) compared to patients in the TKIs +SBRT cohort. CONCLUSION: Real world data prove that TKIs plus thoracic SBRT significantly extend PFS with tolerable toxicity. The mutation ratio of T790M was increased in the TKIs +SBRT group compared to the TKIs only group. Further randomized studies are warranted.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Tuberculosis Infection in Lung Cancer: A Case Series and Systematic Review With Pooled Analysis.

The association between immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and tuberculosis (TB) infection in patients with lung cancer remains largely elusive. We performed a systematic review and conducted a retrospective analysis of TB infection in patients with lung cancer and ICI exposure to assess the clinical characteristics and outcomes using PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library. The time interval from ICI administration to diagnosis of TB between patients with and without a history of TB was compared using Kaplan-Meier analysis. A multivariate Cox regression model was used to identify potential risk factors associated with the time interval of TB development. Twenty-four studies including 53 patients with lung cancer were included. The median age of the patients was 64 years. Eight patients had a history of TB. The median time interval from ICI administration to TB diagnosis was 3 months. In retrospective analysis, 5 (1.16%, 95%CI 0.38% to 2.68%) patients with lung cancer developed TB during ICI treatment. The median time interval was 10.4 months. In a pooled analysis, the median time interval in the without-TB and with-TB groups was 7.00 and 2.35 months, respectively (P = .034). Multivariate Cox regression analyses revealed a history of TB to be an independent factor affecting the time interval of TB activation in patients with lung cancer and ICI exposure (HR 3.59; 95%CI 1.17 to 11.02; P = .026). Therefore, TB infection should be considered in patients with lung cancer during or after ICI treatment. Moreover, we found TB history to be a positive risk factor for a shorter median time interval from ICI to TB diagnosis in patients with lung cancer receiving ICI.

Efficacy of PD-1 Inhibitors Combined with Anti-Angiogenic Therapy in Driver Gene Mutation Negative Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer with Brain Metastases.

OBJECTIVE: Anti-angiogenic therapy has proven effective in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitors combined with anti-angiogenic therapy in patients with driver gene mutation negative NSCLC and brain metastases (BMs). METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on NSCLC BMs in patients without driver gene mutations who received PD-1 inhibitors. Two groups, receiving either PD-1 inhibitor monotherapy or PD-1 inhibitor plus anti-angiogenesis therapy, were identified. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS). The secondary endpoints were safety, intracranial objective response rate (iORR) and intracranial disease control rate (iDCR). RESULTS: 113 NSCLC patients were included, 51 (45.1%) in the PD-1 inhibitor monotherapy group and 62 (54.9%) in the PD-1 inhibitor plus anti-angiogenesis therapy group. The median follow-up time was 26.2 months. OS was higher in the combination therapy cohort than in the monotherapy cohort (OS: 21.4 vs. 11.8 months; p = 0.004), with no significant difference in iPFS (p = 0.088). Moreover, the PD-1 inhibitor + anti-angiogenic therapeutic regimen exhibited the preferred iDCR (p = 0.005) but not the iORR (p = 0.121). There was no significant difference in the incidence of grade 3-4 adverse events between the two groups. In multivariate Cox regression analysis, PD-1 inhibitor therapy combined with anti-angiogenic treatment (p = 0.003) was an independent prognostic indicator of OS. CONCLUSIONS: Combining PD-1 inhibitor therapy with anti-angiogenic treatment significantly improves the OS of driver gene mutation negative NSCLC patients with BMs.