Pathological autoantibody internalisation in myositis.

OBJECTIVES: Autoantibodies targeting intracellular proteins are common in various autoimmune diseases. In the context of myositis, the pathologic significance of these autoantibodies has been questioned due to the assumption that autoantibodies cannot enter living muscle cells. This study aims to investigate the validity of this assumption. METHODS: Confocal immunofluorescence microscopy was employed to localise antibodies and other proteins of interest in myositis muscle biopsies. Bulk RNA sequencing was used to examine the transcriptomic profiles of 669 samples, including those from patients with myositis, disease controls and healthy controls. Additionally, antibodies from myositis patients were introduced into cultured myoblasts through electroporation, and their transcriptomic profiles were analysed using RNA sequencing. RESULTS: In patients with myositis autoantibodies, antibodies accumulated inside myofibres in the same subcellular compartment as the autoantigen. Bulk RNA sequencing revealed that muscle biopsies from patients with autoantibodies targeting transcriptional regulators exhibited transcriptomic patterns consistent with dysfunction of the autoantigen. For instance, in muscle biopsies from patients with anti-PM/Scl autoantibodies recognising components of the nuclear RNA exosome complex, an accumulation of divergent transcripts and long non-coding RNAs was observed; these RNA forms are typically degraded by the nuclear RNA exosome complex. Introducing patient antibodies into cultured muscle cells recapitulated the transcriptomic effects observed in human disease. Further supporting evidence suggested that myositis autoantibodies recognising other autoantigens may also disrupt the function of their targets. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that, in myositis, autoantibodies are internalised into living cells, causing biological effects consistent with the disrupted function of their autoantigen.

The utility of electrodiagnostic testing in unprovoked rhabdomyolysis in the era of next-generation sequencing.

INTRODUCTION/AIMS: Rhabdomyolysis is an etiologically heterogeneous, acute necrosis of myofibers characterized by transient marked creatine kinase (CK) elevation associated with myalgia, muscle edema, and/or weakness. The study aimed to determine the role of electrodiagnostic (EDX) testing relative to genetic testing and muscle biopsy in patients with unprovoked rhabdomyolysis in identifying an underlying myopathy. METHODS: EDX database was reviewed to identify unprovoked rhabdomyolysis patients who underwent EDX testing between January 2012 and January 2022. Each patient's clinical profile, EDX findings, muscle pathology, laboratory, and genetic testing results were analyzed. RESULTS: Of 66 patients identified, 32 had myopathic electromyography (EMG). Muscle biopsy and genetic testing were performed in 41 and 37 patients, respectively. A definitive diagnosis was achieved in 15 patients (11 myopathic EMG and 4 nonmyopathic EMG; p = .04) based on abnormal muscle biopsy (4/11 patients) or genetic testing (12/12 patients, encompassing 5 patients with normal muscle biopsy and 3 patients with nonmyopathic EMG). These included seven metabolic and eight nonmetabolic myopathies (five muscular dystrophies and three ryanodine receptor 1 [RYR1]-myopathies). Patients were more likely to have baseline weakness (p < .01), elevated baseline CK (p < .01), and nonmetabolic myopathies (p = .03) when myopathic EMG was identified. DISCUSSION: Myopathic EMG occurred in approximately half of patients with unprovoked rhabdomyolysis, more likely in patients with weakness and elevated CK at baseline. Although patients with myopathic EMG were more likely to have nonmetabolic myopathies, nonmyopathic EMG did not exclude myopathy, and genetic testing was primarily helpful to identify an underlying myopathy. Genetic testing should likely be first-tier diagnostic testing following unprovoked rhabdomyolysis.

Disease spectrum of myopathies with elevated aldolase and normal creatine kinase.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Elevation of serum creatine kinase (CK) or hyperCKemia is considered a biological marker of myopathies. However, selective elevation of serum aldolase with normal CK has been reported in a few myopathies, including dermatomyositis, immune-mediated myopathy with perimysial pathology and fasciitis with associated myopathy. The aim was to investigate the disease spectrum of myopathies with isolated aldolase elevation. METHODS: Medical records were reviewed to identify patients >18 years old seen between December 1994 and June 2020 who had pathologically proven myopathies with elevated aldolase and normal CK level. Patients with alternative causes of aldolase elevation were excluded. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients with various types of myopathies were identified. Myopathies were treatable in 27 patients. The three most common etiologies were dermatomyositis (n = 8), overlap myositis (n = 4) and nonspecific myopathy (n = 4). Perimysial pathology comprising inflammation, fragmentation, vasculitis, calcified perimysial vessels or extracellular amyloid deposition was found in 17/34 patients (50%). Eight dermatomyositis patients with selective elevated aldolase were compared to 24 sex- and age-matched patients with dermatomyositis and hyperCKemia. Dermatomyositis patients with normal CK significantly (p < 0.05) had less frequent cutaneous involvement (50.0% vs. 100.0%) and fibrillation potentials (50.0% vs. 90.5%) but higher median erythrocyte sedimentation rate (33.5 vs. 13.5 mm/h) and more common perifascicular mitochondrial pathology (37.5% vs. 4.2%). CONCLUSION: Isolated aldolase elevation can be found in a greater variety of myopathies than initially thought and most were treatable. Dermatomyositis is the most common myopathy with selective elevation of aldolase in our cohort, which features some unique characteristics compared to dermatomyositis with hyperCKemia.

Transcriptomic profiling reveals distinct subsets of immune checkpoint inhibitor induced myositis.

OBJECTIVES: Inflammatory myopathy or myositis is a heterogeneous family of immune-mediated diseases including dermatomyositis (DM), antisynthetase syndrome (AS), immune-mediated necrotising myopathy (IMNM) and inclusion body myositis (IBM). Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can also cause myositis (ICI-myositis). This study was designed to define gene expression patterns in muscle biopsies from patients with ICI-myositis. METHODS: Bulk RNA sequencing was performed on 200 muscle biopsies (35 ICI-myositis, 44 DM, 18 AS, 54 IMNM, 16 IBM and 33 normal muscle biopsies) and single nuclei RNA sequencing was performed on 22 muscle biopsies (seven ICI-myositis, four DM, three AS, six IMNM and two IBM). RESULTS: Unsupervised clustering defined three distinct transcriptomic subsets of ICI-myositis: ICI-DM, ICI-MYO1 and ICI-MYO2. ICI-DM included patients with DM and anti-TIF1γ autoantibodies who, like DM patients, overexpressed type 1 interferon-inducible genes. ICI-MYO1 patients had highly inflammatory muscle biopsies and included all patients that developed coexisting myocarditis. ICI-MYO2 was composed of patients with predominant necrotising pathology and low levels of muscle inflammation. The type 2 interferon pathway was activated both in ICI-DM and ICI-MYO1. Unlike the other types of myositis, all three subsets of ICI-myositis patients overexpressed genes involved in the IL6 pathway. CONCLUSIONS: We identified three distinct types of ICI-myositis based on transcriptomic analyses. The IL6 pathway was overexpressed in all groups, the type I interferon pathway activation was specific for ICI-DM, the type 2 IFN pathway was overexpressed in both ICI-DM and ICI-MYO1 and only ICI-MYO1 patients developed myocarditis.

Symptomatic myopathies in sarcoidosis: disease spectrum and myxovirus resistance protein A expression.

OBJECTIVES: Symptomatic myopathy in sarcoidosis patients is not always due to sarcoid myopathy (ScM). We investigated the clinical and pathological spectrum including myxovirus resistance protein A (MxA) expression among sarcoidosis patients. METHODS: We reviewed the Mayo Clinic database (May 1980-December 2020) to identify sarcoidosis patients with myopathic symptoms and pathological evidence of myopathy. RESULTS: Among 5885 sarcoidosis patients, 21 had symptomatic myopathy. Eight carried a diagnosis of sarcoidosis 5.5 years (median) prior to myopathy onset. Eleven patients had ScM. The remaining had non-sarcoid myopathies (five IBM, one immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy, one non-specific myositis, two non-specific myopathy and one steroid myopathy). Estimated frequency of IBM is 85 per 100 000 sarcoidosis patients. The following features were associated with non-sarcoid myopathies (P < 0.05): (i) predominant finger flexor and quadriceps weakness, (ii) modified Rankin scale (mRS) >2 at time of diagnosis, (iii) creatine kinase >500 U/l, and (iv) absence of intramuscular granulomas. Sarcoplasmic MxA expression was observed in scattered myofibres in three patients, two of whom were tested for DM-specific autoantibodies and were negative. Immunosuppressive therapy led to improvement in mRS ≥1 in 5/10 ScM, none of the five IBM, and 3/3 remaining patients with non-sarcoid myopathies. DISCUSSION: Symptomatic myopathy occurred in 0.36% of sarcoidosis. IBM was the second most common cause of myopathies after ScM. Frequency of IBM in sarcoidosis is higher than in the general population. Recognition of features suggestive of alternative aetiologies can guide proper treatment. Our findings of abnormal MxA expression warrant a larger study.

Granulomatous myopathy: Sarcoidosis and beyond.

Non-necrotizing granulomatous inflammation is a rare but easily recognized histopathological finding in skeletal muscle biopsy. A limited number of diseases are known to be associated with non-necrotizing granulomatous myopathy. Once identified, a careful evaluation for evidence of extramuscular granulomatosis and other signs suggestive of sarcoidosis is warranted as about half of the patients have sarcoid myopathy. In addition, the presence of granulomatous myopathy should trigger a search for clinical and pathological clues of inclusion body myositis (IBM), which accounts for most of the remaining patients and can coexist with sarcoidosis. Recognizing the features of IBM in patients with granulomatous myopathy can potentially spare the patients from unnecessary exposure to immunosuppressive therapies. In patients whose granulomatous myopathy remain unexplained, further investigations should aim at identifying myasthenia gravis and other autoimmune disorders, especially those known to cause granulomatous inflammation in other organs. Laboratory investigations should include acetylcholine receptor, antimitochondrial, antineutrophil cytoplasmic, thyroglobulin, and thyroid peroxidase autoantibodies. In the appropriate clinical context, exposure to immune checkpoint inhibitors and chronic graft-vs-host disease can be causes of granulomatous myopathy. In cases of unexplained granulomatous myopathy, natural killer/T-cell lymphoma should be considered and careful histopathological examination for atypical cells and appropriate immunostaining is crucial. Identifying the etiology of granulomatous myopathy in each patient can guide appropriate treatment.

Treatment-responsive glycogen storage myopathy in a patient with POEMS syndrome: A new monoclonal gammopathy-associated myopathy.

BACKGROUND: Myopathies associated with monoclonal gammopathy are relatively uncommon and underrecognized, treatable myopathies, and include sporadic late onset nemaline myopathy, light chain amyloid myopathy, and a recently described vacuolar myopathy with monoclonal gammopathy and stiffness (VAMGS). Herein, we report a new subtype of monoclonal gammopathy-associated myopathy (MGAM) in a polyneuropathy, organomegaly, endocrinopathy, M protein, and skin changes (POEMS) patient. METHOD: Case report. RESULTS: A 51-year-old woman presented with a 6-month history of progressive bilateral foot drop, lower limb edema, and a 15-lb weight loss. She denied muscle stiffness. Neurologic exam showed severe distal weakness, mild proximal weakness, and length-dependent sensory deficits. Laboratory studies revealed biclonal gammopathy (IgG kappa and IgA lambda), thrombocytosis, and elevated vascular endothelial growth factor. Creatine kinase was normal. Electrodiagnostic studies identified mixed demyelinating and axonal polyradiculoneuropathy and a superimposed proximal myopathy. Gluteus medius biopsy demonstrated scattered fibers with glycogen-filled vacuoles, similar to VAMGS, with additional rare myofibers containing polyglucosan bodies. She was diagnosed with POEMS syndrome and concomitant glycogen storage myopathy. Next-generation sequencing of glycogen storage and polyglucosan body myopathy-related genes was unrevealing. Proximal weakness resolved after autologous stem cell transplant. CONCLUSIONS: This patient expands a spectrum of MGAM. Recognition of this condition and other subtypes of MGAM is of utmost important because they are treatable.

Imported Haycocknema perplexum Infection, United States1.

We report an imported case of myositis caused by a rare parasite, Haycocknema perplexum, in Australia in a 37-year-old man who had progressive facial, axial, and limb weakness, dysphagia, dysphonia, increased levels of creatine kinase and hepatic aminotransferases, and peripheral eosinophilia for 8 years. He was given extended, high-dose albendazole.

Survival and associated comorbidities in inclusion body myositis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate survival and associated comorbidities in inclusion body myositis (IBM) in a population-based, case-control study. METHODS: We utilized the expanded Rochester Epidemiology Project medical records-linkage system, including 27 counties in Minnesota and Wisconsin, to identify patients with IBM, other inflammatory myopathies (IIM), and age/sex-matched population-controls. We compared the frequency of various comorbidities and survival among groups. RESULTS: We identified 50 IBM patients, 65 IIM controls and 294 population controls. Dysphagia was most common in IBM (64%) patients. The frequency of neurodegenerative disorders (dementia/parkinsonism) and solid cancers was not different between groups. Rheumatoid arthritis was the most common rheumatic disease in all groups. A total of 36% of IBM patients had a peripheral neuropathy, 6% had Sjögren's syndrome and 10% had a haematologic malignancy. T-cell large granular lymphocytic leukaemia was only observed in the IBM group. None of the IBM patients had hepatitis B or C, or HIV. IBM patients were 2.7 times more likely to have peripheral neuropathy, 6.2 times more likely to have Sjögren's syndrome and 3.9 times more likely to have a haematologic malignancy than population controls. IBM was associated with increased mortality, with a 10-year survival of 36% from index, compared with 67% in IIM and 59% in population controls. Respiratory failure or pneumonia (44%) was the most common cause of death. CONCLUSIONS: IBM is associated with lower survival, and higher frequency of peripheral neuropathy, Sjögren's syndrome and haematologic malignancies than the general population. Close monitoring of IBM-related complications is warranted.

Cancer and immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy: a longitudinal referral case-controlled outcomes evaluation.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy (IMNM) association with cancer and its clinical implications. METHODS: IMNM cases were identified 1 January 2000 to 31 December 2020 matching sex and age controls (4:1). RESULTS: A total of 152 patients with IMNM were identified and among serologically tested, 60% (83/140) were HMGCR-IgG+, 14% (20/140) were SRP-IgG+ and 26% (37/140) were seronegative. Cancer rates were not significantly different between serological subgroups; 18.1% (15/83) HMGCR-IgG+, 25% (5/20) SRP-IgG+ and 30% (11/37) seronegative (P = 0.34). Cancer screening was performed within 12 months from IMNM diagnosis in 88% (134/152) (whole-body CT plus FDG-PET CT in 53, CT alone in 72 and FDG-PET alone in 9). FDG-PET/CT was positive in 73% (25/34) of cancers. Increasing age was the only risk associated with cancer (P = 0.02). The odds of developing cancer at ±3 or ±5 years from IMNM diagnosis was not higher than controls (OR = 0.49; CI: 0.325-0.76). Lifetime IMNM diagnosis of cancer was less compared with controls (OR = 0.5 CI: 0.33-0.78, P = 0.002). Most patients responded to treatment (137/147, P < 0.001). Death and treatment response did not significantly differ between cancer [23% (8/34); 88% (29/33)] and non-cancer patients [19% (23/118); 92% (108/118)]. In total, 13% (20/152) of patients died during follow-up compared with 14% (41/290) of medicine and 16% (46/290) of neurology controls (P = 0.8). Seropositives had greater life expectancy than seronegatives (P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Greater cancer risk is not observed in IMNM vs controls. Cancer screening in IMNM should be individualized based on age-personal and family history, including consideration of FDG-PET/CT. Immune-treatment response did not differ with cancer.

Hereditary myopathies associated with hematological abnormalities.

The diagnostic evaluation of a patient with suspected hereditary muscle disease can be challenging. Clinicians rely largely on clinical history and examination features, with additional serological, electrodiagnostic, radiologic, histopathologic, and genetic investigations assisting in definitive diagnosis. Hematological testing is inexpensive and widely available, but frequently overlooked in the hereditary myopathy evaluation. Hematological abnormalities are infrequently encountered in this setting; however, their presence provides a valuable clue, helps refine the differential diagnosis, tailors further investigation, and assists interpretation of variants of uncertain significance. A diverse spectrum of hematological abnormalities is associated with hereditary myopathies, including anemias, leukocyte abnormalities, and thrombocytopenia. Recurrent rhabdomyolysis in certain glycolytic enzymopathies co-occurs with hemolytic anemia, often chronic and mild in phosphofructokinase and phosphoglycerate kinase deficiencies, or acute and fever-associated in aldolase-A and triosephosphate isomerase deficiency. Sideroblastic anemia, commonly severe, accompanies congenital-to-childhood onset mitochondrial myopathies including Pearson marrow-pancreas syndrome and mitochondrial myopathy, lactic acidosis, and sideroblastic anemia phenotypes. Congenital megaloblastic macrocytic anemia and mitochondrial dysfunction characterize SFXN4-related myopathy. Neutropenia, chronic or cyclical, with recurrent infections, infantile-to-childhood onset skeletal myopathy and cardiomyopathy are typical of Barth syndrome, while chronic neutropenia without infection occurs rarely in DNM2-centronuclear myopathy. Peripheral eosinophilia may accompany eosinophilic inflammation in recessive calpainopathy. Lipid accumulation in leukocytes on peripheral blood smear (Jordans' anomaly) is pathognomonic for neutral lipid storage diseases. Mild thrombocytopenia occurs in autosomal dominant, childhood-onset STIM1 tubular aggregate myopathy, STIM1 and ORAI1 deficiency syndromes, and GNE myopathy. Herein, we review these hereditary myopathies in which hematological features play a prominent role.

Guidelines for genetic testing of muscle and neuromuscular junction disorders.

Despite recent advances in the understanding of inherited muscle and neuromuscular junction diseases, as well as the advent of a wide range of genetic tests, patients continue to face delays in diagnosis of sometimes treatable disorders. These guidelines outline an approach to genetic testing in such disorders. Initially, a patient's phenotype is evaluated to identify myopathies requiring directed testing, including myotonic dystrophies, facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy, oculopharyngeal muscular dystrophy, mitochondrial myopathies, dystrophinopathies, and oculopharyngodistal myopathy. Initial investigation in the remaining patients is generally a comprehensive gene panel by next-generation sequencing. Broad panels have a higher diagnostic yield and can be cost-effective. Due to extensive phenotypic overlap and treatment implications, genes responsible for congenital myasthenic syndromes should be included when evaluating myopathy patients. For patients whose initial genetic testing is negative or inconclusive, phenotypic re-evaluation is warranted, along with consideration of genes and variants not included initially, as well as their acquired mimickers.

Neuromuscular amyloidosis: Unmasking the master of disguise.

Amyloidosis refers to an etiologically heterogeneous group of protein misfolding diseases, pathologically characterized by extracellular amyloid fibrils producing congophillic amorphous deposits in organs and tissues, which may lead to severe organ dysfunction and mortality. Clinical presentations vary and are often nonspecific, depending on what organs or tissues are affected. In systemic amyloidosis, the peripheral nervous system is commonly affected, whereas the skeletal muscles are only rarely involved. Immunoglobulin light chain (AL) amyloidosis and hereditary transthyretin (ATTRv) amyloidosis are the most frequent types of systemic amyloidosis involving the neuromuscular system. Localized amyloidosis can occur in skeletal muscle, so-called isolated amyloid myopathy. Amyloid neuropathy typically involves small myelinated and unmyelinated sensory and autonomic nerve fibers early in the course of the disease, followed by large myelinated fiber sensory and motor deficits. The relentlessly progressive nature with motor, painful sensory and severe autonomic dysfunction, profound weight loss, and systemic features are distinct characteristics of amyloid neuropathy. Amyloid myopathy presentation differs between systemic amyloidosis and isolated amyloid myopathy. Long-standing symptoms, distal predominant myopathy, markedly elevated creatine kinase level, and lack of peripheral neuropathy or systemic features are highly suggestive of isolated amyloid myopathy. In ATTR and AL amyloidosis, early treatment correlates with favorable outcomes. Therefore, awareness of these disorders and active screening for amyloidosis in patients with neuropathy or myopathy are crucial in detecting these patients in the everyday practice of neuromuscular medicine. Herein, we review the clinical manifestations of neuromuscular amyloidosis and provide a diagnostic approach to this disorder.

Anti-cN1A antibodies do not correlate with specific clinical, electromyographic, or pathological findings in sporadic inclusion body myositis.

BACKGROUND: Anti-cytosolic 5'-nucleotidase 1A (cN1A) antibodies are commonly detected in patients with sporadic inclusion body myositis (sIBM). However, their pathogenic role has not been established. Moreover, efforts toward identifying sIBM distinct clinicopathologic characteristics associated with these antibodies have yielded conflicting results. METHODS: We first searched for patients, seen in our clinics, tested for anti-cN1A antibodies between December 2015 and December 2019. We identified 92 patients who were diagnosed with sIBM, according to the 2011 ENMC or Griggs et al criteria. Thereafter, we reviewed and compared the clinical and investigational findings of these patients in relation to their antibody status. RESULTS: Anti-cN1A antibodies were present in 47/92 (51%) patients with sIBM. Comparison of seropositive and seronegative cohorts yielded no significant difference in clinical features, including facial weakness, oropharyngeal and respiratory involvement, or disease severity. The antibody titer did not correlate with the clinical phenotype, CK value, or presence of myotonic discharges on EMG. Anti-cN1A antibody positive patients appeared to have more frequent auto-aggressive inflammation on muscle biopsy but not as an isolated myopathological feature. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that anti-cN1A antibody positive and negative sIBM patients have similar clinical features and disease severity. Anti-cN1A antibodies in our sIBM cohort did not correlate with any studied clinical or laboratory parameter and, therefore, were of limited value in the patient's assessment.

Immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy: Unusual presentations of a treatable disease.

INTRODUCTION/AIMS: Immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy (IMNM) is an immune-mediated myopathy typically presenting with progressive subacute weakness and characteristic, but nonspecific, myopathological findings. Atypical cases however can mimic other inherited or acquired myopathies, depriving patients of treatment. We describe a cohort of such patients. METHODS: We retrospectively identified IMNM patients who either previously carried a diagnosis of an inherited myopathy established on clinicopathological grounds or whose muscle biopsies displayed atypical features suggestive of a different myopathy. RESULTS: Among 131 IMNM patients, seven previously unreported patients (5%) met one of the above criteria. Three patients were diagnosed with limb-girdle muscular dystrophy on the basis of a chronic progressive course of weakness and family history of myopathy or cardiomyopathy. The other four patients displayed atypical histological features (two prominent mitochondrial abnormalities, one myofibrillar pathology, and one granulomatous inflammation). Immunostaining of biopsies from 12 additional IMNM patients did not identify myofibrillar pathology. The patient with granulomatous inflammation was known to have pulmonary sarcoidosis. Genetic testing for inherited myopathies was unrevealing. Antibodies against 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase or signal recognition particle were identified in 5 and 1 patients, respectively. Four patients presented with slowly progressive weakness over 3-13 y, while weakness was subacute over ≤6 mo in three patients. All patients responded to immunomodulatory therapy. DISCUSSION: Atypical clinical and histological features can occur in IMNM patients, causing delays in diagnosis and treatment. Clinicians should, therefore, consider IMNM in the differential diagnosis of unexplained proximal myopathies in spite of atypical clinical and myopathological findings.

Interstitial amyloidosis in sporadic inclusion body myositis.

INTRODUCTION/AIMS: Intracellular congophilic inclusions within muscle fibers, although nonspecific, are one of the pathological hallmarks of sporadic inclusion body myositis (sIBM). Extracellular amyloid deposits in muscle, on the other hand, are the canonical findings of amyloid myopathies, which occur with or without systemic amyloidosis. METHODS: We reviewed the muscle biopsy database (1998-2020) to identify sIBM patients with extracellular amyloid deposits. Clinical and laboratory data were reviewed. RESULTS: We identified five sIBM patients (three clinicopathologically defined and two clinically defined) with extracellular amyloid deposits in muscle. Mean age at diagnosis was 74.8 y (range, 68-84 y). All patients had a typical sIBM pattern of weakness without associated sensory or autonomic symptoms. None had electrophysiological evidence of peripheral neuropathy. Only one patient had a monoclonal gammopathy (immunoglobulin M-lambda, IgM-λ) with normal bone marrow biopsy. This patient with monoclonal gammopathy and three other patients underwent abdominal fat pad aspirate and were negative for amyloid. Cardiac evaluation was unrevealing in the four patients tested. Three patients without monoclonal gammopathy had normal transthyretin gene sequencing and inconclusive mass spectrometry-based analysis. The patient with monoclonal gammopathy died of pneumosepsis 5 y after diagnosis and autopsy revealed multi-organ transthyretin amyloidosis. DISCUSSION: Detection of extracellular amyloid deposition in muscle should trigger an aggressive search for systemic amyloidosis independently from other associated myopathological abnormalities. Amyloid subtyping is crucial for early therapy and mortality prevention. An isolated monoclonal gammopathy should not halt a search for non-hematological causes of systemic amyloidosis.

Myopathies with finger flexor weakness: Not only inclusion-body myositis.

Muscle disorders are characterized by differential involvement of various muscle groups. Among these, weakness predominantly affecting finger flexors is an uncommon pattern, most frequently found in sporadic inclusion-body myositis. This finding is particularly significant when the full range of histopathological findings of inclusion-body myositis is not found on muscle biopsy. Prominent finger flexor weakness, however, is also observed in other myopathies. It occurs commonly in myotonic dystrophy types 1 and 2. In addition, individual reports and small case series have documented finger flexor weakness in sarcoid and amyloid myopathy, and in inherited myopathies caused by ACTA1, CRYAB, DMD, DYSF, FLNC, GAA, GNE, HNRNPDL, LAMA2, MYH7, and VCP mutations. Therefore, the finding of finger flexor weakness requires consideration of clinical, myopathological, genetic, electrodiagnostic, and sometimes muscle imaging findings to establish a diagnosis.

Myopathies featuring early or prominent dysphagia.

BACKGROUND: Limited data exist regarding myopathies with early or prominent dysphagia. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed (January 2003 to August 2019) to identify myopathy patients in whom dysphagia was the initial symptom or was disproportionately severe compared with limb weakness. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients were identified. The median age at diagnosis was 65 y (range, 36-80 y). Inclusion body myositis (IBM) (n = 15), immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy (IMNM) (n = 5), and oculopharyngeal muscular dystrophy (n = 4), were the most common diagnoses. In 4 patients (3 IMNM and 1 nonspecific myositis) dysphagia evolved rapidly. At evaluation, 21 patients required diet alterations, 5 required feeding tubes, and 8 had aspiration pneumonia. Follow-up data were available for 20 patients (median, 24 mo). Eight patients received immunosuppressive therapies with improvement in 7, including 3 of 4 with rapidly progressive dysphagia. CONCLUSIONS: IBM and IMNM accounted for approximately two-thirds of patients with early or prominent dysphagia at our institution. Rapidly progressive dysphagia may predict immunotherapy responsiveness.

Transthyretin amyloidosis: Putting myopathy on the map.

INTRODUCTION: Although peripheral neuropathy and cardiomyopathy are well-recognized manifestations of transthyretin (ATTR) amyloidosis, myopathy has been rarely reported. METHODS: In this study we reviewed our muscle biopsy database (January 1998 to June 2018) to identify patients with ATTR amyloid myopathy confirmed by molecular or proteomic analysis. Clinical and laboratory findings were reviewed. RESULTS: We identified eight ATTR amyloid myopathy patients (5 hereditary ATTR [ATTRv] and 3 wild-type ATTR [ATTRwt]). Myopathy was the initial manifestation in all ATTRwt patients and followed peripheral neuropathy (4 patients) or cardiomyopathy (1 patient) in ATTRv patients. One ATTRv patient developed myopathy after liver transplant. Peripheral neuropathy and cardiac amyloidosis occurred in seven and six patients, respectively. Muscle biopsy showed interstitial amyloid deposition in all patients, rare necrotic/regenerating fibers in six, and vacuoles in four. DISCUSSION: Myopathy can be the initial manifestation of ATTRwt amyloidosis and can precede the peripheral neuropathy or occur after liver transplant in ATTRv amyloidosis.

The unfolding spectrum of inherited distal myopathies.

Distal myopathies are a group of rare muscle diseases characterized by distal weakness at onset. Although acquired myopathies can occasionally present with distal weakness, the majority of distal myopathies have a genetic etiology. Their age of onset varies from early-childhood to late-adulthood while the predominant muscle weakness can affect calf, ankle dorsiflexor, or distal upper limb muscles. A spectrum of muscle pathological changes, varying from nonspecific myopathic changes to rimmed vacuoles to myofibrillar pathology to nuclei centralization, have been noted. Likewise, the underlying molecular defect is heterogeneous. In addition, there is emerging evidence that distal myopathies can result from defective proteins encoded by genes causative of neurogenic disorders, be manifestation of multisystem proteinopathies or the result of the altered interplay between different genes. In this review, we provide an overview on the clinical, electrophysiological, pathological, and molecular aspects of distal myopathies, focusing on the most recent developments in the field. Muscle Nerve 59:283-294, 2019.