Local anaesthetic delivery regimens for peripheral nerve catheters: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

There are numerous possible techniques for delivering local anaesthetic through peripheral nerve catheters. These include continuous infusions, patient-controlled boluses and programmed intermittent boluses. The optimal delivery regimen of local anaesthetic is yet to be conclusively established. In this review, we identified prospective trials of delivery regimens through peripheral nerve catheters. Our primary outcome was visual analogue scale scores for pain at 48 h. Secondary outcomes were: visual analogue scores at 24 h; patient satisfaction scores; rescue opioid use; local anaesthetic consumption; and nausea and vomiting. Network meta-analysis was used to compare these outcomes. Predefined sub-group analyses were performed. Thirty-three studies enrolling 1934 participants were included. In comparison with continuous infusion, programmed intermittent boluses improved visual analogue pain scores at both 48 and 24 h, the weighted mean difference (95%CI) being -0.63 (-1.12 to -0.14), p = 0.012 and -0.48 (-0.92 to -0.03), p = 0.034, respectively. Programmed intermittent boluses also improved satisfaction scores, the weighted mean difference (95%CI) being 0.70 (0.10-1.31), p = 0.023, and reduced rescue opioid use, the weighted mean difference (95%CI) in oral morphine equivalent at 24 h being -23.84 mg (-43.90 mg to -3.77 mg), p = 0.020. Sub-group analysis revealed that these findings were mostly confined to lower limb and truncal catheter studies; there were few studies of programmed intermittent boluses for upper limb catheters. Programmed intermittent boluses may provide optimal delivery of a local anaesthetic through peripheral nerve catheters. Further research is warranted, particularly to delineate the differences between upper and lower limb catheter locations, which will help clarify the clinical relevance of these findings.

Systematic review of the systemic concentrations of local anaesthetic after transversus abdominis plane block and rectus sheath block.

BACKGROUND.: Safe and efficacious modalities of perioperative analgesia are essential for enhanced recovery after surgery. Truncal nerve blocks are one potential adjunct for analgesia of the abdominal wall, and in recent years their popularity has increased. Transversus abdominis plane block (TAPB) and rectus sheath block (RSB) have been shown to reduce morphine consumption and improve pain relief after abdominal surgery. These blocks typically require large volumes of local anaesthetic (LA). We aimed to synthesize studies evaluating systemic concentrations of LA after perioperative TAP and RSB to enhance our understanding of systemic LA absorption and the risk of systemic toxicity. METHODS.: An independent literature review was performed in accordance with the methods outlined in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. An electronic search of four databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and PubMed) was conducted. Primary articles measuring systemic concentrations of LA after single-shot bolus TAPB or RSB were included. RESULTS.: Fifteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Rapid systemic LA absorption was observed in all studies. Of a total of 381 patients, mean peak concentrations of LA exceeded toxic thresholds in 33 patients, of whom three reported mild adverse effects. The addition of epinephrine reduced systemic absorption of LA. No instances of seizure or cardiac instability were observed. CONCLUSIONS.: Local anaesthetic in TAPB and RSB can lead to detectable systemic concentrations that exceed commonly accepted thresholds of LA systemic toxicity. Our study highlights that these techniques are relatively safe with regard to LA systemic toxicity.

Mallet finger in an anaesthetist following tracheal intubation.

We describe an unusual work-related mallet finger injury sustained by an anaesthetist at the time of induction of anaesthesia. Although injuries in healthcare workers are common, they are rarely described in the literature, and this is the first time that such an injury has been described in this setting. The injury was managed non-surgically and after a significant time away from clinical duties, the anaesthetist made a good recovery and returned to clinical work. Potential contributing factors and preventative strategies are discussed in order to help anaesthetists avoid similar injuries occurring in future.