RESUMO
Rationale: Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension involves the formation and nonresolution of thrombus, dysregulated inflammation, angiogenesis, and the development of a small-vessel vasculopathy. Objectives: We aimed to establish the genetic basis of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension to gain insight into its pathophysiological contributors. Methods: We conducted a genome-wide association study on 1,907 European cases and 10,363 European control subjects. We coanalyzed our results with existing results from genome-wide association studies on deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension. Measurements and Main Results: Our primary association study revealed genetic associations at the ABO, FGG, F11, MYH7B, and HLA-DRA loci. Through our coanalysis, we demonstrate further associations with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension at the F2, TSPAN15, SLC44A2, and F5 loci but find no statistically significant associations shared with idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension. Conclusions: Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension is a partially heritable polygenic disease, with related though distinct genetic associations with pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis.
Assuntos
Estudo de Associação Genômica Ampla , Hipertensão Pulmonar , Embolia Pulmonar , Humanos , Embolia Pulmonar/genética , Embolia Pulmonar/complicações , Hipertensão Pulmonar/genética , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Doença Crônica , Genômica , Predisposição Genética para Doença , Adulto , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Idoso , Trombose Venosa/genéticaRESUMO
Hallucinations are a common feature of psychosis, yet access to effective psychological treatment is limited. The Managing Unusual Sensory Experiences for First-Episode-Psychosis (MUSE-FEP) trial aimed to establish the feasibility and acceptability of a brief, hallucination-specific, digitally provided treatment, delivered by a non-specialist workforce for people with psychosis. MUSE uses psychoeducation about the causal mechanisms of hallucinations and tailored interventions to help a person understand and manage their experiences. We undertook a two-site, single-blind (rater) Randomised Controlled Trial and recruited 82 participants who were allocated 1:1 to MUSE and treatment as usual (TAU) (n = 40) or TAU alone (n = 42). Participants completed assessments before and after treatment (2 months), and at follow up (3-4 months). Information on recruitment rates, adherence, and completion of outcome assessments was collected. Analyses focussed on feasibility outcomes and initial estimates of intervention effects to inform a future trial. The trial is registered with the ISRCTN registry 16793301. Criteria for the feasibility of trial methodology and intervention delivery were met. The trial exceeded the recruitment target, had high retention rates (87.8%) at end of treatment, and at follow up (86.6%), with good acceptability of treatment. There were 3 serious adverse events in the therapy group, and 5 in the TAU group. Improvements were evident in both groups at the end of treatment and follow up, with a particular benefit in perceived recovery in the MUSE group. We showed it was feasible to increase access to psychological intervention but a definitive trial requires further changes to the trial design or treatment.