Microvascular imaging: new Doppler technology for assessing focal liver lesions. Is it useful?

Microvascular imaging (MVI) is an advanced Doppler ultrasound technique, permitting detailed evaluation of microvessel architecture without the need for contrast agents. The clinical applications of the technology are broad, with a growing body of evidence suggesting a potential role for MVI in the characterisation of benign and malignant focal liver lesions (FLLs). This review discusses the current evidence regarding the use of MVI in the assessment of FLLs, with a proposed algorithmic approach to radiological work-up of FLLs based on MVI features. Ongoing research and future directions in the field are highlighted.

Microflow imaging: New Doppler technology to detect low-grade inflammation in patients with arthritis.

AIM: To assess the efficacy of microvascular imaging in detecting low-grade inflammation in arthritis compared with Power Doppler ultrasound (PDUS). METHOD AND MATERIALS: Patients presenting for ultrasound with arthralgia were assessed with grey-scale, PDUS and Superb Microvascular Imaging (SMI). Videoclips were stored for analysis at a later date. Three musculoskeletal radiologists scored grey-scale changes, signal on PDUS and/or SMI within these joints. If a signal was detected on both PDUS and SMI, the readers graded the conspicuity of vascular signal from the two Doppler techniques using a visual analogue scale. RESULTS: Eighty-three patients were recruited with 134 small joints assessed. Eighty-nine of these demonstrated vascular flow with both PD and SMI, whilst in five no flow was detected. In 40 joints, vascularity was detected with SMI but not with PDUS (p = 0.007). Out of the 89 joints with vascularity on both SMI and PDUS, 23 were rated as being equal; while SMI scored moderately or markedly better in 45 cases (p <0.001). CONCLUSION: SMI is a new Doppler technique that increases conspicuity of Doppler vascularity in symptomatic joints when compared to PDUS. This allows detection of low grade inflammation not visualised with Power Doppler in patients with arthritis. KEY POINTS: • SMI detects vascularity with improved resolution and sensitivity compared to Power Doppler. • SMI can detect low-grade inflammation not seen with Power Doppler. • Earlier detection of active inflammation could have significant impact on treatment paradigms.

Uterine artery pulsatility index: a predictor of methotrexate resistance in gestational trophoblastic neoplasia.

BACKGROUND: Neo-angiogenesis is a hallmark of cancer. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis, in a prospective patient cohort, that in low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (LR-GTN) the uterine artery pulsatility index (UAPI), a measure of tumour vascularity, can predict resistance to methotrexate chemotherapy (MTX-R). METHODS: 286 LR-GTN patients (Charing Cross Hospital (CXH) score 0-8, or FIGO score 0-6) were treated with methotrexate between January 2008 and June 2011 at CXH. During staging investigations, patients underwent a Doppler ultrasound to assess the UAPI. RESULTS: 239 patients were assessable for both UAPI and MTX-R. The median UAPI was lower (higher vascularity) in MTX-R compared with MTX-sensitive patients (0.8 vs 1.4, P<0.0001). In multivariate logistic regression, UAPI≤1 predicted MTX-R, independent of both CXH and FIGO scores. The risk of MTX-R in patients with a FIGO score of 6 and UAPI≤1 was 100% vs 20% in patients with UAPI>1 (χ(2) P<0.0001). CONCLUSION: UAPI represents an independently validated clinically useful predictor of MTX-R in LR-GTN. Further, consideration of whether to incorporate UAPI into the FIGO scoring system is now warranted so that patients with a score of 6 and a UAPI ≤1 might be upstaged and offered combination chemotherapy rather than MTX.

A comparison of 31P magnetic resonance spectroscopy and microbubble-enhanced ultrasound for characterizing hepatitis c-related liver disease.

We compared in vivo hepatic (31) P magnetic resonance spectroscopy ((31) P MRS) and hepatic vein transit times (HVTT) using contrast-enhanced ultrasound with a microbubble agent to assess the severity of hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related liver disease. Forty-six patients with biopsy-proven HCV-related liver disease and nine healthy volunteers had (31) P MRS and HVTT performed on the same day. (31) P MR spectra were obtained at 1.5 T. Peak areas were calculated for metabolites, including phosphomonoesters (PME) and phosphodiesters (PDE). Patients also had the microbubble ultrasound contrast agent, Levovist (2 g), injected into an antecubital vein, and time-intensity Doppler ultrasound signals of the right and middle hepatic veins were measured. The HVTT was calculated as the time from injection to a sustained rise in Doppler signal 10% greater than baseline. The shortest times were used for analysis. Based on Ishak histological scoring, there were 15 patients with mild hepatitis, 20 with moderate/severe hepatitis and 11 with cirrhosis. With increasing severity of disease, the PME/PDE ratio was steadily elevated, while the HVTT showed a monotonic decrease. Both imaging modalities could separate patients with cirrhosis from the mild and moderate/severe hepatitis groups. No statistical difference was observed in the accuracy of each test to denote mild, moderate/severe hepatitis and cirrhosis (Fisher's exact test P =1.00). (31) P MRS and HVTT show much promise as noninvasive imaging tests for assessing the severity of chronic liver disease. Both are equally effective and highly sensitive in detecting cirrhosis.

Hepatic vein transit times of a microbubble agent in assessing response to antiviral treatment in patients with chronic hepatitis C.

Microbubble measurement of hepatic vein transit times (HVTT) may have the potential to assess severity of hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related liver disease, where there is a shorter HVTT with more severe disease. We investigated the utility of this test as a marker of response to antiviral treatment. Thirty-seven patients with biopsy-proven HCV-related disease undergoing antiviral treatment were studied. All had baseline scans and then repeat scans 6 months after the end of treatment. HVTT using Levovist were obtained from the right and middle hepatic veins, and the shorter time was used for analysis. The aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio index (APRI) scores were calculated retrospectively. There were seven patients with mild hepatitis, 23 with moderate/severe hepatitis and seven with cirrhosis. The mean baseline HVTT in responders ± SE increased from 27.3 ± 2.29 s to 33.5 ± 2.8 s posttreatment (P = 0.01). In the 10 nonresponders, the HVTT remained the same; 43.3 ± 9 s baseline compared to 44 ± 7.8 s posttreatment (P = 0.84). This trend was also seen with the APRI score where in responders, the mean score decreased from 1.1 ± 0.2 to 0.74 ± 1 (P = 0.03) and in nonresponders, the score remained unchanged; 0.88 ± 0.2 compared to 0.84 ± 0.2 (P = 0.31). HVTT measurement lengthened, while APRI scores decreased in patients who responded to antiviral treatment while both remained the same, shortened (HVTT) or increased (APRI), respectively, in patients who were nonresponders. These results are encouraging and indicate that these tests could be potentially used as markers of response to treatment and could obviate the need for serial biopsies in antiviral future treatment studies.

Can contrast-enhanced sonography distinguish benign from malignant breast masses?

BACKGROUND: We investigated whether microvascular enhancement on contrast-enhanced sonographic (CEUS) imaging can aid in distinguishing between benign and malignant lesions and correlated these findings with histopathological findings. METHOD: Fifteen patients with a palpable breast mass were recruited. Following informed consent, 4.8 mL of the microbubble contrast agent SonoVue was injected intravenously. Digital video clips of lesion enhancement were obtained and reviewed by a consultant radiologist who scored each lesion on the following characteristics: homogeneous versus heterogeneous enhancement, the presence or absence of focal defects, well- versus ill-defined margins and vascular morphology score (VMS). RESULT: Histologically there were 7 malignant and 8 benign lesions. The calculated sensitivity for CEUS in the diagnosis of malignancy was 100%, with a 37.5% specificity. There was no statistically significant difference in overall mean VMS between the malignant and benign lesions. CONCLUSION: The results of our study have not shown any additional benefit in the use of CEUS over conventional triple assessment. The positive trend seen in the higher mean VMS for the malignant tumors needs further investigation with a larger cohort of patients.

Hepatocellular adenoma: diagnostic difficulties and novel imaging techniques.

We report the case of a 30-year-old eastern European female who presented with right upper quadrant pain. Clinical examination was unremarkable and liver function tests were normal. CT identified a 5 cm lesion in segment V of the liver, which was of homogeneous low density with no calcification or significant enhancement. MRI showed the lesion to be hypointense to liver on T(1) weighted sequences and isointense on T(2) weighted sequences. Rapid arterial enhancement with gadolinium-DTPA faded without leaving a definite central scar. Ultrasound showed the lesion to be echogenic with minimal vascularity. Administration of a liver-specific microbubble contrast agent showed low uptake relative to the surrounding liver. Phosphorus-31 MR spectroscopy, localized to the lesion itself, revealed a markedly increased phosphomonoester resonance with a decreased phosphodiester resonance, compatible with increased cell turnover. Biopsy confirmed the lesion to be a hepatocellular adenoma. The diagnosis of a hepatic adenoma is difficult with tissue diagnosis the gold standard, but it may be suggested by a combination of imaging modalities. We have described two new imaging techniques not previously described in characterization of hepatic adenomata, namely ultrasound with contrast agent and MR spectroscopy.

Quantitative contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging: a review of sources of variability.

Ultrasound provides a valuable tool for medical diagnosis offering real-time imaging with excellent spatial resolution and low cost. The advent of microbubble contrast agents has provided the additional ability to obtain essential quantitative information relating to tissue vascularity, tissue perfusion and even endothelial wall function. This technique has shown great promise for diagnosis and monitoring in a wide range of clinical conditions such as cardiovascular diseases and cancer, with considerable potential benefits in terms of patient care. A key challenge of this technique, however, is the existence of significant variations in the imaging results, and the lack of understanding regarding their origin. The aim of this paper is to review the potential sources of variability in the quantification of tissue perfusion based on microbubble contrast-enhanced ultrasound images. These are divided into the following three categories: (i) factors relating to the scanner setting, which include transmission power, transmission focal depth, dynamic range, signal gain and transmission frequency, (ii) factors relating to the patient, which include body physical differences, physiological interaction of body with bubbles, propagation and attenuation through tissue, and tissue motion, and (iii) factors relating to the microbubbles, which include the type of bubbles and their stability, preparation and injection and dosage. It has been shown that the factors in all the three categories can significantly affect the imaging results and contribute to the variations observed. How these factors influence quantitative imaging is explained and possible methods for reducing such variations are discussed.

Incidental findings in healthy control research subjects using whole-body MRI.

AIM: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a powerful clinical tool used increasingly in the research setting. We aimed to assess the prevalence of incidental findings in a sequential cohort of healthy volunteers undergoing whole-body MRI as part of a normal control database for imaging research studies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 148 healthy volunteers (median age 36 years, range 21-69 years; 63.5% males, 36.5% females) were enrolled into a prospective observational study at a single hospital-based MRI research unit in London, UK. Individuals with a clinical illness, treated or under investigation were excluded from the study. RESULTS: 43 (29.1%) scans were abnormal with a total of 49 abnormalities detected. Of these, 20 abnormalities in 19 patients (12.8%) were of clinical significance. The prevalence of incidental findings increased significantly with both increasing age and body mass index (BMI). Obese subjects had a fivefold greater risk of having an incidental abnormality on MRI (OR 5.4, CI 2.1-14.0). CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that more than one quarter of healthy volunteers have MR-demonstrable abnormalities. There was an increased risk of such findings in obese patients. This has ethical and financial implications for future imaging research, particularly with respect to informed consent and follow-up of those with abnormalities detected during the course of imaging studies.

Colorectal breast metastases presenting with atypical imaging features.

Breast metastases from non-breast primaries are rare in female patients and exceedingly rare in male patients, with only a handful of cases described. Lymphoma, metastatic melanoma and bronchial carcinoma are the primary sites for the majority of breast metastases. Breast metastases from colorectal carcinoma have been described previously in only a small number of cases in the literature. Here, we report a further two patients with biopsy-proven colorectal carcinoma metastases to both breasts, who demonstrate contrasting unusual and atypical imaging features that have not been reported previously. In one case, the imaging appearances mimic a multifocal primary breast carcinoma. Metastatic disease in the breast is a marker for disseminated metastatic spread, with a correspondingly poor prognosis. Therefore, we review the imaging features that differentiate metastatic breast disease from multifocal breast primaries, which are important to recognize because the management options for these patients differ greatly.

Hepatic vein transit times using a microbubble agent can predict disease severity non-invasively in patients with hepatitis C.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: A reliable non-invasive assessment of the severity of diffuse liver disease is much needed. We investigated the utility of hepatic vein transit times (HVTT) for grading and staging diffuse liver disease in a cohort of patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection using an ultrasound microbubble contrast agent as a tracer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty five untreated patients with biopsy proven HCV induced liver disease were studied prospectively. All were HCV RNA positive on polymerase chain reaction testing. Based on their histological fibrosis (F) and necroinflammatory (NI) scores, untreated patients were divided into mild hepatitis (F < or =2/6, NI < or =3/18), moderate/severe hepatitis (3 < or =F <6 or NI > or =4), and cirrhosis (F=6/6) groups. In addition, 20 age matched healthy volunteers were studied. After an overnight fast, a bolus of contrast agent (Levovist) was injected into an antecubital vein and spectral Doppler signals were recorded from both the right and middle hepatic veins for analysis. HVTTs were calculated as the time from injection to a sustained rise in Doppler signal >10% above baseline. The Doppler signals from the carotid artery were also measured in 60 patients and carotid delay times (CDT) calculated as the difference between carotid and hepatic vein arrival times. The earliest HVTT in each patient was used for analysis. RESULTS: Mean (SEM) HVTT for the control, mild hepatitis, moderate/severe hepatitis, and cirrhosis groups showed a monotonic decrease of 38.1 (2.8), 38.8 (2.4), 26.0 (2.4), and 15.8 (0.8) seconds, respectively. Mean (SEM) CDT for the control, mild hepatitis, moderate/severe hepatitis, and cirrhosis patients again showed progressive shortening of 30.3 (2.6), 25.9 (2.6), 14.8 (2.1), and 5.6 (1.2) seconds, respectively. There were significant differences between the groups for HVTT (ANOVA, p<0.001) and CDT (ANOVA, p<0.001). There was 100% sensitivity and 80% specificity for diagnosing cirrhosis and 95% sensitivity and 86% specificity for differentiating mild hepatitis from more severe liver disease. CONCLUSION: We have shown, for the first time, that HVTT using an ultrasound microbubble contrast agent can assess HCV related liver disease with clear differentiation between mild hepatitis and cirrhosis. There were significant differences between these two groups and the moderate/severe hepatitis group. CDT offers no additional benefit or greater differentiation than HVTT and can be omitted, thus simplifying this technique. HVTT may complement liver biopsy and may also be a useful alternative for assessment of liver disease in patients who have contraindications to biopsy.

Liver microbubble transit time compared with histology and Child-Pugh score in diffuse liver disease: a cross sectional study.

BACKGROUND: A previous pilot study showed that early arrival time of a microbubble in a hepatic vein is a sensitive indicator of cirrhosis. AIM: To see if this index can also grade diffuse liver disease. PATIENTS: Thirty nine fasted patients with histologically characterised disease were studied prospectively. Nine patients had no evidence of liver fibrosis, 10 had fibrosis without cirrhosis, and 20 had cirrhosis (five Child's A, seven Child's B, and eight Child's C). METHODS: Bolus injections of a microbubble (Levovist; Schering, Berlin) were given intravenously, followed by a saline flush. Time intensity curves of hepatic vein and carotid artery spectral Doppler signals were analysed. Hepatic vein transit time (HVTT) was calculated as the time after injection at which a sustained signal increase >10% of baseline was seen. Carotid delay time (CDT) was calculated as the difference between carotid and hepatic vein enhancement. RESULTS: Diagnostic studies were achieved in 38/39 subjects. Both HVTT and CDT became consistently shorter with worsening disease, as follows (means (SD)): HVTT: no fibrosis 44 (25) s, fibrosis 26 (8) s, Child's A 21 (1) s, Child's B 16 (3) s, and Child's C 16 (2) s; CDT: no fibrosis 31 (29) s, fibrosis 14 (6) s, Child's A 8 (1) s, Child's B 4 (4) s, and Child's C 3 (3) s. These differences were highly significant (p<0.001, ANOVA comparison). A HVTT <24 s and a CDT <10 s were 100% sensitive for cirrhosis (20/20 and 18/18, respectively) but not completely specific: 2/8 subjects with fibrosis had CDT values <10 s and 3/9 had HVTT <24 s. CONCLUSION: This minimally invasive test shows promise not only in diagnosing cirrhosis but also in assessing disease severity.