Hospital-acquired peritonitis in patients on peritoneal dialysis: A call to action.

Peritonitis remains a significant complication of peritoneal dialysis (PD), and severe episodes of peritonitis lead to structural and functional alterations of the peritoneal membrane, which can result in a permanent transfer to hemodialysis. Although PD is designed primarily to be delivered in the community setting, patients on PD get hospitalized for a number of reasons. In this commentary, we highlight the enormous risks each hospitalization has on the occurrence of peritonitis in patients on PD and the need to understand factors that predispose patients to hospital-acquired peritonitis. Furthermore, we suggest directions on several strategies that could not only reduce the risks of developing peritonitis but also improve outcomes of patients on PD who get hospitalized for an unrelated illness.

Systematic Review on Treatment and Outcomes of Tuberculous Peritonitis in Patients on Peritoneal Dialysis.

Introduction: Peritoneal dialysis (PD)-associated peritonitis due to tuberculosis (TB) is associated with poor outcomes and optimal treatment strategies for this condition remain unknown. Our study aimed to: (i) systematically review the published literature on peritonitis caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis in patients on PD and (ii) review cases of peritonitis due to M tuberculosis in patients on PD reported in Australia and New Zealand to determine the epidemiology, management strategies, and outcomes of this condition. Methods: A literature search of Medline, Scopus, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov, Cochrane CENTRAL Register of Controlled Trials and Google Scholar for articles published from inception date to June 2022 was conducted. To be eligible, articles had to describe patient characteristics, initial anti-TB therapy, and treatment outcomes in all patients on PD with peritonitis caused by M tuberculosis. Data from the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant (ANZDATA) Registry of patients on PD who developed peritonitis due to M tuberculosis between September 2001 and December 2020 were included and analyzed. Results: The systematic literature review identified 70 case studies (151 patients) and 8 cohort studies (97 patients), whereas the ANZDATA Registry identified 17 cases of peritonitis due to M tuberculosis. Overall, in patients diagnosed with peritonitis due to M tuberculosis, the rates of PD catheter removal and permanent transfer to hemodialysis (HD) were numerically higher in the ANZDATA Registry cases (82%) than in the case studies (23%) and cohort studies (20%). Observed all-cause mortality rates were also higher as observed in the case studies (33%) and cohort studies (26%) than in the ANZDATA Registry cases (6%). Conclusion: Tuberculous peritonitis is uncommon in patients on PD and is associated with poor outcomes. Prospective studies are warranted to study the effect of retaining PD catheters after M tuberculosis infection on patient outcomes.

Culture-directed antibiotics in peritoneal dialysis solutions: a systematic review focused on stability and compatibility.

BACKGROUND: This systematic review summarises the stability of less commonly prescribed antibiotics in different peritoneal dialysis solutions that could be used for culture-directed therapy of peritonitis, which would be especially useful in regions with a high prevalence of multidrug antibiotic-resistant strains. METHODS: A literature search of Medline, Scopus, Embase and Google Scholar for articles published from inception to 25 January, 2023 was conducted. Only antibiotic stability studies conducted in vitro and not recently reviewed by So et al. were included. The main outcomes were chemical, physical, antimicrobial and microbial stability. This protocol was registered in PROSPERO (registration number CRD42023393366). RESULTS: We screened 1254 abstracts, and 28 articles were included in the study. In addition to those discussed in a recent systematic review (So et al., Clin Kidney J 15(6):1071-1078, 2022), we identified 18 antimicrobial agents. Of these, 9 have intraperitoneal dosing recommendations in the recent International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis (ISPD) peritonitis guidelines, and 7 of the 9 had stability data applicable to clinical practice. They were cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, daptomycin, ofloxacin, and teicoplanin in glucose-based solutions, tobramycin in Extraneal solution only and fosfomycin in Extraneal, Nutrineal, Physioneal 1.36% and 2.27% glucose solutions. CONCLUSIONS: Physicochemical stability has not been demonstrated for all antibiotics with intraperitoneal dosing recommendations in the ISPD peritonitis guidelines. Further studies are required to determine the stability of antibiotics, especially in icodextrin-based and low-glucose degradation products, pH-neutral solutions.

Treatment and outcomes of peritonitis due to Rothia species in patients on peritoneal dialysis: A systematic review and multicentre registry analysis.

Peritoneal dialysis (PD)-associated peritonitis remains a severe complication of PD. Although peritonitis due to Rothia spp. is rare, the treatment recommendations and outcomes are uncertain. Our study aims to review (1) published literature on peritonitis caused by Rothia spp. and (2) reported cases of peritonitis due to Rothia spp. in patients on PD in Australia and New Zealand. A literature search of PubMed, Scopus, Embase and Google Scholar for articles published between January 1949 and February 2022 was conducted. To be eligible, articles had to describe antibiotic therapy and treatment outcomes in all PD patients for peritonitis caused by Rothia or Stomatococcus spp. Data from the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant (ANZDATA) registry of PD patients who developed peritonitis due to Rothia spp. between July 2011 and May 2020 were also reviewed. A total of 12 articles and 28 episodes were identified from the literature search and ANZDATA registry analysis, respectively. Over 60% of the peritonitis cases due to Rothia spp. were from the Rothia mucilaginosa species (8/12 and 17/28, respectively), while Rothia dentocariosa was the second most commonly identified species in both the literature search and the ANZDATA registry analysis (4/12 and 5/28, respectively). A majority 8 (66.7%) of the articles in the literature search employed a combination antibiotic regimen, while the remaining 4 (33.3%) used a single antibiotic regimen. In contrast, most of the episodes, 22 (78.6%) described in the ANZDATA registry analysis, employed a single antibiotic regimen, and only 6 (21.4%) episodes were treated with a combination antibiotic regimen. The duration of antibiotic therapy ranged from 2 to 3 weeks in the literature search, and 1 to 3 weeks in the ANZDATA registry. While no deaths within 30 days of developing peritonitis were reported, catheter removal was reported in three (25%) and two (7.1%) episodes in both the literature search and the ANZDATA registry analysis, respectively, of which the majority occurred in patients treated for ≤2 weeks. PD-associated peritonitis due to Rothia spp. is uncommon and associated with relatively good outcomes. Antibiotic treatment for 3 weeks is associated with better outcomes.

Characteristics and outcomes of hospital-acquired and community-acquired peritonitis in patients on peritoneal dialysis: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Peritonitis remains a significant complication of peritoneal dialysis. However, there is limited information on the clinical characteristics and outcomes of hospital-acquired peritonitis compared to community-acquired peritonitis in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis. Furthermore, the microbiology and outcomes of community-acquired peritonitis may vary from hospital-acquired peritonitis. Therefore, the aim was to gather and analyse data to address this gap. METHODS: Retrospective review of the medical records of all adult patients on peritoneal dialysis within the peritoneal dialysis units in four university teaching hospitals in Sydney, Australia, who developed peritonitis between January 2010 and November 2020. We compared the clinical characteristics, microbiology and outcomes of community-acquired peritonitis and hospital-acquired peritonitis. Community acquired peritonitis was defined as the development of peritonitis in the outpatient setting. Hospital-acquired peritonitis was defined as: (1) developed peritonitis anytime during hospitalisation for any medical condition other than peritonitis, (2) diagnosed with peritonitis within 7 days of hospital discharge and developed symptoms of peritonitis within 3 days of the hospital discharge. RESULTS: Overall, 904 episodes of peritoneal dialysis-associated peritonitis were identified in 472 patients, of which 84 (9.3%) episodes were hospital-acquired. Patients with hospital-acquired peritonitis had lower mean serum albumin levels compared to those with community-acquired peritonitis(22.95 g/L vs. 25.76 g/L, p = 0.002). At the time of diagnosis, lower median peritoneal effluent leucocyte and polymorph counts were observed with hospital-acquired peritonitis compared to community-acquired peritonitis (1236.00/mm3 vs. 3183.50/mm3, p < 0.01 and 1037.00/mm3 vs. 2800.00/mm3, p < 0.01, respectively). Higher proportions of peritonitis due to Pseudomonas spp. (9.5% vs. 3.7%, p = 0.020) and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (2.4% vs. 0.0%, p = 0.009), lower rates of complete cure (39.3% vs. 61.7%, p < 0.001), higher rates of refractory peritonitis (39.3% vs. 16.4%, p < 0.001) and higher all-cause mortality within 30 days of peritonitis diagnosis (28.6% vs. 3.3%, p < 0.001) were observed in the hospital-acquired peritonitis group compared to the community-acquired peritonitis group, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Despite having lower peritoneal dialysis effluent leucocyte counts at the time of diagnosis, patients with hospital-acquired peritonitis had poorer outcomes, including lower rates of complete cure, higher rates of refractory peritonitis and higher rates of all-cause mortality within 30 days of diagnosis, compared to those with community-acquired peritonitis.

Practice variations in antibiotic administration for the management of peritonitis in patients on automated peritoneal dialysis in Australia and New Zealand.

In the absence of guidelines on the management of peritoneal dialysis (PD)-associated peritonitis in patients on automated peritoneal dialysis (APD), variations in clinical practice potentially exist between PD units that could affect clinical outcomes. This study aimed to document the current practices of treating PD-associated peritonitis in patients on APD across Australia and New Zealand and the reasons for practice variations using a cross-sectional online survey. Of the 62 PD units, 34 medical leads (55%) responded to the survey. When treating APD-associated peritonitis, 21 units (62%) continued patients on APD and administered intraperitoneal (IP) antibiotics in manual daytime exchanges; of these, 17 (81%) considered allowing at least 6 h dwell time for adequate absorption of the IP antibiotics as an important reason for adding manual daytime exchange. Nine units (26%) temporarily switched patients from APD to continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD); of these, five (55%) reported a lack of pharmacokinetic (PK) data for IP antibiotics in APD, four (44%) reported a shortage of APD-trained nursing staff to perform APD exchanges during hospitalisation and three (33%) reported inadequate time for absorption of IP antibiotics on APD as important reasons for their practice. Four units (12%) continued patients on APD and administered IP antibiotics during APD exchanges; of these, three (75%) believed that PK data available in CAPD could be extrapolated to APD. This study demonstrates wide variations in the management of APD-associated peritonitis in Australia and New Zealand; it points towards the lack of PK on antibiotics used to treat peritonitis as an important reason underpinning practice variations.

Pharmacokinetics of culture-directed antibiotics for the treatment of peritonitis in automated peritoneal dialysis: A systematic narrative review.

The objectives of this study were to provide a summary of the pharmacokinetic data of some intraperitoneal (IP) antibiotics that could be used for both empirical and culture-directed therapy, as per the ISPD recommendations, and examine factors to consider when using IP antibiotics for the management of automated peritoneal dialysis (APD)-associated peritonitis. A literature search of PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, MEDLINE and Google Scholar for articles published between 1998 and 2020 was conducted. To be eligible, articles had to describe the use of antibiotics via the IP route in adult patients ≥18 years old on APD in the context of pharmacokinetic studies or case reports/series. Articles describing the use of IP antibiotics that had been recently reviewed (cefazolin, vancomycin, gentamicin and ceftazidime) or administered for non-APD-associated peritonitis were excluded. A total of 1119 articles were identified, of which 983 abstracts were screened. Seventy-three full-text articles were assessed for eligibility. Eight records were included in the final study. Three reports had pharmacokinetic data in patients on APD without peritonitis. Each of cefepime 15 mg/kg IP, meropenem 0.5 g IP and fosfomycin 4 g IP given in single doses achieved drug plasma concentrations above the minimum inhibitory concentration for treating the susceptible organisms. The remaining five records were case series or reports in patients on APD with peritonitis. While pharmacokinetic data support intermittent cefepime 15 mg/kg IP daily, only meropenem 0.5 g IP and fosfomycin 4 g IP are likely to be effective if given in APD exchanges with dwell times of 15 h. Higher doses may be required in APD with shorter dwell times. Information on therapeutic efficacy was derived from case reports/series in individual patients and without therapeutic drug monitoring. Until more pharmacokinetic data are available on these antibiotics, it would be prudent to shift patients who develop peritonitis on APD to continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis, where pharmacokinetic information is more readily available.