A quasi-physical algorithm for the structure optimization in an off-lattice protein model.

In this paper, we study an off-lattice protein AB model with two species of monomers, hydrophobic and hydrophilic, and present a heuristic quasi-physical algorithm. First, by elaborately simulating the movement of the smooth solids in the physical world, we find low-energy conformations for a given monomer chain. A subsequent off-trap strategy is then proposed to trigger a jump for a stuck situation in order to get out of the local minima. The algorithm has been tested in the three-dimensional AB model for all sequences with lengths of 13-55 monomers. In several cases, we renew the putative ground state energy values. The numerical results show that the proposed methods are very promising for finding the ground states of proteins.

The anatomical study of transoral atlantoaxial reduction plate internal fixation.

OBJECTIVE: To study relevant anatomical features of the structures involved in transoral atlanto-axial reduction plate (TARP) internal fixation through transoral approach for treating irreducible atlanto-axial dislocation and providing anatomical basis for the clinical application of TARP. METHODS: Ten fresh craniocervical specimens were microsurgically dissected layer by layer through transoral approach. The stratification of the posterior pharyngeal wall, the course of the vertebral artery, anatomical relationships of the adjacent structures of the atlas and axis, and the closely relevant anatomical parameters for TARP internal fixation were measured. RESULTS: The posterior pharyngeal wall consisted of two layers and two interspaces: the mucosa, prevertebral fascia, retropharyngeal space, and prevertebral space. The range from the anterior edge of the foramen magnum to C(3) could be exposed by this approach. The thickness of the posterior pharyngeal wall was (3.6+/-0.3) mm (ranging 2.9-4.3 mm) at the anterior tubercle of C1, (6.1+/-0.4) mm (ranging 5.2-7.1 mm) at the lateral mass of C(1) and (5.5+/-0.4) mm (ranging 4.3-6.5 mm) at the central part of C(2), respectively. The distance from the incisor tooth to the anterior tubercle of C(1), C(1) screw entry point, and C(2)screw entry point was (82.5+/-7.8) mm (ranging 71.4-96.2 mm), (90.1+/-3.8) mm (ranging 82.2-96.3 mm), and (89.0+/-4.1) mm (ranging 81.3-95.3 mm), respectively. The distance between the vertebral artery at the atlas and the midline was (25.2+/- 2.3) mm (ranging 20.4-29.7 mm) and that between the vertebral artery at the axis and the midline was (18.4+/- 2.6) mm (ranging 13.1-23.0 mm). The allowed width of the atlas and axis for exposure was (39.4+/-2.2) mm (ranging 36.2-42.7 mm) and (39.0+/-2.1) mm (ranging 35.8-42.3 mm), respectively. The distance (a) between the two atlas screw insertion points (center of anterior aspect of C(1) lateral mass) was (31.4+/-3.3) mm (ranging 25.4-36.6 mm). The vertical distance (b) between the line connecting the two C(1) screw entry points and that connecting the two C(2) screw entry points (at the central part of the vertebrae, namely 3-4 mm lateral to the midline of C(2) vertebrae) was (21.3+/-2.7) mm (ranging 19.4-24.3 mm), with an a/b ratio of 1.3-1.5. The screws of TARP had a lateral tilt of 12.2 degrees+/-0.4 degrees(ranging 10.2 degrees-14.6 degrees) at C(1) and a medial tilt of 7.3 degrees+/-0.3 degrees (ranging 5.1 degrees-9.4 degrees) at C(2) relative to the coronal plane. CONCLUSIONS: An atlanto-axial surgery through transoral approach is safe and feasible. This approach is suitable for an anterior TARP internal fixation, and the design of the internal fixation system should be based on the above anatomical data.

Transoral atlantoaxial reduction plate fixation for irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation.

OBJECTIVE: To design a clinically applicable transoralpharyngeal atlantoaxial reduction plate (TARP), introduce the operation procedure, and evaluate its preliminary clinical effects. METHODS: A novel TARP system, including butterfly titanium alloy plate, self-locking screws, atlantoaxial reductor and other operational instruments was developed. This system was applied clinically on five patients with irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation of congenital or traumatic origin. During operation, the reduction was completed by the combined action of the plate and the atlantoaxial reductor after transoral joint release and cord decompression. Bone graft granules were implanted between the bilateral atlantoaxial joints and TARP was used to immobilize subsequently the atlas and axis. RESULTS: Clinical application demonstrated that TARP could induce instant reduction and that the method was operationally feasible and its postoperational effect was satisfactory. CONCLUSIONS: The design of TARP is novel. The operational procedure is simple and easy to use. Furthermore, instant reduction can be completed during the operation and the fixation is relatively stable. TARP is an ideal alternative for irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation and may have excellent prospects for further clinical applications.

[Anatomic evaluation the entry point of C2 pedicle screw].

OBJECTIVE: To study the relevant position of C(2) pedicle to C(2) inferior articular process, set up a technique of C(2) pedicle screw placement with the inferior articular process of axis as an anatomic landmark. METHODS: Fifty C(2) bone specimens were used to measure the distance from the sagittal midline to the medial border, the midpoint and the lateral border of C(2) inferior articular process or C(2) pedicle; the width and the height of the C(2) pedicle were also evaluated. The anatomic relation between the measurements data of C(2) pedicle and that of C(2) inferior articular process were analyzed, and the technique of C(2) pedicle screw fixation was established. RESULTS: The medial border of C(2) inferior articular process was averaged (3.67 +/- 0.41) mm lateral to that of C(2) pedicle, and the midpoint C(2) inferior articular process was averaged (1.15 +/- 0.44) mm lateral to the lateral border of C(2) pedicle, respectively. Using the C(2) inferior articular process as landmark, two techniques was established for C(2) pedicle screw placement. The entry point of method A was located in 2 mm medial and superior to the central point of C(2) inferior articular process; the entry point of method B was at the crossing point of the medial border C(2) inferior articular process with the superior quarter of C(2) inferior articular process. CONCLUSIONS: There is a steady anatomic relation between C(2) pedicle and C(2) inferior articular process, the C(2) inferior articular process could be as a convenient key anatomic landmark to determine the location of C(2) pedicle and the position of C(2) pedicle screw entry point.

[Anatomic identification of the location of the pedicle of atlas with the lateral mass of C2 to C4 as the landmark].

OBJECTIVE: To study the relevant position of the pedicle of C1 to the lateral mass of C(2-4), set up an identification technique for the entry point decision of C1 pedicle screw by using the lateral mass of C(2-4) as anatomic landmarks. METHODS: Twenty cadaver specimens were used to measure the distance from the sagittal midline of spine to the medial border, the midpoint and the lateral border of C1 pedicle or the lateral mass of C2, C3 or C4. The anatomic relation between the measurements data of C1 pedicle and that of the lateral masses of the cervical vertebrae were analyzed, and the technique of C1 pedicle screw fixation was established. RESULTS: The average medial border of the lateral mass of C2, C3 and C4 was 0.37 mm, 0.27 mm and 0.24 mm lateral to that of C1 pedicle, the average midpoint of the lateral mass of C2, C3 and C4 was 1.18 mm, 1.41 mm and 1.74 mm lateral to that of C1 pedicle, and the average lateral border of the lateral mass of C2, C3 and C4 was 1.96 mm, 2.54 mm and 3.24 mm lateral to that of C1 pedicle, respectively. CONCLUSION: There is a steady anatomic location relation between C1 pedicle and the lateral mass of C2, C3 or C4. As well as the lateral mass of C2, the lateral mass of C3 or that of C4 could be convenient anatomic landmarks to determine the location of C1 pedicle and the position of C1 pedicle screw entry point.

[Results of 1310 knees of meniscal treatment evaluated by arthroscopy].

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate results of 1310 knees of meniscal treatments by arthroscopy and to present good method of meniscal treatment. METHODS: Their age, traumatic mechanism and effects under arthroscopy were analysed in a series of 254 patients with meniscal injuries, there were 880 males and 374 females, the average of the patients was 25.5 years. The meniscal repair in 68 knee, partial meniscectomy in 756 knee, total meniscectomy in 480 knee and conservative treatment in 6 cases. RESULTS: The patients were followed up 1 to 12 years with the average of 4 years and 3 months. The mean Lysholm score was 86.3 points in arthroscopic meniscal repair, 84.0 points in partial meniscectomy and 76.1 points in total meniscectomy. The mean Lysholm 98.7 points in all children patients with conservative treatment. They showed significant difference (P < 0.01) in the results of three treatments. CONCLUSIONS: Meniscal injuries should not cut off as it, should be repaired in 5 mm from meniscus to synovium and or partial meniscectomy. The general adoption is not the surgical operation on meniscal injuries of the child.

[Design and preliminary clinical application of transoralpharyngeal atlantoaxial reduction plate].

OBJECTIVE: To design transoralpharyngeal atlantoaxial reduction plate (TARP), evaluate its biomechanical performance and observe its preliminary clinical effect. METHODS: A brand-new TARP system was designed, including butterfly titanium alloy plate, self-locking screws, atlantoaxial reductor and other operation instruments. Twelve fresh occipital bone-C(3) specimen were designed for biomechanical test including range of motion (ROM) (n = 6) and screw pull-out strength (n = 12). Preliminary clinical application of TARP was reported. RESULTS: The reduction mechanism of the TARP system was designed cleverly. TARP had equal effect with Magerl + Brooks and it was more stable than the other three clinically widely used atlantoaxial fixators: Magerl, Brooks and anterior transarticular screw fixation through C(2) vertebral body. TARP's C(1) and C(2) screws were strong enough for atlantoaxial arthrodesis and their antipull-out performance was excellent. Clinical application on irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation proved that TARP had the function of instant reduction, the operation was feasible and the operation effect was significant. CONCLUSION: TARP's design is novel and it has excellent biomechanical performance. The operation procedure is simple and reasonable. Furthermore, instant reduction could be completed during the operation and the fixation is strong. Above all, TARP is creative and will have excellent prospect.

[The reason and prevention of upper cervical reoperations].

OBJECTIVE: To discuss the reasons for the operation performed on 13 patients with upper cervical disease and to explore the management and prevention of upper cervical disease. METHODS: Thirteen patients with upper cervical disease were retrospectively reviewed. The reason for of reoperations on these patients were analyzed. The measures to reduce upper cervical operational complication and bad prognosis were discussed to avoid reoperations. RESULTS: The reasons for reoperations included 9 cases with unstable or re-dislocated atlantoaxial joint, 10 cases with residual spinal cord compression, 1 case with malposition of odontoid screw, 1 case with adjacent cervical spine regression, 1 case with occipital-cervical fusion failure, 1 case with spinal cord injury during operation, 1 case with bone-plant slipped into canales spinalis, and 1 case with demand to take out internal fixation for aggravated symptom. CONCLUSIONS: The common reasons for upper cervical reoperations were due to instability or redislocation of atlantoaxial joint and residual of spinal cord compression. Some measures such as reducing operate miss, using firm internal fixation and decompressing were advisable to decrease the incidence of reoperations.

C2 anatomy and dimensions relative to translaminar screw placement in an Asian population.

STUDY DESIGN: A cadaveric specimen study. OBJECTIVES: To determine the applicability of a modified C2 translaminar screw placement in the general adult population and to provide pertinent clinical data for screw insertion. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: C2 intralaminar screw fixation has recently been popularized, but this technique carries a potential drawback that the screw may breakout ventrally into the spinal canal. For this reason, a modified C2 translaminar screw fixation technique was developed to intraoperatively verify screw position and thereby decrease the risk or canal compromise. To our knowledge, there has been not an anatomic study evaluating this modification of the translaminar screw technique. METHODS: The tips of the modified screws were aimed such that they exited the dorsal cortex of the center of the contralateral lateral mass, achieving bicortical fixation. A total of 120 adult C2 vertebrae were evaluated bilaterally for the following: thickness of the cranial, midportion, and caudal edge of C2 lamina; the heights of the spinous process, lamina, and lateral mass; inclination angle of the laminae, screw projection length, and trajectory angle of cranial and caudal C2 translaminar screw. RESULTS: A total of 83.3% specimens had bilateral laminar thicknesses ≥4.0 mm and a spinous process height ≥9.0 mm; 5% had a laminar thickness less than 4.0-mm bilaterally; 9.2% had a laminar thickness less than 4.0 mm on one side; 2.5% had a spinous process height lower than 9.0 mm. CONCLUSION: A large percentages of C2 laminae are of sufficient size to safely accommodate a bicortical 3.5-mm diameter screw. The thickness of the lamina and the height of the spinous process are the 2 limiting factors for safe translaminar screws placement. Using a bicortical technique confirms the position of the screw and thereby helps to decrease the risk of neurologic injury from screw penetration of the inner cortex of the lamina.

C1 pedicle screws versus C1 lateral mass screws: comparisons of pullout strengths and biomechanical stabilities.

STUDY DESIGN: In vitro biomechanical study. OBJECTIVE: To compare the pullout strengths and the biomechanical stabilities afforded by C1 lateral mass screws and C1 pedicle screws using bicortical and unicortical fixation techniques. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Posterior screw fixation techniques in the atlas including C1 lateral mass screw and C1 pedicle screw. The shortcomings of C1 lateral mass screw technique and potential risks of bicortical fixation method were recently described; C1 pedicle screw technique with unicortical fixation might overcome these anatomic and clinical drawbacks. However, it is unknown whether the biomechanical characteristics of unicortical C1 pedicle screw are comparable with that of bicortical C1 lateral mass screw. METHODS.: Bicortical or unicortical C1 pedicle screws and C1 lateral mass screws were inserted into 12 adult fresh human C1 specimens. Pullout strength was evaluated using a material testing machine. The construct's stability of bicortical C1 lateral mass screws or unicortical C1 pedicle screws incorporating unicortical C2 pedicle screws was compared with bilateral transarticular screws using another 6 fresh cervical cadaver spines. Pullout strength and biomechanical stability differences were compared statistically. RESULTS: Bicortical C1 pedicle screws provided the biggest pullout strength (1757.0 +/- 318.7 N) of all 4 methods, whereas unicortical C1 lateral mass screws provided the weakest(794.5 +/- 314.8 N). However, there were no statistically significant differences between bicortical C1 lateral mass screws (1243.8 +/- 350.0 N) and unicortical C1 pedicle screws (1192.5 +/- 172.6 N). Furthermore, there was no statistically significant difference of biomechanical construct stability between unicortical C1 pedicle screw-rod constructs and bicortical C1 lateral mass screw-rod constructs. CONCLUSION: C1 pedicle screws are stiffer than C1 lateral mass screws. Unicortical C1 pedicle screw provided the same pullout resistance and three-dimensional stability as bicortical C1 lateral mass fixation. Although lateral mass screw placement into C1 requires bicortical purchase, pedicle screw insertion into the atlas only requires unicortical fixation.

Anatomic considerations for the pedicle screw placement in the first cervical vertebra.

STUDY DESIGN: Anatomic bony measurements were manually performed on 50 dry atlantoaxial vertebral complexes with an electronic digital caliper, and a reliable landmark for insertion of a pedicle screw in C1 vertebra was described and evaluated. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the feasibility of placing a screw in the C1 pedicle and evaluate the reliability of the C2 lateral mass as a landmark for determining the optimal site of screw entry. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The use of C1-C2 pedicle screws with the additional rods or plates has been an alternative method of stabilization for patients who are unsuitable for C1-C2 transarticular screw stabilization. However, the optimal portal of entry for the C1 pedicle screw is difficult to determine during surgery in the absence of reliable reference landmarks and sufficient relevant anatomic studies. METHODS: We manually measured 11 linear anatomic parameters related to the C1 lateral mass, its pedicle and posterior arch under the groove on 50 pairs of dry C1-C2 complexes harvested from cadavers. We also treated five patients with atlantoaxial instability with C1 and C2 pedicle screw fixation; the entry point of the C1 pedicle screw was ascertained by using C2 lateral mass as a landmark, and the position of the C1 pedicle screws in each case was evaluated with postoperative radiographs and computed tomography scans. RESULTS: The mean mediolateral width and rostrocaudal height of C1 pedicle were 8.57 and 5.83 mm, respectively. The mean rostrocaudal height of C1 posterior lamina at the reference entry point for the screw was 4.59 mm. The mean rostrocaudal height of the C1 posterior arch under the vertebral artery groove was 3.88 mm at its medial one-third and 4.25 mm at its lateral one-third. The thinnest external diameter of the screw tract that was recorded was <4 mm in six (12%) specimens of C1 vertebrae. The center of C2 lateral mass was 1.51 mm lateral to the sagittal plane of the mediolateral midpoint of the C1 pedicle. The distance from the suggested screw entry point to C1 posterior tubercle was 22.15 mm, and the mean length of the screw tract was 28.55 mm. Ten C1 pedicle screws were placed exactly, without neural or vascular injury in all five patients. CONCLUSION: The heights of the C1 pedicle, the posterior arch under the groove and the posterior lamina at the screw entry point are the major determinants for the possibility of placing pedicle screws in C1 of a given patient. This study indicates that it is feasible to place a 3.5-mm pedicle screw safely in C1 in most patients, and the lateral mass of C2 is a reliable anatomic landmark that can be easily identified to help the surgeon determine the optimal screw entry portal conveniently during surgery.