Partial thrombosis of the false lumen in patients with acute type B aortic dissection.

BACKGROUND: Patency or thrombosis of the false lumen in type B acute aortic dissection has been found to predict outcomes. The prognostic implications of partial thrombosis of the false lumen have not yet been elucidated. METHODS: We examined 201 patients with type B acute aortic dissection who were enrolled in the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection between 1996 and 2003 and who survived to hospital discharge. Kaplan-Meier mortality curves were stratified according to the status of the false lumen (patent, partial thrombosis, or complete thrombosis) as determined during the index hospitalization. Cox proportional-hazards analysis was performed to identify independent predictors of death. RESULTS: During the index hospitalization, 114 patients (56.7%) had a patent false lumen, 68 patients (33.8%) had partial thrombosis of the false lumen, and 19 (9.5%) had complete thrombosis of the false lumen. The mean (+/-SD) 3-year mortality rate for patients with a patent false lumen was 13.7+/-7.1%, for those with partial thrombosis was 31.6+/-12.4%, and for those with complete thrombosis was 22.6+/-22.6% (median follow-up, 2.8 years; P=0.003 by the log-rank test). Independent predictors of postdischarge mortality were partial thrombosis of the false lumen (relative risk, 2.69; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.45 to 4.98; P=0.002), a history of aortic aneurysm (relative risk, 2.05; 95% CI, 1.07 to 3.93; P=0.03), and a history of atherosclerosis (relative risk, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.01 to 3.47; P=0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Mortality is high after discharge from the hospital among patients with type B acute aortic dissection. Partial thrombosis of the false lumen, as compared with complete patency, is a significant independent predictor of postdischarge mortality in these patients.

Acute type B aortic dissection: does aortic arch involvement affect management and outcomes? Insights from the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD).

BACKGROUND: Stanford Type B acute aortic dissection (TB-AAD) spares the ascending aorta and is optimally managed with medical therapy in the absence of complications. However, the treatment of TB-AAD with aortic arch involvement (AAI) remains an unresolved issue. METHODS AND RESULTS: We examined 498 patients with TB-AAD enrolled in the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD) between 1996 and 2003. Kaplan-Meier mortality curves were constructed and multivariate regression models were performed to identify independent predictors of AAI and to evaluate whether AAI was an independent predictor of follow-up mortality. We found that 371 (74.5%) patients with TB-AAD did not have AAI versus 127 (25.5%) with AAI. Independent predictors of AAI were a history of previous aortic surgery (OR 3.4; 95% CI, 1.6 to 7.6; P=0.002), absence of back pain (OR 1.6; 95% CI, 1.1 to 2.5; P=0.05), and any pulse deficit (1.9; 95% CI, 1.1 to 3.3, P=0.03). Mortality for patients without AAI was 9.4%+/-4.3% and 21.0%+/-6.9% at 1 and 3 years versus 9.2%+/-7.7% and 19.9%+/-11.1% with AAI, respectively (mean follow-up overall, 2.3 years, log rank P=0.82). AAI was not an independent predictor of long-term mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with TB-AAD and aortic arch involvement do not differ with regards to mortality at 3 years. Whether or not AAI involvement impacts other measures of morbidity such as freedom from operation or endovascular intervention deserves further study.

Prognostic role of transesophageal echocardiography in acute type A aortic dissection.

BACKGROUND: Acute type A aortic dissection (AAD) remains a highly lethal entity for which emergent surgical correction is standard care. Prior studies have identified specific clinical findings as being predictive of outcome. The prognostic significance of specific findings on imaging studies is less well described. We sought to identify the prognostic value of transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in medically and surgically treated patients with AAD. METHODS: We studied 522 AAD patients enrolled over 6 years in the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection who underwent TEE. Multivariate analysis identified independent associations of inhospital mortality, first using clinical variables (model 1), after which TEE data were added to build a final model (model 2). RESULTS: Inhospital mortality was 28.7%. Transesophageal echocardiographic evidences of pericardial effusion (P = .04), tamponade (P < .01), periaortic hematoma (P = .02), and patent false lumen (P = .08) were more frequent in nonsurvivors. Dilated ascending aorta (P = .03), dissection localized to the ascending aorta (P = .02), and thrombosed false lumen (P = .08) were less common in nonsurvivors. Model 1 identified age > or = 70 years, any pulse deficit, renal failure, and hypotension/shock as independent predictors of death. Model 2 identified dissection flap confined to ascending aorta (odds ratio 0.2, 95% CI 0.1-0.6) and complete thrombosis of false lumen (odds ratio 0.15, 95% CI 0.03-0.86) as protective. In the medically treated group, mortality was 31% for subjects with a partially or completely thrombosed false lumen versus 66% in the presence of a patent false lumen. CONCLUSIONS: Transesophageal echocardiography provides prognostic information in AAD beyond that provided by clinical risk variables.

Predicting death in patients with acute type a aortic dissection.

BACKGROUND: Given the high mortality rates in patients with type A aortic dissection, predictive tools to identify patients at increased risk of death are needed to assist clinicians for optimal treatment. METHODS AND RESULTS: Accordingly, we evaluated 547 patients with this diagnosis enrolled in the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD) between January 1996 and December 1999. Univariate testing followed by multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictors of death. In-hospital mortality rate was 32.5% in type A dissection patients. In-hospital complications (neurological deficits, altered mental status, myocardial or mesenteric ischemia, kidney failure, hypotension, cardiac tamponade, and limb ischemia) were increased in patients who died compared with survivors (P<0.05 for all). Logistic regression identified the following presenting variables as predictors of death: age > or =70 years (OR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.05 to 2.77; P=0.03), abrupt onset of chest pain (OR 2.60; 95% CI, 1.22 to 5.54; P=0.01), hypotension/shock/tamponade (OR, 2.97; 95% CI, 1.83 to 4.81; P<0.0001), kidney failure (OR, 4.77; 95% CI, 1.80 to 12.6; P=0.002), pulse deficit (OR, 2.03; 95% CI, 1.25 to 3.29, P=0.004), and abnormal ECG (OR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.06 to 2.95; P=0.03) (area under receiver operating curve, 0.74; Hosmer-Lemeshow statistic, P=0.75). CONCLUSIONS: The in-hospital mortality rate in acute type A aortic dissection is high and can be predicted with the use of a clinical model incorporated in a simple risk prediction tool. This tool can be used to educate patients with dissection about their predicted risk and in clinical research for risk adjustment while comparing outcomes of different therapies.

Implications of periaortic hematoma in patients with acute aortic dissection (from the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection).

The clinical profiles, presentation, and outcomes of patients with acute aortic dissections and associated periaortic hematomas on aortic imaging have not been described in a large cohort. This study sought to assess the prognostic implications of periaortic hematomas in patients with aortic dissections and to identify factors associated with in-hospital mortality in patients with periaortic hematomas. The study population was 971 patients with acute aortic dissections enrolled in the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection with available imaging data on presentation with the presence or absence of periaortic hematomas. Patients with periaortic hematomas (n = 227, 23.4%) were more likely to be women, to have a history of hypertension and atherosclerosis, and to present early to the hospital. At presentation, they had greater frequencies of shock, cardiac tamponade, coma, and/or altered consciousness. Clinical outcomes were significantly worse in patients with periaortic hematomas, including significantly greater mortality (33% vs 20.3%, p <0.001). A multivariate model demonstrated periaortic hematomas to be an independent predictor of mortality in patients with aortic dissections (odds ratio 1.71, 95% confidence interval 1.15 to 2.54, p = 0.007). In conclusion, this study provides insight into the profiles, presentation, and outcomes of patients with periaortic hematomas and acute aortic dissections. The early identification and aggressive management of patients with periaortic hematomas may potentially improve clinical outcomes.

Syncope in acute aortic dissection: diagnostic, prognostic, and clinical implications.

BACKGROUND: Syncope is a well-recognized symptom of acute aortic dissection, often indicating the development of dangerous complications such as cardiac tamponade. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We identified consecutive patients with acute aortic dissection at 18 referral centers in six countries. Data on key clinical findings and outcomes were collected via extensive questionnaires. Multiple logistic regression models were used to determine the association between syncope and in-hospital mortality, adjusting for demographic characteristics, dissection type, comorbid conditions, and complications (e.g., cardiac tamponade). RESULTS: Syncope was reported in 96 (13%) of 728 patients. Patients with syncope were more likely to die in the hospital (34% [n = 33 deaths]) than were those without syncope (23% [144/632], P = 0.01). They were also more likely to have cardiac tamponade (28% [n = 27] vs. 8% [n = 49], P <0.001), stroke (18% [n = 17] vs. 4% [n = 27], P <0.001), and other neurologic deficits (25% [n = 24] vs. 14% [n = 88], P = 0.005). After multivariate adjustment, clinical factors independently associated with the occurrence of syncope included a proximal dissection (odds ratio [OR] = 5.5; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.5 to 12; P <0.001), cardiac tamponade (OR = 3.1; 95% CI: 1.7 to 5.4; P <0.001), and stroke (OR = 3.5; 95% CI: 1.7 to 7.2; P = 0.001). There was a significant association between in-hospital death and syncope after adjustment for demographic characteristics alone (OR = 2.0; 95% CI: 1.2 to 3.5; P = 0.01), but not after adjustment for dissection type, comorbid conditions, and complications. CONCLUSION: Patients with dissections complicated by cardiac tamponade or stroke are significantly more likely to present with syncope. If these complications are excluded, syncope alone does not appear to increase the risk of death independently.

Association of painless acute aortic dissection with increased mortality.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with painless acute aortic dissection (AAD). PATIENTS AND METHODS: For this study conducted from 1997 to 2001, we searched the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection to identify patients with painless AAD (group 1). Their clinical features and in-hospital events were compared with patients who had painful AAD (group 2). RESULTS: Of the 977 patients in the database, 63 (6.4%) had painless AAD, and 914 (93.6%) had painful AAD. Patients in group 1 were older than those in group 2 (mean +/- SD age, 66.6 +/- 13.3 vs 61.9 +/- 14.1 years; P = .01). Type A dissection (involving the ascendIng aorta or the arch) was more frequent in group 1 (74.6% vs 60.9%; P = .03). Syncope (33.9% vs 11.7%; P < .001), congestive heart failure (19.7% vs 3.9%; P < .001), and stroke (11.3% vs 4.7%; P = .03) were more frequent presenting signs in group 1. Diabetes (10.2% vs 4.0%; P = .04), aortic aneurysm (29.5% vs 13.1%; P < .001), and prior cardiovascular surgery (48.1% vs 19.7%; P < .001) were also more common in group 1. In-hospital mortality was higher in group 1 (33.3% vs 23.2%; P = .05), especially due to type B dissection (limited to the descending aorta) (43.8% vs 10.4%; P < .001), and the prevalence of aortic rupture was higher among patients with type B dissection in group 1 (18.8% vs 5.9%; P = .04). CONCLUSION: Patients with painless AAD had syncope, congestive heart failure, or stroke. Compared with patients who have painful AAD, patients who have painless AAD have higher mortality, especially when AAD is type B.

Fever due to inflammation in acute aortic dissection: Description and proposals for diagnostic and therapeutic management.

Few studies have investigated fever secondary to underlying acute aortic dissection. A retrospective analysis of 59 patients was carried out. Diagnostic criteria for fever secondary to underlying aortic dissection were defined. Five patients had a clinical presentation consistent with inflammatory fever due to acute aortic dissection. The main features were: fever occurred within the first 48 hours, the variability in body temperature was significantly less than with infectious fever (P=.015), episodes of fever did not affect the patient's general clinical condition, microbiological tests gave negative results, there was no response to empirical antimicrobial treatment, and fever disappeared within 24 hours in those treated with indomethacin. In conclusion, fever due to acute aortic dissection has distinct characteristics that enable it to be distinguished from infectious fever. Good management of this condition should not involve unnecessary diagnostic tests, the inappropriate use of antimicrobials, or a delay in applying the therapeutic measures necessary to treat the underlying aortic dissection.

Fiebre inflamatoria por disección aguda de aorta: estudio descriptivo y propuesta de abordaje diagnóstico-terapéutico / Fever due to inflammation in acute aortic dissection: description and proposals for diagnostic and therapeutic management

La fiebre secundaria a la propia disección aguda de aorta ha sido poco estudiada. Se valoró retrospectivamente a 59 sujetos. Se definieron unos criterios diagnósticos de fiebre secundaria a la propia disección. Cinco pacientes presentaron clínica compatible con fiebre inflamatoria por disección aguda. Sus características fueron: fiebre en las primeras 48 horas; variabilidad de temperatura significativamente menor que en la fiebre de etiología infecciosa (p = 0,015); no afectación del estado general durante los episodios de fiebre; resultados microbiológicos negativos; ausencia de respuesta a antimicrobianos empíricos; desaparición de la fiebre en 24 horas en los tratados con indometacina. En conclusión, la fiebre por disección aguda de aorta presenta unas características que la hacen distinguible de la fiebre por infección. Un adecuado abordaje de esta patología podría evitar la realización de pruebas diagnósticas innecesarias, el uso inadecuado de antimicrobianos y el retraso de medidas terapéuticas que se pudieran precisar para la propia disección (AU)

Few studies have investigated fever secondary to underlying acute aortic dissection. A retrospective analysis of 59 patients was carried out. Diagnostic criteria for fever secondary to underlying aortic dissection were defined. Five patients had a clinical presentation consistent with inflammatory fever due to acute aortic dissection. The main features were: fever occurred within the first 48 hours, the variability in body temperature was significantly less than with infectious fever (P=.015), episodes of fever did not affect the patient’s general clinical condition, microbiological tests gave negative results, there was no response to empirical antimicrobial treatment, and fever disappeared within 24 hours in those treated with indomethacin. In conclusion, fever due to acute aortic dissection has distinct characteristics that enable it to be distinguished from infectious fever. Good management of this condition should not involve unnecessary diagnostic tests, the inappropriate use of antimicrobials, or a delay in applying the therapeutic measures necessary to treat the underlying aortic dissection (AU)

Bloqueo auriculoventricular completo transitorio tras traumatismo torácico cerrado / Transient Complete Atrioventricular Block Following a Nonpenetrating Chest Trauma

La contusión miocárdica puede ocasionar trastornos en la formación y en la propagación de los impulsos eléctricos en el sistema específico de conducción. La aparición de un bloqueo auriculoventricular completo transitorio tras un traumatismo torácico cerrado es una complicación poco frecuente. Se describe el caso de un paciente que tras sufrir un traumatismo torácico cerrado debido a un accidente de tráfico presentó, de manera transitoria, un bloqueo auriculoventricular completo y posteriormente un bloqueo de rama derecha con hemibloqueo anterior izquierdo. Se resalta la dificultad para el diagnóstico de contusión miocárdica y se discute la utilidad del estudio electrofisiológico para descartar la existencia de alteraciones basales del sistema específico de conducción (AU)