Simultaneous quantitation of urine aldosterone and tetrahydroaldosterone in healthy Chinese subjects using a validated LC-MS/MS method.

Aldosterone (ALD) is excreted in urine mainly as glucuronide conjugates of ALD and tetrahydroaldosterone. Measuring these urinary metabolites might be an alternative screening test to plasma ALD for primary aldosteronism. We report a validated LC-MS/MS method to measure both analytes simultaneously. Urine samples underwent enzymatic hydrolysis to release the analytes from their glucuronide conjugates followed by organic solvent extraction and LC-MS/MS. The analytical performance of this method was evaluated. The within-batch and between-batch coefficients of variation for urine ALD and urine THA were all ≤5.2 and ≤3.7%. The lower limit of quantification was 0.5 nmol/L, and the linearity was up to at least 2770 nmol/L for both analytes. No significant matrix interference and carryover were observed. Both analytes in urine were stable for at least 48 h at 10°C and at least 18 months at -80°C. Local reference intervals were established from 126 healthy normotensive Chinese subjects (53% women, age: 20-65 years). Reference intervals for urine ALD and tetrahydroaldosterone were 2-38 and 9-139 nmol/day, respectively. This validated method can be applied to screening and diagnosing primary aldosteronism.

Chinese normotensive and essential hypertensive reference intervals for plasma aldosterone and renin activity by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.

OBJECTIVES: The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) regulates blood pressure. Plasma renin activities (PRA) and plasma aldosterone concentrations (PAC) are biomarkers related to RAAS. Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS)-based measurements for PRA and PAC have become popular. Method-specific reference intervals (RIs) are required. METHODS: Routine PRA and PAC services in a Hong Kong teaching hospital were based on LC-MS/MS methods. PRA and PAC RIs were developed for normotensive subjects and essential hypertensive (EH) patients. Healthy volunteers were recruited to establish normotensive RIs. PRA and PAC results of hypertensive patients with urine aldosterone tests for primary aldosteronism (PA) screening were retrieved from the laboratory information system. Patients without PA were included. Patients with secondary hypertension and patients on medications affecting the RAAS were excluded. The central 95% RIs were established based on the recommendations of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guideline C28-A3. RESULTS: PRA and PAC of 170 normotensive volunteers and 362 EH patients were analysed. There was no sex-specific difference in PRA and PAC for normotensive and EH reference subjects. Differences for PRA and PAC were noted between normotensive subjects aged below 45 and their older counterparts. However, such a difference was only identified for PRA but not PAC in EH patients. Age-specific RIs were established accordingly. CONCLUSIONS: This study presented age-specific LC-MS/MS RIs of PRA and PAC for both normotensive and EH populations for local Chinese in Hong Kong.

Quantitation of plasma angiotensin II in healthy Chinese subjects by a validated liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry method.

Quantitation of plasma angiotensin (Ang) II, the active mediator of the renin-angiotensin system, is challenging owing to its low physiological concentration. We report a validated liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LCMS) method to overcome this challenge. Ang II was extracted from EDTA plasma by an offline solid-phase extraction procedure with a Waters MAX µElution plate. LCMS quantitation was performed on the Waters TQS system, monitoring the 3+ ions of the peptide. The analytical performance of the LCMS method was validated. The stability of Ang II was studied with or without the presence of a protease inhibitor. Local reference intervals were established from 143 healthy normotensive subjects (57% female, 21-60 years old). The Ang II LCMS method had a measurable range of 3.3-700 pmol/L. The between-batch precision coefficient of variation was <7% over Ang II concentrations of 8.6-110 pmol/L. No significant matrix interference and carryover were observed. There was no significant difference in Ang II concentration in EDTA blood and plasma for at least 2h and 1 h at room temperature, respectively. Ang II was stable for at least 1 year when stored at -80°C, with or without the protease inhibitor. Age-dependent Ang II reference intervals were established: 4.4-17.7 pmol/L (21-30 years) and 3.9-12.8 pmol/L (31-60 years). The present LCMS method is suitable for quantitation of plasma Ang II to study the renin-angiotensin system.

Influence of isotopically labeled internal standards on quantification of serum/plasma 17α-hydroxyprogesterone (17OHP) by liquid chromatography mass spectrometry.

Objectives Our recent survey of 44 mass spectrometry laboratories across 17 countries identified variation in internal standard (IS) choice for the measurement of serum/plasma 17α-hydroxyprogesterone (17OHP) by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). The choice of IS may contribute to inter-method variations. This study evaluated the effect of two common isotopically labeled IS on the quantification of 17OHP by LC-MS/MS. Methods Three collaborating LC-MS/MS laboratories from Asia, Europe and Australia, who routinely measure serum 17OHP, compared two IS, (1) IsoSciences carbon-13 labeled 17OHP-[2,3,4-13C3], and (2) IsoSciences deuterated 17OHP-[2,2,4,6,6,21,21,21-2H]. This was performed as part of their routine patient runs using their respective laboratory standard operating procedure. Results The three laboratories measured 99, 89, 95 independent samples, respectively (up to 100 nmol/L) using the 13C- and 2H-labeled IS. The slopes of the Passing-Bablok regression ranged 0.98-1.00 (all 95% confidence interval [CI] estimates included the line of identity), and intercept of <0.1 nmol/L. Average percentage differences of -0.04% to -5.4% were observed between the two IS materials, which were less than the optimal bias specification of 7% determined by biological variation, indicating no clinically significant difference. The results of 12 Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia Quality Assurance Programs (RCPAQAP) proficiency samples (1-40 nmol/L) measured by the laboratories were all within the RCPAQAP analytical performance specifications for both IS. Conclusions Overall, the comparison between the results of 13C- and 2H-labeled IS for 17OHP showed good agreement, and show no clinically significant bias when incorporated into the LC-MS/MS methods employed in the collaborating laboratories.