[Case report: Neuroleptic malignant syndrome and diagnostic difficulties]. / Syndrome malin des neuroleptiques et difficultés diagnostiques : à propos d'un cas.

BACKGROUND: Neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS) is an uncommon but potentially fatal adverse effect of neuroleptic drugs. It is commonly characterized by muscular rigidity, fever, altered mental status, and autonomic dysfunction. Emerging of NMS is possible with all neuroleptics, classic and atypical. NMS occurs most often during the first week of treatment or after increasing the dosage of the neuroleptic medication. The frequency of NMS ranges from 0.07 to 2.2%. Its pathophysiology is not clearly understood but the blockade of dopamine receptors appears to be the central mechanism. Issues of NMS are those of diagnosis, treatment and reintroduction of antipsychotic treatment or not. OBJECTIVE: We here present an interesting case because of its atypical clinical presentation and its slow resolution, illustrating the various problems linked to the NMS. CASE REPORT: A 55-year-old woman with a history of mental retardation and infantile psychosis is hospitalized for worsening of her psychiatric symptoms. She is treated by risperidone long-acting injection every 2weeks, escitalopram 20 mg/d and oxazepam 10 mg/d. Early December 2012, she had fever spikes treated with many antibiotics and neuroleptics were stopped, without improvement. Early January 2013, a pulmonary embolism was diagnosed, and a treatment with loxapine is introduced and her injection of risperidone is done because of the state of agitation of the patient. Two weeks later, a NMS is suspected to hyperthermia, tremor of the limbs, a slight stiffness, and neuroleptics are stopped. Dantrolene is then introduced, but after 7days of treatment the fever is still important. Other assumptions are then discussed: infection, serotonin syndrome, encephalopathy, catatonia, malignant hyperthermia. But diagnosis of NMS is finally retained because of the recurrence of symptoms after introduction of clozapine early February. DISCUSSION: In this patient, diagnosis was made more difficult by the use of long-acting neuroleptic. NMS was indeed partly rejected because of the lack of improvement despite 7 days of dantrolene treatment, but the release of risperidone lasts 7weeks after the injection. This NMS is also of atypical presentation with a minor muscular rigidity. And this case is particularly interesting because of the recurrence of NMS with clozapine, allowing to finally diagnose it. This atypical neuroleptic is not known to be a major provider of NMS but the very short period before reintroduction and possible persistence of risperidone in the body could explain the recurrence. CONCLUSION: NMS can be hard to diagnose. It is a diagnosis of exclusion, but we should keep in mind that there is great variability of its clinical presentation in order to not exclude too quickly this syndrome in a patient treated by neuroleptic.

[Lethal Lyell's syndrome induced by fusidic acid]. / Syndrome de Lyell à l'acide fusidique oral d'évolution fatale.

BACKGROUND: Herein, we report the first case of toxic epidermal necrosis due to oral fusidic acid having a fatal outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: An 82-year-old woman was referred to our dermatology department for generalized bullous skin eruption. Clinical examination showed fever, oral and ocular ulcerations, and epidermal detachment involving more than 70 % of her body surface area together with a positive Nikolsky sign. Lyell's syndrome was diagnosed. Cutaneous histology showed total epidermal necrosis and a normal dermis. Oral fusidic acid had been prescribed 12 days earlier for a chronic sacral pressure sore. No other treatment had been introduced during the previous two months. The outcome was fatal within 24 hours. DISCUSSION: Fusidic acid is commonly used topically by dermatologists for limited staphylococcal skin infections. Oral treatment is rare and is recommended only for skin, bone or joint infections. This is the first reported case of toxic epidermal necrolysis due to oral fusidic acid. The French national drug safety monitoring register contains only one case in which fusidic acid was a possible culprit. CONCLUSION: Fusidic acid must be considered a potential source of serious cutaneous adverse reactions, particularly toxic epidermal necrolysis.

[Pulmonary embolism by cyanoacrylate following embolisation of an arteriovenous malformation]. / Embolie pulmonaire de cyanoacrylate après embolisation d'une malformation artérioveineuse.

INTRODUCTION: Symptomatic complications can occur after intravascular injection of cyanoacrylate glue. We report a case of pulmonary embolism following embolisation of an arteriovenous malformation (AVM). CASE REPORT: A 46-year-old woman was found to have an internal iliac AVM which was obliterated using N-butyl-2 cyanoacrylate (NBCA) mixed with lipiodol. The early clinical course was uneventful. On the third post-operative day she complained of sudden, transient chest tightness. On admission one hour later the chest pain had disappeared. Physical examination was normal. A chest roentgenogram showed multiple, dense, branched opacities scattered throughout both lung fields which were confirmed on HRCT, suggesting diffuse scattered embolism of iodine- labelled NBCA. The radiological signs persisted 6 months later. CONCLUSION: Endovascular treatment of arteriovenous malformations with NBCA can be responsible for symptomatic pulmonary embolism. This is not detectable radiologically in the absence of contrast medium. Radiologists should be aware of these often asymptomatic, but sometimes fatal, embolic complications.

The PREGVAXGRIP study: a cohort study to assess foetal and neonatal consequences of in utero exposure to vaccination against A(H1N1)v2009 influenza.

BACKGROUND: In October 2009, in the context of an A(H1N1)v2009 influenza pandemic, a vaccination campaign was launched in France, in which one of the priority groups was pregnant women, on account of the high risk of developing complications following infection by this virus. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this multicentric, prospective, observational study was to assess safety and pregnancy outcomes in a cohort of pregnant women when receiving the A(H1N1)v2009 influenza pandemic vaccine. METHODS: This was a prospective study that followed up pregnant women recruited mainly in vaccination centres and maternity departments. Following the expected delivery date, follow-up data were collected concerning the delivery, the infant, and, if appropriate, the reasons why the pregnancy did not reach its term. RESULTS: Between 1 November 2009 and 31 March 2010, 2,415 pregnant women were included at the time of vaccination; 97.6 % of women received a vaccine without adjuvant and 2.4 % received an adjuvanted vaccine. Ninety-two (3.9 %) women were vaccinated during the first trimester of pregnancy, 1,090 (46.5 %) during the second trimester, and 1,162 (49.6 %) during the third trimester. One hundred and thirty-three adverse events (5.5 % of women) were reported, of which 12 were unexpected or serious. There were 2,246 (93.0 %) known pregnancy outcomes with 12 spontaneous abortions (0.5 %), 6 stillbirths (0.3 %), and 4 therapeutic abortions (0.2 %). There were 65 neonates with congenital anomalies, among which 31 were major. But only one congenital malformation (1.4 %) was reported for the 92 women vaccinated in their first trimester. Of the women, 93.3 % were delivered full term and 6.7 % preterm. For 96 (4.2 %) neonates, a disorder was reported in the neonatal period and 130 (5.6 %) were transferred to the neonatology department. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that exposure to the A(H1N1)v2009 pandemic influenza vaccine during pregnancy does not increase the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. However, because of the relatively small number of women exposed during the first trimester, other studies are needed to exclude an increased risk of malformation.