A multi-centre study on the performance of the molecular genotyping platform ID RHD XT for resolving serological weak RhD phenotype in routine clinical practice.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: There is concern regarding the lack of prevention of unnecessary transfusion of RhD negative red cells and unnecessary administration of Rh immunoglobulin (RhIG) to pregnant women. In this study, performance of ID RHD XT, a genotyping assay for identification of six RHD allelic variants and human platelet antigens HPA-1a/1b was assessed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Whole blood samples presenting weak, discrepant or inconclusive D phenotype results were genotyped with ID RHD XT and compared to reference molecular tests. Candidacy for RhIG prophylaxis was determined by analysing samples from pregnant women. Hands-on time to complete the procedures was measured. RESULTS: Overall, 167 samples were tested (55 donors, 56 patients, 52 pregnant women and four newborns). Agreement between ID RHD XT and the reference method was 100% (51% weak D type 1, 2 or 3; 35·5% weak D Types 1, 2 or 3 not detected; 4% RHD deletion; 1% RHD*Pseudogene; 1% RHD*DIIIa-CE(3-7)-D; and 4% no amplification variant detected for RHD genotype; and 64% HPA-1a/a; 30% HPA-1a/b; and 3% HPA-1b/b for HPA-1 genotype). Call rate was 98·2%. ID RHD XT identified 40% of the pregnant women that would not have required RhIG prophylaxis. Overall hands-on time was 25-45 min to process a batch of 24 samples, and four hours for total assay time. CONCLUSION: ID RHD XT yielded reproducible results for RHD typing in serologically weak D phenotype individuals. ID RHD XT was proven useful for the correct management of patients with RhD serological discrepancies and the rational use of RhIG in pregnancy.

Identification of six new RHCE variant alleles in individuals of diverse racial origin.

BACKGROUND: The introduction of molecular methods into routine blood typing is prompting the identification of new blood group alleles. Discrepancies between the results of genotyping and serology or chance events uncovered during genotyping prompted additional investigations, which revealed six new RHCE variant alleles. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Samples from eight blood donors, two patients (one prenatal), and a patient's relative, all of diverse racial origin, were analyzed by standard serology methods, targeted genotyping arrays, DNA sequencing, and allele-specific polymerase chain reaction. RESULTS: Six new RHCE alleles were identified, namely, RHCE*cE84A, RHCE*ce202G, RHCE*ce307T, RHCE*Ce377G, RHCE*ce697G,712G,733G,744C, and RHCE*Ce733G. CONCLUSION: While implementation of new assays in commercial genotyping platforms to detect the polymorphisms reported here may not be justified given their apparent rarity, software interpretative algorithms may benefit from the identification of new alleles for a more accurate determination of genotypes and prediction of phenotypes.

Prenatal screening service for fetal RHD genotyping to guide prophylaxis: the two-year experience of the Friuli Venezia Giulia region in Italy.

BACKGROUND: Fetal RHD genotyping of cell-free fetal DNA (cff-DNA) from RhD-negative pregnant women can be used to guide anti-D prophylaxis: the knowledge of fetal RhD type can direct and restrict the use of prenatal anti-D immunoglobulin exclusively to RhD-negative women carrying a RhD-positive fetus. Since November 2019 in the region of Friuli Venezia Giulia (Italy) a prenatal screening service has been offered to RhD-negative women at 22-24 weeks of gestation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The cff-DNA is extracted from a simple peripheral maternal blood sample to analyze the fetal RHD gene: the results are interpreted as RHD-positive fetus, RHD-negative fetus, or Inconclusive. The service is shared with all regional hospitals and tests are provided free of charge by the National Health System. RESULTS: Overall, 142 RhD-negative pregnant women were recruited in nearly 2 years. Fetal RHD genotyping was negative in 53 pregnancies and positive in 89 pregnancies. Thus, unnecessary treatment of pregnant women and exposure to a scarce plasma-derived medicinal product was avoided, by the use of a single blood sample, in 37.8% of cases, representing 100% of the RhD-negative women carrying a RhD-negative fetus in our cohort. DISCUSSION: The first Italian region-wide screening service for fetal RHD genotyping has been implemented for 2 years, despite the COVID-19 pandemic, in order to obtain the predicted fetal RhD phenotype before the 28th week of gestation, during which prenatal prophylaxis is usually administered. Giving prenatal anti-D immunoglobulin exclusively to RhD-negative women carrying a RhD-positive fetus reduces the overall use of anti-D immunoglobulin, which is becoming an ever more limited resource. The high sensitivity of the procedure provides evidence that the implementation of a diagnostic test in a reference laboratory guarantees the quality of the results, the concordance of reports and the sustainability of costs, representing an excellent guide to targeted use of prophylaxis.

An antivenin resistant, IVIg-corticosteroids responsive viper induced thrombocytopenia.

In this case report the hospital management of an acute, severe thrombocytopenia in a 57-year-old man in the north-east of Italy is reported. Thrombocytopenia developed immediately after the viper bite, despite the absence of clinical signs of envenomation. No hemorrhage, ecchymoses or other signs of coagulopathy developed during the hospitalization; two doses of antivenin FAB-Fragments had no effect on thrombocytopenia, which instead responded promptly to intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIg) and glucocorticoids. Direct and indirect anti-platelet antibodies against anti-GP IIb/IIIa and Ia/IIa were detected during the treatment and turned negative after 20 weeks. The rationale of such off-label treatment is the interpretation of the thrombocytopenia as a venom-induced immune thrombocytopenia which led to splenic sequestration of platelets. To our knowledge, there is no literature about venom-induced immune thrombocytopenia against GP IIb/IIIa and Ia/IIa protein in European countries and subsequent response to IVIg and corticosteroids.

Horiba Micros ES 60 Blood Cell Analyzer in Blood Donor Eligibility: A Validation Study.

Background: Eligibility criteria for blood donation require hemoglobin levels of ≥12.5 g/dL for women and ≥13.5 g/dL for men, and a platelet count of ≥180 × 109/L. Screening methods before donation should ensure high accuracy, precision, and ease in operation. We assessed the performance, precision, and repeatability of the Horiba Micros ES 60 (Horiba) compared to the Beckman Coulter DXH 800. Methods: Performance was compared by testing samples for each of the 11 devices across 6 sites in the Transfusion Service of Friuli Venezia Giulia Region, Italy. We measured precision by calculating the coefficient of variation (CV), concordance with ρ-Pearson's correlation coefficient, and accuracy with F-tests. The intra-assay agreement was examined in the 11 devices, and repeatability was performed by using CV and the Kruskal−Wallis test. Results: The precision of Horiba was acceptable. Overall, ρ-Pearson's coefficients indicated a strong correlation and positive relationship between all variables. The Bland−Altman plots showed that most of the differences lay within the limits of agreement. All CV were below the reference threshold for all the parameters. Finally, the Kruskal−Wallis test reported non-significant statistical differences for all parameters, except platelet count (p < 0.000). Conclusions: Horiba is adequate for routine pre-donation screening. The intra-assay agreement further demonstrates the accuracy of the device.

ABO antibody titres: a multisite comparative study of equivalency and reproducibility for automated solid-phase and haemagglutination titration, and manual dilution with gel column agglutination technology.

BACKGROUND: ABO antibody titres are important in many clinical decisions; however, much variability is observed in titre results. For reliable and reproducible titre results, automated ABO titration methods have been developed. In this 10-site study, we evaluated the equivalency of the automated ABO titration assays on the Galileo NEO, a fully automated blood bank analyzer (Immucor, Inc.) to manual titration with gel Column Agglutination Technology (CAT), as well as the reproducibility of both methods. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten different locations participated in this study. The equivalency study included 70 random samples at each site. The reproducibility study tested the same blinded 30-sample panel at each study site. Anti-A and anti-B IgM and IgG antibody titres were tested with both the automated and manual methods; additionally, dithiothreitol (DTT) treatment was used to inactivate IgM antibodies in the manual CAT method. RESULTS: The equivalency between CAT manual method and Galileo NEO automated titres at each site ranged from 38 to 88%; equivalency for each isotype was 66.2% for IgM, 60.6% for IgG, and 88.5% for DTT-treated IgG. The reproducibility study evaluated the titre variation of each sample obtained from the 10 sites. The average titre ranges (in doubling dilutions) for the automated and manual methods, respectively, were 2.15±1.0 and 4.03±1.8 for IgM, and 1.53±0.7 and 4.10±1.9 for IgG; for the manual DTT-treated IgG, the average titre range was 3.45±1.8 doubling dilutions. DISCUSSION: The results demonstrated that the Galileo NEO automated and manual CAT ABO titres are not equivalent. However, the study also demonstrated that titre reproducibility is enhanced with the Galileo NEO automated ABO titration assays relative to the manual CAT ABO titration method. Therefore, to improve management of patients receiving care across multiple institutions, our study supports the use of automated ABO titration.

A new HLA-B allele, HLA-B*35:481.

The novel allele HLA-B*35:481 differs from HLA-B*35:05:01 by two nucleotide substitution in exon 3.

Molecular RH blood group typing of serologically D-/CE+ donors: the use of a polymerase chain reaction-sequence-specific primer test kit with pooled samples.

The known presence of RHD blood group alleles in apparently D­ individuals who are positive for C or E antigens leads to an appropriate investigation for the RHD gene on the red blood cells (RBCs) of D­ blood donors, thus preventing their RBCs from immunizing D­ recipients. Ready-to-use polymerase chain reaction­sequence-specific primer (PCR-SSP) typing kits are available and allow single-sample results. The need to perform this testing on a large number of donors affiliated with the Transfusion Department of Udine (Northern Italy) led to the use of molecular genetic RH blood group typing with PCR-SSP test kits and DNA samples mixed in pools. From a population of 35,000 blood donors screened for D antigen by serologic typing, a total of 235 samples, distributed in pools of 5 DNA samples, were investigated. Positive results were reevaluated by opening the pools and retesting single samples. Validation of DNA-pool typing with commercial kits was done. Among 235 genotyped samples, 12 were found to be PCR positive (5.1%), exhibiting DEL genotype and RHD-CE-D hybrid alleles. Our data demonstrate that the use of a PCR-SSP commercial test kit with pooled samples is a helpful and valid method to correctly detect RHD alleles. As a consequence, we reclassified our donors as carriers of potentially immunogenic alleles.