RESUMO
Objective The aim of this study is to investigate the efficacy of using transcatheter aortic valve replacement(TAVR)with self-expanding valve(SEV)to treat patients with pure aortic regurgitation(PAR)and to understand the preliminary experience of such procedure.Methods A total of 20 PAR patients who underwent TAVR using the TaurusElite system at Wuhan Asia Heart Hospital and Wuhan Asia Heart Disease Hospital from April 2022 to May 2023 were included in the study.Patient baseline data,echocardiographic data,follow-up data during hospitalization and 30 days after the procedures were collected and analyzed.Results The mean age of the patients was(73.5±5.5)years,and the mean STS score was(8.7±3.6)％.16(16/20)cases had severe PAR before the procedure.After TAVR treatment,the success rate of the procedure was 20/20,with only 1 case of valve-in-valve(ⅥⅤ).The 30-day follow-up results showed that none of the 20 patients experienced death,disabling stroke,myocardial infarction,and conversion to surgery.The degree of residual PAR after the procedure was none or mild in all patients.The interventional outcome was ideal.Conclusions The preliminary experience shows that,with strict patient selection and standardized procedural steps,using TAVR with SEV to treat patients with PAR could have high feasibility and ideal early clinical outcomes and can potentially be popularized.Such experience will be further validated in future clinical trials.
RESUMO
Objectives: To explore the efficacy and safety of emergency transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Methods: Data of patients who underwent emergency TAVR in eight centers, namely Fuwai Hospital, Wuhan Asia Heart Hospital, Xijing Hospital, Union Hospital Affiliated to Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Zhongshan Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, the Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, between May 2017 and December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. The use of mechanical circulatory support system (MCS) and the results of laboratory tests (N-terminal B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP)) and echocardiography (mean aortic valve cross valve pressure difference and left ventricular ejection fraction) before and after operation were collected. The primary endpoint was all-cause death, and the secondary endpoints were stroke, major bleeding, major vascular complications, myocardial infarction, permanent pacemaker implantation, and acute renal injury. Device success was caculated, which refered to absence of procedural mortality and correct positioning of a single prosthetic heart valve into the proper anatomical location and intended performance of the prosthetic heart valve (mean aortic valve gradient<20 mmHg(1 mmHg=0.133 kPa) or peak velocity<3 m/s, with no moderate or severe prosthetic valve regurgitation). Kaplan-Meier survival curve was used to estimate the survival rate of patients during follow-up. Results: This study included 48 patients. The age was (72.5±8.1) years, and 34 patients were males (70.8%). Device success rate was 91.7% (44/48). The mean aortic valve transvalvular pressure was significantly decreased after operation ((12.3±6.4)mmHg vs. (60.2±23.8)mmHg, P<0.000 1). Left ventricular ejection fraction was significantly increased ((41.5±11.7)% vs. (31.0±11.3)%, P<0.000 1). NT-proBNP significantly decreased (3 492.0 (1 638.8, 7 165.5) ng/L vs. 12 418.5 (6 693.8, 35 000.0) ng/L, P<0.000 1). In-hospital all-cause mortality was 8.3% (4/48). During hospitalization, the rate of stroke was 2.1% (1/48), major bleeding was 6.3% (3/48), major vascular complications was 10.4% (5/48), myocardial infarction was 4.2% (2/48), permanent pacemaker implantation was 6.3% (3/48), and the rate of acute renal injury was 12.5% (6/48). MCS was used in 20 patients (41.7%). The median follow-up time was 196 days. During the follow-up, one patient died (due to systemic metastasis of pancreatic cancer), two cases suffered new myocardial infarction and one case received permanent pacemaker implantation. The survival rate of 30 days, 1 year and 2 years after the operation were 91.7% (44/48), 89.6% (43/48), 89.6% (43/48), respectively. Conclusion: Emergency TAVR may be a safe and effective treatment for patients with severe decompensated aortic valve stenosis.