Retransplanting a previously transplanted kidney: A safe strategy in times of organ shortage?

BACKGROUND: The shortage of organs for transplantation remains a global problem. The retransplantation of a previously transplanted kidney might be a possibility to expand the pool of donors. We provide our experience with the successful reuse of transplanted kidneys in the Eurotransplant region. METHODS: A query in the Eurotransplant database was performed between January 1, 1995 and December 31, 2015, to find kidney donors who themselves had previously received a kidney graft. RESULTS: Nine out of a total of 68,554 allocated kidneys had previously been transplanted. Four of these kidneys were transplanted once again. The mean interval between the first transplant and retransplantation was 1689±1682 days (SD; range 55-5,333 days). At the time of the first transplantation the mean serum creatinine of the donors was 1.0 mg/dl (.6-1.3 mg/dl) and at the second transplantation 1.4 mg/dl (.8-1.5 mg/dl). The mean graft survival in the first recipient was 50 months (2-110 months) and in the second recipient 111 months (40-215 months). CONCLUSION: Transplantation of a previously transplanted kidney may successfully be performed with well-preserved graft function and long-term graft survival, even if the first transplantation was performed a long time ago. Such organs should be considered even for younger recipients in carefully selected cases.

Surgical Therapy in Patients with Colorectal Liver Metastases.

BACKGROUND: Liver metastases (LM) occur in about 50% of patients with colorectal cancer. Besides the multimodal treatment of the primary tumor, the only way to cure patients with colorectal LM (CRLM) is complete resection. Different surgical procedures for this purpose are available depending on location, size, and number of LM. Additional concepts for patients with primary unresectable LM exist, ranging from Chemotherapy to induction of liver hypertrophy and even liver transplantation. This review intends to provide an overview of the surgical approach. SUMMARY: Surgical options in the treatment of CRLM are defined and limited by their intraparenchymal location and their proximity to major vessels and intrahepatic bile ducts. Lesions located in the periphery can be excised in a parenchymal sparing fashion with a small tumor-surrounding resection margin of healthy liver parenchyma. If this is not possible, anatomical resections based on segmental boundaries are performed. In these cases, a sufficient functional volume of liver parenchyma after resection (future liver remnant volume [FLRV]) has to be preserved. This FLRV depends on various factors such as bodyweight and possible preexisting liver damage, such as cirrhosis, fibrosis, or chemotherapy-induced liver impairment. Liver hypertrophy via partial occlusion of the portal venous system is a standard procedure for patients with primary unresectable LM to increase FLRV. Furthermore, discussion of liver transplantation in cases of unresectable LM is gaining importance again. A combination of surgery and adjuvant and/or neoadjuvant chemotherapy may be indicated in individual cases, but general evidence-based recommendations cannot be given without further studies. KEY MESSAGES: Surgical removal of all metastases represents the only option of a potentially curative treatment of UICC stage IV colorectal carcinoma with liver involvement. An interdisciplinary approach consisting of chemotherapeutical downsizing and hypertrophy of the FLRV offers potential curative treatment for patients with initially unresectable metastases. For all others, liver transplantation is seeing a revival showing promising results in overall survival compared to chemotherapy alone.

Liver transplantation for combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma: Outcomes and prognostic factors for mortality. A multicenter analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma is rare and comprises features of hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma. The treatment of choice has not yet been defined. The aim of the study was to analyze outcomes of patients with combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma, who underwent liver transplantation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: All patients with combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma, who underwent liver transplantation, from January 2001 to August 2018 were identified. Pre-, intra- and postoperative data were retrospectively assessed. A univariate analysis was performed to identify prognostic factors. RESULTS: A total number of 19 patients were included to this study. Perioperative death was seen in two patients (10.5%). Recurrent disease was reported in 11 patients (64.7%) within the median time of 4 months. One and three years survival rates were 57.1% (CI 0.301-1) and 38.1% (CI 0.137-1). Factors associated mortality were tumor size >3 cm, presence of lymphatic invasion, and prolonged ICU stay. Patients with mixed HCC-CC lesions have significantly better survival compared to patients with separate lesions of HCC and CCC in one liver (p = .025). CONCLUSION: Although overall survival rates are clearly decreased compared to HCC patients, liver transplantation should be taken under consideration for selected patients with early stage and real mixed HCC-CC, who are likely to benefit from liver transplantation.

Donor Dopamine Does Not Affect Liver Graft Survival: Evidence of Safety From a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Treatment of donation after brain death (DBD) donors with low-dose dopamine improves the outcomes after kidney and heart transplantation. This study investigates the course of liver allografts from multiorgan donors enrolled in the randomized dopamine trial between 2004 and 2007 (clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT00115115). There were 264 hemodynamically stable DBDs who were randomly assigned to receive low-dose dopamine. Dopamine was infused at 4 µg/kg/minute for a median duration of 6.0 hours (interquartile range, 4.4-7.5 hours). We assessed the outcomes of 212 liver transplantations (LTs) performed at 32 European centers. Donors and recipients of both groups were very similar in baseline characteristics. Pretransplant laboratory Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score was not different in recipients of a dopamine-treated versus untreated graft (18 ± 8 versus 20 ± 8; P = 0.12). Mean cold ischemia time was 10.6 ± 2.9 versus 10.1 ± 2.8 hours (P = 0.24). No differences occurred in biopsy-proven rejection episodes (14.4% versus 15.7%; P = 0.85), requirement of hemofiltration (27.9% versus 31.5%; P = 0.65), the need for early retransplantation (5.8% versus 6.5%; P > 0.99), the incidence of primary nonfunction (7.7% versus 8.3%; P > 0.99), and in-hospital mortality (15.4% versus 14.8%; P > 0.99). Graft survival was 71.2% versus 73.2% and 59.6% versus 62.0% at 2 and 3 years (log-rank P = 0.71). Patient survival was 76.0% versus 78.7% and 65.4% versus 69.4% at 1 and 3 years (log-rank P = 0.50). In conclusion, donor pretreatment with dopamine has no short-term or longterm effects on outcome after LT. Therefore, low-dose dopamine pretreatment can safely be implemented as the standard of care in hemodynamically stable DBDs.

High-urgency kidney transplantation in the Eurotransplant Kidney Allocation System: success or waste of organs? The Eurotransplant 15-year all-centre survey.

BACKGROUND: In the Eurotransplant Kidney Allocation System (ETKAS), transplant candidates can be considered for high-urgency (HU) status in case of life-threatening inability to undergo renal replacement therapy. Data on the outcomes of HU transplantation are sparse and the benefit is controversial. METHODS: We systematically analysed data from 898 ET HU kidney transplant recipients from 61 transplant centres between 1996 and 2010 and investigated the 5-year patient and graft outcomes and differences between relevant subgroups. RESULTS: Kidney recipients with an HU status were younger (median 43 versus 55 years) and spent less time on the waiting list compared with non-HU recipients (34 versus 54 months). They received grafts with significantly more mismatches (mean 3.79 versus 2.42; P < 0.001) and the percentage of retransplantations was remarkably higher (37.5 versus 16.7%). Patient survival (P = 0.0053) and death with a functioning graft (DwFG; P < 0.0001) after HU transplantation were significantly worse than in non-HU recipients, whereas graft outcome was comparable (P = 0.094). Analysis according to the different HU indications revealed that recipients listed HU because of an imminent lack of access for dialysis had a significantly worse patient survival (P = 0.0053) and DwFG (P = 0.0462) compared with recipients with psychological problems and suicidality because of dialysis. In addition, retransplantation had a negative impact on patient and graft outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Facing organ shortages, increasing wait times and considerable mortality on dialysis, we question the current policy of HU allocation and propose more restrictive criteria with regard to individuals with vascular complications or repeated retransplantations in order to support patients on the non-HU waiting list with a much better long-term prognosis.

Perioperative LiMAx Test Analysis: Impact of Portal Vein Embolisation, Chemotherapy and Major Liver Resection.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative liver failure (PLF) is a severe complication after major liver resection (MLR). To increase the safety of patients, clinical bedside tests are of great importance. However, limitations of their applicability and validity impair their value. METHODS: Preoperative measurements of the liver maximum capacity (LiMAx) were performed in n = 40 patients, who underwent MLR (≥3 segments). Matched postoperative LiMAx was measured in n = 21 patients. Liver function was compared between pretreated patients (n = 11 with portal vein embolisation (PVE) and n = 19 patients with preoperative chemotherapy) and therapy naïve patients. The LiMAx values were compared with liver-specific blood parameters and volumetric analysis. RESULTS: In total, n = 40 patients were enrolled in this study. The majority of patients (n = 33; 82.5%) had high preoperative LiMAx values (>315 µg/kg/h), while only seven patients (17.5%) had medium values (140-315 µg/kg/h), and none of the patients had low values (<140 µg/kg/h). A comparison of pretreated patients (with PVE and/or chemotherapy) and therapy naïve patients showed no significant difference in the preoperative LiMAx values (p > 0.05). The preoperative LiMAx values were significantly higher than the matched postoperative values on postoperative day 1 (p < 0.0001). A comparison between the expected and measured postoperative LiMAx showed a difference (≥10%) in 7 out of 13 patients (53.8%). After an initial postoperative decrease in the LiMAx, the patients without complications (n = 12) showed a continuous increase until 14 days after surgery. In the patients with postoperative complications, a decrease in the LiMAx was associated with a prolonged recovery. CONCLUSIONS: For patients undergoing MLR within the 0.5% rule, which is the clinical gold standard, the LiMAx values do not offer any additional information. Additionally, the LiMAx may have reflected liver function, but it did not deliver additional information regarding postoperative liver recovery. The clinical use of LiMAx might be relevant in selected patients beyond the 0.5% rule.

Reperfusion of liver graft during transplantation: techniques used in transplant centres within Eurotransplant and meta-analysis of the literature.

It remains unclear which liver graft reperfusion technique leads to the best outcome following transplantation. An online survey was sent to all transplant centres (n = 37) within Eurotransplant (ET) to collect information on their technique used for reperfusion of liver grafts. Furthermore, a systematic review of all literature was performed and a meta-analysis was conducted based on patients' mortality, number of retransplantations and incidence of biliary complications, depending on the technique used. Of the 28 evaluated centres, 11 (39%) reported performing simultaneous reperfusion (SIMR), 13 (46%) perform initial portal vein reperfusion (IPR), 1 (4%) performs an initial hepatic artery reperfusion (IAR) and 3 (11%) perform retrograde reperfusion (RETR). In 21 centres (75%), one reperfusion technique is used as a standard, but in only one centre is this decision based on available literature. Twenty centres (71%) said they would agree to participate in randomized controlled trials (RCT) if required. For meta-analysis, IAR vs. IPR, SIMR vs. IPR and RETR vs. IPR were compared. There was no difference between any of the techniques compared. There is no consensus on a preferable reperfusion technique. Available evidence does not help in the decision-making process. There is thus an urgent need for multicentric RCTs.

Ischemic Reperfusion Injury After Liver Transplantation: Is There a Place for Conservative Management?

Ischemic reperfusion injury (IRI) after liver transplantation is a common cause of early allograft dysfunction with high mortality. The purpose of this case report series is to highlight an unusual clinical course in which complete recovery can occur following the identification of severe hepatic IRI post-transplantation and the implications of this finding on management strategies in patients with IRI post-transplant. Here, we include three cases of severe IRI following liver transplantation that are putatively resolved without retransplantation or definitive therapeutic intervention. All patients recovered until their final follow-up visits to our institution and developed no significant complications from their injury throughout the course of patient care by our institution after discharge from the hospital.

Right portal vein ligation combined with in situ splitting induces rapid left lateral liver lobe hypertrophy enabling 2-staged extended right hepatic resection in small-for-size settings.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a new 2-step technique for obtaining adequate but short-term parenchymal hypertrophy in oncologic patients requiring extended right hepatic resection with limited functional reserve. BACKGROUND: Patients presenting with primary or metastatic liver tumors often face the dilemma that the remaining liver tissue may not be sufficient. Preoperative portal vein embolization has thus far been established as the standard procedure for achieving resectability. METHODS: Two-staged hepatectomy was performed in patients who preoperatively appeared to be marginally resectable but had a tumor-free left lateral lobe. Marginal respectability was defined as a left lateral lobe to body weight ratio of less than 0.5. In the first step, surgical exploration, right portal vein ligation (PVL), and in situ splitting (ISS) of the liver parenchyma along the falciform ligament were performed. Computed tomographic volumetry was performed before ISS and before completion surgery. RESULTS: The study included 25 patients with primary liver tumors (hepatocellular carcinoma: n = 3, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: n = 2, extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: n = 2, malignant epithelioid hemangioendothelioma: n = 1, gallbladder cancer: n = 1 or metastatic disease [colorectal liver metastasis]: n = 14, ovarian cancer: n = 1, gastric cancer: n = 1). Preoperative CT volumetry of the left lateral lobe showed 310 mL in median (range = 197-444 mL). After a median waiting period of 9 days (range = 5-28 days), the volume of the left lateral lobe had increased to 536 mL (range = 273-881 mL), representing a median volume increase of 74% (range = 21%-192%) (P < 0.001). The median left lateral liver lobe to body weight ratio was increased from 0.38% (range = 0.25%-0.49%) to 0.61% (range = 0.35-0.95). Ten of 25 patients (40%) required biliary reconstruction with hepaticojejunostomy. Rapid perioperative recovery was reflected by normalization of International normalized ratio (INR) (80% of patients), creatinine (84% of patients), nearly normal bilirubin (56% of patients), and albumin (64% of patients) values by day 14 after completion surgery. Perioperative morbidity was classified according to the Dindo-Clavien classification of surgical complications: grade I (12 events), grade II (13 events), grade III (14 events, III a: 6 events, III b: 8 events), grade IV (8 events, IV a: 3 events, IV b: 5 events), and grade V (3 events). Sixteen patients (68%) experienced perioperative complications. Follow-up was 180 days in median (range: 60-776 days) with an estimated overall survival of 86% at 6 months after resection. CONCLUSIONS: Two-step hepatic resection performing surgical exploration, PVL, and ISS results in a marked and rapid hypertrophy of functional liver tissue and enables curative resection of marginally resectable liver tumors or metastases in patients that might otherwise be regarded as palliative.

Interleukin 2 receptor antagonists for liver transplant recipients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled studies.

UNLABELLED: Interleukin 2 receptor antagonists (IL-2Ra) are frequently used as induction therapy in liver transplant recipients to decrease the risk of acute rejection while allowing the reduction of concomitant immunosuppression. We conducted a systematic review of prospective, controlled studies to test the hypothesis that the use of IL-2Ra is associated with a decrease in acute rejection and/or a decrease in the side effects of concomitant medication. We performed a search of all major databases and secondary sources from inception to December 2010. Random effects models were used to assess the incidence of acute rejection, graft loss, patient death, and adverse side effects, with or without IL-2Ra. Subgroup analysis and meta-regression were used to explore differences in effect and sources of heterogeneity. Eighteen studies (13 randomized and 5 nonrandomized) met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Acute rejection at 12 months or later favored the use of IL-2Ra (relative risk [RR] 0.83; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.76-0.94) and steroid-resistant rejection was also less frequent in patients receiving IL-2Ra (RR 0.66; CI 0.48-0.91). Graft loss and patient death did not differ significantly between treatments. Patients who received IL-2Ra in addition to reduced or delayed calcineurin inhibitors had better renal function (mean difference of estimated glomerular filtration rate: 6.29 mL/min; CI 1.66-10.91) and a lower incidence of renal dysfunction (RR 0.46; CI 0.27-0.78). The use of IL-2Ra was also associated with a lower incidence of posttransplant diabetes mellitus, whereas the incidence of other adverse events was similar. CONCLUSION: The use of IL-2Ra is associated with a lower incidence of acute rejection after transplantation. Concomitant immunosuppression can be reduced, avoiding long-term side effects of immunosuppression.

Liver transplantation in patients with liver cirrhosis and active pneumonia: an observational study.

Patients with chronic liver disease are at high risk for severe infection because of increased bacterial translocation and immune suppression associated with liver dysfunction. Patients presenting with severe pneumonia and acute decompensation of cirrhosis are generally not considered for liver transplantation because it is unknown if these patients can recover from infection while under immunosuppression. We performed an observational study where patients with cirrhosis of the liver remained on the waiting list, although suffering from active pneumonia. Nine patients were included, but only six patients improved under goal-directed therapy and subsequently underwent liver transplantation. All six patients recovered quickly from infection; five patients recovered without sequelae and one patient died because of late complications. We propose that in patients with chronic liver disease and active pneumonia transplantation is a treatment option that should not hastily be abandoned.

Posterior cavoplasty: a new approach to avoid venous outflow obstruction and symptoms for small-for-size syndrome in right lobe living donor liver transplantation.

PURPOSE: A common and serious problem after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) of small grafts is small-for-size syndrome (SFSS). Although hyperdynamic portal inflow and portal hypertension are cornerstones in the development of SFSS, inadequate outflow may aggravate SFSS. Therefore, enlargement of the portal outflow tract by incision of the anterior rim of the orifice of the right hepatic vein (RHV) has been advocated for right lobe LDLT. But backwards tilt of a small graft into a large abdominal cavity may lead to a choking of the otherwise large anastomosis and thus we propose posterior enlargement of the orifice of the RHV. METHOD: In this test-of-concept study, we evaluated portal vein pressure (PVP), clinical parameters, and laboratory measurements in 22 patients that underwent right lobe LDLT and either received standard end-to-end anastomosis of the RHV or posterior cavoplasty. RESULTS: In patients that underwent posterior cavoplasty, we observed significantly lower PVP and less hyperbilirubinemia. There was a non-significant trend to lower incidence of SFSS. Other laboratory measurements and clinical parameters were not significantly different. CONCLUSION: We recommend posterior cavoplasty for enlargement of the hepatic venous outflow tract in right lobe LDLT as a method to avoid portal hypertension, hyperbilirubinemia, and possibly SFSS, especially in patients that receive small grafts.

Fourteen-year survival of a renal graft reused 2 years after initial transplantation: a case report.

We report on the successful regrafting of a transplanted kidney. The donor kidney was first transplanted into a 32-year-old patient with renal atrophy. More than 2 years later, he suffered from severe grand mal seizure with brain edema and the patient met the criteria for brain death. The well-functioning graft was recovered and subsequently transplanted into a 66-year-old woman with chronic glomerular nephritis. Neither the first nor the second recipient experienced any acute rejection. To date, more than 14 years later, she is in good health with excellent graft function. This case report implies that excellent long-term graft function is viable in a graft reused 2 years after the initial transplantation.

Multimodal treatment options for bilobar colorectal liver metastases.

PURPOSE: We evaluated individualized multimodal oncological strategies in patients with bilobular colorectal liver metastases (biCRC-LM) as well as their effect on R0 resection rates, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS). METHODS: Between January 2001 and December 2008, 64 patients were assigned to straightforward or two-stage liver resection +/- preoperative 5-fluorouracil (5FU)-based chemotherapy (CTx). Postoperative strategy after R0-resection was either "wait and see" or "adjuvant" therapy (3 cycles of CTx or anti-carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA)-radioimmunotherapy with (131)I-labetuzumab in a dose of 40-50 mCi/m(2)). RESULTS: Forty-three initially unresectable patients received preoperative CTx for downsizing of their biCRC-LM. Straightforward or two-stage liver resection was intended in 40 and 24 patients, respectively. Histopathologically confirmed R0-liver resection could be achieved in 47 patients. Surgical morbidity and mortality rates were 33% and 1.5%, respectively. Postoperatively, 26 patients received anti-cancer therapy (5 x CTx, 21 x anti-CEA-radioimmunotherapy). After R0-liver resection, median OS was significantly better compared to R1/R2 resections followed by palliative 5FU-CTx (38 versus 19 months, p = 0.035). There was no significant difference in DFS (p = 0.650) and OS (p = 0.435) between straightforward and two-stage liver resection. Compared to "wait and see" strategy, the application of postoperative therapy in adjuvant intent was associated with a better OS (p = 0.048). CONCLUSION: Extensive liver resection within multimodal treatment concepts is justified in patients with biCRC-LM when complete resection of all metastases seems to be achievable.

A therapeutic exploratory study to determine the efficacy and safety of calcineurin-inhibitor-free de-novo immunosuppression after liver transplantation: CILT.

BACKGROUND: Immunosuppression with calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) increases the risk of renal dysfunction after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). Controlled trials have shown improvement of renal function in patients that received delayed and/or reduced-dose CNI after OLT. Delaying immunosuppression with CNI in combination with induction therapy does not increase the risk of acute rejection but reduces the incidence of acute renal dysfunction. Based on this clinical data this study protocol was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of calcineurin-inhibitor-free de-novo immunosuppression after liver transplantation. METHODS/DESIGN: A prospective therapeutic exploratory, non-placebo controlled, two stage monocenter trial in a total of 29 liver transplant patients was designed to assess the safety and efficacy of de-novo CNI-free immunosuppression with basiliximab, mycophenolate sodium, prednisolone and everolimus. The primary endpoint is the rate of steroid resistant rejections. Secondary endpoints are the incidence of acute rejection, kidney function (assessed by incidence and duration of renal replacement therapy, incidence of chronic renal failure, and measurement glomerular filtration rate), liver allograft function (assessed by measurement of AST, ALT, total bilirubin, AP, GGT), treatment failure, (i. e., re-introduction of CNI), incidence of adverse events, and mortality up to one year after OLT. DISCUSSION: This prospective, two-stage, single-group pilot study represents an intermediate element of the research chain. If the data of the phase II study corroborates safety of de-novo CNI-free immunosuppressive regimen this should be confirmed in a randomized, prospective, controlled double-blinded clinical trial. The exploratory data from this trial may then also facilitate the design (e. g. sample size calculation) of this phase III trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT00890253 (clinicaltrials.gov).

Acute paranoid psychosis as sole clinical presentation of hepatic artery thrombosis after living donor liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Hepatic artery thrombosis is a devastating complication after orthotopic liver transplantation often requiring revascularization or re-transplantation. It is associated with considerably increased morbidity and mortality. Acute cognitive dysfunction such as delirium or acute psychosis may occur after major surgery and may be associated with the advent of surgical complications. CASE PRESENTATION: Here we describe a case of hepatic artery thrombosis after living-donor liver transplantation which was not preceded by signs of liver failure but rather by an episode of acute psychosis. After re-transplantation the patient recovered without sequelae. CONCLUSION: This case highlights the need to remain cautious when psychiatric disorders occur in patients after liver transplantation. The diagnostic procedures should not be restricted to medical or neurological causes of psychosis alone but should also focus vascular complications related to orthotopic liver transplantation.

Thrombolysis in Postoperative Pulmonary Embolism Following Liver Transplantation: A Case Report.

BACKGROUND Postoperative pulmonary embolism following liver transplantations is still one of the most fatal complications, especially during the early postoperative phase. The use of a thrombolytic agent such as the recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (rtPA) is considered a contraindication early after major abdominal surgery such as liver transplantation. However, thrombolysis after major surgery in the early postoperative period carries a substantial risk of surgical site hemorrhage. CASE REPORT A 55-year-old patient presented with a hepatic mass diagnosed as a combined cholangio/hepatocellular carcinoma. Following the criteria of the University of San Francisco, California (UCSF) for liver transplantation, the case was selected for liver transplantation. The patient received neoadjuvant therapy. After the liver transplantation, on the second postoperative day, an acute, severe dyspnea with sudden onset occurred on the surgical ward. A computed tomography angiography showed a drawn-out embolus, which sprawled into both pulmonary main arteries and occluded them subtotally. A thrombolysis with rtPA was started. Within the first 60 minutes of administration of rtPA, the circulation stabilized effectively, so that epinephrine could be tapered down to zero and the patient was promptly extubated. About 6 hours after administration of rtPA, a sudden and pronounced bleeding via one of the intraperitoneal drains occurred, hemoglobin concentration dropped from 9.7 g/dL to 6.4 g/dL. After immediate re-laparotomy, circulation and hemoglobin concentration were absolutely stable. CONCLUSIONS Even with anticipated high risk of bleeding, thrombolysis with rtPA can be used as a life-savings treatment in a case of pulmonary embolism after liver transplantation.

Prevention and Management of CMV Infections after Liver Transplantation: Current Practice in German Transplant Centers.

Human cytomegalovirus (CMV) remains a major cause of mortality and morbidity in human liver transplant recipients. Anti-CMV therapeutics can be used to prevent or treat CMV in liver transplant recipients, but their toxicity needs to be balanced against the benefits. The choice of prevention strategy (prophylaxis or preemptive treatment) depends on the donor/recipient sero-status but may vary between institutions. We conducted a series of consultations and roundtable discussions with German liver transplant center representatives. Based on 20 out of 22 centers, we herein summarize the current approaches to CMV prevention and treatment in the context of liver transplantation in Germany. In 90% of centers, transient prophylaxis with ganciclovir or valganciclovir was standard of care in high-risk (donor CMV positive, recipient CMV naive) settings, while preemptive therapy (based on CMV viremia detected during (bi) weekly PCR testing for circulating CMV-DNA) was preferred in moderate- and low-risk settings. Duration of prophylaxis or intense surveillance was 3-6 months. In the case of CMV infection, immunosuppression was adapted. In most centers, antiviral treatment was initiated based on PCR results (median threshold value of 1000 copies/mL) with or without symptoms. Therefore, German transplant centers report similar approaches to the prevention and management of CMV infection in liver transplantation.

Accuracy of Pretransplant Imaging Diagnostic for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Retrospective German Multicenter Study.

Selection and prioritization of patients with HCC for LT are based on pretransplant imaging diagnostic, taking the risk of incorrect diagnosis. According to the German waitlist guidelines, imaging has to be reported to the allocation organization (Eurotransplant) and pathology reports have to be submitted thereafter. In order to assess current procedures we performed a retrospective multicenter analysis in all German transplant centers with focus on accuracy of imaging diagnostic and tumor classification. 1168 primary LT for HCC were conducted between 2007 and 2013 in Germany. Patients inside the Milan, UCSF, and up-to-seven criteria were misclassified with definitive histologic results in 18%, 15%, and 11%, respectively. Patients pretransplant outside the Milan, UCSF, and up-to-seven criteria were otherwise misclassified in 34%, 43%, and 41%. Recurrence-free survival correlated with classification by posttransplant histological report, but not pretransplant imaging diagnostic. Univariate analysis revealed tumor size, vascular invasion, and grading as significant parameters for outcome, while tumor grading was the only parameter persisting by multivariate testing. Conclusion. There was a relevant percentage (15-40%) of patients misclassified by imaging diagnosis at a time prior to LI-RADS and guidelines to improve imaging of HCC. Outcome analysis showed a good correlation to histological, in contrast poor correlation to imaging diagnosis, suggesting an adjustment of the LT selection and prioritization criteria.

Altered regulation of Prox1-gene-expression in liver tumors.

BACKGROUND: Prospero-related homeobox 1 (Prox1) transcription factor was described as a tumor-suppressor gene in liver tumors. In contrast, Prox1 knock out in murine embryos drastically reduces proliferation of hepatoblasts. METHODS: We have studied the expression of Prox1 in normal liver, liver cirrhosis and peritumoral liver samples in comparison to hepatocellular (HCC) and cholangiocellular carcinoma (CCC) at mRNA, protein and functional levels. RESULTS: Prox1 was found in hepatocytes of normal liver, while normal bile duct epithelial cells were negative. However, Prox1+ cells, which co-expressed biliary epithelial makers and showed ductular morphology, could be detected within fibrotic septa of cirrhotic livers, and in both HCC and CCC. Two Prox1 mRNA isoforms (2.9 kb and 7.9 kb) were identified with a prevalence of the longer isoform in several HCC samples and the shorter in most CCC samples. Evidence was provided that Myc-associated zinc finger protein (MAZ) might significantly contribute to the gene expression of Prox1 in HCC, while neo-expression of Prox1 in CCC remains to be resolved. A point mutation in the prospero domain of Prox1 was found in one HCC sample. CONCLUSION: Our study shows dysregulation of Prox1 in liver cirrhosis, HCC and CCC, such as neo-expression in cells with biliary epithelial phenotype in liver cirrhosis, and in CCC. Altered Prox1 mRNA expression is partly regulated by MAZ, and mutation of the prospero domain in HCC indicates an involvement for Prox1 during tumor progression.