Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
J Viral Hepat ; 26(11): 1301-1310, 2019 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31299127

RESUMO

A community-based public health facility in Sydney, Australia, the Kirketon Road Centre (KRC), provides health care to people who inject drugs (PWID), homeless and other marginalized people. Since March 2016, KRC has provided treatment for chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) with direct-acting antivirals (DAAs). We aimed to evaluate treatment adherence amongst clients taking DAAs in a highly marginalized population. All clients who commenced DAA therapy prior to March 2018 at KRC were included in this observational cohort with a subset of clients attending daily or weekly for enhanced adherence support and dosing. Demographic, behavioural, clinical measures and medication dosing were recorded, and adherence was calculated as the proportion of doses taken during the expected treatment duration. Factors associated with adherence were examined using logistic regression. A total of 242 individuals commenced DAA therapy, of whom 79 (32%) received enhanced adherence support. Enhanced support was associated with homelessness, daily injecting, Aboriginality, mental health co-morbidity and poly-drug use (all P < .001). Overall adherence was 86%, and 92% of patients missed one or more doses (median 10, IQR 4-24). At least 90% adherence during planned duration was seen in 38%, but increased to 66% by continuing therapy beyond planned duration. Intention-to-treat SVR12 was 68% and 66% in the enhanced adherence support sub-population, with 29% lost to follow-up by SVR12 testing. There were only 2 (0.8%) documented virological failures. Per-protocol SVR12 was 99% and 96% in the enhanced adherence support sub-population. In conclusion, adherence support may benefit those with multiple markers of marginalization. Extension of therapy beyond planned duration is a pragmatic strategy to enhance completion. Strategies to improve follow-up, particularly post-treatment are required.


Assuntos
Usuários de Drogas , Hepatite C/complicações , Hepatite C/epidemiologia , Cuidados Paliativos , Abuso de Substâncias por Via Intravenosa/complicações , Abuso de Substâncias por Via Intravenosa/epidemiologia , Cooperação e Adesão ao Tratamento , Adulto , Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Hepatite C/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação de Resultados da Assistência ao Paciente , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Resposta Viral Sustentada
2.
Drug Alcohol Rev ; 38(2): 185-189, 2019 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30761640

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION AND AIMS: To maximise the benefits of direct acting antivirals in Australia, innovative options for marginalised populations to receive daily or weekly medication may be beneficial. This study evaluated the feasibility and acceptability of direct acting antivirals provision by leveraging an opioid agonist treatment program to support adherence regardless of opioid agonist treatment enrolment. DESIGN AND METHODS: Feasibility was evaluated by monitoring selection of dosing options by clients initiating direct acting antivirals during the first 6 months. Client acceptability was assessed using a cross-sectional survey after 6 months. Pre- and post-implementation surveys of attitudes and concerns regarding the program were compared to evaluate staff acceptability. RESULTS: Among 79 clients commencing direct acting antivirals, 30 (38%) chose adherence support. Among these, 12 (40%) were not simultaneously enrolled in opioid agonist treatment. Clients were satisfied with service provision and access despite introducing daily dosing. All highly marginalised clients receiving direct acting antivirals with adherence support found this helpful. Staff concerns identified prior to the program proved unfounded. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates providing adherence support for direct acting antivirals regardless of client participation in opioid agonist treatment is both feasible and acceptable with minimal impact on service provision. Availability of direct acting antivirals in opioid agonist treatment or primary health-care settings expands the pool of people who may receive effective treatment for hepatitis C virus and reduces treatment barriers.


Assuntos
Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Hepatite C/tratamento farmacológico , Adesão à Medicação , Tratamento de Substituição de Opiáceos/métodos , Abuso de Substâncias por Via Intravenosa/tratamento farmacológico , Abuso de Substâncias por Via Intravenosa/virologia , Adulto , Estudos Transversais , Usuários de Drogas , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Hepacivirus/isolamento & purificação , Hepatite C/virologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Inquéritos e Questionários , Cooperação e Adesão ao Tratamento
3.
Int J Drug Policy ; 47: 209-215, 2017 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28587943

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The Kirketon Road Centre (KRC) is a community-based public health facility in Sydney, Australia, that provides healthcare to people who inject drugs (PWID), including hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment. From March 2016, the Australian Government has provided access to direct-acting antivirals (DAA) for adults with chronic HCV, without liver disease stage or drug and alcohol use restrictions. The aim of this study was to report DAA treatment outcomes among highly marginalised PWID treated at KRC. METHODS: All individuals initiating DAA treatment at KRC and due for sustained virological response (SVR12) testing by end 2016 were included. Demographic, drug use behaviour, clinical parameters, adherence support and HCV treatment outcomes, including SVR12 were recorded. Factors associated with SVR12, loss-to-follow-up (LTFU) and delayed SVR12 testing (>SVR16) were assessed by multivariate analysis. SVR12 was assessed by intention-to-treat (ITT) and modified ITT, the latter excluding individuals with an end-of-treatment response (ETR) but no SVR12 assessment, or who postponed their SVR12 date due to treatment interruption. RESULTS: A total of 72 individuals commencing DAAs were included, of whom 67% were male, 30% homeless, and 32% Aboriginal. All had a lifetime history of injecting drug use, with 75% having injected within the last six months, and 44% injecting at least weekly; 25% were also enrolled in opioid substitution therapy. Twenty-five (35%) individuals elected to receive an enhanced adherence-support package. Fifty-nine of 72 (82%) individuals due for SVR12 attended for testing, of whom 59/59 (100%) achieved SVR, providing an ITT SVR of 82%. A further six individuals had undetectable HCV RNA at ETR, but no SVR12 assessment, and one interrupted treatment, providing a mITT SVR of 91%. Homelessness was associated with delayed SVR12 testing (OR 24.9 95%CI 2.9-212.8, p=0.003). There was no association between LTFU and frequency of drug injection, last drug injected, or planned treatment duration. CONCLUSION: This study confirms that PWID can be successfully treated for HCV in a real-world setting using an integrated primary health care model. It also demonstrates feasibility to upscale DAA therapy in high-risk PWID populations, with potential individual and population-level public health benefits. Enhanced efforts are required to optimise post-treatment follow-up.


Assuntos
Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Usuários de Drogas , Hepatite C Crônica/complicações , Hepatite C Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Abuso de Substâncias por Via Intravenosa/complicações , Populações Vulneráveis , Adulto , Idoso , Austrália , Estudos de Coortes , Serviços de Saúde Comunitária , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Resposta Viral Sustentada
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa