RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the value of rotational coronary angiography (RoCA) in the context of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) planning. BACKGROUND: As a diagnostic tool, RoCA is associated with decreased patient irradiation and contrast use compared with conventional coronary angiography (CA) and provides superior appreciation of three-dimensional anatomy. However, its value in PCI remains unknown. METHODS: We studied stable coronary artery disease assessment and PCI planning by interventional cardiologists. Patients underwent either RoCA or conventional CA pre-PCI for planning. These were compared with the referral CA (all conventional) in terms of quantitative lesion assessment and operator confidence. An independent panel reanalyzed all parameters. RESULTS: Six operators performed 127 procedures (60 RoCA, 60 conventional CA, and 7 crossed-over) and assessed 212 lesions. RoCA was associated with a reduction in the number of lesions judged to involve a bifurcation (23 vs. 30 lesions, P < 0.05) and a reduction in the assessment of vessel caliber (2.8 vs. 3.0 mm, P < 0.05). RoCA improved confidence assessing lesion length (P = 0.01), percentage stenosis (P = 0.02), tortuosity (P < 0.04), and proximity to a bifurcation (P = 0.03), particularly in left coronary artery cases. X-ray dose, contrast agent volume, and procedure duration were not significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with conventional CA, RoCA augments quantitative lesion assessment, enhances confidence in the assessment of coronary artery disease and the precise details of the proposed procedure, but does not affect X-ray dose, contrast agent volume, or procedure duration.
Assuntos
Angiografia Coronária/métodos , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/diagnóstico por imagem , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/terapia , Estenose Coronária/diagnóstico por imagem , Estenose Coronária/terapia , Vasos Coronários/diagnóstico por imagem , Seleção de Pacientes , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Idoso , Meios de Contraste/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Humanos , Imageamento Tridimensional , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Doses de Radiação , Exposição à Radiação , Interpretação de Imagem Radiográfica Assistida por Computador , Índice de Gravidade de DoençaRESUMO
Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) are indicated in patients with Brugada syndrome with resuscitated ventricular arrhythmias. When these patients have atrial septal defects, they also need closure to prevent paradoxic embolism of thrombus from the defibrillator leads. A 15-year-old boy with Brugada syndrome had transvenous ICD placement along with device closure of a large atrial septal defect. When the defibrillation threshold was checked during device testing, a shock was delivered to terminate the induced ventricular fibrillation. The sudden jerk during this shock resulted in device embolization into the left atrium. The device was successfully retrieved and the defect closed with a larger device. This report discusses this extremely rare association of Brugada syndrome with atrial septal defect, unreported complications after device closure, and successful management of the problem.
Assuntos
Síndrome de Brugada/terapia , Desfibriladores Implantáveis/efeitos adversos , Embolia/etiologia , Átrios do Coração , Dispositivo para Oclusão Septal , Adolescente , Síndrome de Brugada/fisiopatologia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos/métodos , Remoção de Dispositivo/métodos , Eletrocardiografia , Embolia/diagnóstico , Embolia/cirurgia , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Falha de PróteseRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Dual antiplatelet therapy is the current standard of care after acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We intended to study the pattern of use of ticagrelor in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing PCI and the effect of switching over to other P2Y12 receptor inhibition on clinical outcomes. RESULTS: All patients aged > 18 years who had been admitted with acute coronary syndrome and had been provided ticagrelor as the second antiplatelet agent were included as study participants. The primary outcome of the study was the composite outcome of death, recurrent myocardial infarctions, re-intervention, and major bleeding. We studied 321 patients (54 female patients, 16.82%). The mean age of the patients was 56.65 ± 11.01 years. Ticagrelor was stopped in 76.7% on follow-up. It was stopped in 6.3%, 13.5%, 13.1%, 21.9%, and 45.1% of patients during the first month but after discharge, between first and third months, between 3 and 6 months, between 6 and 12 months, and after 12 months, respectively. In the majority of patients, ticagrelor was replaced by clopidogrel (97.9%). It was stopped according to the physician's discretion in 79.3% of patients, whereas it was the cost of the drug that made the patient to get swapped to another agent in 18.6%. No difference in the primary composite outcome was observed between the groups where ticagrelor was continued post 12 months and ticagrelor was continued and ticagrelor was switched-over to another agent. Similarly, no difference in death, recurrent myocardial infarctions, re-interventions, or major bleeding manifestations was observed between the two groups. CONCLUSION: In patients with acute coronary syndrome who undergo PCI, we observed that early discontinuation of ticagrelor and switching over to other P2Y12 inhibitors after discharge did not affect clinical outcomes.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The management of patients who suffer from medically refractory angina and are unsuitable for conventional revascularization therapy is often unsatisfactory. Enhanced external counterpulsation (EECP) is a noninvasive treatment that is safe and effective immediately after a course of treatment. However, the duration of benefit is less certain. HYPOTHESIS: To evaluate the 3-year outcome of EECP treatment. METHODS: One thousand four hundred and twenty seven patients from 36 centers registered in the International EECP Patient Registry (IEPR)-Phase 1 was prospectively followed for a median of 37 months. Two hundred and twenty patients (15.4%) died, while 1,061 patients (74.4%) completed their follow-up. RESULTS: The mean age was 66+/-11 years and 72% were men. Seventy-six percent had multivessel coronary disease for 11+/-8 years. Eighty-eight percent had a prior percutaneous or surgical revascularization and 82% were unsuitable for further coronary intervention. Immediately post-EECP, the proportion of patients with severe angina (Canadian Cardiovascular Angina Classification [CCS] III/IV) were reduced from 89% to 25%, p<0.001. The CCS class was improved by at least 1 class in 78% of the patients and by at least 2 classes in 38%. This was sustained in 74% of the patients during follow-up.Thirty-six percent of the patients had CCS II or less angina, which was better than pre-EECP state without a major adverse cardiovascular event during follow-up. More severe baseline angina and a history of heart failure or diabetes were independent predictors of unfavorable outcome. CONCLUSION: An EECP improves angina and quality of life immediately after a course of treatment. For most of the patients, these beneficial effects are sustained for 3 years.