[Use of an empirical antiretroviral treatment depends on the primary resistance rate of the human immunodeficiency virus]. / La práctica de un tratamiento antirretroviral empírico es dependiente del porcentaje de resistencias primarias del virus de la inmunodeficiencia humana.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was the analysis of the prevalence and type of primary resistance to antiretroviral drugs in patients diagnosed with HIV infection, and to determine the most appropriate empirical treatment to obtain a virological and immunological response. PATIENTS AND METHODS: An observational analysis of patients with a de novo diagnosis of HIV infection during the period 2008-2010. Clinical, immunological and virological characteristics, including genotype analysis of resistance to antiretrovirals, were considered as independent variables. The dependent variable was an undetectable HIV viral load after six months of treatment. Data are provided as median (interquartile range) and absolute number (percentage). RESULTS: Seventy-three patients with a de novo diagnosis of HIV infection were included [53 males (73%); 36 (30-46) years-old; prior use of intravenous drugs: 5 patients (7%); hepatitis C virus co-infection: 13 individuals (18%)]. Ten patients (14%) showed symptoms attributable to acute HIV infection. A CD4+ T cell count lower than 350 mm(3) was detected in a 37% (n=27) of all patients. The initiation of antiretroviral therapy followed the GESIDA recommendations (no therapy: 20 patients; tenofovir+emtricitabine+efavirenz: 28 patients; abacavir+lamivudine+efavirenz: 1 patient; tenofovir+emtricitabine+protease inhibitors: 5 patients; abacavir+lamivudine+protease inhibitors: 1 patient; 18 patients were lost in the follow-up). After starting antiretroviral therapy, the resistance analyses detected the existence of primary resistance to antiretrovirals in 12.7% (confidence interval 95%: 3-22) of the patients, distributed as follows: isolated resistance to, nucleosides was detected in 2% (M184V), to nevirapine/efavirenz in 9% (K103N), and combined resistance to nucleosides and non-nucleosides in 2%; there were no cases of resistance to protease inhibitors. Consequently, antiretroviral therapy was changed in 5 (14%) out of 35 patients, attaining an undetectable HIV viral load at 6 months in all of them. The primary resistance to antiretrovirals was not related with epidemiological, virological (including infection by non B subtype) or immunological variables. CONCLUSIONS: In the present study, a change in the epidemiological pattern of de novo diagnosis of HIV infection in our area has been observed. The existence of resistance mutations in more than 5% of the new cases is noteworthy. This finding must be considered in order to establish the rules of empirical treatment in our area.

[Respiratory syncytial virus outbreak in a tertiary hospital Neonatal Intensive Care Unit]. / Brote por virus respiratorio sincitial en la Unidad de Neonatología de un hospital de tercer nivel.

INTRODUCTION: Investigation and control of a respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) outbreak that affected the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) of a university hospital from October to December 2012. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Cohort study of children admitted to the NICU. The infection attack rate was calculated. A descriptive analysis of the cases and a multivariate analysis was performed using the variables that were shown to be risk factors for RSV infection. Preventive measures taken were: contact isolation; hand hygiene training and observation; exclusivity of a health team of nurses and physicians for positive cases, restrictions on visitor numbers; surveillance RSV testing, and palivizumab prophylaxis. RESULTS: The outbreak had three epidemic waves and 20 positive cases out of a total of 48 children admitted. The overall attack rate was 42%. Half of positive cases were children, with a median age of 36 days (p25=22, p75=58). The independent risk factors for RSV infection were birth weight below 1000 grams (OR=23.5; P=.002) and to have another nosocomial infection the week before the diagnosis of RSV infection (OR=19.98; P=.016). CONCLUSIONS: It was an outbreak with a high number of cases, due to the delay in notification, prolonged RSV carrier status, and low adherence to hand hygiene practice, which favoured the cross-transmission of infection. The most effective preventive measures were direct observation of hand hygiene and supervision of isolation measures.

Brote por virus respiratorio sincitial en la Unidad de Neonatología de un hospital de tercer nivel / Bedside ultrasound in the critically ill paediatric patient

INTRODUCCIÓN: Investigación y control de un brote por virus respiratorio sincitial (VRS) que afectó a la Unidad de Neonatología (UN) de un hospital universitario de octubre a diciembre del 2012. PACIENTES Y MÉTODOS: Estudio de cohortes de los niños ingresados en la UN. Se calculó la tasa de ataque de infección y se realizaron un análisis descriptivo de los casos y un análisis multivariante de aquellas variables que mostraron ser factores de riesgo de infección por VRS. Las medidas preventivas llevadas a cabo fueron: aislamiento de contacto de casos; formación y observación de higiene de manos; exclusividad del personal sanitario para casos, restricción de visitas; estudio de portadores de VRS y profilaxis con palivizumab. RESULTADOS: El brote tuvo 3 ondas epidémicas y un total de 20 casos, de 48 niños ingresados. La tasa de ataque global fue del 42%. De los casos, la mitad fueron niños, con una edad mediana de 36 días (p25=22, p75=58). El peso al nacimiento inferior a 1.000 g (OR=23,5; p = 0,002) y tener otra infección nosocomial en la semana previa al diagnóstico de infección por VRS (OR=19,98; p = 0,016), fueron factores de riesgo independientes de infección por VRS. CONCLUSIONES: Se trató de un brote epidémico con un elevado número de casos, relacionado con el retraso en la notificación, el tiempo prolongado del estado de portador del VRS y los fallos en el cumplimiento de la higiene de manos, que favoreció la transmisión cruzada de la infección. Las medidas preventivas más eficaces fueron la observación directa de higiene de manos y supervisión de las medidas de aislamiento

INTRODUCTION: Investigation and control of a respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) outbreak that affected the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) of a university hospital from October to December 2012. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Cohort study of children admitted to the NICU. The infection attack rate was calculated. A descriptive analysis of the cases and a multivariate analysis was performed using the variables that were shown to be risk factors for RSV infection. Preventive measures taken were: contact isolation; hand hygiene training and observation; exclusivity of a health team of nurses and physicians for positive cases, restrictions on visitor numbers; surveillance RSV testing, and palivizumab prophylaxis. RESULTS: The outbreak had three epidemic waves and 20 positive cases out of a total of 48 children admitted. The overall attack rate was 42%. Half of positive cases were children, with a median age of 36 days (p25=22, p75=58). The independent risk factors for RSV infection were birth weight below 1000 grams (OR=23.5; P=.002) and to have another nosocomial infection the week before the diagnosis of RSV infection (OR=19.98; P=.016). CONCLUSIONS: It was an outbreak with a high number of cases, due to the delay in notification, prolonged RSV carrier status, and low adherence to hand hygiene practice, which favoured the cross-transmission of infection. The most effective preventive measures were direct observation of hand hygiene and supervision of isolation measures