A randomized phase III study of fractionated docetaxel, oxaliplatin, capecitabine (low-tox) vs epirubicin, oxaliplatin and capecitabine (eox) in patients with locally advanced unresectable or metastatic gastric cancer: the lega trial.

BACKGROUND: EOX (epirubicin, oxaliplatin, and capecitabine) is one of the standard regimens for metastatic or locally advanced gastric cancer (GC). A new combination based on fractional docetaxel (low-TOX) has been developed in an attempt to increase the efficacy of EOX and reduce the heavy toxicity of classical docetaxel regimens. METHODS: Overall, 169 previously untreated GC patients were randomized between EOX (arm A) and low-TOX (arm B). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), while secondary ones were overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and tolerability. The study was designed to detect a 35% (80% power at a two-sided 5% significance level) PFS increase with low-TOX and an interim analysis for futility was planned after the first 127 events. RESULTS: At the cut-off date of interim analysis, median PFS was 6.3 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 5.0-8.1] in arm A vs 6.3 months (95% CI 5.0-7.8) in arm B, without statistical difference. OS was comparable in the two arms: 12.4 in arm A (95% CI 9.1-19.2) vs 11.5 months in arm B (95% CI 8.6-15.0). ORR was 33% and 24%, while DCR was 68% and 67%, respectively. Treatment modification (91% vs 78%, P = 0.017) and number of patients with CTC grade ≥ 3 adverse events (42 vs 35) were higher in arm B. CONCLUSIONS: A triplet regimen based on the fractional dose of docetaxel achieves no improvement over EOX which remains a potential standard treatment in many patients with inoperable, locally advanced or metastatic GC.

Tas-102 for Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study.

Trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) is an oral chemotherapy approved for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. The efficacy and tolerability of TAS-102 were shown in phase II-III clinical trials and in several real-life studies. The elderly and other special subgroups are underrepresented in published literature. We conducted a retrospective multicenter study to assess the effectiveness and safety of TAS-102 in consecutive patients with pretreated mCRC. In particular, we estimated the effectiveness and safety of TAS-102 in elderly patients (aged ≥70, ≥75 and ≥80 years) and in special subgroups, e.g., patients with concomitant heart disease. One hundred and sixty patients were enrolled. In particular, 71 patients (44%) were 70 years of age or older, 50 (31%) were 75 years of age or older, and 23 (14%) were 80 years of age or older. 19 patients (12%) had a concomitant chronic heart disease, three (2%) patients were HIV positive, and one (<1%) patient had a DPYD gene polymorphism. In 115 (72%) cases TAS-102 was administered as a third-line treatment. The median overall survival (OS) in the overall population was 8 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 6-9), while the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3 months (95% CI, 3-4). No significant age-related reduction in effectiveness was observed in the subpopulations of elderly patients included. The toxicity profile was acceptable in both the whole and subgroups' population. Our study confirms the effectiveness and safety of TAS-102 in patients with pretreated mCRC, suggesting a similar risk-benefit profile in the elderly.

Baseline Characteristics and Outcomes of Cancer Patients Infected with SARS-CoV-2 in the Lombardy Region, Italy (AIOM-L CORONA): A Multicenter, Observational, Ambispective, Cohort Study.

Cancer patients may be at high risk of infection and poor outcomes related to SARS-CoV-2. Analyzing their prognosis, examining the effects of baseline characteristics and systemic anti-cancer active therapy (SACT) are critical to their management through the evolving COVID-19 pandemic. The AIOM-L CORONA was a multicenter, observational, ambispective, cohort study, with the intended participation of 26 centers in the Lombardy region (Italy). A total of 231 cases were included between March and September 2020. The median age was 68 years; 151 patients (62.2%) were receiving SACT, mostly chemotherapy. During a median follow-up of 138 days (range 12-218), 93 events occurred. Age ≥60 years, metastatic dissemination, dyspnea, desaturation, and interstitial pneumonia were all independent mortality predictors. Overall SACT had a neutral effect (Odds Ratio [OR] 0.83, 95%Confidence Interval [95%CI] 0.32-2.15); however, metastatic patients receiving SACT were less likely to die as compared to untreated counterparts, after adjusting for other confounding variables (OR 0.23, 95%CI 0.11-0.51, p < 0.001). Among cancer patients infected by SARS-CoV-2, those with metastases were most at risk of death, especially in the absence of SACT. During the ongoing pandemic, these vulnerable patients should avoid exposure to SARS-CoV-2, while treatment adjustments and prioritizing vaccination are being considered according to international recommendations.

Adjuvant treatment for elderly patients with colon cancer. An observational study.

BACKGROUND: Adjuvant 5-fluoruracil-based chemotherapy significantly reduces mortality in patients with stage II-III colon cancer, but is less prescribed with rising age. In this study we were interested in the pattern of adjuvant treatment and possible effects on survival among elderly patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January to December 2004, 63 questionnaires on the management of stage II-III resected colon cancer patients aged over 70 years, collected from 10 Italian Centres, were retrospectively examined. Determinants of receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy and their relation to survival were considered. RESULTS: The proportion of elderly patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy was 79.4%, distinct of age, gender, educational level and comorbidities. Grade 3-4 toxicities were the following: haematological in 4 (8.5.%) patients, mucositis in 4 (8.5%), diarrhoea in 2 (4.2%) and nausea in 1 (2.1%). The disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) at two years were 79.9% and 95.6%, respectively. Due to the paucity of events, the impact of prognostic factors (patient's age and comorbidity, tumour stage and grade) on DFS and OS could not be assessed. CONCLUSION: An increasing proportion of elderly patients with colon cancer may be treated with a tolerability and OS similar to those observed in the younger population. Development of age-based guidelines and increased awareness of both physicians and patients through education is important to prevent undertreatment of those elderly patients who are eligible for chemotherapy.

Palliative treatment for elderly patients with colon cancer in ten Italian medical oncology units.

BACKGROUND: Palliative chemotherapy significantly reduces mortality in patients with stage IV colon cancer, but is less prescribed with rising age. In this paper, we highlight the pattern of palliative treatment and possible effects on survival among elderly patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January to December 2004, 78 files on the management of stage IV colorectal cancer (CRC) patients over 70 years, collected from 10 Italian Centres, were retrospectively examined. Determinants of receipt of palliative chemotherapy and their relation to toxicity and survival were considered. RESULTS: The proportion of elderly patients receiving first-line palliative chemotherapy was 98.7% and it was evaluated according to age, gender, educational level and comorbidities; patients receiving second-line therapy comprised 47.4%, those receiving third-line therapy 14.1% and those treated with a fourth-line therapy totalled 2.6%. Forty-one percent of patients received best supportive care (BSC) alone. CONCLUSION: In Italy, a proportion of elderly patients with metastatic chemonaive CRC are usually treated with a tolerability and overall survival similar to those for the younger population. Among progressive patients after second-line therapy, 45.8% usually undergo third line therapy; the remaining 54.2% undergo BSC.

Colorectal cancer treatment in elderly patients: results of a retrospective analysis addressed to the chiefs of medical oncology units in Italy.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this retrospective analysis was to evaluate the differences of 1-year treatment and chemotherapy related-toxicity in elderly colorectal cancer (CRC) patients in different Italian medical oncology units. PATIENTS AND METHODS: An open questionnaire on the management of CRC patients over 70 years of age, from January to December 2004, was sent to Italian centres. One hundred and seventy-five files from 10 centres were analysed. Variables considered were age, gender, educational level, comorbidities and modality of therapy administration. RESULTS: In only a minority of units were there some staff specifically dedicated to the older patients in close cooperation with geriatricians and the Multidimensional Geriatric Assessment (MGA) was not routinely used (11.2%-16.8% of cases). Only 5.7% patients were routinely enrolled in a protocol. In total, 95 out of 175 (54.3%) of CRC underwent adjuvant chemotherapy and 80 out of 175 (45.7%) received palliative chemotherapy. Of the patients who underwent adjuvant chemotherapy, 75.6% immediately accepted postoperative treatment while 12.2% were initially dubious but subsequently agreed. Only 5.5 and 9.7% of these patients reported very bad or bad tolerability, respectively. At disease progression, 62.5% patients accepted chemotherapy instantly while 33.3% accepted subsequently. Only 1.3% cases reported very bad and 1.3% bad tolerability. CONCLUSION: In those units in which the problem of the elderly is actually recognised, CRC treatment is adequate, not influenced by age discrimination but inhomogeneous. In the future, standardizing treatment in different oncology units could prove to be beneficial to this population.

Weekly docetaxel and gemcitabine following docetaxel plus epirubicin or vinorelbine as first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer: results of a multicenter phase II study.

AIMS AND BACKGROUND: Sequential docetaxel and gemcitabine following initial docetaxel plus epirubicin or vinorelbine association could be worthwhile as first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer. METHODS: Fifty-eight patients entered a phase II study that included two sequential phases. In the first phase, 36 and 22 patients previously unexposed or exposed to adjuvant anthracyclines received the association of docetaxel (75 mg/m2, day 1) with epirubicin (75 mg/m2, day 1) or vinorelbine (20 mg/m2, days 1 and 5), respectively, every 21 days for 4 courses. In the second phase, patients who had a response (R) or stable disease (SD) received docetaxel (35 mg/m2) and gemcitabine (800 mg/m2) on days 1, 8 and 15 every 28 days for 4 courses. RESULTS: In the first phase, grade > or = III neutropenia occurred in 51% and 37% of patients during docetaxel-epirubicin and docetaxel-vinorelbine, respectively. In the second phase, it occurred in the 27% and 15% of patients initially treated with docetaxel-epirubicin and docetaxel-vinorelbine, respectively. On an intention to treat basis, the complete (CR) + partial response (PR) rate to the first phase was 71%, and 22% of patients had SD, without a significant difference between the docetaxel-epirubicin and docetaxel-vinorelbine arms. After the second phase, the CR + PR rate was 65%, and 14% of patients had SD. Median time to progression and survival were 12.1 and 22.0 months, respectively, without a significant difference between patients initially treated with docetaxel-epirubicin and docetaxel-vinorelbine. CONCLUSIONS: Following an initial docetaxel-based treatment, weekly docetaxel and gemcitabine maintains high percentages of R and SD, with improved toxicity. Survival was similar in patients previously untreated and treated with adjuvant anthracyclines.

Systematic versus on-demand early palliative care: A randomised clinical trial assessing quality of care and treatment aggressiveness near the end of life.

AIM: Early palliative care (EPC) in oncology has shown sparse evidence of a positive impact on patient outcomes, quality of care outcomes and costs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data for this secondary analysis were taken from a trial of 207 outpatients with metastatic pancreatic cancer randomly assigned to receive standard cancer care plus on-demand EPC (standard arm) or standard cancer care plus systematic EPC (interventional arm). After 20 months' follow-up, 149 (80%) had died. Outcome measures were frequency, type and timing of chemotherapy administration, use of resources, place of death and overall survival. RESULTS: Some indices of end-of-life (EoL) aggressiveness had a favourable impact from systematic EPC. Interventional arm patients showed higher use of hospice services: a significantly longer median and mean period of hospice care (P = 0.025 for both indexes) and a significantly higher median and mean number of hospice admissions (both P < 0.010). In the experimental arm, chemotherapy was performed in the last 30 days of life in a significantly inferior rate with respect to control arm: 18.7% versus 27.8% (adjusted P = 0.036). Other non-significant differences were seen in favour of experimental arm. CONCLUSIONS: Systematic EPC showed a significant impact on some indicators of EoL treatment aggressiveness. These data, reinforced by multiple non-significant differences in most of the other items, suggest that quality of care is improved by this approach. This study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01996540).

Chemotherapy-induced anemia and oncologist perception on treatment: results of a web-based survey.

AIMS AND BACKGROUND: Anemia prevalence and incidence in chemotherapy-treated patients is high. Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) are frequently employed in the management of chemotherapy-induced anemia. However, other treatments such as red blood transfusion or iron supplementation are normally used. Recent international guidelines raised some concern about ESAs employment with a possible impact in chemotherapy-induced anemia management and changes in clinical practice behavior. METHODS: To evaluate opinions about chemotherapy-induced anemia clinical management preference, the Associazione Italiana Oncologia Medica (AIOM) Lombardy section coordinators sent via email a 12-item questionnaire about their knowledge on CIA and usual therapeutic strategies to manage this adverse event to AIOM Lombardy onco-hematologist members. RESULTS: From January 2011 to March 2011, 81 questionnaires were collected with an approximated share of 30%. The survey was completed mainly by oncologists (91%) aged 35-50 years (50%). Chemotherapy-induced anemia was considered to have clinical impact in changing cancer therapeutic strategy by nearly 60% of the respondents. ESAs were administered largely (80%) with concomitant iron supplementation in 52%; 38% jointly used blood transfusion as part of the therapy. Nearly 20% of those who replied correctly employed transferrin saturation levels as a marker to guide iron supplementation. Physician prescribers strictly followed the guidelines to start and stop ESAs even if 14% were negatively influenced by new ASCO recommendations. ESA biosimilars were considered future substitutes of originators in 45% of the cases. CONCLUSIONS: Chemotherapy-induced anemia was perceived as an adverse event with a mild impact on clinical practice. ESAs were largely employed, however the number of transfusions and lack of employment of markers of iron depletion suggested that adherence to guidelines could be theoretically met but with some discordances regarding the most appropriate strategies in daily clinical practice.