Association of Opioid Disposal Practices with Parental Education and a Home Opioid Disposal Kit Following Pediatric Ambulatory Surgery.

BACKGROUND: The majority of opioid analgesics prescribed for pain after ambulatory pediatric surgery remain unused. Most parents do not dispose of these leftover opioids or dispose of them in an unsafe manner. We aimed to evaluate the association of optimal opioid disposal with a multidisciplinary quality improvement (QI) initiative that proactively educated parents about the importance of optimal opioid disposal practices and provided a home opioid disposal kit before discharge after pediatric ambulatory surgery. METHODS: Opioid disposal behaviors were assessed during a brief telephone interview pre- (Phase I) and post-implementation (Phase II) after surgery. For each phase, we aimed to contact the parents of 300 pediatric patients ages 0 to 17 years who were prescribed an opioid after an ambulatory surgery. The QI initiative included enhanced education and a home opioid disposal kit including DisposeRX®, a medication disposal packet that renders medications inert within a polymeric gel when mixed with water. Weighted segmented regression models evaluated the association between the QI initiative and outcomes. We considered the association between the QI initiative and outcome significant if the beta coefficient for the change in intercept between the end of Phase I and the beginning of Phase II was significant. Safe opioid disposal and any opioid disposal were evaluated as secondary outcomes. RESULTS: The analyzed sample contained 161 pediatric patients in Phase I and 190 pediatric patients in Phase II. Phase II (post-QI initiative) cohort compared to Phase I cohort reported higher rates of optimal (58%, n = 111/190 vs 11%, n = 18/161) and safe (66%, n = 125/190 vs 34%, n = 55/161) opioid disposal. Weighted segmented regression analyses demonstrated significant increases in the odds of optimal (odds ratio [OR], 26.5, 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.0-177.0) and safe (OR, 4.4, 95% CI, 1.1-18.4) opioid disposal at the beginning of Phase II compared to the end of Phase I. The trends over time (slopes) within phases were nonsignificant and close to 0. The numbers needed to be exposed to achieve one new disposal event were 2.2 (95% CI, 1.4-3.7]), 3.1 (95% CI, 1.6-7.4), and 4.3 (95% CI, 1.7-13.6) for optimal, safe, and any disposal, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: A multidisciplinary approach to educating parents on the importance of safe disposal of leftover opioids paired with dispensing a convenient opioid disposal kit was associated with increased odds of optimal opioid disposal.

Leftover Opioid Analgesics and Disposal Following Ambulatory Pediatric Surgeries in the Context of a Restrictive Opioid-Prescribing Policy.

BACKGROUND: Opioid analgesics are commonly prescribed for postoperative analgesia following pediatric surgery and often result in leftover opioid analgesics in the home. To reduce the volume of leftover opioids and overall community opioid burden, the State of Tennessee enacted a policy to reduce initial opioid prescribing to a 3-day supply for most acute pain incidents. We aimed to evaluate the extent of leftover opioid analgesics following pediatric ambulatory surgeries in the context of a state-mandated restrictive opioid-prescribing policy. We also aimed to evaluate opioid disposal rates, methods of disposal, and reasons for nondisposal. METHODS: Study personnel contacted the parents of 300 pediatric patients discharged with an opioid prescription following pediatric ambulatory surgery. Parents completed a retrospective telephone survey regarding opioid use and disposal. Data from the survey were combined with data from the medical record to evaluate proportion of opioid doses prescribed that were left over. RESULTS: The final analyzable sample of 185 patients (62% response rate) were prescribed a median of 12 opioid doses (interquartile range [IQR], 12-18), consumed 2 opioid doses (IQR, 0-4), and had 10 opioid doses left over (IQR, 7-13). Over 90% (n = 170 of 185) of parents reported they had leftover opioid analgesics, with 83% of prescribed doses left over. A significant proportion (29%, n = 54 of 185) of parents administered no prescribed opioids after surgery. Less than half (42%, n = 71 of 170) of parents disposed of the leftover opioid medication, most commonly by flushing down the toilet, pouring down the sink, or throwing in the garbage. Parents retaining leftover opioids (53%, n = 90 of 170) were most likely to keep them in an unlocked location (68%, n = 61 of 90). Parents described forgetfulness and worry that their child will experience pain in the future as primary reasons for not disposing of the leftover opioid medication. CONCLUSIONS: Despite Tennessee's policy aimed at reducing leftover opioids, a significant proportion of prescribed opioids were left over following pediatric ambulatory surgeries. A majority of parents did not engage in safe opioid disposal practices. Given the safety risks related to leftover opioids in the home, further interventions to improve disposal rates and tailor opioid prescribing are warranted after pediatric surgery.

Enhancing Recovery After Kasai Portoenterostomy With Epidural Analgesia.

BACKGROUND: Biliary atresia (BA) is a rare obstructive cholangiopathy that presents in early infancy. The Kasai portoenterostomy (PE) improves survival with the native liver. Epidural analgesia is an appealing option to control pain in this fragile patient population, yet its safety, efficacy, and potential benefits remain unproven. METHODS: Patients undergoing PE for BA between 2001 and 2016 at a single institution were identified by ICD codes. Preoperative laboratories, procedure details, and recovery outcomes were reviewed retrospectively. Outcomes of interest were need for postoperative mechanical ventilation, pain scores, normalized opioid administration, return of bowel function, and length of hospital stay after PE. RESULTS: Of 47 infants undergoing PE for BA, 25 received epidural analgesia, and 22 did not. Infants with epidurals received less systemic opioids over the first 96 h postoperatively than those without (P < 0.001). Epidurals were associated with lower pain scores between 6 and 30 h postoperatively (P = 0.01 to 0.04), during which the highest median 6-h interval pain score was 0.2 (IQR 0-1.3) for patients with epidurals yet 2.1 (IQR 1.2-3.3) for patients without. Patients with epidurals (88%, n = 22) were more commonly extubated before leaving the operating room than those without (59%, n = 13; P = 0.02). No significant difference was observed in time to first bowel movement (P = 0.48) or first oral feed (P = 0.81). However, infants with epidurals had shorter hospital stays after PE than those without (6 d [IQR 5-7] versus 8 d [IQR 6.3-11], P = 0.01). No major complications were associated with epidural catheters. CONCLUSIONS: Epidural analgesia in patients undergoing PE for BA appears safe and effectively controls pain while minimizing the need for systemic opioids. Reduced need for mechanical ventilation postoperatively and shortened hospital stays serve as further evidence for using epidurals to enhance recovery after PE.

Interventional and multimodal pain rehabilitation in a child with meralgia paresthetica.

Meralgia paresthetica is a chronic pain syndrome that is extremely rare in the pediatric population. It is manifested by hypesthesia or pain in the distribution of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN) and is typically caused by entrapment as the nerve passes deep to the inguinal ligament. This sensory mononeuropathy is rare in children and diagnosis is typically delayed, often leading to prolonged functional impairment and unnecessary medical testing. A 9-year-old girl presented to the pain clinic with a 6-week history of right anterolateral thigh pain first noticed after a nontraumatic cheerleading practice. Comprehensive laboratory and radiographic evaluation by multiple prior specialists revealed no clear nociceptive source of pain. History and examination were consistent with a diagnosis of idiopathic, compressive meralgia paresthetica. Conservative management including physical therapy was followed for 2 weeks with only mild improvement noted. To facilitate physical therapy, an ultrasound-guided LFCN block was performed which confirmed the diagnosis by providing complete analgesia. The patient reported overall 25% improvement from multimodal therapy at another 2 weeks. A second LFCN block was performed with complete resolution of symptoms and restoration of function. The patient remains pain-free and has returned to walking, running, and competitive sports. The primary goal of pediatric chronic pain management, regardless of pain etiology, is early restoration of function to avoid prolonged absence from school, sports, or other productive activities and limit the psychological burden of chronic disease.

Pediatric chronic orchialgia: patient population and patterns of care.

OBJECTIVE: A major hurdle in management of any chronic pain syndrome is understanding the population in which it occurs. We describe our pediatric population of patients with peripubertal and postpubertal chronic orchialgia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Pediatric patients ≥ 10 years of age seen between 2002 and 2012 were identified by ICD code 608.9, Male Genital Disorder NOS. Patients were included if they had orchialgia without identifiable cause lasting >3 months. Patient history, diagnostic evaluations, treatments, and outcomes were assessed. RESULTS: Seventy-nine pediatric patients were identified. The mean age was 13.3 years (range 10-18); mean duration of orchialgia was 16.3 months (range 3-85). Thirty-three of 79 (42%) had concomitant medical conditions and/or psychiatric-behavioral issues. The mean follow-up was 7.1 months (range 0-70.4) with 41/79 (52%) having more than one office visit follow-up. Eleven patients were referred to a pediatric pain clinic; 10 out of 11 (91%) were evaluated there. Overall, 16 out of 41 (39%) had resolution of pain: nine out of 41 (22%) responding to conservative management vs seven of 10 (70%) responding to pain clinic management (3 to anti-neuropathic medications, 4 to nerve block). CONCLUSION: Many pediatric patients with chronic orchialgia have co-morbidities amenable to multidisciplinary collaborative coordination of care. Referral to pediatric pain clinic can be of significant benefit.