Topical therapy of atopic dermatitis with a focus on pimecrolimus.

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic and relapsing, inflammatory skin disease characterized by impaired skin barrier function and immune system dysregulation that results in dryness, skin microbiome dysbiosis and intense pruritus. It is highly heterogeneous, and its management is demanding. Patients with AD are at greater risk of comorbidities such as attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder as well as other atopic diseases. Early-onset AD cases typically improve or resolve in late childhood; however, it is proposed that the prevalence of persistent or adult-onset AD is higher than previously thought. Basic therapy consists of emollient application and trigger avoidance, and when insufficient, topical corticosteroids (TCS) are the first-line treatment. However, corticophobia/steroid aversion and TCS side-effects, particularly on sensitive skin areas, lead to low compliance and insufficient disease control. Several long- and short-term randomized controlled and daily practice studies have demonstrated that topical calcineurin inhibitors, such as pimecrolimus, have similar anti-inflammatory effects to low-to-medium strength TCS, reduce pruritus and improve the quality of life of patients. In addition, pimecrolimus does not cause skin atrophy, is steroid-sparing and has a good safety profile, with no evidence for an increased risk of malignancies or skin infections. In general, pimecrolimus cream is well-accepted and well-tolerated, encouraging patient adherence and leading to its use by many physicians as a preferred therapy for children and sensitive skin areas.

Developments and challenges in dermatology: an update from the Interactive Derma Academy (IDeA) 2019.

The 2019 Interactive Derma Academy (IDeA) meeting was held in Lisbon, Portugal, 10-12 May, bringing together leading dermatology experts from across Europe, the Middle East and Asia. Over three days, the latest developments and challenges in relation to the pathophysiology, diagnosis, evaluation and management of dermatological conditions were presented, with a particular focus on acne, atopic dermatitis (AD) and actinic keratosis (AK). Interesting clinical case studies relating to these key topics were discussed with attendees to establish current evidence-based best practices. Presentations reviewed current treatments, potential therapeutic approaches and key considerations in the management of acne, AK and AD, and discussed the importance of the microbiome in these conditions, as well as the provision of patient education/support. It was highlighted that active treatment is not always required for AK, depending on patient preferences and clinical circumstances. In addition to presentations, two interactive workshops on the diagnosis and treatment of sexually transmitted infections/diseases (STIs/STDs) presenting to the dermatology clinic, and current and future dermocosmetics were conducted. The potential for misdiagnosis of STIs/STDs was discussed, with dermoscopy and/or reflectance confocal microscopy suggested as useful diagnostic techniques. In addition, botulinum toxin was introduced as a potential dermocosmetic, and the possibility of microbiome alteration in the treatment of dermatological conditions emphasized. Furthermore, several challenges in dermatology, including the use of lasers, the complexity of atopic dermatitis, wound care, use of biosimilars and application of non-invasive techniques in skin cancer diagnosis were reviewed. In this supplement, we provide an overview of the presentations and discussions from the fourth successful IDeA meeting, summarizing the key insights shared by dermatologists from across the globe.

Protection of glucotoxicity by a tripeptide derivative of α-melanocyte-stimulating hormone in human epidermal keratinocytes.

BACKGROUND: Chronic skin ulcers are a major complication and a therapeutic challenge in patients with diabetes mellitus. Glucose-induced accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) is considered to be an important pathogenetic factor in diabetes. OBJECTIVES: To characterize the impact of high glucose (HG) on normal human keratinocytes (NHKs) and examine if Lys-d-Pro-Thr (KdPT), a tripeptide derived from α-melanocyte-stimulating-hormone, has protective effects. METHODS: We investigated the key functions of NHKs under HG conditions with or without KdPT in vitro as well as ex vivo employing a skin organ culture model. RESULTS: HG impaired metabolic activity, cell proliferation, viability and migration of NHKs. As shown by atomic force microscopy HG altered the biophysical properties of NHKs, i.e. cell size and elasticity. Glucotoxicity in NHKs was paralleled by the induction of intracellular ROS and endoplasmic reticulum stress. KdPT attenuated HG-induced oxidative stress and antagonized the effects of glucose on cell viability, metabolic activity and migration. Importantly, KdPT also antagonized the suppressive effect of HG on epidermal migration in wounded human skin organ cultures. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings highlight a novel effect of KdPT that could be exploited for the future therapy of diabetic skin ulcers.

Neurokinin 1 receptor antagonists exhibit peripheral effects in prurigo nodularis including reduced ERK1/2 activation.

BACKGROUND: Aprepitant is a neurokinin 1 receptor (NK1R) antagonist used for its antipruritic properties in dermatoses and systemic diseases. The mode of action is still unclear. A peripheral effect is assumed as aprepitant shows efficacy in inflammatory skin diseases including prurigo nodularis (PN). OBJECTIVES: To investigate the peripheral effects of NK1R antagonism in PN and cell culture models. METHODS: Subjects with PN received an aprepitant treatment. Clinical, morphological and immunohistochemical changes were investigated in skin biopsies before and after treatment. Expression of NK1R was analysed by immunohistochemistry and for downstream pathways ((p)ERK1/2) by Western blotting in PN patients and matched healthy volunteers. Effects of NK1R blocking were analysed in cell cultures of primary keratinocytes by Western blotting for (p)ERK1/2 and by qPCR for NK1R, interleukin (IL)-1beta, IL-6, IL-8 and TNFalpha. RESULTS: Aprepitant treatment showed significant reduction in pruritus intensity (P < 0.05) in PN and relevant immunohistochemical changes (down: CD5, CD25, up: CD79a, IL4). NK1R expression was higher in keratinocytes of PN patients compared to healthy controls. After treatment, epidermal NK1R expression increased while expression and activation of ERK1/2 decreased. In vitro, receptor up-regulation and reduced expression and activation of ERK1/2 were confirmed and reduced IL-expression shown when blocking NK1R. CONCLUSION: Our data confirm that NK1R antagonists such as aprepitant exhibit effects in the skin. Epidermal receptor expression, epidermal inflammatory ILs, ERK1/2 MAPK signalling and cutaneous inflammatory infiltrate were targets of NK1R antagonism. This may explain partly the antipruritic effect of NK1R antagonists next to its role in the central nervous system.

Examining the association between pruritus and quality of life in patients with atopic dermatitis treated with crisaborole.

BACKGROUND: Pruritus is a leading cause of reduced health-related quality of life (QoL) in atopic dermatitis (AD). Crisaborole ointment is a non-steroidal phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor for the treatment of mild-to-moderate AD. In identical Phase 3 studies (NCT02118766, NCT02118792), crisaborole reduced disease and pruritus severity versus vehicle. OBJECTIVE: Quantify the relationship between pruritus and QoL using data from these studies. METHODS: Patients aged ≥2 years were randomly assigned 2 : 1 to receive crisaborole:vehicle twice daily for 28 days. QoL was measured at baseline and day 29 using the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI; patients aged ≥16 years), the Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI; patients aged 2-15 years) and the Dermatitis Family Impact (DFI; caregivers of patients aged 2-17 years). Pruritus was measured using the Severity of Pruritus Scale (SPS), a 4-point scale from 0 ('no itching') to 3 ('bothersome itching/scratching that disturbs sleep'), and captured morning and evening via electronic diary. Data from crisaborole and vehicle arms were pooled for this analysis. A repeated-measures longitudinal model was used to estimate relationships between pruritus (SPS) and QoL (DLQI, CDLQI and DFI in separate analyses). RESULTS: One thousand five hundred and twenty two patients received crisaborole or vehicle. A linearity assumption for the relationship between SPS and DLQI (n = 294), CDLQI (n = 1200), and DFI (n = 1293) was appropriate. For DLQI, SPS score of 0 was associated with 'no negative effect on patient QoL'; SPS score of 1 was associated with 'small effect on patient QoL'; SPS score of 2 was associated with 'moderate effect on patient QoL'; and SPS score of 3 was associated with 'very large effect on patient QoL'. The pattern of relationships between SPS and CDLQI and DFI was similar. CONCLUSIONS: The relationships between SPS and DLQI, CDLQI and DFI substantiate the significant link between pruritus and patient/caregiver QoL in AD.

Dupilumab treatment improves quality of life in adult patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: results from a randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Dupilumab, a human anti-interleukin-4 receptor alpha monoclonal antibody, significantly improved clinical signs and symptoms in adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase IIa trial. OBJECTIVES: We evaluate health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and correlation of HRQoL with secondary clinical and patient-reported outcomes in a subset of patients from this trial of dupilumab. METHODS: Patients were randomized to 300 mg weekly subcutaneous dupilumab or placebo for 12 weeks (trial registration: NCT01548404). The Quality of Life Index of Atopic Dermatitis (QoLIAD) score (exploratory outcome) and its correlation with efficacy outcomes [Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI); primary end point; SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD), SCORAD visual analogue scale (VAS) scores for sleep and pruritus, pruritus numerical rating scale (NRS) and 5-dimensional pruritus] were assessed in 64 adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. RESULTS: Mean QoLIAD scores at baseline ± standard error (SE) were 13·3 ± 1·34 and 11·3 ± 1·09 for the placebo and dupilumab groups, respectively. Dupilumab significantly improved QoLIAD score after 12 weeks of treatment vs. placebo (mean % change from baseline in QoLIAD score ± SE: -64·0 ± 6·91 vs. -11·1 ± 9·31). Least squares mean % difference from baseline vs. placebo in QoLIAD score ±SE was -52·0 ± 11·43, P < 0·001). QoLIAD scores significantly correlated with changes in efficacy outcomes, including EASI (r = 0·44), 5-dimensional pruritus (r = 0·49), pruritus NRS (r = 0·41), total SCORAD (r = 0·56) and SCORAD VAS scores for sleep (r = 0·47) and pruritus (r = 0·54); all P < 0·05. CONCLUSIONS: Dupilumab improved QoLIAD scores in adults with atopic dermatitis and was significantly associated with improvements in study outcomes.

Secukinumab demonstrates high sustained efficacy and a favourable safety profile in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis through 5 years of treatment (SCULPTURE Extension Study).

BACKGROUND: Secukinumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody that selectively neutralizes IL-17A, has been shown to have significant efficacy and a favourable safety profile in the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of secukinumab through 5 years of treatment in moderate-to-severe psoriasis. METHODS: In the core SCULPTURE study, Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 75 responders at Week 12 continued receiving subcutaneous secukinumab until Year 1. Thereafter, patients entered the extension phase and continued treatment as per the core trial. Treatment was double-blinded until the end of Year 3 and open-label from Year 4. Here, we focus on the 300 mg fixed-interval (every 4 weeks) treatment, the recommended per label dose. Efficacy data are primarily reported as observed, but multiple imputation (MI) and last observation carried forward (LOCF) techniques were also undertaken as supportive analyses. RESULTS: At Year 1, 168 patients entered the extension study and at the end of Year 5, 126 patients completed 300 mg (every 4 weeks) treatment. PASI 75/90/100 responses at Year 1 (88.9%, 68.5% and 43.8%, respectively) were sustained to Year 5 (88.5%, 66.4% and 41%). PASI responses were consistent regardless of the analysis undertaken (as observed, MI, or LOCF). The average improvement in mean PASI was approximately 90% through 5 years compared with core study baseline. DLQI (dermatology life quality index) 0/1 response also sustained through 5 years (72.7% at Year 1 and 65.5% at Year 5). The safety profile of secukinumab remained favourable, with no cumulative or unexpected safety concerns identified. CONCLUSION: Secukinumab 300 mg treatment delivered high and sustained levels of skin clearance and improved quality of life through 5 years in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis. Favourable safety established in the secukinumab phase 2/3 programme was maintained through 5 years.

Secukinumab sustains good efficacy and favourable safety in moderate-to-severe psoriasis after up to 3 years of treatment: results from a double-blind extension study.

BACKGROUND: Secukinumab has demonstrated significant efficacy with a good safety profile through 1 year in plaque psoriasis. Given the chronic nature of this disease, long-term follow-up is needed to evaluate psoriasis therapies fully. OBJECTIVES: To determine the long-term (3-year) efficacy and safety of secukinumab in moderate-to-severe psoriasis. METHODS: Patients completing 52 weeks of secukinumab treatment in the SCULPTURE core study entered an extension in which they continued the same double-blind regimens. Dosing regimens included a fixed-interval schedule (FI; every 4 weeks) and retreatment as needed (RAN), in which patients were withdrawn from secukinumab and received placebo until the start of relapse, at which time secukinumab every 4 weeks was reinitiated. The study was registered with number NCT01640951. RESULTS: In total 168 patients receiving secukinumab 300 mg FI and 172 receiving secukinumab 300 mg RAN entered the extension. Secukinumab 300 mg FI sustained high efficacy: at the end of year 3, the proportion of responders achieving ≥ 90% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 90) was 63·8%, and of PASI 100 responders it was 42·6%. The mean absolute PASI remained low (2-4) from week 52 to week 152 with 300 mg FI, with approximately two-thirds of patients reporting no impact of skin disease on their lives (Dermatology Life Quality Index of 0 or 1). Improvements in overall and subscale scores on all quality-of-life instruments were well sustained. As in the core study, FI dosing was consistently more efficacious than RAN. No new safety signals were identified to year 3. CONCLUSIONS: Secukinumab 300 mg FI sustained high responses and improved quality of life with no new safety concerns through 3 years.

Successful monotherapy of pemphigus vegetans with minocycline and nicotinamide.

BACKGROUND: Pemphigus vegetans is a rare variant of pemphigus vulgaris, accounting for 1-2% of all pemphigus diseases. Systemic corticosteroids are the therapy of first choice in combination with immunosuppressants as steroid-sparing agents. OBJECTIVE: To highlight the exceptional but successful use of minocycline/nicotinamide monotherapy in pemphigus vegetans. METHODS: A review of the literature to date about pemphigus vegetans with special emphasis on therapy was performed. Due to its rarity, multiple anecdotal reports without long-term follow-up are available and prospective controlled trials are lacking. Only one retrospective study from Tunisia includes 17 patients with pemphigus vegetans. RESULTS: We present a 76-year-old woman with pemphigus vegetans achieving complete response to a minocycline/nicotinamide monotherapy at onset and at relapse of the disease. Treatment has been discontinued after repeated direct immunofluorescence (DIF) of previously affected normal skin and anti-desmoglein 3 antibodies had become negative. In addition, DIF of previously involved oral mucosa was negative. During long-term follow-up clinical remission has been maintained for more than 5 years. Up to now, negative results of serial performed indirect immunofluorescence and desmoglein ELISA testing also predict immunological remission. CONCLUSION: In our patient and in a case with oesophageal involvement, published more than 20 years ago, clearly the benefit of minocycline/nicotinamide monotherapy was demonstrated. We propose to consider minocycline/nicotinamide as first-line monotherapy in pemphigus vegetans, especially in elderly patients with comorbidities and contraindications to standard therapy, as it avoids the toxicities of systemic corticosteroids and immunosuppressants.

Quality of life and patient benefit following transition from methotrexate to ustekinumab in psoriasis.

BACKGROUND: TRANSIT (NCT01059773) compared immediate and gradual transition from methotrexate to ustekinumab in psoriasis patients via multiple measures, including patient-reported outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate patient perception of treatment benefits in TRANSIT. METHODS: A total of 489 psoriasis patients received ustekinumab, with immediate cessation of methotrexate (Arm 1) or 4 weeks' overlap with decreasing methotrexate dose (Arm 2). Ustekinumab was administered at weeks 0, 4, 16, 28 and 40. Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), EuroQol 5-item (EQ-5D), visual analogue scale (VAS) valuation technique and patient benefit index (PBI) were employed. Mean global PBI and sub-scores were calculated from the sum of the benefit items weighted by their respective relevance at baseline. Patient-relevant benefit was defined as PBI ≥1 (scale: 0 [no benefit] to 4 [maximum benefit]). Correlations of global PBI with Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) and DLQI were examined. RESULTS: Relationships between PBI and clinical data were evaluable in 340 patients. The most important treatment goals at baseline included: 'be healed of all skin defects', 'have confidence in therapy', 'get better skin quickly' and 'regain control of the disease'. Benefit in PBI global score was achieved at week 4 by 93% of patients in Arm 1 and 91% in Arm 2. Global PBI scores increased in both Arms between weeks 4 and 52. Global PBI correlated weakly with PASI change from baseline (correlation coefficient range: -0.22 to -0.40), and moderately with DLQI (-0.29 to -0.54). Overall DLQI score was lower than baseline at all times; and the percentage of patients with an overall score of 0 or 1 increased with time. Correspondingly, EQ VAS scores increased with time. DLQI and EQ VAS results were similar between arms. CONCLUSIONS: Regardless of the strategy for transitioning from methotrexate, ustekinumab was associated with rapid and sustained improvement in patient-reported outcomes. PBI appears a suitable tool for assessing patient-relevant treatment benefits in psoriasis patients.

European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) recommendations for the management of psoriatic arthritis with pharmacological therapies: 2015 update.

BACKGROUND: Since the publication of the European League Against Rheumatism recommendations for the pharmacological treatment of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in 2012, new evidence and new therapeutic agents have emerged. The objective was to update these recommendations. METHODS: A systematic literature review was performed regarding pharmacological treatment in PsA. Subsequently, recommendations were formulated based on the evidence and the expert opinion of the 34 Task Force members. Levels of evidence and strengths of recommendations were allocated. RESULTS: The updated recommendations comprise 5 overarching principles and 10 recommendations, covering pharmacological therapies for PsA from non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), to conventional synthetic (csDMARD) and biological (bDMARD) disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, whatever their mode of action, taking articular and extra-articular manifestations of PsA into account, but focusing on musculoskeletal involvement. The overarching principles address the need for shared decision-making and treatment objectives. The recommendations address csDMARDs as an initial therapy after failure of NSAIDs and local therapy for active disease, followed, if necessary, by a bDMARD or a targeted synthetic DMARD (tsDMARD). The first bDMARD would usually be a tumour necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitor. bDMARDs targeting interleukin (IL)12/23 (ustekinumab) or IL-17 pathways (secukinumab) may be used in patients for whom TNF inhibitors are inappropriate and a tsDMARD such as a phosphodiesterase 4-inhibitor (apremilast) if bDMARDs are inappropriate. If the first bDMARD strategy fails, any other bDMARD or tsDMARD may be used. CONCLUSIONS: These recommendations provide stakeholders with an updated consensus on the pharmacological treatment of PsA and strategies to reach optimal outcomes in PsA, based on a combination of evidence and expert opinion.

Regulation of melanocortin 1 receptor in allergic rhinitis in vitro and in vivo.

BACKGROUND: α-melanocyte-stimulating hormone (α-MSH) was shown to inhibit allergic airway inflammation and exert suppressive effects on human basophils. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to extend our current knowledge on the melanocortin 1 receptor (MC1R) expression in nasal tissue of patients with allergic rhinitis (AR) and functional effects of α-MSH in human basophils especially from patients with allergic rhinitis. METHODS: MC1R expression before and after nasal allergen provocation was studied in nasal mucosal tissue of AR patients and in a mouse model of allergic airway inflammation using immunofluorescence. In vitro regulation of the MC1R and CD203c surface expression on whole-blood basophils of patients with AR and controls was assessed with flow cytometry. Functional effects of α-MSH on isolated basophils were analysed regarding apoptosis with flow cytometry and chemotaxis using a Boyden chamber assay. RESULTS: We detected an accumulation of MC1R-positive basophils in nasal mucosa tissue of patients with AR 24 h after nasal allergen provocation. Such accumulation was not present in mucosa sections from healthy controls. In mice with allergic airway inflammation, we found a clear accumulation of MC1R-positive basophils in the nasal tissue compared to control mice. MC1R expression was inducible in AR patients and controls by stimulation with anti-IgE. α-MSH inhibited anti-IgE and grass pollen induced upregulation of CD203c, but had no effect on chemotaxis or apoptosis of basophils in vitro. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: MC1R-positive basophils accumulate in the nasal mucosa of patients with AR after nasal allergen provocation. Since α-MSH suppresses proinflammatory effector functions in human basophils via the MC1R, it constitutes an interesting novel target for modulating the allergic inflammatory response.

Fumaric acid ester treatment in cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE): a prospective, open-label, phase II pilot study.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to assess the efficacy and safety of fumaric acid esters (FAEs) in patients with cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE). METHODS: In this 24-week, prospective, open-label, phase II pilot study, 11 patients with CLE, refractory to topical corticosteroids, were included. The primary endpoint of the study was the evaluation of the efficacy of FAEs after 24 weeks of treatment as assessed by the Revised Cutaneous Lupus Disease Area and Severity Index (RCLASI). RESULTS: Compared to baseline, significant improvement in the mean total RCLASI activity score and the mean RCLASI activity score for skin lesions was observed in week 12 (p = 0.002, p = 0.002, respectively) and in week 24 (p = 0.009, p = 0.009, respectively). Most common adverse events included abdominal cramps and headache. CONCLUSIONS: FAEs could be an alternative and safe treatment in patients with therapy-refractory CLE; however, randomized controlled trials are warranted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of FAEs in this disease.

An observational study to evaluate the long-term outcomes of treatment with etanercept in patients with plaque-type psoriasis.

BACKGROUND: There is an unmet need for long-term, real-life data on the effect of a drug-free interval between treatment cycles in patients with plaque psoriasis being treated with etanercept, which is licensed for intermittent and continuous treatment. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the average duration of the drug-free interval between etanercept treatment cycles in patients with plaque psoriasis. METHODS: This was a non-interventional, open-label, multicentre, prospective study in patients for whom the decision had already been made to initiate treatment with etanercept during routine practice in German centres. Clinical outcomes were documented over 36 months with study visits every 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was the duration of the treatment-free interval between etanercept treatment cycles (24 weeks/cycle). Secondary endpoints assessed efficacy [Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI), Body Surface Area (BSA), static Physician's Global Assessment (sPGA)], health-related outcomes [EuroQol-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D), Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI)] and safety. RESULTS: A total of 955 patients were enrolled from 224 centres; 926 of these were included in the safety analyses and 720 patients from the safety population were included in the efficacy analysis. The mean duration of drug-free intervals was 12.9 ± 12.8 weeks. Efficacy and health-related quality of life outcomes measures showed consistent improvement that occurred within 12 weeks of treatment with etanercept. There was a descriptive difference between the continuous and intermittent treatment subgroups, as subjects in the latter showed a deterioration at the first visit following an interval. However, retreatment with etanercept resulted in a clinical efficacy identical to the initial effect. The incidence of physician-assessed, drug-related adverse events and serious adverse events was 13.1% and 1.9%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The mean duration of drug-free intervals was relatively short, most patients experienced improvements in disease activity and health-related quality of life within 12 weeks of either continuous or intermittent treatment with etanercept, and there were no new safety signals. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00708708.

State of the art: systemic rosacea management.

Based on numerous trials, oral tetracyclines and most commonly their second-generation derivative doxycycline have become the main pillar in systemic rosacea treatment. However, the only preparation that has been approved so far in this setting is 40 mg doxycycline in an anti-inflammatory dosage and with a modified release formulation. With the introduction of this once-daily, non-antibiotic dosing of doxycycline, oral therapy is more commonly prescribed as first-line treatment in moderate to severe papulopustular rosacea. In addition, topical and oral strategies are often used in combination due to the more substantial improvements compared to monotherapy. Although several other non-approved oral agents like macrolides, isotretinoin, and carvedilol have been evaluated for systemic treatment and showed promising results, yet the experience with these drugs in rosacea is limited, and thus they should be reserved for special situations.

Aktueller Stand der systemischen Rosazea-Therapie.

Basierend auf den Daten zahlreicher Studien sind orale Tetracycline - und hier insbesondere Doxycyclin als Tetracyclin der zweiten Generation - die Grundpfeiler der systemischen Rosazea-Therapie. Bisher ist dafür jedoch nur Doxycyclin 40 mg in antientzündlicher Dosierung mit veränderter Wirkstofffreisetzung zugelassen. Seit Einführung der Therapie mit Doxycyclin einmal täglich in nicht antibiotischer Dosierung wird die orale Therapie häufiger als Erstbehandlung bei mittelschwerer bis schwerer papulopustulöser Rosazea verschrieben. Oft wird diese Behandlung aufgrund der besseren Wirksamkeit im Vergleich zur Monotherapie auch mit einer topischen Behandlung kombiniert. Obwohl in der Systemtherapie weitere, nicht zugelassene Wirkstoffe wie Makrolide, Isotretinoin und Carvedilol mit viel versprechenden Ergebnissen untersucht wurden, ist die vorliegende Erfahrung bisher begrenzt, so dass diese Substanzen speziellen Situationen vorbehalten bleiben sollten.

Pathogenesis and clinical presentation of rosacea as a key for a symptom-oriented therapy.

Rosacea is a common chronic inflammatory skin disorder that typically occurs in adults and affects the face. Synonyms of rosacea include "acne rosacea", "couperose" and "facial erythrosis", in German also "Kupferfinne" and "Rotfinne". The disorder is characterised by a chronic and flaring course and is caused by a genetically predisposed, multifactorial process. A higher incidence is seen in people with fair skin and a positive family history. The characteristic rosacea symptoms manifest primarily, but not exclusively centrofacially, with forehead, nose, chin and cheeks significantly affected. Based on the various main symptoms a classification of the individual clinical pictures can be performed. However, a classification often does not reflect the clinical reality, since the various symptoms commonly coexist. The present review provides an introduction on pathogenesis and clinical manifestations of rosacea and prefers a symptom-oriented therapy approach.

Rosazea-Management: Update über allgemeine Maßnahmen und topische Therapieoptionen.

Obwohl bislang für die Rosazea keine kurative Therapie besteht, können verschiedene Optionen zur Behandlung der Symptome und zur Vorbeugung von Exazerbationen empfohlen werden. Neben Selbsthilfemaßnahme wie der Vermeidung von Triggerfaktoren und einer geeigneten Hautpflege sollte das Rosazea-Management bei Patienten mit erythematöser und leichter bis schwerer papulopustulöser Rosazea die Anwendung topischer Präparate als First-Line-Therapie umfassen. Da Überlappungen der charakteristischen Rosazea-Symptome im klinischen Alltag die Regel sind, sollte die medikamentöse Therapie auf die individuellen Symptome zugeschnitten werden; auch eine Kombinationstherapie kann erforderlich sein. Zu den für die Behandlung der Hauptsymptome der Rosazea zugelassenen Wirkstoffen gehören Brimonidin gegen das Erythem sowie Ivermectin, Metronidazol oder Azelainsäure gegen entzündliche Läsionen. Ihre Wirksamkeit wurde in zahlreichen validen, gut kontrollierten Studien belegt. Darüber hinaus existieren verschiedene nicht zugelassene topische Behandlungsmöglichkeiten, deren Wirksamkeit und Sicherheit noch in größeren, kontrollierten Studien zu untersuchen ist.

Pathogenese und Klinik der Rosazea als Schlüssel für eine symptomorientierte Therapie.

Rosazea ist eine häufige chronisch-entzündliche Hauterkrankung, die typischerweise bei Erwachsenen vorkommt und das Gesicht betrifft. Synonyme der Rosazea sind Acne rosacea, Kupferfinne, Rotfinne, Couperose und Rosacea. Die Erkrankung ist durch einen chronischen und schubartigen Verlauf gekennzeichnet und wird durch ein genetisch prädisponiertes, multifaktorielles Geschehen bedingt. Ein vermehrtes Auftreten wird bei hellem Hauttyp und positiver Familienanamnese verzeichnet. Die charakteristischen Rosazea-Symptome manifestieren sich vorwiegend, aber nicht ausschließlich zentrofazial, wobei Stirn, Nase, Kinn und die Wangen maßgeblich betroffen sind. Dabei werden unterschiedliche Hauptsymptome voneinander unterschieden, anhand derer eine Klassifikation der verschiedenen klinischen Bilder vorgenommen werden kann. Eine Klassifizierung wird oftmals jedoch nicht der klinischen Realität gerecht, da die verschiedenen Symptome häufig gemeinsam auftreten. Diese Übersichtarbeit führt in die Pathogenese und Klinik der Rosazea ein und plädiert für einen symptomorientierten Therapieansatz.

Rosacea Management: Update on general measures and topical treatment options.

Although there is presently no cure for rosacea, there are several recommended treatment options available to control many of the symptoms and to prevent them from getting worse. In addition to self-help measures like avoidance of trigger factors and proper skin care, rosacea management should include topical medications as one of the first-line choices for patients with erythematous and mild to severe papulopustular rosacea. Since mixed forms of characteristic rosacea symptoms are more common, medical treatment must be symptom-tailored for each individual case and will often involve a combination therapy. Approved topical agents for the major symptoms of rosacea encompass brimonidine for erythema and ivermectin, metronidazole or azelaic acid for inflammatory lesions, all of which have shown their efficacy in numerous valid, well-controlled trials. In addition, there are several other, not approved topical treatments which are possible options that require further validation in larger well-controlled studies.