Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Heliyon ; 9(8): e19066, 2023 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37636449

RESUMO

Background: Both calcification and colloid in thyroid nodules are reflected as echogenic foci in ultrasound images. However, calcification and colloid have significantly different probabilities of malignancy. We explored the performance of a deep learning (DL) model in distinguishing the echogenic foci of thyroid nodules as calcification or colloid. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study using ultrasound image sets. The DL model was trained and tested on 30,388 images of 1127 nodules. All nodules were pathologically confirmed. The area under the receiver-operator characteristic curve (AUC) was employed as the primary evaluation index. Results: The YoloV5 (You Only Look Once Version 5) transfer learning model for thyroid nodules based on DL detection showed that the average sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of distinguishing echogenic foci in the test 1 group (n = 192) was 78.41%, 91.36%, and 77.81%, respectively. The average sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the three radiologists were 51.14%, 82.58%, and 61.29%, respectively. The average sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of distinguishing small echogenic foci in the test 2 group (n = 58) was 70.17%, 77.14%, and 73.33%, respectively. Correspondingly, the average sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the radiologists were 57.69%, 63.29%, and 59.38%. Conclusions: The study demonstrated that DL performed far better than radiologists in distinguishing echogenic foci of thyroid nodules as calcifications or colloid.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa