RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Nitric oxide (NO) has a well-known efficacy in pulmonary hypertension (PH), with wide use for 20 years in many countries. The objective of this study was to describe the current use of NO in real life and the gap with the guidelines. METHODS: This is a multicenter, prospective, observational study on inhaled NO administered through an integrated delivery and monitoring device and indicated for PH according to the market authorizations. The characteristics of NO therapy and ventilation modes were observed. Concomitant pulmonary vasodilator treatments, safety data, and outcome were also collected. Quantitative data are expressed as median (25th, 75th percentile). RESULTS: Over 1 year, 236 patients were included from 14 equipped and trained centers: 117 adults and 81 children with PH associated with cardiac surgery and 38 neonates with persistent PH of the newborn. Inhaled NO was initiated before intensive care unit (ICU) admission in 57%, 12.7%, and 38.9% with an initial dose of 10 (10, 15) ppm, 20 (18, 20) ppm, and 17 (11, 20) ppm, and a median duration of administration of 3.9 (1.9, 6.1) days, 3.8 (1.8, 6.8) days, and 3.1 (1.0, 5.7) days, respectively, for the adult population, pediatric cardiac group, and newborns. The treatment was performed using administration synchronized to the mechanical ventilation. The dose was gradually decreased before withdrawal in 86% of the cases according to the usual procedure of each center. Adverse events included rebound effect for 3.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.9%-8.5%) of adults, 1.2% (95% CI, 0.0%-6.7%) of children, and 2.6% (95% CI, 0.1%-13.8%) of neonates and methemoglobinemia exceeded 2.5% for 5 of 62 monitored patients. Other pulmonary vasodilators were associated with NO in 23% of adults, 95% of children, and 23.7% of neonates. ICU stay was respectively 10 (6, 22) days, 7.5 (5.5, 15) days, and 9 (8, 15) days and ICU mortality was 22.2%, 6.2%, and 7.9% for adults, children, and neonates, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms the safety of NO therapy in the 3 populations with a low rate of rebound effect. Gradual withdrawal of NO combined with pulmonary vasodilators are current practices in this population. The use of last-generation NO devices allowed good compliance with recommendations.
Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos/efeitos adversos , Unidades de Cuidados Coronarianos , Hipertensão Pulmonar/tratamento farmacológico , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva Neonatal , Óxido Nítrico/administração & dosagem , Síndrome da Persistência do Padrão de Circulação Fetal/tratamento farmacológico , Respiração Artificial/instrumentação , Vasodilatadores/administração & dosagem , Ventiladores Mecânicos , Administração por Inalação , Idoso , Bélgica , Pré-Escolar , Desenho de Equipamento , Feminino , França , Humanos , Hipertensão Pulmonar/diagnóstico , Hipertensão Pulmonar/etiologia , Hipertensão Pulmonar/fisiopatologia , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Óxido Nítrico/efeitos adversos , Síndrome da Persistência do Padrão de Circulação Fetal/diagnóstico , Síndrome da Persistência do Padrão de Circulação Fetal/fisiopatologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Respiração Artificial/efeitos adversos , Resultado do Tratamento , Vasodilatadores/efeitos adversos , Ventiladores Mecânicos/efeitos adversosRESUMO
STUDY OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of a two-step patient blood management (PBM) program in red blood cell (RBC) transfusion requirements among patients undergoing elective cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) surgery. DESIGN: Prospective, non-randomized, two-step protocol design. SETTING: Cardiac surgery department of Clinique Pasteur, Toulouse, France. PATIENTS: 897 patients undergoing for elective CPB surgery. INTERVENTIONS: We conducted a two-steps protocol: PBMe and PBMc. PBMe involved a short quality improvement program for health care workers, while PBMc introduced a systematic approach to pre- and postoperative correction of deficiencies, incorporating iron injections, oral vitamins, and erythropoiesis-stimulating agents. MEASUREMENTS: The PBM program's effectiveness was evaluated through comparison with a pre-PBM retrospective cohort after propensity score matching. The primary objective was the proportion of patients requiring RBC transfusions during their hospital stay. Secondary objectives were also analyzed. MAIN RESULTS: After matching, 343 patients were included in each group. Primary outcomes were observed in 35.7% (pre-PBM), 26.7% (PBMe), and 21.1% (PBMc) of patients, resulting in a significant reduction (40.6%) in the overall RBC transfusion rate. Both the PBMe and PBMc groups exhibited significantly lower risks of RBC transfusion compared to the pre-PBM group, with adjusted odds ratios of 0.59 [95% CI 0.44-0.79] and 0.44 [95% CI 0.32-0.60], respectively. Secondary endpoints included reductions in transfusions exceeding 2 units, total RBC units transfused, administration of allogeneic blood products, and total bleeding volume recorded on Day 1. There were no significant differences noted in mortality rates or the duration of hospital stays. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that health care education and systematic deficiency correction are associated with reduced RBC transfusion rates in elective CPB surgery. However, further randomized, controlled studies are needed to validate these findings and refine their clinical application.
RESUMO
Anaemia and iron deficiency are frequent in patients scheduled for cardiac surgery. Perioperative patient blood management (PBM) is widely recommended in current practice guidelines. The aim of this protocol is to analyse the effect of a global perioperative PBM programme on the red blood cell (RBC) transfusion ratio, morbidities and rehabilitation score in elective cardiac surgery.This study is a prospective, single-centre trial with a 2-step protocol, A and B, as follows: A: non-drug intervention: the caregiver is given a blood management educational programme; B: drug intervention: systematic correction of perioperative iron, vitamin deficiencies, and anaemia. This study was designed to enrol 900 patients (500 in group A and 400 in group B) in a rolling period starting at anaesthesia consultation and ending 3 months after surgery. The primary objective was a 20% reduction in RBC transfusion after implementation of PBM programmes (protocol A + B) when compared to our previous transfusion ratio in the first half of 2018 (30.4% vs 38%). The secondary objectives were to evaluate the impact for each step of the study on the RBC transfusion rate, morbidity and the quality of postoperative rehabilitation.The strength of this study is its evaluation of the effect of a global PBM programme on RBC transfusion in cardiac surgery through a 2-step protocol. We aim to assess for the first time the impact of non-drug and drug interventions on RBC transfusion, comorbidities and delayed rehabilitation parameters. TRIALS REGISTRATIONS: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04040023: registered 29 July 2019.