Validation of the modified Alvarado score on patients attending A&E units with suspected appendicitis.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of our prospective study was to confirm validity and diagnostic accuracy of the modified Alvarado score, which was developed at the Department of Surgery, University of Szeged, on patients presenting with symptoms suggestive of acute appendicitis (right lower quadrant complaints) at the A&E department. PATIENT POPULATION, METHODS: 138 patients were included in our study between 01.01.2019 and 01.01.2020. For patients attending A&E, the first medic calculated and recorded the modified Alvarado score before surgical consultation. The consulting surgeon decided on further treatment without knowing the score. Validation of the score was based on the pathology report of the removed appendix (whether the operation was warranted, and if the score also supported indication for surgery), if there was readmission or surgery due to worsening symptoms after discharge from A&E. We also examined if there was any connection between the value of the Alvarado score and the severity of inflammation. Our aim was to prove that using modified Alvarado score at the A&E Units helps to reduce patient's waiting time and avoid unnecessary surgical consultations. Furthermore our study included measuring the diagnostic accuracy of the ultrasound examination (specificity, sensitivity). RESULTS: Based on the results, patients presenting at A&E had a mean modified Alvarado score of 6.5. Comparing the score to histological results showed that the specificity of the modified Alvarado score was 100%, and its sensitivity was 80.7%. Based on Spearman's rank correlation (0.796) and ROC analysis (AUC 0.968), the modified Alvarado score has an excellent predictive value in diagnosing acute appendicitis. When comparing the patients' waiting times with the use of modified Alvarado score and without it we found that there was a significant difference in group also in group under 4 points and in group over 7 points when using modified Alvarado score, so the diagnostic and therapeutic algorithm should be much quicker with the help of the score. We found a correlation between the severity of inflammation based on the Fisher's exact test. Rank correlation of the same question also showed a significant connection. All patients had an US examination during their diagnostic course, its sensitivity was 82.6%, specificity was 87%. Based on this, we can conclude that the predictive value of the imaging method is good. CONCLUSIONS: We can conclude according to our results that the predictive value of the modified score is excellent, and it can be safely applied by non-surgeons in urgent care in the differential diagnosis of acute appendicitis. The new score incorporates the results of an easily obtainable, ionising radiation free imaging method, the ultrasound, which was not included in previous scores. With the help of the new score, the number of unnecessary surgical referrals and waiting times for patients are reduced, excess examinations will become avoidable.

[Laparoscopic removal of large spleens: Pfannenstiel incision as an alternative specimen extraction method]. / Laparoscopos technika alkalmazása nagyméretu lépek eltávolítására: Pfannenstiel-metszés mint alternatív specimeneltávolítási mód.

BACKGROUND: Removing the extremely enlarged spleen from the abdominal cavity is a common technical problem in case of laparoscopic splenectomy ( LS). In general, the specimen is placed into a plastic bag and removed after morcellation. In case of massive splenomegaly , when the spleen weight is 1000-2000 grams, this method is often not feasible, because the spleen size is larger than the maximum capacity of the EndoBag. According to the literature in this case the splenic extraction was performed by specimen fragmentation in the abdominal cavity (risk of splenosis) or by a laparotomy. To solve this problem our team removes the specimen via a Pfannenstiel incision since 2009. METHODS: Between January 1, 2002 and September 30, 2014, 74 LS procedures were performed at our department. The specimen was retrieved with morcellation in a conventional manner through the lateral port site in 56 cases, whereas in 12 cases, the large spleen was retrieved through a 10-12 cm long Pfannenstiel incision. RESULTS: The mean duration of surgery was 121 (50-220) minutes. In those cases where the specimen was retrieved through a Pfannenstiel incision the mean duration of surgery was significantly shorter (108 vs. 125 minutes; p=0.05), and the mean spleen size was significantly larger (1032 vs. 338 grams; p=0.0001) than in the case of morcellation. In the duration of the mean postoperative hospital stay there was no significant difference (4.7 vs. 5.2 days; p=0.178). CONCLUSION: Our study supports that laparoscopic splenectomy is safe and has numerous advantages even in the case of massive splenomegaly. The retrieval of the specimen through a Pfannenstiel incision is considered a safe and cosmetically acceptable alternative.

Impact of the Alvarado score on the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: comparing clinical judgment, Alvarado score, and a new modified score in suspected appendicitis: a prospective, randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: The Alvarado score is a clinical scoring system used in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. This study aimed to compare the reliability of the Alvarado score and clinical judgment and to refine the score to make it easier to use. METHODS: In this prospective, randomized study, patients presenting at the authors' outpatient department with suspected appendicitis during a 1-year period were assigned in weekly alternation to either group A or group B. The group A patients were treated on the basis of their Alvarado score, and the group B patients underwent treatment based on clinical judgment. The correctness of the methods was assessed by evaluation of the final histology. Statistical comparison of the data was performed using SPSS 20. RESULTS: The study investigated 269 patients (131 in group A and 138 in group B). The groups were homogeneous in terms of mean age, gender, body mass index, and American Society of Anesthesiologists score. The number of negative appendectomies was 12 (9.16%) in group A versus 5 (3.6%) in group B (p = 0.063). The clinical judgment had better specificity and sensitivity than the Alvarado score. For that reason, the specificity of the Alvarado score was refined using statistical methods, with weighting of certain clinical data and inclusion of new ones (e.g., ultrasound investigation). Consequently, the area under the curve by receiver operating characteristic analysis gradually increased, and the Alvarado score became more accurate. CONCLUSION: The study findings showed clinical judgment to be more reliable in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis than the Alvarado score, but the score is a useful diagnostic aid, especially for young colleagues. The use of the new scoring system has become easier. It includes fewer criteria as well as an important and sensitive predictor: the ultrasound investigation.

[Comparison of wound infection rates after colon and rectal surgeries using triclosan-coated or bare sutures -- a multi-center, randomized clinical study]. / Sebfertozések gyakoriságának összehasonlítása colon- és rectummutétek után triclosan bevonatú varróanyag (PDS plus®) és azonos alapanyagú nem bevont varróanyag (PDS II®) felhasználása esetén - multicentrikus, randomizált, klinikai tanulmány.

BACKGROUND: Surgical Site Infection (SSI) is the third most frequent nosocomial infection, and accounts for 14-16% of all infections. While the treatment of SSI can be very costly, previous results indicated that triclosan may reduce SSI rate. Therefore, we carried out a prospective randomised trial to further evaluate the effect of triclosan after elective colorectal surgery. METHODS: Seven surgical units in Hungary were involved in a prospective, randomised, multicentric clinical trial to compare triclosan coated (PDS plus®) and uncoated (PDS II®) sutures for abdominal wall closure in elective colorectal surgery. Pre- and perioperative variables were recorded in an online database. The primary aims of the study were to determine the incidence of SSI and the pathogens associated with it, as well as evaluation of additional cost of treatment. RESULTS: 485 patients were randomised. SSI occurred in 47 cases (12.5%), of those 23 (12.23%) from the triclosan group (n = 188) and 24 (12.18%) from the uncoated group (n = 197, p = 0.982). In 13 (27.66%) cases late appearance of SSI was detected, of those 4 patients with triclosan coated suture (8.51%) and 9 patients with uncoated suture (19.15%, p = 0.041). There was no difference between the type of incisions or elective colon and rectal resections in terms of incidence of SSI. CONCLUSION: Beneficial effect of triclosan against Gram positive bacteria could not be confirmed in our study due to the relatively low number of patients with SSI. Furthermore, triclosan did not influence the incidence of SSI due to Gram negative bacteria. SSI rate decreased by 50% compared to our previous study, however, it was regardless of the use of coated or uncoated PDS loop. Finally, operative factors were more important than patient's risk factors in terms of incidence of SSI. In case SSI developed, delayed discharge from hospital as well as special wound care significantly increased overall cost of treatment.

Laparoscopic splenectomy in our practice at the University of Szeged Department of Surgery / Laparoszkópos lépsebészet a szegedi Sebészeti Klinikán

Since its introduction in 1991, laparoscopic splenectomy has been considered the gold standard in spleen surgery, and the advantages of this technique over open surgery are indisputable. The technique was initiated in the Department of Surgery, University of Szeged in 1994 and since then our working group has gained one of the greatest experiences in this field in Hungary. Based on our results, similarly to literature data, it may be established that laparoscopic splenectomy can be considered a surgical procedure with low morbidity after gaining the necessary experience. In our study, the bowel motility recovered earlier, and hospital stay was significantly shorter after laparoscopic procedures. We proved laparoscopic splenectomy is a safe method in cases of extremely large spleens, and the Pfannenstiel incision is a cosmetically acceptable alternative for the retrieval of the spleen. Although several medications are available for second-line ITP therapy, laparoscopic splenectomy provides the longest-lasting results. In our study, young age and a preoperative response to steroids (steroid-dependent cases) were positive predictors for the success of splenectomy. Based on our experiences in the case of an immediate complete response to splenectomy, relapse occurred significantly less often.

[Clinical and histopathological results after the neo-adjuvant treatment of advanced rectal tumors]. / Klinikai és hisztopatológiai eredmények elorehaladott rectumtumorok neoadjuváns kezelése után.

The role of the surgical intervention is decisive in treating colorectal tumors. The neo-adjuvant radio-chemotherapy has improved the efficacy of the treatment of advanced rectum tumors. In order to decrease the size and stage of advanced rectal carcinoma and to increase the rate of resecability, we introduced neoadjuvant radio-chemotherapy. We carried out neo-adjuvant and surgical treatment in case of 67 patients with rectal adenocarcinoma (T 2-4 N 1-2 M 0 ) between June 1, 2005 and July 31, 2008. The average age of the patients was 61.2 years, the division according to sex was 44 males/23 females. Regarding the local stage of the rectal process or the proximity to the sphincter, we applied radio-chemotherapy (radiotherapy 25 times altogether 45 Gy and on the first and last week for 5-5 days they received 350 mg/m 2 /day 5-FU and 20 mg/m 2 /day leucovorin chemotherapy, recently complemented with 3 x 1.8 Gy advanced boost radiation aiming at the macroscopic tumor site with security zone). Patients underwent surgery 8 weeks on average after restaging examinations. Thirty-eight patients underwent anterior rectal resection with double stapler procedure; there were 18 abdominoperineal rectal extirpations, 7 Hartmann operations and 4 per annum excisions. Compared to the preoperative staging, the histological evaluation of the resected specimens showed total remission (pT 0 N 0 ) in 11% and partial remission in 43%. The morbidity necessitating reoperation was 5.9%, without mortality and suture insufficiency. The long-term neo-adjuvant oncological treatment led to down-staging of rectal tumors in most cases and increased the resecability and rate of resection operations.

Role of endoscopic clipping in the treatment of oesophageal perforations.

With advances in endoscopic technologies, endoscopic clips have been used widely and successfully in the treatment of various types of oesophageal perforations, anastomosis leakages and fistulas. Our aim was to summarize the experience with two types of clips: The through-the-scope (TTS) clip and the over-the-scope clip (OTSC). We summarized the results of oesophageal perforation closure with endoscopic clips. We processed the data from 38 articles and 127 patients using PubMed search. Based on evidence thus far, it can be stated that both clips can be used in the treatment of early (< 24 h), iatrogenic, spontaneous oesophageal perforations in the case of limited injury or contamination. TTS clips are efficacious in the treatment of 10 mm lesions, while bigger (< 20 mm) lesions can be treated successfully with OTSC clips, whose effectiveness is similar to that of surgical treatment. However, the clinical success rate is significantly lower in the case of fistulas and in the treatment of anastomosis insufficiency. Tough prospective randomized multicentre trials, which produce the largest amount of evidence, are still missing. Based on experience so far, endoscopic clips represent a possible therapeutic alternative to surgery in the treatment of oesophageal perforations under well-defined conditions.

Learning curve after rapid introduction of laparoscopic appendectomy: are there any risks in surgical resident participation?

BACKGROUND: With the spread of the minimally invasive technique, laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) is performed with increasing frequency with excellent results. The method provides surgical residents with an excellent opportunity to learn basic laparoscopic skills and prepares them for more complex interventions. METHODS: We evaluated the results of 600 laparoscopic appendectomies performed by 5 surgical residents (Group A) and 5 consultant surgeons (Group B) between 2006 and 2009. Comparing the two groups based on patient demographics, duration of surgery, operation time depending on the severity of inflammation, intraoperative blood loss, conversion rate, hospital stay in days, and postoperative complications. We also assessed the extent to which the minimum of 20 surgeries to be performed in the learning curve period as recommended by the EAES corresponds to our experience. SPPS 20 was used for the statistical analysis. RESULTS: Six hundred laparoscopic appendectomies were performed in the study period (Group A: n = 319; Group B: n = 281). A significant difference was found between the two groups in duration of surgery during the learning curve period and when comparing the duration of LA surgeries in the learning curve period with the duration of later surgeries in both groups. The operation time in case of more severe inflammation also showed a significant difference when comparing with simple appendicitis operation time. CONCLUSIONS: The rapid introduction of laparoscopy involves few risks, the surgery is also performed with sufficient safety by surgical residents, and it provides them with an excellent opportunity to learn the basic laparoscopy skills.

Laparoscopic splenectomy is a safe method in cases of extremely large spleens.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to assess if there is a relationship between the outcome of laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) procedures and the size of the spleen, the learning curve, or the method of specimen retrieval. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 1, 2002 and December 31, 2013, 70 LS procedures were performed at our department. Based on the weight of the removed spleen, patients were divided into three groups: Group 1, <350 g (n=32); Group 2, 350-1000 g (n=15); and Group 3, >1000 g (n=7). The role of the learning curve was also analyzed with the first 20 surgeries considered as the learning period. The specimen was retrieved with morcellation through the lateral port site in 54 cases, whereas in 11 cases, the large spleen was retrieved through a Pfannenstiel incision. RESULTS: The mean duration of surgery was 122 minutes. When considered by spleen weight, durations for Groups 1-3 were 117, 128, and 134 minutes, respectively. When considered by the learning curve, durations for learning and later periods were 149 and 111 minutes, respectively (P=.002). After the learning period, larger spleens were removed (208 versus 519 g; P=.02), and there were fewer conversions. The mean postoperative hospital stay was 5.1 days. In the 11 cases where the specimen was retrieved through a Pfannenstiel incision, the mean duration of surgery was 108 minutes, and the mean spleen weight was 1032 g. CONCLUSIONS: Our study supports that the proposal that LS is safe and has numerous advantages, even in the case of massive splenomegaly. Our results were mainly affected by the spleen size and the learning curve.