Treatment patterns and comparative analysis of non-intensive regimens in elderly acute myeloid leukemia patients-a real-world experience from India.

Elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia have a poor prognosis. Data from developing countries is sparse in the literature. In this retrospective study, 402 patients aged ≥ 60 years, diagnosed between Jan 2013 and Dec 2017, were analyzed for treatment patterns and survival. Median age of the whole cohort was 68 years (range 61-84). A total of 213 patients (53.3%) refused care; 188 patients (46.7%) received either BSC, LDAC, or HMA. Survival (in months) was 3.9, 6.4, and 1.2 with LDAC, HMA, and BSC, respectively. One-year survival was 17.2% and 6% with HMA and LDAC, respectively (P = 0.02). Overall response rate (ORR) did not differ between HMA and LDAC group (p = 0.12). HMA cohort had higher complete responses (20.6% vs 7.4%, p = 0.02), stable disease (32.7% vs 13.5%, p = 0.02), and transfusion independence (TI) (46.5% vs 22.2%, p = 0.01). Survival did not differ between the groups if the patients achieved ORR (12.3 vs 9.8 p = 0.2) or TI (11.6 vs 6.4 p = 0.2). Stable disease with HMA led to longer survival (8.1 vs 5.3 p = 0.01). HMAs were more effective than LDAC irrespective of cytogenetic risk category and blasts, of note HMAs improved survival of poor risk patients (5.6 vs 2.9 p = 0.004). HMA treatment (HR = 0.48; 95% 0.29-0.79, p = 0.004) and transfusion independence (HR = 0.2; 95% 0.1-0.3, p = 0.0001) predicted survival in multivariate analysis. Neutropenia and febrile neutropenia were frequent in HMA. Thrombocytopenia was the common adverse event with LDAC. Novel and cost-effective drugs are essential to improve the prognosis of these patients.

Role of prephase treatment prior to definitive chemotherapy in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

BACKGROUND: During the treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients, treatment-related toxicities are higher in the initial phase of treatment (First cycle effect). Toxicities can be tumor lysis syndrome, deterioration in performance status, febrile neutropenia, and rarely mortality. Prephase treatment before definitive chemotherapy is used in European countries to alleviate these toxicities. METHODS: This was a non-randomized study carried out with the aim to evaluate the role of prephase treatment given prior to definitive chemotherapy in newly diagnosed DLBCL patients. Patients were divided into 2 cohorts "prephase cohort" and "non-prephase cohort." Prephase cohort received prephase treatment consisting of vincristine (1 mg) on -6th day and prednisolone 100 mg daily for 7 days (-6th day to day 0). Prephase treatment was followed by CHOP/R-CHOP chemotherapy on day 1. Non-prephase cohort received chemotherapy without prephase. Both groups were followed up for 30 days post-first cycle chemotherapy. RESULTS: A total of 100 patients with DLBCL (50 in each cohort) were enrolled. There was a significant improvement in performance status of the patients who received prephase. A majority of 92% patients attained ECOG performance status of either 0 or 1 before starting chemotherapy in the prephase cohort. Febrile neutropenia was lower (16%) in the prephase cohort as compared with the non-prephase cohort (34%; P = .037). CONCLUSION: Prephase treatment prior to definitive chemotherapy (CHOP ± Rituximab) improves the performance status and decreases first cycle effect in DLBCL patients.