RESUMO
A retrospective cohort study was set up to analyse the prevalence and treatment of obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) in relation to the severity of the deformity in patients with craniofacial microsomia (CFM). This study included a population of 755 patients with CFM from three craniofacial centres. Medical charts were reviewed for severity of the deformity, types of breathing difficulty, age at which breathing difficulty first presented, treatment for OSA, and treatment outcome. In total, 133 patients (17.6%) were diagnosed with OSA. Patients with Pruzansky IIB/III classification or bilateral craniofacial microsomia were significantly more often diagnosed with OSA than unilaterally affected patients of Pruzansky I/IIA classification. The initial treatment of OSA consisted of adenotonsillectomy, tracheotomy, or non-invasive positive pressure ventilation. Thirty-seven patients received more than one treatment (range 1-3). In this study, the prevalence of OSA in patients with CFM was higher than the prevalence in the healthy population described in the literature. Although several treatment modalities are available for the treatment of OSA in patients with CFM, treatment should be individualized and based on clinical symptoms, the severity of the deformity, and comorbidities.
Assuntos
Síndrome de Goldenhar/complicações , Apneia Obstrutiva do Sono/etiologia , Apneia Obstrutiva do Sono/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Boston/epidemiologia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Terapia Combinada , Feminino , Síndrome de Goldenhar/epidemiologia , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Londres/epidemiologia , Masculino , Países Baixos/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Apneia Obstrutiva do Sono/epidemiologia , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to evaluate immediate versus delayed removal of cerclage for women with preterm premature rupture of membranes with respect to maternal and neonatal outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: We retrospectively analyzed women with preterm premature rupture of membranes at <34 weeks' gestation with prior cerclage placement. Exclusion criteria included presentation with chorioamnionitis, active labor, or nonreassuring fetal status. Timing of cerclage removal, immediate (<24 hours) or delayed (>24 hours), was compared. RESULTS: There were 25 women in the delayed-removal group and 37 in the immediate-removal group. Average times to removal were 206.8 +/- 7.4 and 5.4 +/- 0.2 hours, respectively. Use of betamethasone was similar for both groups; however, antenatal antibiotic use (100% vs 80%; P =.03) and short-term tocolytic use (20% vs 3%; P =.04) were higher in the delayed-removal group. Duration of latency was significantly longer with delayed removal (10.1 vs 5.0 days; P <. 001). Delivery occurred >48 hours from preterm premature rupture of membranes in 96% (24/25) versus 54% (20/37; P <.001) and >7 days from rupture in 56% (14/25) versus 24% (9/37; P =.02), respectively. Rates of neonatal sepsis (at <10 days) and maternal infection were not statistically different. Neonatal outcomes did not significantly differ regarding mortality, respiratory distress syndrome, birth weight, or duration of stay in the intensive care nursery. CONCLUSION: With the current management scheme for preterm premature rupture of membranes, cerclage retention significantly increases duration of latency without significantly altering maternal or neonatal outcomes.