Investigating health disparities in vestibular rehabilitation.

BACKGROUND: Health disparities (HD) impact care delivery and health outcomes in individuals with vestibular disorders (IVD). OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to identify whether health disparities (HD) exist in Vestibular Rehabilitation (VR) between individuals identifying as Caucasians or racial or ethnic minorities (REM). METHODS: This study was a retrospective chart review of IVD who attended outpatient VR between 1/2014 and 9/2020. Data recorded included age, gender, race/ethnicity, vestibular diagnosis, VR interventions, and pre-post outcome measures such as Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI), and Activities-Specific Balance Confidence Scale (ABC), Gait speed (GS), and Functional Gait Assessment (FGA). Chi-squared tests, one-tailed, and two-tailed t-tests (α= 0.05) were utilized to compare Caucasian and REM groups. RESULTS: Three hundred and forty-three charts (N = 343) met inclusion/exclusion criteria. REM demonstrated higher median DHI scores (46 vs. 38, p = 0.008) and lower ABC scores (53.10% vs. 66.30%, p <  0.001) at VR evaluation compared to Caucasians. There were no statistically significant differences in DHI, ABC, FGA, and GS scores between Caucasians and REM at discharge. CONCLUSIONS: VR was able to equalize HD in DHI and ABC which initially existed between REM and Caucasians. VR therapists should work with public health and policy researchers to improve access to VR.

Estimating the minimal clinically important difference for balance and gait outcome measures in individuals with vestibular disorders.

BACKGROUND: Vestibular Rehabilitation Therapists (VRT) utilize outcome measures to quantify gait and balance abilities in individuals with vestibular disorders (IVD). The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in gait and balance outcome measures for IVD is unknown. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to estimate the MCID of the Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale (ABC), Functional Gait Assessment (FGA), and Gait Speed (GS) using distribution and anchor-based methods relative to the Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) in IVD. METHODS: Data were collected using a retrospective chart review from two outpatient Vestibular Rehabilitation (VR) clinics. Data included demographic characteristics, diagnosis, VR course, and pre and post outcome measures including DHI, ABC, FGA, and GS. The DHI was used to classify subjects as "responders" or "non-responders" in order to calculate MCID values. RESULTS: The total number of subjects analyzed for each outcome measure was 222 for the ABC, 220 for FGA, and 237 for GS. Subjects made statistically significant improvements in ABC, DHI, FGA, and GS (p < 0.001) from pre to post VR. The MCID calculated for ABC, FGA, and GS using the anchor-based approach was 18.1%, 4 points, and 0.09 m/s respectively. The MCIDs calculated using distribution-based approach for the ABC ranged between 7.5-23.5%, FGA ranged between 1.31-4.15 points, and GS ranged between 0.07 m/s-0.22 m/s. CONCLUSIONS: The anchor-based calculations of the MCID of 18.1%, 4 points, and 0.09 m/s for ABC, FGA, and GS respectively for IVD should be used over distribution-based calculations. This is due to strength of DHI as the anchor and statistical analysis. VRT and researches can use these values to indicate meaningful changes in gait and balance function in IVD.

Can Dizziness Handicap Inventory and Activities-Specific Balance Confidence Scores Assess Vestibular Loss After Vestibular Schwannoma Excision?

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate and compare the Dizziness Handicap Inventory with Activities-specific Balance Confidence scores shortly after vestibular schwannoma excision. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective database review. SETTING: Tertiary care center. PATIENTS: Adults undergoing vestibular schwannoma excision between January 2015 and December 2019. INTERVENTION: Diagnostic, therapeutic, and rehabilitative. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Postoperative change in Dizziness Handicap Inventory scores and Activities-specific Balance Confidence scores 2 to 3 weeks after surgical intervention in relation to preoperative vestibular testing. RESULTS: A total of 49 patients met inclusion criteria. The average change in the Dizziness Handicap Inventory was 6 (p = 0.07, 95% CI 0-13). This was weakly correlated to preoperative caloric testing values (r = -0.31, p = 0.03), but not cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (cVEMP) values (r = -0.17, p = 0.23). The average change in Activities-specific Balance Confidence was -10% (p = 0.007, 95% CI -3 to -17%). This change was moderately correlated with preoperative caloric values (r = 0.42, p = 0.006), but it was not correlated with cVEMP (r = 0.07, p = 0.66). CONCLUSIONS: In vestibular schwannoma patients, factors other than preoperative vestibular function likely affect postoperative Dizziness Handicap Inventory and Activities-specific Balance Confidence scores. The change in Activities-specific Balance Confidence was slightly more consistent with expected physiological vestibular loss, and it represents another tool in a multidisciplinary vestibular evaluation of the postoperative patient.

The impact of symptoms of anxiety and depression on subjective and objective outcome measures in individuals with vestibular disorders.

BACKGROUND: Anxiety and depression are common in individuals with vestibular disorders and anecdotally symptoms of these disorders have been associated with poorer scores on subjective outcome measures of dizziness and balance. It is unknown if symptoms of psychological distress impact individual outcomes with vestibular rehabilitation therapy (VRT). OBJECTIVE: To compare subjective and objective outcome measures in subjects with vestibular disorders who have symptoms of anxiety and/or depression to those who do not exhibit those symptoms. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed at two outpatient vestibular rehabilitation clinics. Data recorded included demographics, scores on the Positive and Negative Affective Scale (PANAS), and subjective and objective outcome measures of balance and gait. RESULTS: The PANAS scale was utilized to group subjects (N = 118) into two groups: Subjects with abnormal affect (SAA) (18.6%; N = 22) and subjects with normal affect (SNA) (81.4%; N = 96). Both groups demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in all outcome measures (p < 0.001) from evaluation to discharge. SAA subjects took longer than SNA subjects to achieve goals (p < 0.05). SAA subjects tended to have poorer outcome measure scores at both initial and final assessment, but this was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Results from this study indicate that VRT is effective in treating vestibular disorders in individuals with symptoms of psychological distress such as anxiety and depression. However, individuals with these symptoms may not achieve as high of outcomes as those that do not report symptoms of psychological distress.