Increasing Levels of Positive End-expiratory Pressure Cause Stepwise Biventricular Stroke Work Reduction in a Porcine Model.

BACKGROUND: Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is commonly applied to avoid atelectasis and improve oxygenation in patients during general anesthesia but affects cardiac pressures, volumes, and loading conditions through cardiorespiratory interactions. PEEP may therefore alter stroke work, which is the area enclosed by the pressure-volume loop and corresponds to the external work performed by the ventricles to eject blood. The low-pressure right ventricle may be even more susceptible to PEEP than the left ventricle. The authors hypothesized that increasing levels of PEEP would reduce stroke work in both ventricles. METHODS: This was a prospective, observational, experimental study. Six healthy female pigs of approximately 60 kg were used. PEEP was stepwise increased from 0 to 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, and 20 cm H2O to cover the clinical spectrum of PEEP. Simultaneous, biventricular invasive pressure-volume loops, invasive blood pressures, and ventilator data were recorded. RESULTS: Increasing PEEP resulted in stepwise reductions in left (5,740 ± 973 vs. 2,303 ± 1,154 mmHg · ml; P < 0.001) and right (2,064 ± 769 vs. 468 ± 133 mmHg · ml; P < 0.001) ventricular stroke work. The relative stroke work reduction was similar between the two ventricles. Left ventricular ejection fraction, afterload, and coupling were preserved. On the contrary, PEEP increased right ventricular afterload and caused right ventriculo-arterial uncoupling (0.74 ± 0.30 vs. 0.19 ± 0.13; P = 0.01) with right ventricular ejection fraction reduction (64 ± 8% vs. 37 ± 7%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A stepwise increase in PEEP caused stepwise reduction in biventricular stroke work. However, there are important interventricular differences in response to increased PEEP levels. PEEP increased right ventricular afterload leading to uncoupling and right ventricular ejection fraction decline. These findings may support clinical decision-making to further optimize PEEP as a means to balance between improving lung ventilation and preserving right ventricular function.

Comparison of admittance and cardiac magnetic resonance generated pressure-volume loops in a porcine model.

Objective. Pressure-volume loop analysis, traditionally performed by invasive pressure and volume measurements, is the optimal method for assessing ventricular function, while cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging is the gold standard for ventricular volume estimation. The aim of this study was to investigate the agreement between the assessment of end-systolic elastance (Ees) assessed with combined CMR and simultaneous pressure catheter measurements compared with admittance catheters in a porcine model.Approach. Seven healthy pigs underwent admittance-based pressure-volume loop evaluation followed by a second assessment with CMR during simultaneous pressure measurements.Main results. Admittance overestimated end-diastolic volume for both the left ventricle (LV) and the right ventricle (RV) compared with CMR. Further, there was an underestimation of RV end-systolic volume with admittance. For the RV, however, Ees was systematically higher when assessed with CMR plus simultaneous pressure measurements compared with admittance whereas there was no systematic difference in Ees but large differences between admittance and CMR-based methods for the LV.Significance. LV and RV Ees can be obtained from both admittance and CMR based techniques. There were discrepancies in volume estimates between admittance and CMR based methods, especially for the RV. RV Ees was higher when estimated by CMR with simultaneous pressure measurements compared with admittance.

Veno-occlusive unloading of the heart reduces infarct size in experimental ischemia-reperfusion.

Mechanical unloading of the left ventricle reduces infarct size after acute myocardial infarction by reducing cardiac work. Left ventricular veno-occlusive unloading reduces cardiac work and may reduce ischemia and reperfusion injury. In a porcine model of myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury we randomized 18 pigs to either control or veno-occlusive unloading using a balloon engaged from the femoral vein into the inferior caval vein and inflated at onset of ischemia. Evans blue and 2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride were used to determine the myocardial area at risk and infarct size, respectively. Pressure-volume loops were recorded to calculate cardiac work, left ventricular (LV) volumes and ejection fraction. Veno-occlusive unloading reduced infarct size compared with controls (Unloading 13.9 ± 8.2% versus Control 22.4 ± 6.6%; p = 0.04). Unloading increased myocardial salvage (54.8 ± 23.4% vs 28.5 ± 14.0%; p = 0.02), while the area at risk was similar (28.4 ± 6.7% vs 27.4 ± 5.8%; p = 0.74). LV ejection fraction was preserved in the unloaded group, while the control group showed a reduced LV ejection fraction. Veno-occlusive unloading reduced myocardial infarct size and preserved LV ejection fraction in an experimental acute ischemia-reperfusion model. This proof-of-concept study demonstrated the potential of veno-occlusive unloading as an adjunctive cardioprotective therapy in patients undergoing revascularization for acute myocardial infarction.