Coronary CT angiography (CCTA) using third-generation dual-source CT for ruling out in-stent restenosis.

AIMS: Late in-stent restenosis (ISR) has become increasingly important, in particular due to neo-atherosclerosis. CCTA is a highly sensitive method for detecting coronary plaques. Its diagnostic accuracy regarding ISR is controversial. Stent artifacts can impede image quality, but recent developments in CT-technology may help to overcome some of these problems and allow for improved diagnostic accuracy. METHODS: Consecutive patients after previous coronary revascularization who had stable symptoms or signs of possible disease progression were examined using a third-generation dual-source CT scanner. After the scan, patients were followed for clinical events (MACE) over a mean of 399 days. Patients with high-grade stenoses were referred for invasive coronary angiography (ICA), unclear findings were further evaluated either by ICA or functional testing. RESULTS: Overall, 226 patients were included. A total of 457 stents were evaluated (2.0 ± 1.4 per patient). Mean stent diameter was 2.9 ± 0.45 mm. In 61%, a high-pitch protocol was employed. Mean dose-length product (DLP) of CCTA was 159.2 mGy cm, corresponding to 2.2 mSv using a conversion factor of k = 0.014. Mean amount of contrast agent was 58.3 ± 12.5 ml. In 145 patients (64%), CCTA was negative. In this group, one MACE occurred (acute coronary syndrome) during follow-up in a patient who had also undergone unremarkable ICA. In 23 patients (10%), CCTA detected 28 ISR which were confirmed and treated by ICA (true positive). In 27 patients (12%), ISR was suspected by CCTA but excluded by ICA (false positive), 30 patients (13%) had unclear findings and normal non-invasive tests. No MACE occurred during follow-up in these patients. One patient was misclassified in CCTA as having intermediate and not high-grade ISR who underwent revascularization within 3 months. Eleven patients (5%) were lost to follow-up. During follow-up, eight patients had myocardial infarctions due to five ISRs and three de novo lesions. No patient died. In cases with unclear or false-positive findings, the amount of stents was significantly higher, stents were smaller and patients had a higher BMI. CONCLUSION: In almost two-thirds of symptomatic patients with previous coronary stent implantation, ISR could be ruled out by CCTA. 10% of patients had definite ISR. The rate of false-negative findings was low (< 1%), whereas the rate of false positive or inconclusive findings was 25%, leading to invasive rule-out of ISR by ICA in 12%. CCTA appears valuable as a tool for safely excluding ISR. It might help to avoid invasive diagnostic procedures. Further analyses are warranted, in particular regarding the influence of stent dimensions and the total amount of stents in a patient.

Radiation dose exposure of computed tomography coronary angiography: comparison of dual-source, 16-slice and 64-slice CT.

BACKGROUND: Dual-source CT (DSCT) promises a significant reduction of radiation dose exposure for coronary CT angiography (CTA). Large studies on radiation dose estimates are rare. OBJECTIVE: To compare radiation dose estimates of DSCT with 16- and 64-slice multidetector CT (MDCT) for non-invasive coronary angiography. PATIENTS AND DESIGN: Retrospective data analysis was performed on 292 patients: 56 patients were examined with 16-slice MDCT, 38 patients with 64-slice MDCT and 202 patients using DSCT. The effective dose (ED) estimates were calculated for all patients from the dose-length product and the conversion factor k (0.017 mSv/mGy/cm), as recommended by current guidelines. RESULTS: The mean (SD) ED for patients examined by 16-slice MDCT was 9.8 (1.8) mSv, for 64-slice MDCT 8.6 (2.8) mSv and for DSCT 11.4 (7.2) mSv. With a protocol of 100 kV tube voltage and 110 ms ECG pulsing window the mean (SD) ED was 3.8 (1.7) mSv for DSCT scanning. When DSCT with a tube voltage of 100 kV was used, a significant inverse correlation between heart rate and radiation dose exposure was found. CONCLUSIONS: When standard protocols for coronary CTA with 16-, 64-slice MDCT and DSCT scanners are used, the radiation dose is still high. However, using optimised and individually adjusted protocols low estimated radiation doses can be achieved.

Noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-detector-row computed tomography in patients with a low to moderate pretest probability of significant coronary artery disease.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the value of 64-detector-row computed tomography for ruling out high-grade coronary stenoses in patients with a low to moderate pretest probability of significant coronary artery disease. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study included 61 patients with a suspicion of coronary artery disease on the basis of atypical angina or ambiguous findings in noninvasive stress testing and a class II indication for invasive coronary angiography (ICA). All patients were examined by 64-detector-row computed tomography angiography (CTA) and ICA. On a coronary segmental level, the presence of significant (> or = 50% diameter) stenoses was examined. RESULTS: In a total of 915 segments, CTA detected 62 significant stenoses. Thirty-four significant stenoses were confirmed by ICA, whereas 28 stenoses could not be confirmed by ICA. Twenty-two of them showed wall irregularities on ICA, and six were angiographically normal. Accordingly, on a coronary segmental basis, 28 false-positive and 0 false-negative findings resulted in a sensitivity of 100%, a specificity of 96.8%, a positive predictive value of 54.8%, and a negative predictive value of 100%. The diagnostic accuracy was 96.9%. CONCLUSION: Sixty-four-detector-row computed tomography reliably detects significant coronary stenoses in patients with suspected coronary artery disease and appears to be helpful in the selection of patients who need to undergo ICA. Calcified and non-calcified plaques are detected. Grading of stenoses in areas with calcification is difficult. Frequently, stenosis severity is overestimated by 64-detector-row computed tomography.

Assessment of left ventricular function and mass in patients undergoing computed tomography (CT) coronary angiography using 64-detector-row CT: comparison to magnetic resonance imaging.

PURPOSE: To quantify left ventricular function and mass derived from retrospectively ECG-gated 64-detector-row computed tomography coronary angiography data sets in comparison to cine magnetic resonance (MR) imaging as the reference standard. We hypothesized that the administration of beta-blockers prior to multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) coronary angiography has a significant impact on left ventricular functional parameters. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Multiplanar reformations in the short-axis orientation were calculated from axial contrast-enhanced CT images in 21 patients (16 male, five female; age range 41-75 years, mean 64.3+/-6.8 years) referred for CT coronary angiography. Patients whose heart rates exceeded 60 bpm received 5 mg bisoprolol orally 1 hour before the MDCT examination. In case of insufficient heart-rate reduction, up to four vials (20 mg) of metoprolol were injected intravenously. The end-diastolic volume (EDV), end-systolic volume (ESV), stroke volume (SV), ejection fraction (EF), cardiac output (CO), and left ventricular mass (LVM) of the reformatted images were analyzed compared to volumetric measurements based on continuous short-axis steady-state free-precession cine MR sequences (TR 3 ms, TE 1.5 ms, FA 60 degrees ). RESULTS: On average, each patient received 15.5 mg metoprolol (range 0-20 mg) and 3.85 mg bisoprolol (range 0-5 mg). The mean heart rate was 56+/-5 bpm during CT and 73+/-9 bpm during MRI examination. This difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Mean EDV and ESV measured on MDCT were significantly higher compared to MR (MDCT vs. MR: EDV 164.2+/-52.5 vs. 144.2+/-46.7 ml, ESV 77.3+/-46.6 vs. 63.8+/-47.3 ml; P<0.05). Mean EF and CO derived from MDCT images were significantly lower compared to MR (MDCT vs. MR: EF 55.4+/-11.8 vs. 59.3+/-15.4%, CO 4822+/-779 vs. 5755+/-1267 ml; P<0.05). Mean SV and LVM were not significantly different between both methods (MDCT vs. MR: SV 86.8+/-18.1 vs. 80.3+/-15.6 ml, P = 0.44; LVM 132.4+/-42.5 vs. 138.7+/-39.1 g, P = 0.31). CONCLUSION: Left ventricular volumes assessed by the newest-generation MDCT scanners are significantly higher compared with MRI, whereas ejection fraction and cardiac output are significantly lower in MDCT. This appears to be a result of the frequent application of beta-blockers prior to MDCT examinations.