Treatment of morbid obesity with the Transcend Implantable Gastric Stimulator (IGS): a prospective survey.

BACKGROUND: The implantable gastric stimulator (IGS), a pacemaker-like device, has been found to be safe and effective to induce and maintain weight loss. We present our experience with 20 morbidly obese patients. METHODS: Between September 20 and November 22, 2002, 20 patients (F/M 12/8), mean age 40.3 years (23-62) underwent IGS implantation. Mean BMI was 40.9 (33.9-48.2), mean weight 115.0 kg (87.0-137.0) and mean excess weight (EW) 51.3 kg (35.6-70.1).Co-morbitidies were: 3 cases of hypertension, 1 diabetes, 1 dislipidemia and 1 depression. Mean operative time was 58.5 min (37-85). The IGS was actived 30 days after implantation. Patients were advised to follow a low calorie diet and behavior modification (to avoid fat and to ingest more liquids during meals, to chew slowly, to eat vegetables before main meals, and to perform exercise daily). RESULTS: Mean +/- standard error percent excess weight loss (%EWL) was: 10.6+/-1.8 at 1 month; 15.0+/-2.3 at 2 months; 16.6+/-2.6 at 3 months; 18.1+/-3.5 at 4 months; 15.5+/-3.5 at 6 months; 18.9+/-3.5 at 8 months; and 23.8+/-5.0 at 10 months. There were no intra-operative surgical or long-term complications. There were 3 intra-operative gastric penetrations, observed by gastroscopy, without sequelae. One patient with hypertension ceased his medical therapy at the 4th month. CONCLUSION: IGS can be implanted laparoscopically with minimal perioperative complications. The observed weight loss is comparable to other noninvasive procedures. If weight loss is maintained, IGS could be considered as a first choice therapy in the treatment of morbid obesity in selected patients.

Preoperative weight loss by intragastric balloon in super-obese patients treated with laparoscopic gastric banding: a case-control study.

BACKGROUND: The authors investigated the usefulness of preoperative treatment with the BIB intragastric balloon in super-obese patients before undergoing laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB). METHODS: The case-control study involved 43 case patients treated with the intragastric balloon followed by LAGB ("Case" group) and 43 sex-, age- and BMI-matched historical controls treated with LAGB alone. RESULTS: Mean length of the intragastric balloon treatment was 164.4+/-39.7 days, with a fill volume of 609+/-95 ml. Total complication rate with balloon was 7.0% and percent excess weight loss (%EWL) was 26.1 +/- SD 9.3 %. At the time of gastric band placement, both operative time and hospital stay were shorter in patients treated previously with the balloon (Case group) than in the Control group patients. No Case patients required conversion to open surgery or had intraoperative complications. In the Control group, the rate of conversion was 16.3% (P<0.05) and the rate of intraoperative complications was 7.0%. Postoperative follow-up length was 1.1+/-1.0 years in Case patients and 4.4+/-1.8 years in Control patients (P<0.001). The %EWL produced by the intragastric balloon in the Case patients was identical to the %EWL observed in the first 6 months after LAGB in the Control group (26.1+/-9.3 vs 25.3+/-12.4%). %EWL 6 months after banding was higher in the Case patients than in Controls (33.6+/-12.5 vs 25.3+/-12.4%, P<0.01). However, no significant difference in %EWL between the two groups was observed at the subsequent postoperative evaluations. CONCLUSION: Preoperative treatment with the intragastric balloon reduced the risk of conversion to open surgery and the risk of intraoperative complications in super-obese patients treated with LAGB. Preoperative treatment with the intragastric balloon did not change the total weight loss after LAGB.