Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 33
Filtrar
1.
Thorax ; 76(10): 970-979, 2021 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33622981

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of venous thromboembolic event (VTE) and arterial thromboembolic event (ATE) thromboembolic events in patients with COVID-19 remains largely unknown. METHODS: In this meta-analysis, we systematically searched for observational studies describing the prevalence of VTE and ATE in COVID-19 up to 30 September 2020. RESULTS: We analysed findings from 102 studies (64 503 patients). The frequency of COVID-19-related VTE was 14.7% (95% CI 12.1% to 17.6%, I2=94%; 56 studies; 16 507 patients). The overall prevalence rates of pulmonary embolism (PE) and leg deep vein thrombosis were 7.8% (95% CI 6.2% to 9.4%, I2=94%; 66 studies; 23 117 patients) and 11.2% (95% CI 8.4% to 14.3%, I2=95%; 48 studies; 13 824 patients), respectively. Few were isolated subsegmental PE. The VTE prevalence was significantly higher in intensive care unit (ICU) (23.2%, 95% CI 17.5% to 29.6%, I2=92%, vs 9.0%, 95% CI 6.9% to 11.4%, I2=95%; pinteraction<0.0001) and in series systematically screening patients compared with series testing symptomatic patients (25.2% vs 12.7%, pinteraction=0.04). The frequency rates of overall ATE, acute coronary syndrome, stroke and other ATE were 3.9% (95% CI 2.0% to to 3.0%, I2=96%; 16 studies; 7939 patients), 1.6% (95% CI 1.0% to 2.2%, I2=93%; 27 studies; 40 597 patients) and 0.9% (95% CI 0.5% to 1.5%, I2=84%; 17 studies; 20 139 patients), respectively. Metaregression and subgroup analyses failed to explain heterogeneity of overall ATE. High heterogeneity limited the value of estimates. CONCLUSIONS: Patients admitted in the ICU for severe COVID-19 had a high risk of VTE. Conversely, further studies are needed to determine the specific effects of COVID-19 on the risk of ATE or VTE in less severe forms of the disease.


Assuntos
COVID-19/complicações , Tromboembolia/epidemiologia , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/terapia , Cuidados Críticos , Hospitalização , Humanos , Prevalência , Tromboembolia/diagnóstico , Tromboembolia/prevenção & controle
2.
Rheumatology (Oxford) ; 59(9): 2226-2236, 2020 09 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32449926

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To assess the net benefit of biological agents (BA) used in JIA. METHODS: We systematically searched databases up to March 2019 for randomized controlled trials (RCT) performed in JIA disease. Separate random-effects meta-analyses were conducted for efficacy (ACR paediatric score 30%, ACRpedi30) and serious adverse events for safety. In order to standardize the baseline risk, we performed a meta-analysis of baseline risk in the control group (for both efficacy and safety meta-analysis). The net benefit was determined as the risk difference of efficacy subtracted by the risk difference of safety. RESULTS: We included 19 trials: 11 parallel RCTs (754 patients) and 8 withdrawal RCTs (704 patients). The net benefit ranged from 2.4% (adalimumab) to 17.6% (etanercept), and from 2.4% (etanercept) to 36.7%, (abatacept) in parallel and withdrawal trials assessing non-systemic JIA, respectively. In the systemic JIA category, the net benefit ranged from 22.8% (rilonacept) to 70.3% (canakinumab), and from 32.3% (canakinumab) to 58.2% (tocilizumab) in parallel and withdrawal trials, respectively. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that a greater number of patients experienced therapeutic success without serious adverse events in the systemic onset JIA category compared with the BAs for non-systemic JIA categories. Baseline risk, design of trial and JIA categories impact the measure of net benefit of BAs in JIA patients.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/uso terapêutico , Antirreumáticos/uso terapêutico , Artrite Juvenil/tratamento farmacológico , Fatores Biológicos/uso terapêutico , Abatacepte/uso terapêutico , Adalimumab/uso terapêutico , Artrite Juvenil/imunologia , Criança , Etanercepte/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Análise de Regressão , Medição de Risco , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
Semin Respir Crit Care Med ; 40(2): 255-270, 2019 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31137064

RESUMO

Lung involvement is the leading cause of mortality in inflammatory myopathy. A careful assessment of clinical and serologic manifestations especially myositis-associated autoantibodies allows precise classification of the different phenotypes of inflammatory myopathy and stratification of the risk of lung involvement. About three out of four patients with inflammatory myopathy develop interstitial lung disease (ILD), which represents the main cause of morbidity and mortality. In patients with a confirmed diagnosis of inflammatory myopathy, the approach to the diagnosis of ILD includes assessment of clinical and functional severity, evaluation of the high-resolution computed tomography pattern of disease, which often suggests nonspecific interstitial pneumonia or organizing pneumonia. Bronchoalveolar lavage to rule out infection is often performed; however, video-assisted thoracoscopic lung biopsy is now generally discouraged, unless malignancy is suspected. The so-called antisynthetase syndrome characterized by the combination of mechanics' hands, Raynaud' phenomenon, myositis often mild or absent, and presence of one of the anti-tRNA synthetase antibodies is associated with a 70% risk of ILD, especially in subjects with antibodies other than anti-Jo1 antibodies (i.e., anti-PL7 or -PL12 antibodies). Treatment depends on both severity and progression of ILD, often including a combination of corticosteroids and immunosuppressive therapy. Rituximab-based regimen has showed promising results in retrospective studies for the management of refractory or rapidly progressive forms of ILD. Clinical trials are ongoing to evaluate the actual efficacy of this strategy on mortality related to lung disease. Secondary pulmonary complications of inflammatory myopathy include opportunistic infections, aspiration pneumonia, pneumomediastinum, ventilatory failure due to diaphragmatic muscular weakness, drug-induced pneumonitis, and rarely pulmonary hypertension.


Assuntos
Pneumopatias/etiologia , Miosite/complicações , Autoanticorpos/imunologia , Progressão da Doença , Humanos , Pneumopatias/diagnóstico , Pneumopatias/mortalidade , Pneumopatias/terapia , Miosite/imunologia
7.
Fundam Clin Pharmacol ; 38(2): 369-379, 2024 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38012082

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) represent a breakthrough in oncology in terms of prognosis and safety. They now constitute a cornerstone in the management of metastatic melanoma. However, a new kind of adverse event called immune-related adverse events (irAE) has emerged. These irAE could be conceptually considered as an indicator of the antitumoral immune response, but the association between irAE and prognosis is still a matter of debate. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between the overall survival (OS) and the prevalence of irAE in melanoma. METHODS: MEDLINE/PubMed, WebofScience, ClinicalTrials, and WHOTrials databases were searched to identify phase 3 randomized controlled trials (RCT) assessing ICI in melanoma and published up to April 2021. A weighted regression was performed to estimate this association according to standard method of surrogacy analysis. RESULTS: A total of 14 RCT including 7646 patients (median age: 59.3 years) with melanoma were included. All types of ICI were represented (ipilimumab, tremelimumab, pembrolizumab, nivolumab, atezolizumab, as well as ipilimumab and nivolumab combination). irAE were frequent but rarely fatal. The combination of ICI caused more irAE than anti-PD1 (or PDL1) and anti-CTLA4 monotherapies. No relationship was found between the occurrence of irAE and OS (beta coefficient 0.078, R2 3%, p = 0.52), nor between cutaneous irAE and OS (beta coefficient 0.080, R2 6%, p = 0.33). CONCLUSION: Although limited by the heterogeneity of ICI included in the regression and the low number of included RCT, the present study suggests an absence of association between irAE and prognosis in melanoma.


Assuntos
Melanoma , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Melanoma/tratamento farmacológico , Nivolumabe/efeitos adversos , Ipilimumab/efeitos adversos , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/efeitos adversos , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos
8.
Biomed Pharmacother ; 171: 116055, 2024 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38171239

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: During the first wave of COVID-19, hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) was used off-label despite the absence of evidence documenting its clinical benefits. Since then, a meta-analysis of randomised trials showed that HCQ use was associated with an 11% increase in the mortality rate. We aimed to estimate the number of HCQ-related deaths worldwide. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We estimated the worldwide in-hospital mortality attributable to HCQ use by combining the mortality rate, HCQ exposure, number of hospitalised patients, and the increased relative risk of death with HCQ. The mortality rate in hospitalised patients for each country was calculated using pooled prevalence estimated by a meta-analysis of published cohorts. The HCQ exposure was estimated using median and extreme estimates from the same systematic review. The number of hospitalised patients during the first wave was extracted from dedicated databases. The systematic review included 44 cohort studies (Belgium: k = 1, France: k = 2, Italy: k = 12, Spain: k = 6, Turkey: k = 3, USA: k = 20). HCQ prescription rates varied greatly from one country to another (range 16-84%). Overall, using median estimates of HCQ use in each country, we estimated that 16,990 HCQ-related in-hospital deaths (range 6267-19256) occurred in the countries with available data. The median number of HCQ-related deaths in Belgium, Turkey, France, Italy, Spain, and the USA was 240 (range not estimable), 95 (range 92-128), 199 (range not estimable), 1822 (range 1170-2063), 1895 (range 1475-2094) and 12739 (3244- 15570), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Although our estimates are limited by their imprecision, these findings illustrate the hazard of drug repurposing with low-level evidence.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Hidroxicloroquina , Humanos , Ensaios de Uso Compassivo , Tratamento Farmacológico da COVID-19 , Resultado do Tratamento
9.
Front Med (Lausanne) ; 11: 1341310, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38585151

RESUMO

Introduction: Asthma associated with eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) is often severe and corticosteroid-dependent, leading to significant morbidity. Mepolizumab and benralizumab are humanized monoclonal antibodies targeting interleukin 5 (IL-5) and its receptor, respectively. They have been shown to be effective in steroid-sparing in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma. Objective: Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of mepolizumab and benralizumab prescribed for severe asthma in patients with EGPA under "real-world" conditions. Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of patients with EGPA and persistent asthma who received either mepolizumab 100 or 300 mg administered every 4 weeks, or benralizumab 30 mg administered every 4 weeks for the initial 3 injections and followed by an injection every 8 weeks thereafter, whilst combined with oral glucocorticoids. The follow-up every 6 ± 3 months included an assessment of clinical manifestations, pulmonary function tests and eosinophil cell count. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients at 12 months receiving a daily oral dose of prednisone or equivalent of 4 mg or less with a BVAS of 0. Results: Twenty-six patients were included. After 12 months of treatment with mepolizumab or benralizumab, 32% of patients met the primary outcome and were receiving less than 4 mg of prednisone per day with a BVAS of 0. The median dose of prednisone was 10 mg per day at baseline, 9 mg at 6 months, and 5 mg at 12 months (p ≤ 0.01). At 12 months, 23% of patients were weaned off corticosteroids, while an increase or no change in dose was observed in 27% of patients. The median eosinophil count was significantly reduced from 365 cells/mm3 to 55 cells/mm3 at 6 months and 70 cells/mm3 at 12 months, respectively. No significant change was observed in FEV1. After 12 months of treatment, 14% of patients had had an average of 1 exacerbation of asthma, compared with 52% of patients before baseline. The tolerability profile was favorable. Conclusion: In this real-world study in patients with severe asthma and a history of EGPA asthma, mepolizumab and benralizumab had a significant steroid-sparing effect and reduced asthma exacerbation, but no significant effect on lung function.

10.
Eur J Intern Med ; 2024 Apr 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38627183

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the ability of 18FDG PET/CT, at diagnosis of giant cell arteritis (GCA) and during follow-up, to predict occurrence of relapse in large-vessel GCA (LV-GCA). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study using the French Study Group for Large-Vessel Vasculitis (GEFA) network. Data from patients with LV-GCA diagnosed by PET/CT and who had PET/CT in the following year were collected. For each PET/CT, PET vascular activity score (PETVAS) and total vascular score (TVS) were assessed, and their ability to predict the occurrence of subsequent relapse was assessed. RESULTS: A total of 65 LV-GCA patients were included, of whom 55 had undergone a follow-up PET/CT 3 to 12 months after the diagnosis of GCA. Patients for whom the second PET/CT (PET2) was performed during active GCA were excluded. PETVAS and TVS decreased between PET1 and PET2 in all patients (p < 0.001). There was no correlation between vascular activity scores in PET2 and time to prednisone taper. For relapse prediction, at PET1, the AUC of the TVS and PETVAS were respectively 51.9 and 41.9 at 6 months, 55.3 and 49.7 at 1 year, 55 and 55.7 at 2 years. For PET2, the AUC were respectively 46.1 and 46.7 at 6 months, 52.1 and 48.9 at 1 year, 58.4 and 52.3 at 2 years. CONCLUSION: PET vascular activity scores at diagnosis and at follow-up PET/CT performed outside a period of GCA activity do not display high performance to predict the occurrence of subsequent relapse in LV-GCA patients.

11.
Blood Adv ; 7(21): 6451-6465, 2023 11 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37624775

RESUMO

The treatment of autoimmune acquired pure red cell aplasia (aPRCA) is challenging. Guidelines are based on expert recommendations in the absence of controlled trials. We assessed the efficacy of the main treatment strategy through a systematic review and meta-analysis using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library up to September 2022. The overall response rate (ORR) was pooled using random-effects models. In total, 24 observational studies (19 retrospective, median follow-up of 48 months) encompassing 753 patients (49% male) were included. Primary aPRCA represented 57% of the cases. The risk of bias was moderate to high using the ROBINS-I tool. Substantial heterogeneity (I2 > 50%) was retrieved. Corticosteroids as monotherapy as first-line treatment (186 patients, 13 studies) provided an ORR of 47% (95% confidence interval [CI], 34-60). Cyclosporine A was the most frequently used immunosuppressant agent (384 patients, 18 studies), providing an ORR of 74% (95% CI, 66-82) with a similar ORR in first- (73%) and second-line (76%) treatment and when cyclosporin was used as monotherapy (83%) or with corticosteroids (77%). A total of 112 patients (10 studies) received cyclophosphamide, with an ORR of 49% (95% CI, 35-64), which was higher when cyclophosphamide was combined with corticosteroids (48%) and used in second-line treatment (58%) than in monotherapy (31%), and in first-line treatment (44%). Sirolimus use was reported only after cyclosporine A failure and provided an ORR of 87% (95% CI, 68-100; 64 patients, 3 studies). Substantial uncertainty remains regarding the best treatment strategy in the absence of high-quality evidence. This study was registered on the PROPERO database as #CRD42022360452.


Assuntos
Ciclosporina , Aplasia Pura de Série Vermelha , Humanos , Corticosteroides/uso terapêutico , Ciclofosfamida , Aplasia Pura de Série Vermelha/tratamento farmacológico , Aplasia Pura de Série Vermelha/etiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos
12.
HLA ; 101(1): 3-15, 2023 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36258305

RESUMO

In biomedical research, population differences are of central interest. Variations in the frequency and severity of diseases and in treatment effects among human subpopulation groups are common in many medical conditions. Unfortunately, the practices in terms of subpopulation labeling do not exhibit the level of rigor one would expect in biomedical research, especially when studying multifactorial diseases such as cancer or atherosclerosis. The reporting of population differences in clinical research is characterized by large disparities in practices, and fraught with methodological issues and inconsistencies. The actual designations such as "Black" or "Asian" refer to broad and heterogeneous groups, with a great discrepancy among countries. Moreover, the use of obsolete concepts such as "Caucasian" is unfortunate and imprecise. The use of adequate labeling to reflect the scientific hypothesis needs to be promoted. Furthermore, the use of "race/ethnicity" as a unique cause of human heterogeneity may distract from investigating other factors related to a medical condition, particularly if this label is employed as a proxy for cultural habits, diet, or environmental exposure. In addition, the wide range of opinions among researchers does not facilitate the attempts made for resolving this heterogeneity in labeling. "Race," "ethnicity," "ancestry," "geographical origin," and other similar concepts are saturated with meanings. Even if the feasibility of a global consensus on labeling seems difficult, geneticists, sociologists, anthropologists, and ethicists should help develop policies and practices for the biomedical field.


Assuntos
Pesquisa Biomédica , Grupos Populacionais , Humanos , Geografia
13.
Therapie ; 78(6): 667-678, 2023.
Artigo em Francês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36841655

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The polypill strategy could become widely accepted in cardiovascular prevention due to reduced costs and its simplicity, which promote compliance. Aspirin is often included as a component of the polypill for primary prevention, but three powerful recent trials failed to show any favorable net benefit even in high-risk subgroups. Our objective is to estimate the net benefit associated with aspirin in primary cardiovascular prevention. METHODS: We simulated the impact of different polypill compositions combining pravastatin, ramipril, hydrochlorothiazide, with or without aspirin, on a realistic French virtual population between 35 and 65 years old. We assessed how this impact on myocardial infarction and stroke varied according to gender, diabetes, and arterial hypertension. We identified the subgroup of individuals whose specific benefit from aspirin was greater than twice the risk of serious bleeding it induced. RESULTS: The absolute benefit associated with aspirin was reduced by co-prescriptions. No subgroup of women benefited from aspirin, and the subgroup of women with a clear net benefit represented 128 women out of 529,421. Men at high risk of cardiovascular death, or with diabetes and hypertension, had a benefit from aspirin exceeding the risk of bleeding induced, but this risk represented more than half of the benefit. No subgroup analyzed did show a benefit greater than twice the risk of bleeding. The proportion of men whose expected benefit from aspirin was greater than twice the risk of bleeding represented 3% of all men. An optimal polypill strategy in primary prevention between the ages of 35 and 65, combining three drugs but not aspirin, can hope to save two out of three strokes and more than one out of two myocardial infarctions. It would prevent a major cardiovascular accident every 16 to 193 individuals treated according to the subgroups considered. CONCLUSION: Until proven otherwise, aspirin has only a limited place in individuals between 35 and 65 years without a cardiovascular history. We showed how simulating therapeutic strategies on a realistic virtual population could be used for best applying available evidence.


Assuntos
Doenças Cardiovasculares , Diabetes Mellitus , Hipertensão , Infarto do Miocárdio , Acidente Vascular Cerebral , Masculino , Humanos , Feminino , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Aspirina/uso terapêutico , Doenças Cardiovasculares/epidemiologia , Doenças Cardiovasculares/prevenção & controle , Infarto do Miocárdio/tratamento farmacológico , Hemorragia , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/prevenção & controle , Diabetes Mellitus/tratamento farmacológico , Hipertensão/tratamento farmacológico , Hipertensão/epidemiologia , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/uso terapêutico
14.
Therapie ; 2023 Nov 18.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38008601

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The disputatio is a pedagogical method existing since the Middle-Ages where students had to debate about a question asked by a "master", exercising their thinking and oratory skills. To move away from traditional vertical teaching methods, the disputatio has been revived by pharmacologists. Thus, for almost three successive years, several groups of young French pharmacologists and therapists confronted their ideas concerning a medical question at a therapeutic impasse. The aim here is to describe the initial feedback received from participants. METHODS: An anonymous questionnaire was sent by email in May 2023 to the participants of the different disputationes of 2019, 2022 and 2023. Participants were asked about different aspects of their feelings before, during and after the disputatio, using the 5-point Likert scale. They were also asked to describe the event in 2 to 5 words. Finally, participants could leave their comments in a free-field and were asked to give an overall satisfaction score out of 10. RESULTS: Out of the 39 participants, 27 (69.2%) answered the questionnaire. Although 50% of respondents reported a feeling of anxiety before participating, most enjoyed the expert talks as well as working with people they did not know. Besides, over 66% reported having underestimated the skills they could share with colleagues from different backgrounds. Over 55% of respondents reported progress in methodology, and over 83% in pharmacology and/or therapeutics. Participants reported an overall satisfaction score of 8.6/10, and the main terms used to describe the event were "sharing", "enriching" and "meeting". CONCLUSION: The disputatio is an innovative training program whose pedagogical and human values were underlined by most of the participants. Beyond pharmacology and therapeutics, the principle of disputatio could be extended to other disciplines, spanning the centuries.

15.
Nutrients ; 14(3)2022 Feb 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35277032

RESUMO

Iron deficiency (ID) diagnosis in cystic fibrosis (CF) is challenging because of frequent systemic inflammation. We aimed to determine the prevalence and risk factors of ID in adult patients with CF. We conducted a single-centre prospective study in a referral centre. ID was defined by transferrin saturation ≤16% or ferritin ≤20 (women) or 30 (men) µg/L, or ≤100 µg/L in the case of systemic inflammation. Apparent exacerbation was an exclusion criterion. We included 165 patients (78 women), mean age­31.1 ± 8.9 years. ID prevalence was 44.2%. ID was significantly associated with female gender (58.9% vs. 38%), lower age (29.4 ± 8.5 vs. 32.5 ± 9.1), lower body mass index (20.5 ± 2.2 vs. 21.3 ± 2.5), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa colonization (70.8% vs. 55.1%). Diabetes mellitus, antiacid drug use and low pulmonary function were more frequent in patients with ID with no statistical significance. The use of CFTR correctors was not associated with ID. In the multivariate analysis, ID was associated with female gender (OR 2.64, CI95% 1.31−5.31), age < 30 years (OR 2.30, CI95% 1.16−4.56), and P. aeruginosa (OR 2.09, CI95% 1.04−4.19).


Assuntos
Fibrose Cística , Deficiências de Ferro , Adulto , Estudos Transversais , Fibrose Cística/complicações , Fibrose Cística/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Ferro , Masculino , Estudos Prospectivos , Encaminhamento e Consulta
16.
Front Neurosci ; 16: 906360, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35585918

RESUMO

Aceruloplasminemia is a rare autosomal recessive inherited disorder. Mutations in the ceruloplasmin gene cause depressed ferroxidase activity leading to iron accumulation. The clinical phenotype is highly variable: anemia, retinopathy, diabetes mellitus, psychiatric disorders, and neurological symptoms including parkinsonian disorders and dementia are the main features of this disease. Characterized by high serum ferritin with low transferrin saturation, aceruloplasminemia uniquely combines brain, liver and systemic iron overload. We report here four new cases of aceruloplasminemia in a consanguineous North-African family. Genetic sequencing revealed a homozygous missense variant c.656T>A in exon 4 of the ceruloplasmin gene, which had been described previously as of "unknown significance" in the dbSNP database and never associated with ACP in the HGMD database. Ferroxidase activity was strongly depressed. Clinical manifestations varied among cases. The proband exhibited mild microcytic anemia, diabetes mellitus, psychosis and parkinsonism, whereas the other cases were asymptomatic or mildly anemic, although high serum ferritin and brain iron deposition were documented in all of them. Therapeutic management was complex. The proband started deferoxamine treatment when already symptomatic and he rapidly declined. In the asymptomatic cases, the treatment was associated with poor tolerance and was discontinued due to anemia requiring red blood cell transfusion. Our series illustrates the need for new therapeutic approaches to aceruloplasminemia.

17.
Autoimmun Rev ; 21(1): 102930, 2022 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34481940

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The relapse rate of giant cell arteritis (GCA) is around 48%. Major relapse of GCA is defined by the European League Against Rheumatism as severe ischemic or aortic (stenosis, aneurysm, or aortic dissection) disease of GCA. The objective of the present study was to determine the prevalence and incidence, as well as the spectrum of major relapse in GCA using published data. METHODS: The MEDLINE and Cochrane databases were searched up to March 2020. Studies that included patients with newly diagnosed or relapsed GCA receiving glucocorticoids (GC) alone and/or GC-sparing therapy, detailing the number of relapsing patients and the characteristics of relapses were included. The prevalence and incidence of major relapse were pooled using a random-effects model. RESULTS: Twenty-six studies (including eight randomised controlled trials) involving 2754 patients with GCA were included. The prevalence and incidence of major relapse in this population was 3.3% (95%CI [1.7;5.6]; I2 = 86%) and 14.5/100 patient-years (95%CI [5.2;27.2]; I2 = 90%). The clinical manifestations were jaw claudication (44.3%), ophthalmological involvement (32.7%), peripheral limb ischemia (12.5%), aortic (7.7%), and neurological involvements (4.8%). In the meta-regression analysis, the duration of follow-up was negatively associated with the incidence of major relapse (Beta = -0.015, 95%CI [-0.026; -0.0042]; p = 0.0063). The incidence of major relapse was significantly higher in prospective studies (55.2/100 person-years, 95%CI [15.3;114.3] than in retrospective studies (4.1/100 patient-years, 95%CI[1.1;8.4]; pinteraction = 0.000.2). CONCLUSION: This study found that there was heterogeneity among studies, and this is partially related to study design. Jaw claudication was frequent and increases the prevalence and incidence of relapses major.


Assuntos
Arterite de Células Gigantes , Arterite de Células Gigantes/diagnóstico , Arterite de Células Gigantes/tratamento farmacológico , Arterite de Células Gigantes/epidemiologia , Glucocorticoides , Humanos , Estudos Prospectivos , Recidiva , Estudos Retrospectivos
18.
Joint Bone Spine ; 89(5): 105380, 2022 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35490940

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Vaccination is considered as a cornerstone of the management of COVID-19 pandemic. However, while vaccines provide a robust protection in immunocompetent individuals, the immunogenicity in patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases (IRD) is not well established. METHODS: A monocentric observational study evaluated the immunogenicity of a two-dose regimen vaccine in adult patients with IRD (n=123) treated with targeted or biological therapies. Serum IgG antibody levels against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) spike proteins were measured after the second vaccination. In addition, a search for observational studies performed in IRD under biologic or targeted therapies up to September 31, 2021 (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42021259410) was undertaken in publication databases, preprint servers, and grey literature sources. Studies that reported sample size, study date, location, and seroprevalence estimate were included. A meta-analysis was conducted to identify demographic differences in the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. RESULTS: Of 123 patients (median age 66 IQR 57-75), 69.9% have seroconverted after vaccination. Seroconverted patients were older than non-seroconverted ones in our cohort. Rituximab was associated with a significantly low antibody response. Besides, we identified 20 seroprevalence studies in addition to our cohort including 4423 participants in 11 countries. Meta-analysis confirmed a negative impact of rituximab on seroconversion rate and suggested a less substantial effect of abatacept, leflunomide and methotrexate. CONCLUSION: Rituximab impairs serological response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in patients with IRD. This work suggests also a negative impact of abatacept, methotrexate or leflunomide especially when associated to biological therapy.


Assuntos
Antirreumáticos , COVID-19 , Doenças Reumáticas , Abatacepte/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Idoso , Antirreumáticos/uso terapêutico , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , Estudos de Coortes , Humanos , Imunoglobulina G , Leflunomida/uso terapêutico , Metotrexato/uso terapêutico , Estudos Observacionais como Assunto , Pandemias , Doenças Reumáticas/tratamento farmacológico , Rituximab/uso terapêutico , SARS-CoV-2 , Estudos Soroepidemiológicos , Serotoninérgicos/uso terapêutico , Glicoproteína da Espícula de Coronavírus/uso terapêutico , Vacinação
19.
Mayo Clin Proc ; 97(10): 1824-1835, 2022 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35995627

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To compare and rank the effect of glucocorticoid-sparing agents in giant cell arteritis (GCA), for which several drugs have been evaluated but with a benefit-risk balance that remains uncertain. METHODS: The MEDLINE and Clinical Trials databases were searched up to November 2021; all randomized controlled trials investigating glucocorticoids in GCA were included. The glucocorticoid regimen was dichotomized into short (≤6 months) or prolonged (>6 months) use. Risk of relapse and safety were estimated using network meta-analysis with frequentist random effects models. RESULTS: Of the 96 records screened, 8 trials were included (572 patients). The trials compared glucocorticoids and a sparing agent: tocilizumab (2 trials), oral methotrexate (3 trials), infliximab (1 trial), etanercept (1 trial), and adalimumab (1 trial). The pooled prevalence of GCA relapse was 52.6% (95% CI, 38.1 to 66.9). The risk of relapse was significantly lower with tocilizumab compared with methotrexate (relative risk [RR], 0.41; 95% CI, 0.17 to 0.97) and prolonged (RR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.20 to 0.83) and short (RR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.16 to 0.66) glucocorticoid use. The risk of relapse was not significantly different with methotrexate compared with short (RR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.48 to 1.31) and prolonged (RR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.31 to 2.89) glucocorticoid use. The frequency of serious adverse events and serious infection was comparable between the different drugs. The certainty of the evidence was low to very low. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis suggests that tocilizumab may be superior to other sparing agents to prevent GCA relapse, but with a low to very low certainty of evidence, and that safety is comparable to the other drugs. REGISTRATION: The protocol of the meta-analysis is registered in the international prospective register of systematic reviews PROSPERO (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/; registration CRD42020112387).


Assuntos
Arterite de Células Gigantes , Metotrexato , Adalimumab , Etanercepte , Arterite de Células Gigantes/tratamento farmacológico , Glucocorticoides/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Infliximab , Metotrexato/uso terapêutico , Metanálise em Rede , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto
20.
J Clin Med ; 11(18)2022 Sep 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36143085

RESUMO

The significance of extreme hyperferritinemia and its association with certain diagnoses and prognoses are not well characterized. We performed a retrospective analysis of adult patients with at least one total serum ferritin (TSF) measurement ≥ 5000 µg/L over 2 years, in three university hospitals. Conditions associated with hyperferritinemia were collected, and patients were classified into 10 etiological groups. Intensive care unit (ICU) transfer and mortality rates were recorded. A total of 495 patients were identified, of which 56% had a TSF level between 5000 and 10,000 µg/L. There were multiple underlying causes in 81% of the patients. The most common causes were infections (38%), hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH, 18%), and acute hepatitis (14%). For TSF levels > 10,000 µg/L, there were no solid cancer or hematological malignancy without another cause of hyperferritinemia. Isolated iron-overload syndromes never exceeded TSF levels > 15,000 µg/L. Extreme hyperferritinemia (TSF levels > 25,000 µg/L) was associated with only four causes: HLH, infections, acute hepatitis and cytokine release syndromes. A total of 32% of patients were transferred to an ICU, and 28% died. Both ICU transfer rate and mortality were statistically associated with ferritin levels. An optimized threshold of 13,405 µg/L was the best predictor for the diagnosis of HLH, with a sensitivity of 76.4% and a specificity of 79.3%. Hyperferritinemia reflects a variety of conditions, but only four causes are associated with extreme hyperferritinemia, in which HLH and acute hepatitis are the most common. Extreme hyperferritinemia has a poor prognosis with increased mortality.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa