RESUMO
Saliva for measurement of cortisol is generally sampled by swabbing the mouth with a cotton roll, but this method has drawbacks. In the present study, we evaluated the use of an eye sponge as an oral collection device for saliva cortisol. The eye sponge was compared with commercial cotton rolls, and tested for use in infants as well as adults. Our results show that the eye sponge has adequate cortisol recoveries, even after samples have been kept at 4-8 degrees C for up to a week. In adults, volumes of 200-250 microl are obtained without problem; although smaller volumes are obtained in young infants, they are sufficient for assays requiring only 50-100 microl of saliva. In conclusion, the eye sponge is a valid and adequate collection device for saliva cortisol. Additional advantages as compared to cotton rolls are: more comfortable sampling, tastelessness, no need to manipulate the absorbing material, and the ease with which the untrained eye can determine that enough saliva has been collected.
Assuntos
Hidrocortisona/análise , Saliva , Manejo de Espécimes/instrumentação , Adulto , Fibra de Algodão , Humanos , Lactente , Saliva/química , Manejo de Espécimes/métodos , Tampões de Gaze CirúrgicosRESUMO
The aim of this study was to investigate whether growth hormone (GH) release during strenuous exercise (EX) is due to complete inhibition of hypothalamic somatostatin (SS) activity. Eight healthy male subjects (age, 22.1 +/- 2.2 years; body mass index [BMI], 22.2 +/- 2.5 kg/m(2); maximum oxygen consumption [Vo(2)max], 52.2 +/- 1.5 mL/min/kg [mean +/- SD]) were exposed to strenuous EX on a cycle ergometer, with and without administration of pyridostigmine (PD), and to administration of PD alone. PD is an acetylcholine-esterase inhibitor that stimulates GH secretion by suppressing hypothalamic SS secretion and unmasking endogenous GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) tone. Serial blood samples in the fasted state were taken immediately before the start of each trial, and at appropriate intervals over 2 hours. GH responses were calculated as area under the response curve (AUC) by trapezoidal integration. The mean peak serum GH level to PD alone was 18.3 microg/L (range, 0.3 to 40.9), which was significantly lower than to EX alone: 64.1 microg/L (range, 30.5 to 90.5), and to the combined administration of PD and EX (PD+EX): 79.8 microg/L (range, 37.7 to 98.2) (P <.05). The arithmetic sum of the individual peak levels of 82.4 microg/L was not different from the mean peak level to PD+EX: 79.8 microg/L. AUC (mean +/- SEM) to PD alone (1,721 +/- 358 microg/L x 180 min) was not significantly different from that to EX alone (2,472 +/- 408 microg/L x 120 min), but was significantly lower than that to PD+EX: 3,526 +/- 752 (P <.05). Although the latter AUC was 6% smaller than the AUC obtained by arithmetic addition (3,747 +/- 706), this difference was not statistically significant. In conclusion, the additive effect between PD and EX indicates that PD and EX act independently in evoking GH responses to strenuous EX. Therefore, GH responses to strenuous EX are only partially due to complete inhibition of hypothalamic SS. Additional potentiating factors, such as activation of endogenous GHRH and ghrelin must be operative.