Dysfunctional tear syndrome: dry eye disease and associated tear film disorders - new strategies for diagnosis and treatment.

Dysfunctional tear syndrome (DTS) is a common and complex condition affecting the ocular surface. The health and normal functioning of the ocular surface is dependent on a stable and sufficient tear film. Clinician awareness of conditions affecting the ocular surface has increased in recent years because of expanded research and the publication of diagnosis and treatment guidelines pertaining to disorders resulting in DTS, including the Delphi panel treatment recommendations for DTS (2006), the International Dry Eye Workshop (DEWS) (2007), the Meibomian Gland Dysfunction (MGD) Workshop (2011), and the updated Preferred Practice Pattern guidelines from the American Academy of Ophthalmology pertaining to dry eye and blepharitis (2013). Since the publication of the existing guidelines, new diagnostic techniques and treatment options that provide an opportunity for better management of patients have become available. Clinicians are now able to access a wealth of information that can help them obtain a differential diagnosis and treatment approach for patients presenting with DTS. This review provides a practical and directed approach to the diagnosis and treatment of patients with DTS, emphasizing treatment that is tailored to the specific disease subtype as well as the severity of the condition.

Mitomycin-C in corneal surface excimer laser ablation techniques: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.

OBJECTIVE: To review the published literature assessing the efficacy and safety of mitomycin-C (MMC) as an adjunctive treatment in corneal surface excimer laser ablation procedures. METHODS: Literature searches of the PubMed and Cochrane Library databases were last conducted on August 19, 2014, without language or date limitations. The searches retrieved a total of 239 references. Of these, members of the Ophthalmic Technology Assessment Committee Refractive Management/Intervention Panel selected 26 articles that were considered to be of high or medium clinical relevance, and the panel methodologist rated each article according to the strength of evidence. Ten studies were rated as level I evidence, 5 studies were rated as level II evidence, and the remaining 11 studies were rated as level III evidence. RESULTS: The majority of the articles surveyed in this report support the role of MMC as an adjunctive treatment in surface ablation procedures. When MMC is applied in the appropriate concentration and confined to the central cornea, the incidence of post-surface ablation haze is decreased. Although a minority of studies that evaluated endothelial cell density (ECD) reported an MMC-related decrease in ECD, no clinical adverse outcomes were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Over the past 15 years, the use of MMC during surgery in surface ablation has become widespread. There is good evidence of the effectiveness of MMC when used intraoperatively as prophylaxis against haze in higher myopic ablations. Although there are reports of decreased endothelial counts after the administration of MMC during surgery, the clinical significance of this finding remains uncertain, because no adverse outcomes were reported with as much as 5 years of follow-up. Optimal dosage, effectiveness as prophylaxis in lower myopic and hyperopic ablations, and long-term safety, particularly in eyes with reduced corneal endothelial cell counts from prior intraocular surgery, have yet to be established.

Early Real-World Patient and Staff Experience with an Intracanalicular Dexamethasone Insert.

Purpose: To evaluate both the early experience of real-world patients treated with dexamethasone ophthalmic insert (0.4 mg; DEXTENZA®), hereafter referred to as DEX, after cataract surgery as well as staff/practice integration of DEX relative to eyedrops. Patients and Methods: This was a cross-sectional survey study of 23 cataract practices in the United States. Respondents were patients and practice staff who had experience with DEX following cataract surgery. Both patients and practice staff completed an online survey. Descriptive statistics summarized the survey responses to portray the experience of the respondents. Results: Surveys were completed by 62 patients and 19 practice staff. Almost all patients (93%) were satisfied or extremely satisfied with DEX. Patients highly preferred DEX (93%) to topical steroid drops (7%) based on past experiences with topical steroid drops. Most practice staff (95%) were satisfied or highly satisfied with DEX, reporting a 45% reduction in time spent educating patients on postoperative drop use and a 46% decrease in time spent addressing calls from pharmacies regarding postoperative medications. Conclusion: Incorporating the DEX insert into clinical practice in cataract surgery practices can improve patient adherence, while potentially providing significant savings to practices in terms of time spent educating patients and responding to patient and pharmacy call-backs.

Femtosecond lasers for LASIK flap creation: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.

OBJECTIVE: To review the published literature to assess the safety, efficacy, and predictability of femtosecond lasers for the creation of corneal flaps for LASIK; to assess the reported outcomes of LASIK when femtosecond lasers are used to create corneal flaps; and to compare the differences in outcomes between femtosecond lasers and mechanical microkeratomes. METHODS: Literature searches of the PubMed and Cochrane Library databases were last conducted on October 12, 2011, without language or date limitations. The searches retrieved a total of 636 references. Of these, panel members selected 58 articles that they considered to be of high or medium clinical relevance, and the panel methodologist rated each article according to the strength of evidence. Four studies were rated as level I evidence, 14 studies were rated as level II evidence, and the remaining studies were rated as level III evidence. RESULTS: The majority of published studies evaluated a single laser platform. Flap reproducibility varied by device and the generation of the device. Standard deviations in flap thicknesses ranged from 4 to 18.4 µm. Visual acuities and complications reported with LASIK flaps created using femtosecond lasers are within Food and Drug Administration safety and efficacy limits. Of all complications, diffuse lamellar keratitis is the most common after surgery but is generally mild and self-limited. Corneal sensation was reported to normalize by 1 year after surgery. Unique complications of femtosecond lasers included transient light-sensitivity syndrome, rainbow glare, opaque bubble layer, epithelial breakthrough of gas bubbles, and gas bubbles within the anterior chamber. CONCLUSIONS: Available evidence (levels I and II) indicates that femtosecond lasers are efficacious devices for creating LASIK flaps, with accompanying good visual results. Overall, femtosecond lasers were found to be as good as or better than mechanical microkeratomes for creating LASIK flaps. There are unique complications that can occur with femtosecond lasers, and long-term follow-up is needed to evaluate the technology fully.

Acute central corneal haze and thinning with atypical keratitis presentation.

A 24-year-old woman presented with a 7-day history of blurry vision, redness, and extreme pain in her right eye. She had no pertinent medical or ocular history and did not use spectacles or contacts. Uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) was 20/40 in the right eye and could not be improved with refraction. Slitlamp examination revealed a 1.5 × 1.5 mm central epithelial defect with surrounding white blood cell recruitment. Confocal microscopy (Figure 1JOURNAL/jcrs/04.03/02158034-202304000-00020/figure1/v/2023-03-24T200747Z/r/image-tiff) was performed, and she was treated with chlorhexidine 0.02% drops every hour in the right eye. 2 weeks later, the cornea had completely re-epithelialized; however, persistent corneal haze, decreased visual acuity, and corneal thinning and flattening was noted. Pachymetry was 484 µm in the right eye and UDVA was 20/40 (Supplemental Figure 1, available at http://links.lww.com/JRS/A836). In the following 2 weeks, UDVA improved to 20/25. 6 months after the initial presentation, UDVA was unchanged and faint central corneal haze was noted on examination (Figure 2JOURNAL/jcrs/04.03/02158034-202304000-00020/figure2/v/2023-03-24T200747Z/r/image-tiff). Of interest, her family history is significant for her younger 16-year-old brother with 3 prior episodes of a similar type of keratitis/keratopathy over the course of 2 years in both eyes with similar central paracentral corneal haze, thinning, and flattening and similar confocal findings (Figure 3JOURNAL/jcrs/04.03/02158034-202304000-00020/figure3/v/2023-03-24T200747Z/r/image-tiff). He also was unresponsive to topical antibiotics and antivirals except topical chlorhexidine. Her brother has been our patient for the last several years prior to her first visit to our clinic. What is your diagnosis? What medical diagnostic tests, if any, would you recommend? Is this an infectious or simply an inflammatory response? Is there any genetic or familial predisposition?

COVID-19 and Eye Banking: Ongoing Impacts of the Pandemic.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of ongoing waves of the COVID-19 pandemic and resulting guidelines on the corneal donor pool with resumption of clinical operations. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of donors deemed eligible for corneal transplantation at an eye bank from July 1, 2020, through December 31, 2021. Donors ineligible due to meeting Eye Bank Association of America (EBAA) COVID-19 guidelines or a positive postmortem COVID-19 testing were examined. The correlation between COVID-19 rule outs and state COVID positivity was calculated. The number of scheduled surgeries, suitable corneas, imports, and international exports was compared with a pre-COVID period. Postmortem testing was reduced for the final 5 months of the study, and numbers were compared before and after the policy change. RESULTS: 2.85% of referrals to the eye bank were ruled out because of EBAA guidelines. 3.2% of postmortem tests were positive or indeterminate resulting in an ineligible tissue donor (0.42% of referrals). Over the 18-month period, there was a 4.30% shortage of suitable corneas compared with transplantation procedures. There was a significant correlation between postmortem testing and state COVID-19 positivity (r = 0.37, P <0.01), but not with EBAA guidelines (r = 0.19, P = 0.07). When postmortem testing was reduced, significantly more corneas were exported internationally. CONCLUSIONS: Although corneal transplant procedures were back to normal levels, there was a shortage of suitable corneal tissue. The discontinuation of postmortem testing was associated with a significant increase in international exports of corneal donor tissue.

Fungal Infectious Interface Keratitis Presenting 2 Years After Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to describe infectious interface keratitis after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) more than 2 years after surgery. METHODS: A case study. RESULTS: In this study, we report a case of fungal infectious interface keratitis occurring 2 years after uncomplicated Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. The donor corneal rim culture at the time of surgery grew a single colony of Candida albicans/dubliniensis , but the patient was not treated with antifungals at that time. At the onset of clinical infection, more than 2 years postoperatively, the patient was treated with systemic antifungals and adjuvant intrastromal amphotericin-B injection. The patient subsequently required penetrating keratoplasty with ultimately well-preserved visual acuity. CONCLUSIONS: Fungal infectious interface keratitis (IIK) is a rare complication associated with lamellar keratoplasty. Although most common in the early postoperative period, this complication can occur several years after successful transplantation. Management may require a combination of systemic and stromal antifungal therapy. However, some patients may eventually require penetrating keratoplasty for definitive treatment.

Pachymetric Assessment After EpiSmart® Epithelium-on Cross-Linking for Keratoconus and Post-Surgical Ectasia.

Purpose: To assess the change in corneal pachymetry after a novel epithelium-on (EpiSmart®) corneal crosslinking procedure (CXL). Methods: Eyes treated as part of the open-label, non-controlled arm of the study "Collagen Crosslinking with Ultraviolet-A in Asymmetric Corneas" (NCT01097447) were examined at baseline, 3-, 6- and 12-months post-CXL. Thinnest pachymetry readings based on Pentacam (OCULUS GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany) were recorded. Results: A total of 101 eyes met the study inclusion criteria. Thinnest pachymetric readings at baseline averaged 451 ± 50 microns. The mean (± SD) minimum thickness was 450 ± 46 microns at 3 months, 452 ± 47 microns at 6 months, and 451 ± 48 microns at 12 months post-CXL. The changes from baseline (mean ± SE) at 3, 6, and 12 months post-CXL were -1.2 ± 1.5 microns, 0.5 ± 1.6 microns, and 0.4 ± 1.6 microns, respectively. Student's t-tests showed no statistically significant change in pachymetry from baseline for any exam period. Conclusion: This study demonstrated that, after EpiSmart® epithelium-on CXL, there was no substantial corneal thinning observable on Scheimpflug tomography out to 12 months.

KPI-121 1% for pain and inflammation in ocular surgery.

Pain and inflammation are common experiences following ocular surgery and, if uncontrolled, can compromise patients' vision, functioning and quality of life. Corticosteroid drugs are available to manage inflammation and discomfort but have limitations in penetrating the ocular mucus barrier to reach the target ocular tissues. KPI-121 1% (INVELTYS®) is a novel formulation of loteprednol etabonate that employs innovative proprietary technology to deliver nanoparticle-sized mucus-penetrating particles to the cornea. Results from clinical trials demonstrate that KPI-121 1% is effective and well tolerated. KPI-121 1% uses mucopenetrative technology for ophthalmic use and is the only US FDA-approved twice-daily ocular corticosteroid indicated for the treatment of inflammation and pain after ocular surgery.

Early Real-World Physician Experience with an Intracanalicular Dexamethasone Insert.

Purpose: To describe the early real-world experience of physicians with an intracanalicular dexamethasone insert (DEX) in patients undergoing cataract surgery and to capture the clinical impact of adopting this therapy. Patients and Methods: 23 United States sites including Ambulatory Surgical Center Setting (ASC) and Outpatient Clinical settings. Respondents were physicians who had early experience with DEX in cataract surgery patients. This was a Phase 4 experiential cross-sectional survey study comprised of 3 sequential online physician surveys. Descriptive statistics summarized the surveys' responses to determine the early impressions of the respondents. Results: Forty-two physicians completed surveys. On average, physicians reported feeling comfortable administering DEX after placing 3 inserts (mean 2.7; standard deviation 1.9). Most physicians (92%) were satisfied with DEX, and all physicians (100%) reported that DEX improved patient compliance. Most physicians (62.5%) indicated they would highly prefer DEX over traditional steroid eyedrops for the management of post-surgical inflammation and pain. Conclusion: The surveys exploring the early use of DEX suggest that DEX is a clinically effective treatment with a rapid initial learning curve and integrates well into clinical use. Physicians had a very positive early experience with DEX, including comfort with insertion and satisfaction. DEX shows promise as a primary treatment choice of physicians for ocular inflammation and pain following cataract surgery by offering patients a hands-free innovative therapy that delivers a preservative-free steroid to the ocular surface over approximately 30 days.

A Randomized Clinical Study (SEECASE) to Assess Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of NOV03 for Treatment of Dry Eye Disease.

PURPOSE: NOV03 has a unique dual mode of action to address dry eye disease (DED) associated with meibomian gland dysfunction. SEECASE evaluated the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of NOV03 at 2 dosing regimens compared with a saline comparator in patients with DED. METHODS: SEECASE was a prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-masked, saline-controlled clinical study. A total of 336 DED patients [tear film breakup time ≤5 seconds, abnormal meibum secretion, total corneal fluorescein staining (tCFS) score of 4 ≤ X ≤ 11 (National Eye Institute scale), Schirmer of ≥5 mm] were randomized in a 2:2:1:1 manner to NOV03 4 times daily (QID), NOV03 twice daily (BID), saline BID, and saline QID, respectively. The primary efficacy endpoint was tCFS staining at 8 weeks for both regimens. Secondary endpoints included visual analog scales and the Ocular Surface Disease Index questionnaire for symptom assessment. RESULTS: The study met its primary endpoint, change from baseline of tCFS over control, for both dosing regimens QID and BID (P < 0.001 and P = 0.009, respectively). NOV03 also showed pronounced improvement in various symptoms. For the Eye Dryness Score, changes from baseline were statistically significant compared with those of the control at week 8 [P < 0.001 (QID) and P = 0.002 (BID)]. Benefits on tCFS and symptoms started at 2 weeks after start of treatment and were maintained over the study duration. The effects were dosing schedule dependent. NOV03 was well tolerated with instillation site reactions below 3% in both treatment regimes. CONCLUSIONS: The SEECASE study demonstrated that NOV03 improves signs and symptoms in patients with highly symptomatic evaporative dry eye disease.

Prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 in human post-mortem ocular tissues.

BACKGROUND: SARS-CoV-2 is found in conjunctival swabs and tears of COVID-19 patients. However, the presence of SARS-CoV-2 has not been detected in the human eye to date. We undertook this study to analyze the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 in human post-mortem ocular tissues. METHODS: The expression of SARS-CoV-2 RNA was assessed by RT-PCR in corneal and scleral tissues from 33 surgical-intended donors who were eliminated from a surgical use per Eye Bank Association of America (EBAA) donor screening guidelines or medical director review or positive COVID-19 test. Ocular levels of SARS-CoV-2 RNA (RT-PCR), Envelope and Spike proteins (immunohistochemistry) and anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG and IgM antibodies (ELISA) in blood were evaluated in additional 10 research-intent COVID-19 positive donors. FINDINGS: Of 132 ocular tissues from 33 surgical-intended donors, the positivity rate for SARS-CoV-2 RNA was ~13% (17/132). Of 10 COVID-19 donors, six had PCR positive post-mortem nasopharyngeal swabs whereas eight exhibited positive post-mortem anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG levels. Among 20 eyes recovered from 10 COVID-19 donors: three conjunctival, one anterior corneal, five posterior corneal, and three vitreous swabs tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 RNA. SARS-CoV-2 spike and envelope proteins were detected in epithelial layer of the corneas that were procured without Povidone-Iodine (PVP-I) disinfection. INTERPRETATIONS: Our study showed a small but noteworthy prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 in ocular tissues from COVID-19 donors. These findings underscore the criticality of donor screening guidelines, post-mortem nasopharyngeal PCR testing and PVP-I disinfection protocol to eliminate any tissue harboring SARS-CoV-2 being used for corneal transplantation.

Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Keratoplasty and Corneal Eye Banking.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of COVID-19 guidelines for corneal donor tissue screening and the utility of routine postmortem COVID-19 testing of donors intended for surgical use at a single eye bank. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of referrals to and eligible donors from an eye bank between March 1, 2020, and June 30, 2020, was performed, with the same time period in 2019 as a control. Referrals who were not procured because of Eye Bank Association of America COVID-19 guidelines and eye bank-specific restrictions were noted. The results of 1 month of routine postmortem testing performed by the eye bank were examined. Analysis of variance tests were performed to assess the change between donors from 2019 to 2020. RESULTS: There was a significant reduction in both the number of total referrals to the eye bank (P = 0.044) and donors eligible for surgical transplantation (P = 0.031). Eye Bank Association of America COVID-19 guidelines reduced the number of referrals over this period by 4% to 14%. Of the 266 surgically eligible donors who received postmortem COVID-19 testing in June by the eye bank, 13 resulted positive (4.9%). CONCLUSIONS: Despite a reduction in referrals and eligible corneal transplant donors at a single eye bank, there was a surplus of surgically suitable corneal tissue during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. Eye banks should consider routine postmortem COVID-19 testing to identify asymptomatic infected donors although the risk of transmission of COVID-19 from infected donors is unknown.

Reduced application time for prophylactic mitomycin C in photorefractive keratectomy.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the duration of mitomycin C (MMC) 0.02% application affects visual outcome or the incidence of subepithelial haze in patients undergoing photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) with prophylactic administration of MMC. DESIGN: Retrospective, comparative case series. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred sixty-nine eyes undergoing PRK. METHODS: This was a retrospective comparative case series that included 269 eyes that underwent PRK with prophylactic MMC application for 120 seconds (group 1, n = 74), 60 seconds (group 2, n = 36), or 12 seconds (group 3, n = 159). The mean preoperative spherical equivalent was -6.49 diopters (D) in group 1, -6.77 D in group 2, and -7.10 D in group 3. Photorefractive keratectomy was performed using a modified nomogram. All eyes received a single intraoperative application of MMC (0.02%) after laser ablation for the above specified durations. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Best-corrected visual acuity and corneal haze score. RESULTS: Best-corrected visual acuity was 20/23 in group 1, 20/20 in group 2, and 20/21 in group 3. The mean haze score+/-standard deviation (scale, 0.00-4.00) was 0.11+/-0.31 in group 1, 0.14+/-0.28 in group 2, and 0.07+/-0.20 in group 3 throughout a mean follow-up of 31 months in group 1, 16 months in group 2, and 10 months in group 3. No eyes had a haze score of more than 1.00. CONCLUSIONS: There was no statistically significant difference in postoperative best-corrected visual acuity or haze scores among the 3 groups. Administration of prophylactic MMC 0.02% for 12 seconds after PRK seems to be equally efficacious for haze prophylaxis when compared with longer application times of 60 and 120 seconds.

Loteprednol Etabonate for the Treatment of Dry Eye Disease.

Dry eye disease (DED) is a common ocular condition that can impair vision and may adversely impact quality of life. Due to the inflammatory nature of this disorder, topical corticosteroids are an effective treatment option, particularly for moderate-to-severe DED when first-line treatments, such as ocular lubricants, are insufficient. Loteprednol etabonate (LE) is a retrometabolically designed corticosteroid with a low propensity to cause corticosteroid-related adverse effects, such as elevated intraocular pressure (IOP). This review was conducted to provide an assessment of published studies on the use of LE for treatment of inflammation associated with DED. Twelve prospective and 2 retrospective studies evaluating LE ophthalmic suspension 0.5% and 2 prospective studies evaluating LE ophthalmic gel 0.5% were identified. LE given as monotherapy or with artificial tears (AT) improved signs of DED, especially among patients with a more pronounced inflammatory component, and also improved DED symptoms compared to baseline and/or control. Treatment with LE before cyclosporine A (CsA) therapy reduced stinging upon CsA initiation and provided more rapid relief of DED signs and symptoms than CsA plus AT alone. In patients with meibomian gland dysfunction, LE alone, or in addition to eyelid scrubs/warm compresses, reduced clinical signs and symptoms, and tear proinflammatory cytokine levels. Overall, LE was safe and well tolerated, with minimal effects on IOP. While larger and longer-term studies are warranted, these data support the use of LE as a safe and effective treatment option for DED.

Late-onset fungal interface keratitis following endothelial keratoplasty with positive donor fungal culture.

PURPOSE: To describe late-onset fungal keratitis after Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK) with positive fungal culture of the donor corneal rim. OBSERVATIONS: A case report of a patient undergoing DSEK is described whereby the donor corneal rim culture grew fungus. No infection was initially noted, but the patient developed fungal keratitis 1 year after the original DSEK procedure, despite prophylactic treatment at the time of the positive donor culture. The patient responded to antifungal therapy, but fungal keratitis recurred following completion of a 1-year course of antifungal treatment. The patient eventually underwent full thickness keratoplasty. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPORTANCE: A positive fungal culture of the donor rim tissue at the time of endothelial keratoplasty is a risk factor for fungal keratitis. Even with prophylactic antifungal treatment, fungal keratitis may eventually develop as late as 1 year after the initial endothelial keratoplasty procedure. Treatment may need to be aggressive, but keratitis may recur despite resolution with antifungal treatment.

Prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 in human post-mortem ocular tissues.

BACKGROUND: SARS-CoV-2 is found in conjunctival swabs and tears of COVID-19 patients. However, the presence of SARS-CoV-2 has not been detected in the human eye to date. We undertook this study to analyze the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 in human post-mortem ocular tissues. METHODS: The expression of SARS-CoV-2 RNA was assessed by RT-PCR in corneal and scleral tissues from 33 surgical-intended donors who were eliminated from a surgical use per Eye Bank Association of America (EBAA) donor screening guidelines or medical director review or positive COVID-19 test. Ocular levels of SARS-CoV-2 RNA (RT-PCR), Envelope and Spike proteins (immunohistochemistry) and anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG and IgM antibodies (ELISA) in blood were evaluated in 10 COVID-19 donors. FINDINGS: Of 132 ocular tissues from 33 surgical-intended donors, the positivity rate for SARS-CoV-2 RNA was ~13% (17/132). Of 10 COVID-19 donors, six had PCR positive post-mortem nasopharyngeal swabs whereas eight exhibited positive post-mortem anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG levels. Among 20 eyes recovered from 10 COVID-19 donors: three conjunctival, one anterior corneal, five posterior corneal, and three vitreous swabs tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 RNA. SARS-CoV-2 spike and envelope proteins were detected in epithelial layer of the corneas that were procured without Povidone-Iodine (PVP-I) disinfection. INTERPRETATIONS: Our study showed a small but noteworthy prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 in ocular tissues from COVID-19 donors. These findings underscore the criticality of donor screening guidelines, post-mortem nasopharyngeal PCR testing and PVP-I disinfection protocol to eliminate any tissue harboring SARS-CoV-2 being used for corneal transplantation.

Phakic intraocular lens implantation for the correction of myopia: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.

OBJECTIVE: To review the published literature for evaluation of the safety and outcomes of phakic intraocular lens (pIOL) implantation for the correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism. METHODS: Literature searches of the PubMed and Cochrane Library databases were conducted on October 7, 2007, and July 14, 2008. The PubMed search was limited to the English language; the Cochrane Library was searched without language limitations. The searches retrieved 261 references. Of these, panel members chose 85 papers that they considered to be of high or medium clinical relevance to this assessment. The panel methodologist rated the articles according to the strength of evidence. RESULTS: Two pIOLs have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA): one iris-fixated pIOL and one posterior-chamber IOL. In FDA trials of iris-fixated pIOLs, uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) was >or=20/40 in 84% and >or=20/20 in 31% after 3 years. In FDA trials of posterior-chamber pIOLs, UCVA was >or=20/40 in 81% and >or=20/20 in 41%. Satisfaction with the quality of vision with both types of pIOLs was generally high. Toric anterior- and posterior-chamber pIOLs have shown improved clinical results in European trials compared with spherical pIOLs. Comparative studies showed pIOLs to provide better best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) and refractive predictability and stability compared with LASIK and photorefractive keratectomy and to have a lower risk of retinal detachment compared with refractive lens exchange. Reported complications and long-term safety concerns include endothelial cell loss, cataract formation, secondary glaucoma (pupillary block, pigment dispersion), iris atrophy (pupil ovalization), and traumatic dislocation. CONCLUSIONS: Phakic IOL implantation is effective in the correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism. In cases of high myopia of -8 diopters or more, pIOLs may provide a better visual outcome than keratorefractive surgeries and better safety than refractive lens exchange. The short-term rates of complications and loss of BSCVA are acceptable. Comprehensive preoperative evaluation and long-term postoperative follow-up examinations are needed to monitor for and prevent serious complications, and to establish long-term safety.

A Multicenter Study Evaluating the Risk Factors and Outcomes of Repeat Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty.

PURPOSE: Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK), currently the most common procedure for managing corneal endothelial dysfunction, may be repeated following DSEK failure from a variety of causes. This multicenter study reports the risk factors and outcomes of repeat DSEK. METHODS: This was an institutional review board-approved multicenter retrospective chart review of patients who underwent repeat DSEK. Twelve surgeons from 5 Midwest academic centers and 3 private practice groups participated. The Eversight Eye Bank provided clinical indication and donor graft data. We also assessed the role of the learning curve by comparing cohorts from the first and second 5-year periods. RESULTS: A total of 121 eyes from 121 patients who underwent repeat DSEK were identified. The average age of the patients was 70 ± 12 years. The most common indication for repeat DSEK was late endothelial graft failure without rejection (58%, N = 63). Average preoperative and 12-month postoperative repeat DSEK corrected distance visual acuities were 20/694 and 20/89, respectively. Visual acuity outcomes, endothelial cell density, and cell loss did not significantly vary between the 2 cohorts. Initial graft rebubble rates for the first and second cohorts were 51% and 25%. The presence of glaucoma, prior glaucoma surgery, or a history of penetrating (full thickness) keratoplasty did not significantly affect visual outcomes. The median, mean, and range of intraocular pressures before repeat DSEK were 15.0, 15.7, and 6 to 37 mm Hg, respectively. Patients with higher intraocular pressures before repeat DSEK had improved postoperative corrected distance visual acuities. CONCLUSIONS: Repeating DSEK improves vision following failed or decompensated DSEK surgery. Higher preoperative repeat DSEK IOPs were associated with improved visual outcomes, and initial graft rebubble rates, which decreased over time, were likely due to surgeon experience.

Wavefront-guided LASIK for the correction of primary myopia and astigmatism a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.

OBJECTIVE: To describe wavefront-guided (WFG) LASIK for the primary treatment of low to moderate levels of myopia and astigmatism and to examine the evidence on the safety and effectiveness of the procedure in comparison with conventional LASIK. METHODS: Literature searches conducted in 2004, 2005, 2006, and 2007 retrieved 209 unique references from the PubMed and Cochrane Library databases. The panel selected 65 articles to review, and of these, chose 45 articles that they considered to be of sufficient clinical relevance to submit to the panel methodologist for review. During the review and preparation of this assessment, an additional 2 articles were included. A level I rating was assigned to properly conducted, well-designed, randomized clinical trials; a level II rating was assigned to well-designed cohort and case-controlled studies; and a level III rating was assigned to case series, case reports, and poorly designed prospective and retrospective studies. In addition, studies that were conducted by laser manufacturers before device approval (premarket approval) were reviewed as a separate category of evidence. RESULTS: The assessment describes studies reporting results of WFG LASIK clinical trials, comparative trials, or both of WFG and conventional LASIK that were rated level II and level III. There were no studies rated as level I evidence. Four premarket approval studies conducted by 4 laser manufacturers were included in the assessment. The assessment did not compare study results or laser platforms because there were many variables, including the amount of follow-up, the use of different microkeratomes, and the level of preoperative myopia and astigmatism. CONCLUSIONS: There is substantial level II and level III evidence that WFG LASIK is safe and effective for the correction of primary myopia or primary myopia and astigmatism and that there is a high level of patient satisfaction. Microkeratome and flap-related complications are not common but can occur with WFG LASIK, just as with conventional LASIK. The WFG procedure seems to have similar or better refractive accuracy and uncorrected visual acuity outcomes compared with conventional LASIK. Likewise, there is evidence of improved contrast sensitivity and fewer visual symptoms, such as glare and halos at night, compared with conventional LASIK. Even though the procedure is designed to measure and treat both lower- and higher-order aberrations (HOAs), the latter are generally increased after WFG LASIK. The reasons for the increase in HOA are likely multifactorial, but the increase typically is less than that induced by conventional LASIK. No long-term assessment of WFG LASIK was possible because of the relatively short follow-up (12 months or fewer) of most of the studies reviewed.