Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Pharm Bioallied Sci ; 14(Suppl 1): S289-S291, 2022 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36110639

RESUMO

Introduction: The bone pathology-giant cell tumor (GCT) is a locally aggressive and recurrent lesion. A bisphosphonate-zoledronic acid (ZA) has been known to lower the recurrence and resorption in similar bone lesions. Hence, we evaluated the effectivity of the ZA for the GCT of the proximal tibia. Materials and Methods: We piloted a prospective clinical observational study. We included 100 subjects with GCT, who were divided into two equal groups of case (given ZA) and control (no ZA). The histopathological features and the recurrence rates along with other findings were compared with P < 0.05 deliberated as significant. Results: We observed that for in the case group, calcification and fibrosis that were beneficial were observed. Reduced giant cells and lower recurrence rate are seen in the case group. No significant variation in the functional outcome was seen between the groups. Conclusions: ZA was shown to have beneficial effect on the outcome for the treatment of the GCT.

2.
J Pharm Bioallied Sci ; 14(Suppl 1): S295-S297, 2022 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36110717

RESUMO

Introduction: The surgery of the fracture of the long bones is inherent to certain complications, one being nonunion. As various modalities are proposed, we aim in our study to compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes after the treatment with the Limb Reconstruction System (LRS) fixator and Ilizarov for the infected tibia with nonunion considering the bone gap quantifications. Materials and Methods: We conducted an observational prospective study among 40 subjects with tibial nonunion. They were grouped equally to be treated by the LRS fixator and Ilizarov. Clinical and radiographic outcomes were compared using the "Chi-squared and independent Student's t-test," deliberating P < 0.05 as significant. Results: We observed no significant difference for both the groups in the clinical union and functional and radiographic outcome for the various gaps of the nonunion. There was no significant difference for the groups when the time of healing was compared. Conclusion: Comparable results are seen for both the treatment modalities. However, IL fixator performed better clinically, while the LRS was easily accepted by the patients.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa