Temporal artery ultrasonography for the diagnosis of giant cell arteritis: a case report.

Orofacial pain is a worldwide pain problem, with many patients unable to find appropriate diagnosis and treatment. Orofacial pain includes pain arising from the odontogenic and nonodontogenic structures in the head and neck region. Dental clinicians need to have a thorough knowledge and skill to diagnose, manage, and treat patients with odontogenic pain or refer patients for treatment of nonodontogenic pain to specialists such as orofacial pain specialists, neurologists, otolaryngologists, and rheumatologists. More often, dental practitioners diagnose patients with a temporomandibular disorder (TMD), and when treatment is ineffective, term it "atypical facial pain." The first requirement for effective treatment is an accurate diagnosis. Dental clinicians must be aware of giant cell arteritis (GCA), a chronic large-vessel vasculitis, primarily affecting adults over the age of 50 years, as it frequently mimics and is misdiagnosed as TMD. GCA is associated with loss of vision, and stroke and can be a life-threatening disorder. Therefore, diagnostic testing for GCA and differential diagnosis should be common knowledge in the armamentarium of all dental clinicians. Historically, temporal artery biopsy was considered the definitive diagnostic test for GCA. Temporal artery ultrasound (TAUSG), a safe and noninvasive imaging modality, has replaced the previous diagnostic gold standard for GCA, the temporal artery biopsy, owing to its enhanced diagnostic capabilities and safety profile. The present case report describes a patient with GCA, and the role TAUSG played in the diagnosis. Case report: A 72-year-old woman presented with left-sided facial pain, jaw claudication, dysesthesia of the tongue, and episodic loss of vision of 2 years' duration. She was diagnosed with and treated for a myriad of dental conditions including endodontia and temporomandibular joint therapy with no benefit. A thorough history and physical examination, combined with serologic analysis, led to the diagnosis of GCA and TAUSG, which confirmed the diagnosis. Conclusion: This report underscores the responsibility of differential diagnosis and early recognition of GCA facilitated by TAUSG in optimizing treatment outcomes as a viable, noninvasive diagnostic tool. (Quintessence Int 2024;55:336-343; doi: 10.3290/j.qi.b4938419).

Secondary trigeminal neuralgia diagnosed in orofacial pain setting as epidermoid tumor.

This case report describes the rare occurrence of an epidermoid tumor compressing the ipsilateral trigeminal nerve resulting in secondary trigeminal neuralgia. MRI is the imaging modality of choice for the diagnosis of secondary trigeminal neuralgia. The epidermoid tumor was discovered by an orofacial pain specialist after reassessing the MRI study, previously reported as normal. Clinicians encounter a diagnostic dilemma when the clinical picture is not consistent with the MRI reports, clinical presentation, and expected results of treatment. The reassessment of the MRI and discovery of the epidermoid tumor resulted in a prompt referral to a neurosurgeon with a successful treatment outcome.