Catheter Ablation in End-Stage Heart Failure with Atrial Fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: The role of catheter ablation in patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation and end-stage heart failure is unknown. METHODS: We conducted a single-center, open-label trial in Germany that involved patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation and end-stage heart failure who were referred for heart transplantation evaluation. Patients were assigned to receive catheter ablation and guideline-directed medical therapy or medical therapy alone. The primary end point was a composite of death from any cause, implantation of a left ventricular assist device, or urgent heart transplantation. RESULTS: A total of 97 patients were assigned to the ablation group and 97 to the medical-therapy group. The trial was stopped for efficacy by the data and safety monitoring board 1 year after randomization was completed. Catheter ablation was performed in 81 of 97 patients (84%) in the ablation group and in 16 of 97 patients (16%) in the medical-therapy group. After a median follow-up of 18.0 months (interquartile range, 14.6 to 22.6), a primary end-point event had occurred in 8 patients (8%) in the ablation group and in 29 patients (30%) in the medical-therapy group (hazard ratio, 0.24; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.11 to 0.52; P<0.001). Death from any cause occurred in 6 patients (6%) in the ablation group and in 19 patients (20%) in the medical-therapy group (hazard ratio, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.12 to 0.72). Procedure-related complications occurred in 3 patients in the ablation group and in 1 patient in the medical-therapy group. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with atrial fibrillation and end-stage heart failure, the combination of catheter ablation and guideline-directed medical therapy was associated with a lower likelihood of a composite of death from any cause, implantation of a left ventricular assist device, or urgent heart transplantation than medical therapy alone. (Funded by Else Kröner-Fresenius-Stiftung; CASTLE-HTx ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04649801.).

Effect of MRI-Guided Fibrosis Ablation vs Conventional Catheter Ablation on Atrial Arrhythmia Recurrence in Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: The DECAAF II Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) remains a challenge. Left atrial fibrosis plays an important role in the pathophysiology of AF and has been associated with poor procedural outcomes. Objective: To investigate the efficacy and adverse events of targeting atrial fibrosis detected on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in reducing atrial arrhythmia recurrence in persistent AF. Design, Setting, and Participants: The Efficacy of Delayed Enhancement-MRI-Guided Fibrosis Ablation vs Conventional Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation trial was an investigator-initiated, multicenter, randomized clinical trial involving 44 academic and nonacademic centers in 10 countries. A total of 843 patients with symptomatic or asymptomatic persistent AF and undergoing AF ablation were enrolled from July 2016 to January 2020, with follow-up through February 19, 2021. Interventions: Patients with persistent AF were randomly assigned to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) plus MRI-guided atrial fibrosis ablation (421 patients) or PVI alone (422 patients). Delayed-enhancement MRI was performed in both groups before the ablation procedure to assess baseline atrial fibrosis and at 3 months postablation to assess for ablation scar. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was time to first atrial arrhythmia recurrence after a 90-day blanking period postablation. The primary safety composite outcome was defined by the occurrence of 1 or more of the following events within 30 days postablation: stroke, PV stenosis, bleeding, heart failure, or death. Results: Among 843 patients who were randomized (mean age 62.7 years; 178 [21.1%] women), 815 (96.9%) completed the 90-day blanking period and contributed to the efficacy analyses. There was no significant difference in atrial arrhythmia recurrence between groups (fibrosis-guided ablation plus PVI patients, 175 [43.0%] vs PVI-only patients, 188 [46.1%]; hazard ratio [HR], 0.95 [95% CI, 0.77-1.17]; P = .63). Patients in the fibrosis-guided ablation plus PVI group experienced a higher rate of safety outcomes (9 [2.2%] vs 0 in PVI group; P = .001). Six patients (1.5%) in the fibrosis-guided ablation plus PVI group had an ischemic stroke compared with none in PVI-only group. Two deaths occurred in the fibrosis-guided ablation plus PVI group, and the first one was possibly related to the procedure. Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients with persistent AF, MRI-guided fibrosis ablation plus PVI, compared with PVI catheter ablation only, resulted in no significant difference in atrial arrhythmia recurrence. Findings do not support the use of MRI-guided fibrosis ablation for the treatment of persistent AF. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02529319.

Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation with Heart Failure.

BACKGROUND: Mortality and morbidity are higher among patients with atrial fibrillation and heart failure than among those with heart failure alone. Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation has been proposed as a means of improving outcomes among patients with heart failure who are otherwise receiving appropriate treatment. METHODS: We randomly assigned patients with symptomatic paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation who did not have a response to antiarrhythmic drugs, had unacceptable side effects, or were unwilling to take these drugs to undergo either catheter ablation (179 patients) or medical therapy (rate or rhythm control) (184 patients) for atrial fibrillation in addition to guidelines-based therapy for heart failure. All the patients had New York Heart Association class II, III, or IV heart failure, a left ventricular ejection fraction of 35% or less, and an implanted defibrillator. The primary end point was a composite of death from any cause or hospitalization for worsening heart failure. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 37.8 months, the primary composite end point occurred in significantly fewer patients in the ablation group than in the medical-therapy group (51 patients [28.5%] vs. 82 patients [44.6%]; hazard ratio, 0.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.43 to 0.87; P=0.007). Significantly fewer patients in the ablation group died from any cause (24 [13.4%] vs. 46 [25.0%]; hazard ratio, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.32 to 0.86; P=0.01), were hospitalized for worsening heart failure (37 [20.7%] vs. 66 [35.9%]; hazard ratio, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.37 to 0.83; P=0.004), or died from cardiovascular causes (20 [11.2%] vs. 41 [22.3%]; hazard ratio, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.29 to 0.84; P=0.009). CONCLUSIONS: Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure was associated with a significantly lower rate of a composite end point of death from any cause or hospitalization for worsening heart failure than was medical therapy. (Funded by Biotronik; CASTLE-AF ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00643188 .).

Effect of DrOnedarone on atrial fibrosis progression and atrial fibrillation recurrence postablation: Design of the EDORA randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence after catheter ablation is associated with worse outcomes and quality of life. Left atrial (LA) structural remodeling provides the essential substrate for AF perpetuation. Baseline extent and the progression of LA fibrosis after ablation are strong predictors of postprocedural AF recurrence. Dronedarone is an antiarrhythmic drug proven to efficiently maintain sinus rhythm. OBJECTIVE: We sought to investigate the effect of the antiarrhythmic drug Dronedarone in decreasing LA fibrosis progression and AF recurrence after ablation of AF patients. METHODS: EDORA (NCT04704050) is a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial. Patients with persistent or paroxysmal AF undergoing AF ablation will be randomized into Dronedarone versus placebo/standard of care. The co-primary outcomes are the recurrence of atrial arrhythmias (AA) within 13 months of follow-up after ablation and the progression of left atrial fibrosis postablation. All patients will receive a late-gadolinium enhancement magnetic resonance imaging at baseline, 3- and 12-month follow-up for the quantification of LA fibrosis and ablation-related scarring. AA recurrence and burden will be assessed using a 30-day ECG patch every 3 months with daily ECG recordings in between. Quality of life improvement is assessed using the AFEQT and AFSS questionnaires. CONCLUSION: EDORA will be the first trial to assess the progression of LA structural remodeling after ablation and its association with Dronedarone treatment and ablation success in a randomized controlled fashion. The trial will provide insight into the pathophysiology of AF recurrence after ablation and may provide potential therapeutic targets to optimize procedural outcomes.

Efficacy of LGE-MRI-guided fibrosis ablation versus conventional catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: The DECAAF II trial: Study design.

INTRODUCTION: Success rates of catheter ablation in persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) remain suboptimal. A better and more targeted ablation strategy is urgently needed to optimize outcomes of AF treatment. We sought to assess the safety and efficacy of targeting atrial fibrosis during ablation of persistent AF patients in improving procedural outcomes. METHODS: The DECAAF II trial (ClinicalTrials. gov identifier number NCT02529319) is a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial of patients with persistent AF. Patients with persistent AF undergoing a first-time ablation procedure were randomized in a 1:1 fashion to receive conventional pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) ablation (Group 1) or PVI + fibrosis-guided ablation (Group 2). Left atrial fibrosis and ablation induced scarring were defined by late gadolinium enhancement magnetic resonance imaging at baseline and at 3-12 months postablation, respectively. The primary endpoint is the recurrence of atrial arrhythmia postablation, including atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, or atrial tachycardia after the 90-day postablation blanking period. Patients were followed for a period of 12-18 months with a smartphone ECG Device (ECG Check Device, Cardiac Designs Inc.). With an anticipated enrollment of 900 patients, this study has an 80% power to detect a 26% reduction in the hazard ratio of the primary endpoint. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: The DECAAF II trial is the first prospective, randomized, multicenter trial of patients with persistent AF using imaging defined atrial fibrosis as a treatment target. The trial will help define an optimal approach to catheter ablation of persistent AF, further our understanding of influencers of ablation lesion formation, and refine selection criteria for ablation based on atrial myopathy burden.

High-degree atrioventricular block in COVID-19 hospitalized patients.

AIMS: The novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 has shown the potential to significantly affect the cardiovascular system. Cardiac arrhythmias are commonly reported complications in COVID-19 hospitalized patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: While tachyarrhythmias seem most common, we describe four cases of COVID-19 patients who developed a transient high-degree atrioventricular (AV) block during the course of their hospitalization. All four patients who developed a high-degree AV block during their hospitalization with COVID-19 did not require permanent pacing. CONCLUSION: Similarly to most AV blocks associated with infectious organisms and given its transient nature, this case series suggests that conservative management strategies should be preferred in COVID-19 patients who develop complete heart block.

Atrial fibrillation and cardiac fibrosis.

The understanding of atrial fibrillation (AF) evolved from a sole rhythm disturbance towards the complex concept of a cardiomyopathy based on arrhythmia substrates. There is evidence that atrial fibrosis can be visualized using late gadolinium enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and that it is a powerful predictor for the outcome of AF interventions. However, a strategy of an individual and fibrosis guided management of AF looks promising but results from prospective multicentre trials are pending. This review gives an overview about the relationship between cardiac fibrosis and AF focusing on translational aspects, clinical observations, and fibrosis imaging to emphasize the concept of personalized paths in AF management taking into account the individual amount and distribution of fibrosis.

High-intensity endurance training is associated with left atrial fibrosis.

INTRODUCTION: Endurance athletes are at higher risk for developing atrial fibrillation as compared to the general population. The exact mechanism to explain this observation is incompletely understood. Our study aimed to determine whether degree of left atrial fibrosis detected by late gadolinium-enhancement magnetic resonance imaging (LGE-MRI) differed between Masters athletes and non-athlete controls. METHODS: We recruited 20 endurance healthy Masters athletes and 20 healthy control subjects who underwent cardiac MRI. Healthy controls were recruited during screening colonoscopies and Masters athletes were recruited through word of mouth and at competitions. The two groups were age and gender matched. None of the participants were known to have an arrhythmia. Fibrosis, as measured by late gadolinium-enhancement, was measured in each participant by blinded readers. The degree of left atrial fibrosis was compared between the two groups. All participants were recruited from the Salt Lake City region and scanned at the University of Utah healthcare complex. RESULTS: Left ventricular function was normal in all study participants. Left atrial volumes were significantly larger in the athletes (74.2 ml ±â€¯14.4) as compared to the healthy control subjects (60.8 mL ±â€¯21.4) (P = .02). Mean left atrial fibrosis score, reported as a percentage of the LA, was 15.5% ±â€¯5.9 in the athlete cohort compared to 9.6% ±â€¯4.9 in the controls (P = .002). CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge this is the first study that describes, characterizes and specifically quantifies fibrotic changes within the left atrium of highly trained endurance athletes. Increased atrial fibrosis seen in this population may be an early indicator for endurance athletes at risk of developing atrial arrhythmias.

Magnetic resonance imaging-guided cryoballoon ablation for left atrial substrate modification in patients with atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Cryoballoon ablation (CBA) for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is an established modality for the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF). We report feasibility of left atrial (LA) substrate modification in addition to PVI both using the cryoballoon. METHODS: LA substrates and CBA-induced scar were assessed at baseline and 3 months after ablation using late gadolinium enhancement magnetic resonance imaging (LGE-MRI). Common periprocedural data including postablation LGE-MRI for evaluation of esophageal thermal injury, and CBA-associated complications were collected. Freedom from AF recurrence at 12 months was assessed using Holter and 30-day rhythm monitors. RESULTS: In 26 patients (64 ± 11 years, 69% male; 27% persistent AF, CHADSVASC score: 2.3 ± 1.5; left ventricular ejection fraction: 56 ± 10%, oral anticoagulation with warfarin/direct oral anticoagulants: n = 11/15), referred for first-time AF ablation, CBA of the pulmonary veins and extrapulmonary LA substrates was performed (median: 12 [interquartile range {IQR}: 7-14] freezes over 1675 seconds [IQR: 1168-2160]). On LGE-MRI, significant postablation cryoballoon-induced LA scar (median: 19.4% [IQR: 13.4-24.7] in comparison to baseline preablation LA-LGE (median: 10.6% [IQR 3.1-13.1]; P = .01) was found. Freedom from AF recurrence at 12 months was 74.5% with median time-to-recurrence of 242 days (IQR: 172-298). In 15 of 26 (58%) patients, esophageal enhancement on the postablation MRI was present with full recovery after 3 months. No major periprocedural complications were observed. CONCLUSION: LA substrate modification in addition to PVI using LGE-MRI-guided CBA is feasible but still experimental. The efficacy and safety have to be investigated in a prospective randomized trial.

Weight Reduction for Obesity-Induced Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction mainly affects the elderly. The obesity phenotype of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction reflects the coexistence of two highly prevalent conditions in the elderly. Obesity may also lead to heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in middle-aged persons, especially in African American women. RECENT FINDINGS: Obesity is twice as common in middle-aged than in elderly persons with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Obese middle-aged persons with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction are less likely to be Caucasian and to have atrial fibrillation or chronic kidney disease as comorbidities than elderly patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Obesity-associated low-grade systemic inflammation may induce/heighten inflammatory activation of the coronary microvascular endothelium, leading to cardiomyocyte hypertrophy/ stiffness, myocardial fibrosis, and left ventricular diastolic dysfunction. Both substantial weight reduction with bariatric surgery and lesser levels of weight reduction with caloric restriction are promising therapeutic approaches to obesity-induced heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

Systematic collection of patient-reported outcomes in atrial fibrillation: feasibility and initial results of the Utah mEVAL AF programme.

AIMS: Incorporating patient-reported outcomes (PROs) into routine care of atrial fibrillation (AF) enables direct integration of symptoms, function, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) into practice. We report our initial experience with a system-wide PRO initiative among AF patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: All patients with AF in our practice undergo PRO assessment with the Toronto AF Severity Scale (AFSS), and generic PROs, prior to electrophysiology clinic visits. We describe the implementation, feasibility, and results of clinic-based, electronic AF PRO collection, and compare AF-specific and generic HRQoL assessments. From October 2016 to February 2019, 1586 unique AF patients initiated 2379 PRO assessments, 2145 of which had all PRO measures completed (90%). The median completion time for all PRO measures per visit was 7.3 min (1st, 3rd quartiles: 6, 10). Overall, 38% of patients were female (n = 589), mean age was 68 (SD 12) years, and mean CHA2DS2-VASc score was 3.8 (SD 2.0). The mean AFSS symptom score was 8.6 (SD 6.6, 1st, 3rd quartiles: 3, 13), and the full range of values was observed (0, 35). Generic PROs of physical function, general health, and depression were impacted at the most severe quartiles of AF symptom score (P < 0.0001 for each vs. AFSS quartile). CONCLUSION: Routine clinic-based, PRO collection for AF is feasible in clinical practice and patient time investment was acceptable. Disease-specific AF PROs add value to generic HRQoL instruments. Further research into the relationship between PROs, heart rhythm, and AF burden, as well as PRO-guided management, is necessary to optimize PRO utilization.

Left atrial fibrosis progression detected by LGE-MRI after ablation of atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Left atrial (LA) fibrosis is thought to be a substrate for atrial fibrillation (AF) and can be quantified by late gadolinium enhancement magnetic resonance imaging (LGE-MRI). Fibrosis formation in LA is a dynamic process and may either progress or regress following AF ablation. We examined the impact of postablation progression in LA fibrosis on AF recurrence. METHODS: LA enhancement in LGE-MRI was quantified in 127 consecutive patients who underwent first time AF ablation. Serial LGE-MRIs were done prior to AF ablation, 3 months postablation and at least 12 months after second LGE-MRI. Transient postablation lesion (TL) was defined as atrial enhancement caused by ablation lesions that was detected on the first (3 month) but not on the second postablation LGE-MRI. New fibrosis (NF) was defined as atrial enhancement detected on the most recent LGE-MRI, at least 15 months after the ablation procedure. AF recurrence and its correlation with TL and NF was assessed in all patients during the follow-up period. RESULTS: An increase of 1% NF increased the chance of postablation AF recurrence by 3% (hazard ratio [HR] 1.03, 95% CI 1-1.06, P = .05). TL had no significant impact on recurrence (P = .057). After adjusting for cardiovascular risk factors, HR increased as NF became greater. Greater volume of NF (≥21%) corresponded with lower arrhythmia-free survival (37% vs 62%, P = .01). CONCLUSION: NF formation postablation of AF is a novel marker of long-term procedural outcome. Extensive NF is associated with significantly higher risk of atrial arrhythmia recurrence.

Ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure deserves more than a IIb guidelines recommendation.

The current evidence and guidelines for rhythm management of AF in HFrEF were examined. We propose updates of rhythm management (catheter ablation and antiarrhythmic drugs) of AF in HFrEF incorporating this most uptodate evidence.

Atrial fibrosis in non-atrial fibrillation individuals and prediction of atrial fibrillation by use of late gadolinium enhancement magnetic resonance imaging.

INTRODUCTION: Besides the traditional concept of atrial fibrillation (AF) perpetuating atrial structural remodeling, there is increasing evidence that atrial fibrosis might precede AF, highlighting the need for better characterization of the fibrotic substrate. We aimed to assess atrial fibrosis by use of late gadolinium enhancement magnetic resonance imaging (LGE-MRI) in non-AF individuals and to identify predisposing risk factors. A second aim was to establish a risk score for the prevalence of AF using atrial fibrosis in addition to established clinical variables. METHODS AND RESULTS: Non-AF individuals without structural heart disease (n = 91) and matched AF controls (n = 91) underwent MRI for assessment of LGE. According to the established UTAH classification, atrial LGE ≥20% was considered extensive. Mean left atrial (LA) fibrosis in non-AF and AF individuals were 8.8 ± 6.5% and 12.5 ± 5.8%, respectively. Body mass index (BMI) >30 kg/m 2 and LA volume were predictors of atrial fibrosis. Diastolic function was not significantly different with respect to atrial fibrosis. A novel scoring system for the prevalence of AF (2 points for arterial hypertension and/or left ventricular ejection fraction <55%; 3 points for atrial fibrosis >6%) was derived demonstrating that patients in the intermediate/high-risk group had a significantly increased risk of AF. CONCLUSION: This study reports unexpectedly high atrial fibrosis in non-AF patients without apparent heart disease, highlighting the concept that structural fibrotic alterations may precede AF onset in a significant proportion of individuals. BMI as a predictor of atrial fibrosis suggests that lifestyle and drug intervention, that is, weight reduction, could positively influence fibrosis development. The derived risk score for AF prevalence provides the basis for prospective studies on AF incidence.

Management of Atrial Fibrillation in Patients with Heart Failure: Time to Implement Ablation Control.

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW: Atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with heart failure and reduced systolic ejection fraction (HFrEF) is common and associated with increased morbidity and mortality, and managing AF in this population has been particularly challenging with sparse data regarding the optimal treatment strategy. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent data suggests that rhythm control with catheter ablation can be of particular benefit to patients with coexisting AF and HFrEF. Recent randomized control trials actually suggest that catheter ablation could potentially improve mortality in this particular patient population. This is in stark contrast to the current practice recommendations that reserve catheter ablation for symptomatic AF in the general population. In this paper, we will review the most current randomized controlled studies using catheter ablation in HFrEF patients with the hope to increase awareness of the potential mortality benefits the need for prioritization of catheter ablation in HFrEF patients in the next AF management guidelines.

Acute noncontrast T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging predicts chronic radiofrequency ablation lesions.

BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been used to visualize radiofrequency (RF) ablation lesions but the relationship between volumes that enhance in acute MRI and the chronic lesion size is unknown. OBJECTIVES: The main goal was to use noncontrast (native) T1-weighted (T1w) MRI and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE)-MRI to visualize lesions acutely and chronically and correlate the acute area of enhancement with chronic lesion size in histology. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a canine (n = 9) model RF ablation lesions were created in both ventricles. Native T1w MRI and LGE-MRI were acquired acutely after the ablation procedure. After 8 weeks, another set of RF ablations was performed, and the MRI study was repeated. Volume and depth of enhancement in native T1w MRI and LGE-MRI acquired after the initial ablation procedure were correlated with chronic lesion volume and depth in histology. RESULTS: Thirty-three lesions were analyzed. Native T1w MRI visualized the acute lesions but not the chronic lesions. LGE-MRI showed both acute and chronic lesions. Acute native T1w MRI volume (average of 102.1 ± 48.5 mm3 ) and depth (4.9 ± 1.2 mm) correlated well with chronic histological volume (105.9 ± 51.8 mm3 ) and depth (4.8 ± 1.3 mm) with R2 of 0.881 (P < 0.001) and 0.874 (P < 0.001), respectively. Acute LGE-MRI had a significantly higher volume of enhancement of 499.7 ± 214.4 mm3 (P < 0.001) and depth of 7.5 ± 1.8 mm ( P < 0.001) when compared with chronic histological lesion volume and depth. CONCLUSIONS: Native T1w MRI acquired acutely after RF ablation is a good predictor of chronic lesion size. Acute LGE-MRI significantly overestimates the chronic lesion size.

Left atrial shape predicts recurrence after atrial fibrillation catheter ablation.

INTRODUCTION: Multiple markers left atrium (LA) remodeling, including LA shape, correlate with outcomes in atrial fibrillation (AF). Catheter ablation is an important treatment of AF, but better tools are needed to determine which patients will benefit. In this study, we use particle-based modeling to quantitatively assess LA shape, and determine to what degree it predicts AF recurrence after catheter ablation. METHODS AND RESULTS: There were 254 patients enrolled in the DECAAF study who underwent cardiac magnetic resonance imaging of the LA prior to AF ablation and were followed for recurrence for up to 475 days. We performed particle-based shape modeling on each patient's LA shape. We selected shape parameters using the LASSO method and factor analysis, and then added them to a Cox regression model, which included multiple clinical parameters and LA fibrosis. We computed Harrell's C-statistic with and without shape in the model. We used the model to stratify patients into recurrence risk classes by both shape and shape and fibrosis combined. Three shape parameters were selected for inclusion. The C-statistic increased from 0.68 to 0.72 when shape was added to the model (P < 0.05). Visualized shapes showed that a more round LA shape with a shorter, more laterally rotated appendage was predictive of recurrence. CONCLUSION: LA shape is an independent predictor of recurrence after AF ablation. When combined with LA fibrosis, shape analysis using PBM may improve patient selection for ablation.

Durable lesion formation while avoiding esophageal injury during ablation of atrial fibrillation: Lessons learned from late gadolinium MR imaging.

INTRODUCTION: Adequate catheter/atrial tissue contact is critical for lesion formation during radiofrequency (RF) ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). Late gadolinium enhancement magnetic resonance imaging (LGE-MRI) is a unique tool for the evaluation of lesion formation and detection of acute esophageal injury. METHODS: LGE-MRIs were obtained prior, within 24 hours of, and at 115 ± 62 days after first AF ablation in 36 patients. The Visitag module of CARTO3 was used to collect contact force (CF) and duration from a CF sensing ablation catheter for each registered ablation point. The minimum CF resulting in permanent lesions was determined. Esophageal enhancement detected by acute LGE-MRI was classified as mild, moderate, and severe. The CF resulting in esophageal enhancement was determined. RESULTS: A total of 4,642 registered ablation tags at 50 W power were analyzed. The mean RF duration (5.9 ± 3.7 vs. 5.6 ± 3.2 seconds, P < 0.05), CF (11.5 ± 5.6 vs. 10.9 ± 5.4 g, P < 0.001), and force time integral (FTI) (67.3 ± 54.5 vs. 62.2 ± 52.7 gs, P < 0.01) were significantly higher between ablation tags with and without associated LGE-MRI detected scar. The mean CF (15.7 ± 6.1 vs. 12.6 ± 5.9 g, P < 0.05, n  =  17 patients) in areas of esophageal enhancement was greater than areas without. CONCLUSION: Left atrial short duration ablation lesions with a CF greater than 12 g are more likely to be associated with permanent lesion formation. Ablating on top of the esophagus, CF less than 15 g would help minimize esophageal wall injury.

Age and sex differences in atrial fibrosis among patients with atrial fibrillation.

Aim: Age and female sex are associated with a higher risk of stroke in atrial fibrillation (AF). We sought to determine whether advancing age and female sex are associated with higher atrial fibrosis. Methods and results: We conducted an observational cohort study of patients with AF enrolled in the University of Utah AF Database and a non-AF control group who underwent late-gadolinium enhancement magnetic resonance imaging (LGE-MRI) for atrial fibrosis quantification. Participants with contra-indications for contrast MRI scanning were excluded. Nine hundred and eight consecutive men and women with AF and 15 non-AF controls were included in this study. Left atrial fibrosis increased with age in both men and women with AF. Women with AF (n = 316) were older than men (n = 592): mean age 68.7±11.6 vs. 64.9±11.7 years; P < 0.01, and had higher left atrial fibrosis compared with men 17.5 ± 10.1% vs. 15.3 ± 8.9%; P < 0.001. Women also had a higher prevalence of prior stroke compared with men (15.8% vs. 6.5%; P < 0.001). Age and sex relationships with atrial fibrosis remained significant in multivariate analysis. Compared with the non-AF control group, patients with AF had significantly higher atrial fibrosis: 16.0 ± 9.4 vs. 5.5 ± 5.8%; P < 0.001. Conclusions: Advancing age and female sex are associated with a higher burden of atrial fibrosis in patients with AF. Women with a prior history of stroke also have higher fibrosis compared with both women and men without history of stroke. Advanced fibrosis may explain the female and age association with stroke in AF.

Magnetic resonance imaging of atrial fibrosis: redefining atrial fibrillation to a syndrome.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained arrhythmia and its treatment continues to be a challenge. Recently, delayed enhancement (DE)-MRI was introduced in the diagnosis and treatment of AF by the assessment of atrial fibrosis, which is considered the hallmark of the arrhythmogenic substrate in AF. Atrial fibrosis was reported to be an independent predictor of arrhythmia recurrences. Post-ablation DE-MRI allows for assessment of the total scar burden, complete encirclement of pulmonary veins, and the assessment of residual fibrosis, which were all reported to be strong predictors of arrhythmia recurrences post-ablation. Current pathophysiological perspectives for AF are heavily based on the adagium AF begets AF. However, several recent observations, such as atrial fibrosis being present in non-AF patients, do introduce a new pathophysiological perspective for AF. Potentially, atrial fibrosis is a disease process that triggers the initiation and maintenance of the syndrome AF.