Patient Views on Surgeon-specific Outcome Reporting in Vascular Surgery: Novel Validated Patient Questionnaire Study.

BACKGROUND: SSMD are used to enhance transparency, improve quality and facilitate patient choice. The use of SSMD is controversial, but patients' views on such data are largely unknown. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was therefore to explore the views of patients and to identify their priorities for outcome reporting in vascular surgery. METHODS: A prospective questionnaire study of 165 patients receiving care in a single academic vascular unit was performed. Data on patients' current understanding and use of SSMD, together with future priorities were collected. RESULTS: Of the 165 patients 80% were unaware of SSMD. 72% thought they should be made aware of the data, although 63% thought they were likely to misinterpret the results. The majority recognized the utility of SSMD to inform treatment (60%) and surgeon (53%) choice. The majority prioritize the patient-surgeon relationship (90%) and past experiences of care (71%) when making treatment decisions. A significant majority (66% vs 49%; P < 0.005) would favour hospital-level to surgeon-level data. The main patient priorities for future outcome reporting were waiting list length (56%), the quality of hospital facilities (55%), and patient satisfaction (54%). CONCLUSIONS: The aims of SSMD reporting are not currently being met, and both patients and healthcare professionals have shared concerns over the nature and usefulness of the data. Patients express a preference for hospital-level outcomes and prioritize the experience of receiving care over outcomes when making treatment decisions. Future outcome reporting should include patient-directed hospital-level metrics that are readily accessible and understood by all.

An Evaluation of the Impact of High-Fidelity Endovascular Simulation on Surgeon Stress and Technical Performance.

OBJECTIVE: To measure the physiological stress response associated with high-fidelity endovascular team simulation. DESIGN: This is a prospective cohort study. SETTING: This study was performed at St Mary's Hospital (Imperial College London, London, UK), in a tertiary setting. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-five participants (10 vascular surgical residents, 4 surgical interns, 12 theatre nurses, 2 attending vascular surgeons, 6 medical students and 1 technician) were recruited from the Imperial Vascular Unit at St Mary's Hospital, Imperial College London by direct approach. All participants finished the study. RESULTS: Junior surgeons experienced significantly increased sympathetic tone (Low frequency/high frequency (LF/HF) ratio) during team simulation compared to individual simulation (6.01 ± 1.68 vs. 8.32 ± 2.84, p < 0.001). Within team simulation junior surgeons experienced significantly higher heart rate (beats per minute) than their senior counterparts (82 ± 5.83 vs. 76 ± 6.02, p = 0.033). Subjective workload scores (NASA Task Load Index [NASA-TLX]) correlated moderately and significantly with sympathetic tone in surgeons across all stages of simulation. (r = 0.39, p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: A discrete, measurable increase in stress is experienced by surgeons during high-fidelity endovascular simulation and differentially effects junior surgeons. High-fidelity team simulation may have a role to play in improving nontechnical skill, reducing intra-operative stress, and reducing error.