Humanistic and economic burden of atopic dermatitis in pediatric patients in Spain: a systematic review.

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic, inflammatory skin disease affecting all age groups, particularly children. This systematic review provides an overview of the humanistic and economic disease burden in the pediatric population with AD in Spain. The evidence, collected from 11 observational studies published over the past 10 years, exhibits the most common characteristics of the patients, disease burden, patient-reported outcomes, use of resources, and treatment patterns. The burden of AD extends beyond physical symptoms, with associated comorbidities such as asthma and impaired health-related quality of life and mental health disorders, particularly in severe cases. Traditional therapies, primarily topical corticosteroids, face adherence and efficacy challenges. Despite promising innovative treatments and available biological therapies, their use is still limited in the pediatric population. The findings of the present review highlight the scarce scientific evidence on the economic burden of pediatric AD, as well as the most updated humanistic evidence on this disease. At the same time, the need for individualized care and innovative therapeutic interventions to address the multifaceted challenges of pediatric AD in Spain is evident.

Parental assessment of infantile hemangioma cosmetic clinical outcomes: results of the Spanish Hemangioma Nationwide Prospective Cohort.

BACKGROUND: Functional impairment is the main consideration when it comes to choosing therapy for infantile hemangiomas (IH). However, since most hemangiomas are treated for cosmetic reasons, it is important to know the cosmetic outcome assessed by the parents. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the aesthetic outcomes of IH, considering the characteristics of the lesions and the treatments used. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The Spanish Infantile Hemangioma Nationwide Prospective Cohort (2016-2022) recruited all consecutive patients diagnosed with IH in 12 Spanish hospitals. The children included had 2 photos of the IH lesion (at both baseline and at the end of the study). A panel of parents blindly assessed all available photos using a scale from 0 (worst cosmetic outcomes) to 10 (best cosmetic outcomes). The different scores -both before and after treatment-as well as the outcomes percent considered excellent (> 9) were described and compared. We analyzed the effect of receiving different therapies and performed causal model analyses estimating the mean treatment effect of parents' assessments. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 3.1 years. A total of 824 photos were evaluated. Baseline aesthetic impact was higher in the propranolol group vs the topical timolol and observation treatment groups (1.85 vs 3.14 vs 3.66 respectively; p < 0.001). After treatment, the aesthetic impact was similar between both treatment groups (7.59 vs 7.93 vs 7.90; p > 0.2). The causal model could only be applied to the comparison between topical timolol and observation, revealing no differences whatsoever. CONCLUSION: This is the first prospective cohort to analyze the aesthetic outcome of IH. The final aesthetic results of the 3 therapies were similar, with nearly 40% of patients achieving excellent aesthetic outcomes.

[Translated article] Requirements for Accessing New Dermatology Drugs in Spain: Results of the EQUIDAD Study.

BACKGROUND: Although the Spanish Ministry of Health prepares national therapeutic positioning reports (TPRs) and drug reimbursement policies, each of the country's 17 autonomous communities (ACs) is responsible for health care services and prescription requirements in its territory. The aim of the EQUIDAD study was to describe and explore potential differences in prescription requirements for new dermatology drugs across the autonomous communities. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Cross-sectional study conducted in April and May, 2023. Two dermatologists with management responsibilities from each autonomous community reported on territorial and more local prescription requirements for drugs covered by national TPRs issued between 2016 and 2022. RESULTS: Thirty-three researchers from 17 autonomous communities participated. The data submitted revealed between-community inequities in access to new drugs. Overall, 64.7% of the regions imposed additional prescription requirements to those mentioned in the TPRs for psoriasis. This percentage was lower for atopic dermatitis (35.3%) and melanoma (11.8%). The most common requirement for accessing a new drug was a previous prescription for another drug. Differences and additional requirements were also detected at the local level (i.e., differences between hospitals within the same autonomous community). CONCLUSIONS: Spain's autonomous communities have multiple regional and local prescription requirements that are not aligned with national TPR recommendations. These differences result in inequitable access to new drugs for both patients and practitioners across Spain.

Descripción basal de la cohorte nacional prospectiva de hemangiomas infantiles de la Academia Española de Dermatología y Venereología. Comparación de los pacientes tratados con propranolol en la práctica clínica rutinaria y los datos del ensayo clínico pivotal previo / Baseline Description of the Spanish Academy of Dermatology Infantile Haemangioma Nationwide Prospective Cohort. Comparison of Patients Treated with Propranolol in Routine Clinical Practice with Previous Pivotal Clinical Trial Data

Introducción Existen diversas opciones terapéuticas para los hemangiomas infantiles (HI). El propranolol se utiliza con base en un ensayo pivotal. Nuestro objetivo fue describir las características del HI en la práctica clínica, incluyendo las terapias utilizadas, así como comparar las características de los pacientes tratados con propranolol y las de los pacientes del ensayo, para valorar su validez externa. Métodos Se incluyó consecutivamente a los pacientes que acudieron a doce hospitales españoles desde junio de 2016 a octubre de 2019 (n=601). Resultados La edad media fue de 3,9 (DE:1,9) meses, con una ratio mujer-varón de 2:1. La mayoría de los HI fueron de tipo localizado (82%, 495), superficial (64%, 383) y ubicados en cara (25%, 157) y tronco (31%, 188). El tamaño mediano fue de 17 (RI: 10-30) x 12 (RI: 7-20) mm. Se encontraron complicaciones en 16 (3%) pacientes. Se inició tratamiento en el 52% (311) de los casos. La mayoría de los pacientes recibió timolol (76%, 237), reservándose propranolol para las complicaciones o los HI de alto riesgo. El compromiso estético fue el principal motivo de iniciar la terapia (64%, 199). Las diversas características de los pacientes y de los HI tratados con propranolol fueron similares a las del ensayo clínico pivotal, aunque 1/3 de los HI no alcanzó el diámetro mínimo para cumplir los criterios de inclusión, y no se comunicó información pronóstica importante. Conclusiones Dado que muchos pacientes reciben tratamiento debido al compromiso estético, existe una necesidad de conocer mejor los resultados estéticos de las terapias e incrementar la evidencia sobre el uso de timolol, que actualmente es la terapia más común. El propranolol está siendo utilizado en una población generalmente similar a la del ensayo; sin embargo, esta afirmación no puede confirmarse de manera definitiva (AU)

Background There are several therapeutic options for infantile haemangiomas (IH). Propranolol is used according to a pivotal trial. We aimed to describe the characteristics of IH in clinical practice, including the therapies used, and to compare the characteristics of patients treated with propranolol with those of the trial to assess its external validity. Methods Consecutive patients attending 12 Spanish hospitals from June 2016 to October 2019 were included (n=601). Results The mean age was 3.9 (SD:1.9) months, with a 2:1 female-to-male ratio. Most IHs were localized (82%, 495), superficial (64%, 383) and located in the face (25%, 157) and trunk (31%, 188). Median size was 17 (IR: 10-30) x 12 (IR: 7-20) mm. Complications were found in 16 (3%) patients. Treatment was initiated for 52% (311). Most patients received timolol (76%, 237); propranolol was reserved for complications or high-risk IHs. Aesthetic impairment was the main reason for starting therapy (64%, 199). Several characteristics of the patients and IHs treated with propranolol are similar to those of the pivotal clinical trial, but 1/3 of IHs did not reach the minimum diameter to meet the inclusion criteria, and important prognostic information was not reported. Conclusions As most patients receive treatment for aesthetic impairment, there is a need to better understand the aesthetic results of therapies and to increase evidence on the use of timolol, which is currently the most common therapy. Propranolol is being used in a population generally similar to that of the trial; however, this statement cannot be definitely confirmed (AU)