Effects of switching from clopidogrel to prasugrel at the chronic phase after coronary stenting on antiplatelet action and vascular endothelial function: Switch-Pras study.

Compared to clopidogrel, prasugrel has a lower incidence of ischemic events following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) because of an early reduction during the acute phase in P2Y12 reaction units (PRU). The objective of this study was to compare the antiplatelet effect and vascular endothelial function of both drugs during the chronic phase after PCI. Patients who had undergone PCI and were confirmed to have no restenosis by follow-up coronary angiography under dual anti-platelet therapy with clopidogrel (75 mg/day) and aspirin (100 mg/day) were randomized to either continue clopidogrel or switch to prasugrel (3.75 mg/day). At baseline, prior to randomization we determined the CYP2C19 genotype. At the baseline and 24 weeks after randomization, the P2Y12 reactivity unit (PRU) was measured using the VerifyNow™ P2Y12 assay. Endothelial function was evaluated by flow-mediated vasodilation (FMD) and reactive hyperemia peripheral arterial tonometry (RH-PAT), while and circulating CD34+/CD133+/CD45low progenitor cells were measured by flow cytometric analysis. Serum high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) level was also measured. The PRU was reduced significantly in the prasugrel group (P = 0.0008), especially in patients who were intermediate or poor metabolizers based on the CYP2C19 genotype (P < 0.0001). This reduction was not observed in the clopidogrel group. The number of CD34+/CD133+/CD45low cells increased in the clopidogrel group (P = 0.008), but not in the prasugrel group. The hsCRP, FMD and reactive hyperemia index measured by RH-PAT did not change in either group. Prasugrel is potentially better than clopidogrel for preventing thrombotic events, although clopidogrel may have an advantage over prasugrel in terms of preventing atherosclerotic events. Proper use of thienopyridine drugs based on the CYP2C19 genotype has promising clinical potential.

Comparison of echocardiographic parameters to assess right ventricular function in pulmonary hypertension.

Although measurement of right ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF) may be relevant for evaluation of therapeutic efficacy and/or prognosis in patients with pulmonary hypertension, RVEF obtained by echocardiography has limited accuracy. In contrast, radionuclide and/or magnetic resonance imaging can measure RVEF more reliably. In this study, we investigated the relationship between RVEF measured by radionuclide angiography and the echocardiographic parameters that are recommended by the American Society of Echocardiography as representative of right heart function. There were 23 study participants with pulmonary hypertension who underwent radionuclide angiography and 2-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography (n = 30 measurements). RVEF measured by radionuclide angiography correlated with right ventricular Tei index (RV Tei index) measured by Doppler echocardiography (r = -0.601, P < 0.0005). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that an RV Tei index cut-off value of 0.371 was the best of predictor of RVEF ≤35% (area under the curve = 0.768, sensitivity = 0.857, selectivity = 0.667). Multiple regression analysis showed that RVEF was correlated with the RV Tei index, and this association was independent of other echocardiographic right ventricular function parameters (r = -0.644, P < 0.005). The RV Tei index measured by Doppler echocardiography may be an acceptable surrogate marker of RVEF in patients with pulmonary hypertension.

Acute-on-Chronic Pattern of Isolated Upper Back Pain in a Patient With Acute Coronary Syndrome.

The aim of this case report is to describe the diagnostic pitfalls of acute coronary syndrome in patients with relatively atypical presentation and how we can prevent diagnostic errors in such a patient, particularly focusing on occupational information. A 66-year-old male, a professional taxi driver, presented with severely deteriorated chronic upper back pain on the left side. Furthermore, the upper back pain was exacerbated by changes in position. An orthopedist examined the patient and arrived at a provisional diagnosis of musculoskeletal pain. However, as the patient was concerned about his cardiopulmonary diseases, he visited another physician. Although musculoskeletal pain was still considered as the most possible diagnosis, the physician advised him additional tests for cardiovascular diseases because he had some risk factors such as smoking, hypertension, and dyslipidemia, and the physician thought that "taxi driving" was a high-risk occupation for cardiovascular diseases. Finally, the patient was diagnosed with acute coronary syndrome, and the pain abated soon after percutaneous coronary intervention. Musculoskeletal pain is very common in professional drivers, and isolated upper back pain worsened by changes in position is a characteristic of musculoskeletal disease. However, since professional drivers also have a higher risk of cardiovascular diseases, physicians should consider the coexistence of two types of conditions. This case underscores that if physicians could utilize occupational information to assess patients' risks, diagnostic accuracy would improve, particularly in patients presenting with atypical symptoms and signs, which are at risk of diagnostic errors.

Provocation and Localization of Arrhythmogenic Triggers from Persistent Left Superior Vena Cava in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Although pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is an established procedure for atrial fibrillation (AF), non-PV foci play a crucial role in AF recurrence. Persistent left superior vena cava (PLSVC) has been reported as critical non-PV foci. However, the effectiveness of provocation of AF triggers from PLSVC remains unclear. This study was designed to validate the usefulness of provoking AF triggers from PLSVC. METHODS: This multicenter retrospective study included 37 patients with AF and PLSVC. To provoke triggers, AF was cardioverted, and re-initiation of AF was monitored under high-dose isoproterenol infusion. The patients were divided into two groups: those whose PLSVC had arrhythmogenic triggers initiating AF (Group A) and those whose PLSVC did not have triggers (Group B). Group A underwent isolation of PLSVC after PVI. Group B received PVI only. RESULTS: Group A had 14 patients, whereas Group B had 23 patients. After a 3-year follow-up, no difference in the success rate for maintaining sinus rhythm was observed between the two groups. Group A was significantly younger and had lower CHADS2-VASc scores than Group B. CONCLUSIONS: The provocation of arrhythmogenic triggers from PLSVC was effective for the ablation strategy. PLSVC electrical isolation would not be necessary if arrhythmogenic triggers are not provoked.

Add-on ezetimibe treatment to low-dose statins vs medium-intensity statin monotherapy in coronary artery disease patients with poorly controlled dyslipidemia.

Although ezetimibe has potential value as an add-on therapy to statins, it is not established whether the addition of ezetimibe to statin therapy is more effective than double-dose statin monotherapy. We conducted a crossover design study. Twenty-one coronary artery disease (CAD) patients whose lipid profiles had not achieved Japanese guideline recommendations (JAS 2017), despite receiving low-dose statin therapy, were divided into two groups. Group A received ezetimibe 10 mg in addition to the baseline dose of statin for the first 3 months and was then switched to monotherapy with a double dose of statin for the next 3 months. Group B first received a double dose of statin for 3 months and was then switched to ezetimibe 10 mg in addition to a baseline dose of statin for the next 3 months. Compared with the baseline, double-dose statin therapy reduced low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol (from 118 ± 22 to 104 ± 15 mg/dL, P < 0.05) and malondialdehyde-modified LDL (MDA-LDL) (from 142 ± 35 to 126 ± 24 U/L, P < 0.05) but did not lower high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) (3.02 ± 0.47 and 2.98 ± 0.41 log [ng/ml]). The addition of ezetimibe to a baseline dose of statin further reduced LDL-cholesterol (to 89 ± 15, P < 0.0001) and MDA-LDL (to 114 ± 22 U/L, P < 0.001) and reduced hsCRP (to 2.78 ± 0.38 log (ng/ml), P < 0.05). The changes in the levels of MDA-LDL (R = 0.548, P = 0.010) and hsCRP (R = 0.473, P < 0.05) were significantly correlated with the change in the LDL-cholesterol level after the addition of ezetimibe. Add-on ezetimibe treatment appears superior to double-dose statin therapy in CAD patients with poorly controlled dyslipidemia in terms of reductions in LDL-cholesterol level, lipid peroxidation, and inflammation.