Periodontal Bacterial DNA and Their Link to Human Cardiac Tissue: Findings of a Pilot Study.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this pilot study was to detect correlations of microbiological DNA, inflammatory proteins, and infection parameters in patients with periodontal disease (PD) and valvular heart disease (VHD). METHODS: A perioperative comprehensive dental examination for the investigation of periodontal status, including sampling of specific subgingival bacteria, was performed in 10 patients with indication for surgery of aortic valve stenosis with or without concomitant myocardial revascularization. Standard protocol biopsies were taken from right atrium (A), left septal myocardium (M), and aortic valve (V). Eleven periodontal pathogens DNA in oral and cardiac tissue samples (A/M/V) were analyzed using polymerase chain reaction. For cardiac tissue samples, Western blot analysis of LPS-binding protein (LBP), immunohistochemical (IHC) detection of LBP-big42, LPS-binding protein receptor (CD14), and macrophages (CD68), as well as inflammation scoring measurement were performed. RESULTS: Periodontitis was present in all patients with severe intensity in 7, moderate in 2 and mild in one patient. Same bacterial DNA was detected in A, M, and V in different distribution, and detection was more often in atrium than in myocardium or valve tissue. Morphological investigation revealed increased extracellular inflammatory cell migration. In IHC markers of LBP, CD68 and CD14 showed positive findings for all patients in atrium and myocardium. CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate the presence of oral bacterial DNA in human cardiac tissue, as well as inflammatory markers potentially indicating connection of PD and VHD. Further investigation is necessary to confirm these preliminary data.

Oral Health and nutritional status in nursing home residents-results of an explorative cross-sectional pilot study.

BACKGROUND: This study was performed to assess oral and nutritional status of nursing home residents in a region of Lower Saxony, Germany. The aim was to show potential associations between oral status (dentate or edentulous), further anamnestic factors (dementia, age, smoking) and the risk for malnutrition in this population. METHODS: In this observational cross-sectional pilot study of residents from four nursing homes Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA), Body-Mass-Index (BMI), dental status (DMF-T) and periodontal situation (PSR®/PSI) were recorded. Associations of recorded factors with oral health and nutritional status were examined in univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Eighty-seven residents participated in the study (mean age: 84.1 years; female: 72%, demented: 47%). Average BMI was 26.2 kg/m2; according MNA 52% were at risk for malnutrition. 48% of the residents were edentulous, and the average DMF-T of dentulous was 25.0 (3.7) (D-T: 2.0 [3.1], M-T: 15.0 [8.3], F-T: 8.0 [7.4]); PSR®/PSI 3 and 4 (need for periodontal treatment) showed 79% of residents. In univariate analysis dementia (OR 2.5 CI95 1.1-5.6) but not being edentulous (OR 2.0 CI95 0.8-5.8) were associated with being at risk for malnutrition. Dementia remained associated in multivariate analysis adjusting for age and sex, (OR 3.1 CI95 1.2-8.2) and additionally being edentulous (OR 2.8 CI95 1.1-7.3) became associated significantly. Furthermore, nursing home residents with dementia had more remaining teeth (OR 2.5 CI95 1.1-5.9). CONCLUSION: Dementia was a stronger predictor for risk of malnutrition in nursing home residents than being edentulous. Further studies to elucidate the possible role of oral health as cofactor for malnutrition in dementia are needed.

Oral health-related quality of life depending on oral health in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) depending on their oral health in comparison with healthy controls (HCs). METHODS: One hundred three RA patients (55.5 years, female 58) were included. A healthy control group (HC n = 104; 56.7 years, female 68) was matched according to age, gender, and smoking habits. The OHRQoL was determined by Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP)-G14 questionnaire. Oral examination included dental findings (DMF-T), gingival inflammation (PBI), periodontal probing depth (PPD), clinical attachment loss (CAL), and bleeding on probing (BOP). Based on CAL and/or PPD, periodontitis was categorized as healthy/mild, moderate, or severe. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: trend test (Cochran-Armitage) and Wilcoxon rank-sum test (α = 5%). RESULTS: For DMF-T (RA 17.6 ± 6.1, HC 16.0 ± 6.5) and PBI (RA 0.10 ± 0.18, HC 0.08 ± 0.18), no significant differences between both groups were found (p > 0.05). Approximately 65% of RA group and 79% of HC group showed moderate to severe periodontitis (p = 0.02); RA patients showed significantly higher BOP values (p < 0.01). OHRQoL was significantly worse in RA group compared to HC group (mean OHIP value RA = 7.3 ± 7.2, HC = 1.6 ± 2.1; p < 0.001). In the HC group, a significant effect of DMF-T, M-T, and PD on OHRQoL was detected (p < 0.01), whereas in the RA group, no influence was determined (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: RA patients showed a worse OHRQoL than HC patients, which was independent of dental and periodontal conditions. RA patients require a more intensive care in consideration of dental, medical, and psychological factors. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Interdisciplinary collaboration between dentists and rheumatologists is necessary, whereby psychological factors should be considered.

Periodontal pathogenic bacteria and aMMP-8 findings depending on periodontal conditions of patients before and after liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this single-center cross-sectional study was to detect the prevalence of selected periodontal pathogenic bacteria and active matrix metalloproteinase-8 (aMMP-8) level in patients before (preLTx) and after liver transplantation (postLTx). METHODS: Periodontal pocket depth (PPD) and clinical attachment loss (CAL) were assessed. Subgingival biofilm samples were analyzed using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to detect 11 common periodontal pathogens. Gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) samples were analyzed with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) to determine aMMP-8 level and assigned to a scoring system: score 0: 0-8 ng/ml, score 1: 8-20 ng/ml, and score 2: >20 ng/ml. The following were used for the statistical analysis: t test, Mann-Whitney U test, Fishers test (α = 5 %). RESULTS: In total, 110 patients (preLTx: n = 35, postLTx: n = 75) could be included in the study. Periodontal findings were not significantly different between groups. In microbiological analysis, a significantly higher prevalence of Campylobacter rectus in preLTx group was detected (p = 0.03). Significantly more patients with score 0 in postLTx group (p = 0.024) and significantly more patients with score 1 in preLTx group were found (p = 0.004). Furthermore, aMMP-8 concentrations for patients with moderate periodontitis were significantly lower in postLTx group compared to preLTx group (p = 0.045). Additionally, in postLTx group, aMMP-8 concentration was significantly higher in patients with severe periodontitis compared to those with no/mild periodontitis (p = 0.016). CONCLUSION: LTx appears to affect aMMP-8 level, but not bacterial findings in patients after LTx. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Determination of aMMP-8 level in patients after LTx with immunosuppressive medication might lead to wrong interpretation of the results.

Influence of manual and power toothbrushes on clinical and microbiological findings in initial treatment of periodontitis - A randomized clinical study.

PURPOSE: This randomized clinical study compared the influence of manual and power toothbrushes on clinical and microbiological findings in initial treatment of periodontitis. METHODS: A total of 72 participants with a mean age of 55.7 years were randomly assigned to three groups (n= 24):oscillating-rotating (OR), sonic-active (SA) and manual toothbrush (MTB). At baseline, after 4 weeks and after 12 weeks, the following parameters were assessed:modified Quigley-Hein-Index (QHI), papilla bleeding index (PBI), periodontal pocket depth (PPD), bleeding on probing (BOP) and recession. For microbiological analysis (PCR) of 11 periodontal pathogenic bacteria, samples of sulcular fluid were taken from the deepest pockets. Statistical analysis was performed using ANOVA, with the level of significance set at α= 5%. RESULTS: All clinical parameters:PBI, modified QHI, PPD, BOP and recession showed an improvement after 12 weeks compared to baseline, regardless of which toothbrush system was used. Regarding PBI, the SA group showed significantly greater improvement compared to OR and MTB (P< 0.01). In plaque removal (QHI) only OR was significantly more effective than MTB (P= 0.01). Periodontal parameters showed a significantly higher reduction of PPD for SA compared to MTB and MTB compared to OR (Plt; 0.05), while for BOP only a significantly higher reduction in SA compared to OR was detected (P= 0.01) Microbiological analysis showed an improvement in prevalence of several bacteria without significant differences between groups. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Patients might benefit from powered TB systems, especially in initial treatment of periodontitis.

Oral Health Behaviour and Oral Hygiene of Dental Professionals and Laypersons - A Survey Performed in Lower Saxony, Germany.

PURPOSE: The aim of this survey-based cross-sectional study was to analyse the oral health behaviour of dental professionals and persons without professional dental knowledge (layperson group) regarding the use and selection of tools for their personal dental hygiene. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 356 persons participated in the survey (dental professional group: 160; layperson group: 196). Information regarding dental hygiene habits, such as toothbrush use, toothbrushing habits, and the use of additional dental hygiene tools was determined using a standardised questionnaire. Data were analysed using the chi-squared and Wilcoxon tests, with significance set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: 93% of the dental professional group and 89% of layperson group used manual toothbrushes (p = 0.03). Power toothbrushes were used by 57% of those surveyed in the dental professional group and 37% of those in the layperson group (p < 0.01). In the dental professional group, the duration of toothbrushing was significantly longer and it was performed more often compared to layperson group (p < 0.001). The use of dental floss and interdental brushes in the layperson group (dental floss 38%, interdental brush 5%) was considerably lower than in the dental professional group (dental floss 84%, interdental brush 11%; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The results of the survey on oral health behaviour revealed significant differences between the groups. The acceptance of additional tools for personal dental hygiene was low, such as dental floss and interdental brushes. Given the great importance of these tools for biofilm control, they should be emphasised in motivational measures and instructions regarding oral care performed at home.

The influence of the utilization time of brush heads from different types of power toothbrushes on oral hygiene assessed over a 6-month observation period: A randomized clinical trial.

PURPOSE: This randomized clinical trial investigated the influence of the utilization time of brush heads from different types of power toothbrushes [oscillating rotating (OR) and sonic action (SA)93; on oral hygiene (plaque accumulation and gingival inflammation) over a 6-month observation period. METHODS: 49 participants were randomly allocated into two groups: use of the same brush head over 6 months (NR: non-replacement) or replacement of brush head every 4 weeks over 6 months (R: replacement). Each group was subdivided into two subgroups according to kind of toothbrush (TB) used (OR and SA). Modified Quigley-Hein plaque index (QHI), papilla bleeding index (PBI), and gingival index (GI) were recorded at baseline and 2, 8, 12, 16, and 24 weeks after baseline. After 24 weeks, participants of both groups (R and NR) received a new brush head. At week 26, final QHI, PBI, and GI were recorded. RESULTS: QHI decreased between baseline and follow-up visits in R groups (P< 0.05), with the exception of week 12 (P= 0.26). In NR groups, no significant decrease was detected (P> 0.05). There was no significant effect of time on PBI or GI in any of R subgroups (P> 0.05). In NR oscillating/rotating TB: significant increase in PBI and GI was detected 24 weeks after baseline (PBI: P= 0.02, GI: P= 0.03); sonic action TBs showed significant decrease in PBI at every follow-up visit (P< 0.05), except at 24 weeks after baseline (P= 0.73). GI was significantly decreased at 2 weeks after baseline only (P< 0.01). CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Six-month use of the same brush head reduced effectiveness in removing plaque, and gingival inflammation appeared to increase after a utilization time of over 4 months. Replacing brush heads is advised after 4 months.

Comparison of clinical and dental panoramic findings: a practice-based crossover study.

BACKGROUND: Aim was to compare clinical findings with x-ray findings using dental panoramic radiography (DPR). In addition, type and frequency of secondary findings in x-rays were investigated. METHODS: Patients were selected on the basis of available DPRs (not older than 12 months). No therapeutic measures were permitted between the DPR and the clinical findings. The clinical findings were carried out by several investigators who had no knowledge of the purpose of the study. A calibrated investigator established the x-ray findings, independently and without prior knowledge of the clinical findings. The evaluation parameters for each tooth were: missing, healthy, carious, restorative or prosthetically sufficient or insufficient treatment. Type and frequency of additional findings in the DPR were documented, e.g. quality of a root canal filling and apical changes. RESULTS: Findings of 275 patients were available. Comparison showed a correspondence between clinical and radiographic finding in 93.6% of all teeth (n = 7,789). The differences were not significant (p > 0.05). Regarding carious as well as insufficiently restored or prosthetically treated teeth, respectively there were significant differences between the two methods (p < 0.05). The DPRs showed additional findings: root fillings in 259 teeth and 145 teeth with periapical changes. CONCLUSIONS: With reference to the assessment of teeth, there was no difference between the two methods. However, in the evaluation of carious as well as teeth with insufficiently restorative or prosthetic treatment, there was a clear discrepancy between the two methods. Therefore, it would have been possible to have dispensed with x-rays. Nevertheless, additional x-ray findings were found.

Long-term effects of tongue piercing--a case control study.

The aim of this study was to evaluate tooth and periodontal damage in subjects wearing a tongue piercing (TP) in comparison to matched control subjects without tongue piercing. Members of the German Federal Armed Forces who had TP (group TP) and a matched control group (group C) volunteered to take part in the study. The time in situ, localization and material of TP were documented. Dental examinations included DMF-T, oral hygiene, enamel fissures (EF), enamel cracks (EC) and recessions. Statistical analysis was determined by χ (2) test and the t test. Both groups had 46 male subjects (mean age 22.1 years). The piercings had been in situ for 3.8 ± 3.1 years. Subjects in the TP group had a total of 1,260 teeth. Twenty-nine subjects had 115 teeth (9.1%) with EF (67% lingual). In group C (1,243 teeth), 30 subjects had 60 teeth with EF (4.8%, 78% vestibular) (p < 0.01). Thirty-eight subjects belonging to group TP had EC in 186 teeth (15%). In group C, 26 subjects with 56 teeth (4.5%) were affected by EC (p < 0.001). Twenty-seven subjects in group TP had 97 teeth (7.7%) with recessions. Lingual surfaces of anterior teeth in the lower jaw were affected most frequently (74%). In group C, 8 subjects had 19 teeth (1.5%) with recessions (65% vestibular). Differences between the two groups were statistically significant (p < 0.001). Tongue piercing is correlated with an increased occurrence of enamel fissures, enamel cracks and lingual recessions. Patients need better information on the potential complications associated with tongue piercing.

Oral health status of patients with acute coronary syndrome--a case control study.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this investigation was to assess the state of oral health of patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and to compare this with that of a provably healthy control group (H). METHODS: 33 patients who were receiving treatment as inpatients following acute myocardial infarction or unstable angina pectoris took part in the study (ACS-group). A healthy control group (H-group) made up of blood donors, was formed following matching for age, gender, and smoking habit with the study patient group.The dental investigation consisted of the dental status (DMF-T), a plaque-Index (PI), an assessment of gingival inflammation (GI) and periodontal situation (Periodontal Screening Index: PSR(®)/PSI), and attachment loss (AL). Statistical evaluation: t-test, Mann-Whitney-test and chi- squared test (level of significance p < 0.05). RESULTS: The mean DMF-T of the ACS-group (18.7 ± 6.8) and the H-group (19.4 ± 5.1) showed no difference (p = 0.7). Although, in the ACS-group the average loss of teeth (M-T: 8.4 ± 5.2) was higher than in the H-group (M-T: 5.8 ± 6.6) the difference was not significant (p = 0.2). Whereas with the PI no difference between the two groups was found (p = 0.9), the ACS-group showed significantly more signs of inflammation (GI) than the H-group (p = 0.045). In the case of PSR(®)/PSI, there was no difference between the two groups (p = 0.7). With regard to AL, no difference was revealed between ACS- and H-group (p = 0.2). CONCLUSION: Although, the state of oral health of the ACS-group differed only insignificantly from that of control, patients with ACS showed more signs of gingival inflammation and a higher loss of teeth.

Dental care and oral health in solid organ transplant recipients: a single center cross-sectional study and survey of German transplant centers.

Aim of this study was to collect information about oral health of patients before and after SOT as well as information about center-based recommendations for dental care. In a single center cross-sectional study, the oral situation of 20 patients before and 20 after SOT were examined including dental (DMF-T), periodontal (PSR(®)/PSI), and oral hygiene findings (modified QHI). In a second project, a survey among 50 transplant centers in Germany was questioned regarding their recommendations for dental care of SOT recipients. Patients before and after SOT showed similar quality of dental findings (DMF-T), but worse compared to the general population. In addition, most patients in both groups showed pronounced periodontal treatment need (PSR(®)/PSI score 3 or 4). Oral hygiene findings (modified QHI) after SOT were significantly worse than in patients on the waiting list (P = 0.032). In a second project, the questionnaire was returned by 28 of 50 centers. Interpretation of data showed that 89% carry out a dental examination before SOT and 67% contacted the patients' dentists. After SOT, 83% of the transplant centers recommend antibiotic cover before dental measures. The results of our study revealed lacks in the dental care of SOT recipients. Consistent recommendations regarding the dental care of patients before and after SOT should be determined.

Initial periodontal screening and radiographic findings--a comparison of two methods to evaluate the periodontal situation.

BACKGROUND: The periodontal screening index (PSI) is an element of the initial dental examination. The PSI provides information on the periodontal situation and allows a first estimation of the treatment required. The dental panoramic tomography (DPT) indicates the proximal bone loss, thus also allowing conclusions on the periodontal situation. In this study, the results of both methods in determining the periodontal situation are compared. METHODS: The clinical examination covered DMF-T, QHI, and PSI scores at four proximal sites per tooth; the examining dentist was unaware of the radiographic finding. Based on the PSI scores, the findings were diagnosed as follows: score 0 - 2 "no periodontitis", score 3 and 4 "periodontitis". Independent of the locality and time of the clinical evaluation, two dentists examined the DPTs of the subjects. The results were classified as follows: no bone loss = "no periodontitis", and bone loss = "periodontitis". RESULTS: 112 male subjects (age 18 to 58, Ø 37.7 ± 8 years) were examined. Regarding the PSI, 17 subjects were diagnosed "no periodontitis" and 95 subjects "periodontitis". According to the evaluation of the DPTs, 70 subjects were diagnosed "no periodontitis" and 42 "periodontitis". A comparison of both methods revealed that the diagnosis "no periodontitis" corresponded in 17 cases and "periodontitis" in 42 cases (53%). In 47% (53 cases) the results were not congruent. The difference between both methods was statistically significant (p < 0.001; kappa = 0.194). CONCLUSION: The present study shows that the initial assessment of the periodontal situation significantly depends on the method of evaluation.

[Dental care of patients with organ transplants or prosthetic joints--a survey of specialty hospitals]. / Organtransplantierte und Endoprothesenträger in der zahnärztlichen Praxis. Zur zahnärztlichen Betreuung vor bzw. nach Organtransplantation oder Endoprotheseninsertion--eine Befragung von spezifischen Fachzentren.

The aim of the investigation was to collect information from specialized hospitals regarding dental care before and after organ transplantation or replacement of prosthetic joints. 50 transplantation centres and 100 orthopaedic hospitals in Germany were chosen. A questionnaire was used to elucidate the following aspects: Is a dental examination carried out preoperatively? When the patient is discharged, is he or she recommended to have antibiotic prophylaxis before dental treatment? If so, which antibiotic is recommended? The response rate was 56% (n = 28) for transplantation centres. 89% arranged a dental examination before the transplantation. 83% of those questioned recommend antibiotic prophylaxis before dental treatment: Amoxicillin was mentioned most frequently (36%). The response rate of the orthopaedic hospitals was 31% (n = 31). 3% of those questioned arranged a dental examination before insertion of an endoprothesis. 55% recommend antibiotic prophylaxis when dental treatment is to be carried out following the insertion of the endoprosthesis. Cephalosporine was most frequently mentioned (33%). It was not possible to identify a uniform recommendation regarding dental care before and after organ transplantation or replacement of prosthetic joints either for patients with an organ transplant or those having a prosthetic joint.

Investigation of wear in manual toothbrushes from different price categories.

This clinical study examined differences in wear in manual toothbrushes from different price categories. 140 volunteers (14 groups of 10) brushed twice daily for 2-3 minutes over a period of three or six months using the modified Bass technique and seven different toothbrushes (TB) from three price categories. A: 2 TB for under 1 Euro; B: 2 TB priced between 1 and 2 Euro; C: 3 TB priced at over 2 Euro. After a period of three or six months the increase in the bristle surface field was determined and the brush heads were rated macroscopically, by light microscopy and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (grades 1-4: new, small, clear or very clear signs of use). The statistical analysis was performed with the Mann-Whitney U-test and Error Rates method (p < or = 0.05). All bristle fields showed an increase in surface area over the period of use. When examined macroscopically and under light microscopy, very little difference was found between three and six months of use, or between brushes from the same price category. The clearest distinction was found between categories B and C, whereby C was rated worse. In SEM it was difficult to separate the findings according to price categories. Here, the scores most often awarded were 3 and 4. The results of the three test methods differed markedly from one another. Thus no conclusions on the state of the bristles can be drawn from a marked increase in bristle field surface area. The category B TB tended to perform best.

Individual versus group oral hygiene instruction for adults.

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to assess the practicability and effectiveness of group oral hygiene instruction for adults in comparison with individual oral hygiene instruction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 104 male subjects aged 18 to 54 (mean age: 29.7) years were randomly assigned to one of four groups: group A was given individual oral hygiene instruction; group B was given group oral hygiene instruction; group C was given a combination of individual and group oral hygiene instructions; and group D received no oral hygiene instruction (the control group). The success of each form of instruction was evaluated on the basis of four parameters: (1) the Quigley-Hein plaque index (QHI), (2) the approximal plaque index (API), (3) a modified sulcus bleeding index (SBI) and (4) the community periodontal index of treatment needs (CPITN). All participants had professional tooth cleaning at the end of the baseline examination. The final examinations were conducted 13 weeks later. RESULTS: All subjects showed a poor oral health status at the beginning of the study, and the mean QHI score was 2.2. In addition, 92% of all subjects had an API score of more than 70%. Moderate-to-severe gingival inflammation (modified SBI) was observed in 67.3% of the subjects. CPITN scores of 2 or 3 were calculated for 82% of all sextants. At the end of the study, all groups showed a significant improvement in their oral health status and periodontal parameters (P < 0.0001). The majority of the subjects achieved an API score between 25% and 70%, and they had a mean QHI score of 1.2. A CPITN score of 0 or 1 was recorded for most sextants (62%). There was no significant difference between the various groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that group oral hygiene instruction and conventional individual instruction have similar beneficial effects in adults.

Complications of tongue piercing: a review of the literature and three case reports.

AIM: The aims of this review of the literature are to offer further insights into possible problems related to tongue piercing and present three case reports showing undesired effects of tongue piercing. BACKGROUND: From a dental perspective, oral piercings and especially tongue piercings are not a harmless fashion trend since they can be associated with local and systemic risks and complications. A search of the literature was conducted to investigate the documentation of health risks associated with tongue piercing using the MEDLINE database as well as the German literature. REVIEW RESULTS: The literature contains numerous case reports, a limited number of studies, and a review describing a wide variety of complications, especially in patients who have undergone tongue piercing. In the majority of cases, the piercing of the tongue is performed in the midline. Piercings are made of different materials, usually metal or synthetic materials. Complications during piercing, immediately following piercing, as well as long term were found. CONCLUSION: The three cases presented here demonstrate some of those adverse effects. The most commonly described oral complication is the damage of teeth and the periodontium caused by tongue piercings. Tongue piercing is a personal decision, but it is important that patients are fully aware of possible oral health hazards. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Patients need better information on the potential complications associated with tongue piercing. Dental practitioners should educate patients about potential side effects and possible oral, dental, and systemic complications.

[Oral health in young adults in Germany--a comparison between women and men of the German army]. / Mundgesundheit von jungen Frauen und Männern in Deutschland. Ein Vergleich von Angehörigen der Bundeswehr.

The objective of this cross-sectional study was to compare oral health in young German women and men. We paired female and male soldiers of the German armed force (Bundeswehr) on the basis of age, school qualification and origin. All participants underwent a clinical examination. Oral health was assessed using the decayed, missing and filled surfaces index (DMF-S), an oral hygiene index (QHI), and a periodontal index (CPITN). In addition, we collected data on the subjects' smoking habits. The study included 90 women (mean age: 21.7 years) and 90 men (mean age: 21.4 years). The mean DMF-S was 20.7 +/- 13.7 for women and 21.0 +/- 19.8 for men (p>0.05). In the female group, dental restorations were present in 71% of the teeth affected by caries. In the male group, restorations were present in 61.2% (p=0.04). The female group showed a less marked polarisation of caries than the male group (p=0.03). Oral hygiene (QHI) was poor in the entire study population. Women (QHI: 2.16 +/- 0.6), however, exhibited significantly better oral hygiene than men (QHI: 2.53 +/- 0.5) (p= 0.01). Deeper probing depths (CPITN scores of 3 and 4) were less frequently seen in females than in males (p= 0.04). In both groups more than half of the participants were smokers (56.7%) since at least four years with more than ten cigarettes per day. Smoking had a significant influence on periodontal health (p=0.02). Men showed poorer oral health than women. The study emphasizes that the proportion of young adults requiring curative dental treatment remains high in Germany. It also underlines the need for intensive preventive care including cessation of smoking.

Different views of dentists and general medical practitioners on dental care for patients with diabetes mellitus and coronary heart diseases: results of a questionnaire-based survey in a district of Germany.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this questionnaire-based study was to evaluate the views of dentists (Ds) and general medical practitioners (GPs) on different aspects of dental care for patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) or coronary heart disease (CHD). METHODS: Reliable and comparable questionnaires for Ds and GPs, with 23 questions, were sent to 1,000 randomly selected Ds and 1,000 randomly selected GPs. Questions were asked about patients with DM or CHD regarding their dental care and potentially related issues (e.g. antibiotic prophylaxis). The responses received within 12 weeks were evaluated and statistically analysed using chi-square and Mann-Whitney U tests (P < 0.05). RESULTS: The response rate was 39% (n = 391) for Ds and 18% (n = 181) for GPs. Both groups stated that they used the medical history as well as patient interviews to assess patients. However, only 55% of Ds assumed correct identification of every at-risk patient compared with 100% of GPs (P < 0.01). Furthermore, Ds speculated that they inform their patients more often about their at-risk status than do GPs (P < 0.01). Neither Ds nor GPs appeared to be confident in their knowledge about adequate antibiotic prophylaxis. Interdisciplinary collaboration was considered insufficient, although Ds had a higher rate of regular collaboration (68% for Ds vs. 40% for GPs; P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Ds and GPs have differing views on dental care of patients with DM or CHD, and Ds showed more interest in this issue. These results might partially explain the insufficient collaboration between Ds and GPs.

Association of different immunosuppressive medications with periodontal condition in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: Results from a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this cross-sectional study was to investigate clinical periodontal findings as well as prevalence of selected potentially periodontal pathogenic bacteria in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treated with different immunosuppressive rheumatic medications. METHODS: One hundred sixty-eight patients with RA undergoing different immunosuppressive medications were included and divided into subgroups according to their medication, which was taken in the past 6 months, in detail, 1) non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) and glucocorticoids combined, and the following different disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs): 2) methotrexate (MTX), 3) leflunomide, 4) MTX and TNF-α antagonists combined, 5) interleukin-6 (IL-6) antagonist, 6) MTX and rituximab combined, and 7) combination therapies of > 2 of these DMARDs. Periodontal examination consisted of papilla bleeding index (PBI), periodontal status with periodontal probing depth (PD), bleeding on probing (BOP), and clinical attachment loss (AL). Periodontitis was classified as none/mild, moderate, or severe. Samples obtained from gingival crevicular fluid were analyzed for presence of 11 periodontal pathogenic bacteria. RESULTS: Patients with MTX + TNF-α antagonists therapy showed higher PBI and BOP values compared with leflunomide (P < 0.01) and higher BOP than MTX + rituximab (P = 0.02). Porphyromonas gingivalis (P < 0.01), Treponema denticola (P < 0.01), Fusobacterium nodatum (P = 0.02) and Capnocytophaga species (P = 0.05) was associated with medication subgroup, whereby post hoc testing confirmed singular differences for several medication subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: RA medication is associated with periodontal inflammation, without differences in periodontal disease severity. Thereby, combination of MTX + TNF-α shows an increased potential to periodontal inflammation. Additionally, several differences in prevalence of selected bacteria were detected.

Periodontal findings and blood analysis of blood donors: a pilot study.

AIM: Before blood donation a medical check-up is mandatory to ascertain the health of the donor and to detect infections clinically. Although gingivitis and periodontitis are also bacterial infections, the oral cavity is only inspected superficially. The purpose of this study was to investigate the periodontal condition of blood donors and whether this affects the results of their blood tests. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 192 blood donors were examined. The investigation included a periodontal examination to determine the Community Periodontal Index (CPI), an analysis of blood chemistry, as well as the determination of hematologic, coagulation, and immune parameters C-reactive protein (CRP), Neopterin, Procalcitonin (PCT), and tumor necrosis factor (TNF-a). Groups were formed according to periodontal status: "healthy" (n=47, mean age 24+/-4 years), "gingivitis" (n=65, mean age 24+/-4 years), and "periodontitis" (n=80, mean age 29+/-8 years). Most parameters of the routine blood test as well as the immune parameters were unremarkable with regard to the periodontal status. The values for SGPT, GGTP, uric acid, triglycerides, total protein (TP), RBC, hemoglobin (Hb) and hematocrit (HC), Eos, and Baso were also within the normal range. Nevertheless, statistical analysis showed some significant differences in these parameters between the "healthy" group and the "periodontitis" group (p=0.05). RESULTS: The results of this study show some blood donors have infections of the gingiva and/or of other periodontal tissues. Whether this is a sufficient reason to exclude them from blood donation, or in which case potential donors should be excluded, is not yet known. Nevertheless, it seems reasonable to integrate a screening method for revealing at least severe periodontitis in the medical check-up of blood donors.