Resilience Among Caregivers of Injured Service Members: Finding the Strengths in Caregiving.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationships between caregiver resilience and a comprehensive set of sociodemographic and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) predictors among both caregivers and injured service members. DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis of an observational cohort. SETTING: Community dwelling. PARTICIPANTS: Caregivers (n=87) who provide instrumental or emotional support to injured service members (n=73)(N=160). INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale 25-item version. RESULTS: Higher caregiver resilience scores were related to lower depressive symptom severity, greater health responsibility, physical activity, nutrition, spiritual growth, interpersonal relations, stress management, and problem-solving orientation. A multivariable regression model showed that spiritual growth and aspects of problem-solving orientation were significantly related to resilience. CONCLUSIONS: Results highlight the relationships between resilience and spirituality, problem-solving orientation, and aspects of HRQOL among caregivers of injured service members. These findings have important implications for caregiver behavioral health programs designed to promote resilience and draw upon caregiver strengths when taking on a caregiver role. Approaches that include a more integrative medicine or strengths-based emphasis may be particularly beneficial when working with families of injured military.

Use of a contraceptive decision support tool in the abortion care setting.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the use of a contraceptive decision support tool in the abortion care setting. STUDY DESIGN: In 2019, Mississippi residents aged 18 to 45 used a tablet-based decision support tool at the consultation visit and completed a survey about their satisfaction with the tool. RESULTS: Among the 325 participants, the majority found the tool "very helpful" for method decision-making (86%) and considered the amount of information provided to be "just right" (95%). Nearly all (98%) reported it was acceptable to get contraception information at their visit. CONCLUSIONS: Decision support tools are a promising, person-centered strategy to support postabortion contraceptive information needs.

Parental Involvement Policies for Minors Seeking Abortion in the Southeast and Quality of Care.

Introduction: Thirty-seven states require minors seeking abortion to involve a parent, either through notification or consent. Little research has examined how implementation of these laws affect service delivery and quality of care for those who involve a parent. Methods: Between May 2018 and September 2019, in-depth interviews were conducted with 34 staff members involved in scheduling, counseling, and administration at abortion facilities in three Southeastern states. Interviews explored procedures for documenting parental involvement, minors' and parents' reactions to requirements, and challenges with implementation and compliance. Both inductive and deductive codes, informed by the Institute of Medicine's healthcare quality framework, were used in the thematic analysis. Results: Parental involvement laws adversely affected four quality care domains: efficiency, patient-centeredness, timeliness, and equity. Administrative inefficiencies stemmed from the extensive documentation needed to prove an adult's relationship to a minor, increasing the time and effort needed to comply with state reporting requirements. If parents were not supportive of their minor's decision, participants felt they had a duty to intervene to ensure the minor's decision and needs remained centered. Staff further noted that delays to timely care accumulated as minors navigated parental involvement and other state mandates, pushing some beyond gestational age limits. Lower income families and those with complex familial arrangements had greater difficulty meeting state requirements. Conclusions: Parental involvement mandates undermine health service delivery and quality for minors seeking abortion services in the Southeast. Policy Implications: Removing parental involvement requirements would protect minors' reproductive autonomy and support the provision of equitable, patient-centered healthcare.