Treatment of pediatric intracranial aneurysms: institutional case series and systematic literature review.

INTRODUCTION: Pediatric intracranial aneurysms (IAs) are rare and have distinct clinical profiles compared to adult IAs. They differ in location, size, morphology, presentation, and treatment strategies. We present our experience with pediatric IAs over an 18-year period using surgical and endovascular treatments and review the literature to identify commonalities in epidemiology, treatment, and outcomes. METHODS: We identified all patients < 20 years old who underwent treatment for IAs at our institution between 2005 and 2020. Medical records and imaging were examined for demographic, clinical, and operative data. A systematic review was performed to identify studies reporting primary outcomes of surgical and endovascular treatment of pediatric IAs. Demographic information, aneurysm characteristics, treatment strategies, and outcomes were collected. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients underwent treatment for 37 aneurysms over 18 years. The mean age was 11.4 years, ranging from one month to 19 years. There were 21 males (63.6%) and 12 females (36.4%), yielding a male: female ratio of 1.75:1. Twenty-six (70.3%) aneurysms arose from the anterior circulation and 11 (29.7%) arose from the posterior circulation. Aneurysmal rupture occurred in 19 (57.5%) patients, of which 8 (24.2%) were categorized as Hunt-Hess grades IV or V. Aneurysm recurrence or rerupture occurred in five (15.2%) patients, and 5 patients (15.2%) died due to sequelae of their aneurysms. Twenty-one patients (63.6%) had a good outcome (modified Rankin Scale score 0-2) on last follow up. The systematic literature review yielded 48 studies which included 1,482 total aneurysms (611 with endovascular treatment; 656 treated surgically; 215 treated conservatively). Mean aneurysm recurrence rates in the literature were 12.7% and 3.9% for endovascular and surgical treatment, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides data on the natural history and longitudinal outcomes for children treated for IAs at a single institution, in addition to our treatment strategies for various aneurysmal morphologies. Despite the high proportion of patients presenting with rupture, good functional outcomes can be achieved for most patients.

Serial dilation to enable ulnar artery access for endovascular neurointervention: Technical report and systematic review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: For rare neuro-endovascular cases in which transfemoral access is not feasible and the palmar circulation is insufficient for radial artery access, ulnar artery access may be considered. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Mechanical thrombectomy via ulnar artery access was performed to preserve the dominant radial artery. The ulnar artery was serial dilated to 7-French with microdilator. Angiography was performed using a diagnostic catheter. The sheath was exchanged for a guide catheter, and a triaxial system was inserted. A mechanical thrombectomy was performed. The systematic literature review included all studies pertaining to techniques for ulnar artery access for neurointervention in the last 20 years (2003-2023) published in the PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase databases. RESULTS: 67-year-old male developed left MCA syndrome in the setting of an infected abdominal aortic endograft. A transfemoral approach was ruled out due to concern for crossing the infected endograft. Allen test and ultrasound demonstrated that the right radial artery was of adequate size for access, but the ulnar artery was insufficient to support the palmar arch. Mechanical thrombectomy resulted in TICI 3 reperfusion. Systematic review of the literature yielded 2 case series and 1 case report of transulnar neurovascular procedures. Access site complications were rare and included 3 access site hematomas and 1 ulnar artery occlusion. CONCLUSION: We report our technique of serial dilation of the ulnar artery for neuroendovascular procedures and provide a systematic review of the literature for complication avoidance in ulnar artery access.

A systematic review of pseudarthrosis and reoperation rates in minimally invasive adult spinal deformity correction.

Background/objective: The recent development of minimally invasive surgical techniques (MIS) has made possible the correction of adult spinal deformity (ASD) with less blood loss and shorter hospital stays. However, minimally invasive placement of pedicle screws at the proximal level of the construct can increase pseudarthrosis risk, leading to implant failure, kyphosis, and reoperations. We aggregate existing literature to describe pseudarthrosis rates at the proximal thoracic or thoracolumbar junction in MIS and subsequent reoperation rates. Methods: After a three-tied search strategy in PubMed, we identified 9 articles for study inclusion, describing outcomes from MIS correction of ASD, pseudarthrosis as complication, and surgery on 4+ levels. Baseline patient characteristics and combined rates of pseudarthrosis and reoperation were calculated. Results: A total of 482 patients were studied with an average [range] age of 65.5 [60.4,72], 6.3 [4.4,11] levels fused per patient, follow-up time of 28.3 [12,39] months, and 64.8% females. Pseudarthrosis was reported in 28 of 482 pooled patients (5.8%) of which 15 of 374 pooled patients (4.0%) ultimately underwent a reoperation for pseudarthrosis. Post-operative characteristics included an estimated blood loss (EBL) of 527.1 [241,1466] mL, operating time of 297.9 [183,475] minutes, and length of stay of 7.7 [5,10] days. Among the papers comparing MIS to open surgery, all reported a significantly lower EBL in patients treated with MIS. Conclusion: This analysis demonstrate a measurable pseudarthrosis risk when using MIS to treat ASD, overwhelming requiring reoperation. The benefits of MIS must be considered against the drawbacks of pseudarthrosis when determining ASD management.

Increased Traumatic Brain Injury Severity and Mortality in Undocumented Immigrants.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Health disparities related to traumatic brain injury (TBI) have focused on socioeconomic status, race, and ethnicity. We sought to characterize TBI patterns and outcomes based on undocumented status. METHODS: Patients who presented to University of California, San Diego Health Trauma Center with a TBI between 2019 and 2022 were identified and stratified based on undocumented status. Undocumented immigrants were identified using validated methods of absent or invalid social security number and key terms through chart review. Demographic information, injury characteristics, and neurosurgical interventions were recorded. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to determine the impact of patient factors on outcomes. RESULTS: Of 1654 patients with TBI, 76 (4.6%) were undocumented. Undocumented immigrants were younger (50 vs 60 years; P < .001) and had higher Injury Severity Score (17 vs 13; P < .001). They presented from farther distances (12.8 vs 5.3 miles, P < .001) with greater midline shift (1.49 vs 0.91 mm; P = .003). A greater proportion had basal cistern compression/effacement (14% vs 4.6%; P = .001) and required neurosurgical intervention (18% vs 9.6%; P = .012). Undocumented immigrants had higher hospital charges ($208 403 vs $128 948; P < .001), length of stay (5 vs 4 days; P = .002), and were discharged to a health facility at a lower rate (18% vs 32%; P = .012). They had nearly double the mortality rate (14% vs 7.3%; P = .021), with undocumented status trending as a predictor on multivariable regression (odds ratio = 2.87; P = .052). CONCLUSION: Undocumented immigrants presented from farther distances with increased TBI severity, likely from both more severe trauma and delayed presentation, requiring more neurosurgical intervention. They also had greater length of stay, charges, and nearly double the mortality rate. Importantly, undocumented status was a strong predictor for mortality. Despite worse outcomes, they were discharged to a health care facility at a lower rate. Advocacy efforts should be directed at increasing health care coverage and migrant community engagement and education.

Safety of middle meningeal artery embolization for treatment of subdural hematoma: A nationwide propensity score matched analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAe) has burgeoned as a treatment for chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH). This study evaluates the safety and short-term outcomes of MMAe patients relative to traditional treatment approaches. METHODS: In this retrospective large database study, adult patients in the National Inpatient Sample from 2012-2019 with a diagnosis of cSDH were identified. Cost of admission, length of stay (LOS), discharge disposition, and complications were analyzed. Propensity score matching (PSM) was utilized. RESULTS: A total of 123,350 patients with cSDH were identified: 63,450 without intervention, 59,435 surgery only, 295 MMAe only, and 170 surgery plus MMAe. On PSM analysis, MMAe did not increase the risk of inpatient complications or prolong the length of stay compared to conservative management (p>0.05); MMAe had higher cost ($31,170 vs. $10,768, p<0.001) than conservative management, and a lower rate of nonroutine discharge (53.8% vs. 64.3%, p=0.024). Compared to surgery, MMAe had shorter LOS (5 vs. 7 days, p<0.001), and lower rates of neurological complications (2.7% vs. 7.1%, p=0.029) and nonroutine discharge (53.8% vs. 71.7%, p<0.001). There was no significant difference in cost (p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: MMAe had similar LOS and decreased odds of adverse discharge with a modest cost increase compared to conservative management. There was no difference in inpatient complications. Compared to surgery, MMAe treatment was associated with decreased LOS and rates of neurological complications and nonroutine discharge. This nationwide analysis supports the safety of MMAe to treat cSDH.

Characterizing the frequency, morbidity, and types of traumatic brain injuries after the Mexico-San Diego border wall extension: a retrospective cohort review.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of the US-Mexico border wall height extension on traumatic brain injuries (TBIs) and related costs. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, patients who presented to the UC San Diego Health Trauma Center for injuries from falling at the border wall between 2016 and 2021 were considered. Patients in the pre-height extension period (January 2016-May 2018) were compared with those in the post-height extension period (January 2020-December 2021). Demographic characteristics, clinical data, and hospital charges were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 383 patients were identified: 51 (0 TBIs, 68.6% male) in the pre-height extension cohort and 332 (14 TBIs, 77.1% male) in the post-height extension cohort, with mean ages of 33.5 and 31.5 years, respectively. There was an increase in the average number of TBIs per month (0.0 to 0.34) and operative TBIs per month (0.0 to 0.12). TBIs were associated with increased Injury Severity Score (8.8 vs 24.2, p < 0.001), median (IQR) hospital length of stay (5.0 [2-11] vs 8.5 [4-45] days, p = 0.03), and median (IQR) hospital charges ($163,490 [$86,369-$277,918] vs $243,658 [$136,769-$1,127,920], p = 0.04). TBIs were normalized for changing migration rates on the basis of Customs and Border Protection apprehensions. CONCLUSIONS: This heightened risk of intracranial injury among vulnerable immigrant populations poses ethical and economic concerns to be addressed regarding border wall infrastructure.

Novel Association of Blunt Cerebrovascular Injuries with the San Diego-Mexico Border Wall Height Extension.

BACKGROUND: The San Diego-Mexico border wall height extension is associated with increased traumatic injuries and related costs after wall falls. We report previous trends and a neurological injury type not previously associated with border falls: blunt cerebrovascular injuries (BCVIs). METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, patients who presented to the UC San Diego Health Trauma Center for injuries from border wall falls from 2016 to 2021 were considered. Patients were included if they were admitted before (January 2016 to May 2018) or after (January 2020 to December 2021) the height extension period. Patient demographics, clinical data, and hospital stay data were compared. RESULTS: We identified 383 patients, 51 (68.6% male; mean age, 33.5 years) in the pre-height extension cohort and 332 (77.1% male; mean age, 31.5 years) in the post-height extension cohort. There were 0 and 5 BCVIs in the pre- and post-height extension groups, respectively. BCVIs were associated with increased injury severity scores (9.16 vs. 31.33; P < 0.001), longer intensive care unit lengths of stay (median, 0 days; [interquartile range (IQR), 0-3 days]; vs. median, 5 days [IQR, 2-21 days]; P = 0.022), and increased total hospital charges (median, $163,490 [IQR, $86,578-$282,036]; vs. median, $835,260 [IQR, $171,049-$1,933,996]; P = 0.048). Poisson modeling found BCVI admissions were 0.21 (95% confidence interval, 0.07-0.41; P = 0.042) per month higher after the height extension. CONCLUSIONS: We review the injuries correlating with the border wall extension and reveal an association with rare, potentially devastating BCVIs that were not seen before the border wall modifications. These BCVIs and associated morbidity shed light on the trauma increasingly found at the southern U.S. border, which could be informative for future infrastructure policy decisions.

The impact of the Mexico-San Diego border wall extension on spine injuries: a retrospective cohort review.

BACKGROUND: The recent San Diego-Mexico border wall height extension has resulted in an increased injury risk for unauthorized immigrants falling from greater heights. However, the effects of the border wall extension on frequency and morbidity of spinal injuries and related economic costs have yet to be highlighted. METHODS: We retrospectively compared two cohorts who presented to the UC San Diego Health Trauma Center for border wall falls: pre-height extension (12 patients; January 2016-May 2018), and post-height extension (102 patients; January 2020-December 2021). Patients presented during border wall construction (June 2018-December 2019) were excluded. Demographics, clinical data and hospital costs were collected. Spinal injuries were normalized using Customs and Border Protection apprehensions. Costs were adjusted for inflation using the 2021 medical care price index. RESULTS: The increase in spine injuries per month (0.8-4.25) and operative spine injuries per month (0.3- 1.7) was statistically significant (P < 0.001). Increase in median length of stay from 6 [interquartile range (IQR) 2-7] to 9 days (IQR 6-13) was statistically significant (P = 0.006). Median total hospital charges increased from $174 660 to $294 421 and was also significant (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The data support that the recent San Diego-Mexico border wall extension is correlated with more frequent, severe and costly spinal injuries. This current infrastructure should be re-evaluated as border-related injuries represent a humanitarian and public health crisis.

Traumatic Brain Injuries After Falls From Height vs Falls at the US-Mexico Border Wall.

This cohort study examines the incidence, severity, and mortality of fall-related injuries among migrants at the US-Mexico border in San Diego, California.