Evaluation of the use of buprenorphine for opioid withdrawal in an emergency department.

OBJECTIVES: To examine the use of buprenorphine for the treatment of opioid withdrawal (OW) in an emergency department (ED) setting. METHODS: The medical records of all adult patients who presented to the study ED during a 10 week period for OW were abstracted. Subjects were categorized as receiving buprenorphine, symptomatic treatment or no pharmacologic treatment for their OW. The three groups were compared by patient and service characteristics, withdrawal symptoms and outcomes. RESULTS: Of the 11,019 patients who presented to the ED during the 10 week study period, 158 (1.4%) were eligible. Subjects were more likely to receive buprenorphine (56%) compared to symptomatic treatment only (26%) or no pharmacologic treatment (18%). Subjects who received buprenorphine were more likely to have a history of suicide ideation (34% versus 12% p<0.05) compared to subjects who received symptomatic treatment(s) and were less likely to present with a gastrointestinal complaint (9% versus 25% p<0.05). Subjects who received buprenorphine were less likely to return to the same ED within 30 days for a drug-related visit (8%) compared to those who received symptomatic treatment (17%) (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Buprenorphine was a common treatment for OW in this ED without any documented adverse outcomes. Given that it did not result in an increase in drug-related return ED visits and its proven efficacy in other settings, a prospective evaluation of its potential value to ED patients who present with OW is warranted.

Short-term wound complications after application of flaps for coverage of traumatic soft-tissue defects about the tibia. The Lower Extremity Assessment Project (LEAP) Study Group.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the present study was to compare the rate of short-term wound complications associated with rotational flaps and that associated with free flaps for coverage of traumatic soft-tissue defects about the tibia. METHODS: Of 601 patients prospectively enrolled in a multicenter study of high-energy trauma of the lower extremity, 190 patients (195 limbs) required flap coverage and had six months of follow-up. The injury data included the ASIF/OTA classification of the tibial fracture and the soft-tissue injury and the functional status of the neurovascular and muscular structures of the soft-tissue compartments at the time of soft-tissue coverage. The treatment data consisted of the type of flap, the timing of the flap coverage, and the type of fixation. The patient characteristics that were recorded included the age, gender, presence of comorbidities, and smoking status at the time of the injury. Short-term complications included wound infection, wound necrosis, and loss of the flap within the first six months after the injury. RESULTS: Eighty-eight limbs were treated with a rotational flap, and 107 limbs were treated with a free flap. Overall, complications occurred after fifty-three (27 percent) of the 195 flap procedures; forty-six (87 percent) of the fifty-three required operative treatment. The two treatment groups were similar with respect to age, gender, comorbidities, preinjury smoking status, ASIF/OTA classification of the fracture, and prevalence of vascular injury requiring repair (p>0.05). There were two important differences between the two groups. First, three of the four leg compartments--that is, the anterior, lateral, and deep posterior compartments--were more likely to be functionally compromised in the free-flap group than in the rotational flap group (p<0.05), suggesting that patients in the free-flap group had sustained more severe soft-tissue injuries. Second, the Injury Severity Score was significantly higher (p = 0.001) in the rotational flap group (mean, 14 points) than in the free-flap group (mean, 11 points), suggesting that patients in the former group had sustained more substantial total body trauma. Overall, there were no significant differences between the two groups with respect to the complication rates. However, among those with the most severe grade of underlying osseous injury (an ASIF/OTA type-C injury), 44 percent of the limbs that were treated with a rotational flap had a wound complication compared with 23 percent of the limbs that were treated with a free flap (p = 0.10). To control for any differences between the two groups with respect to the severity of the injury, the treatment methods, or the patient characteristics, multivariate regression modeling was performed. An interaction effect between the type of flap and the severity of the underlying osseous injury demonstrated significance (p<0.05) after controlling for other factors. Of the limbs that sustained an ASIF/OTA type-C osseous injury, those that were treated with a rotational flap were 4.3 times more likely to have a wound complication requiring operative intervention than were those treated with a free flap. No significant difference in the rate of complications was detected with respect to the type of flap used for the limbs that had lower-grade osseous injuries. CONCLUSIONS: We found that use of a free flap to treat limbs with a severe underlying osseous injury was significantly less likely to lead to a wound complication requiring operative intervention than was use of a rotational flap.

Adult respiratory distress syndrome, pneumonia, and mortality following thoracic injury and a femoral fracture treated either with intramedullary nailing with reaming or with a plate. A comparative study.

Multiply injured patients (an Injury Severity Score of 17 points or more) who were admitted to one of two level-I regional trauma centers between 1983 and 1994 because of a fracture of the femoral shaft with a thoracic injury (an Abbreviated Injury Scale score of 2 points or more) or without a thoracic injury were studied retrospectively. The patient populations and the protocols for the treatment of trauma were similar at the two centers; however, the centers differed with regard to the technique that was used for acute stabilization of the fracture of the femoral shaft. At Center I intramedullary nailing with reaming was used in 217 (95 per cent) of the 229 patients, whereas at Center II a plate was used in 206 (92 per cent) of the 224 patients. This difference was used to investigate the effect of acute femoral reaming on the occurrence of adult respiratory distress syndrome in multiply injured patients who had a chest injury. Three groups of patients were evaluated: those who had both a fracture of the femur and a thoracic injury, those who had a fracture of the femur but no thoracic injury, and those who had a thoracic injury without a fracture of the femur or the tibia. The third group was studied at each center to determine if there was a difference between the institutions with regard to the rate of adult respiratory distress syndrome. Patients who had diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, hepatic or renal failure, or an immunosuppressive condition were excluded from the study. The records were abstracted to determine the Injury Severity Score, Abbreviated Injury Scale score, and Glasgow Coma Score for each patient. Requirements for fluid resuscitation were calculated for the first twenty-four hours; these included the number of units of packed red blood cells, fresh-frozen plasma, and platelets that were transfused and the volume of crystalloid that was used. The duration of intubation, the duration of hospitalization, and the occurence of adverse outcomes (death, multiple organ failure, adult respiratory distress syndrome, pneumonia, and pulmonary embolism) were determined for each patient. The groups of patients were analyzed as a whole and then were stratified into subgroups (according to whether or not they had a thoracic injury and whether the Injury Severity Score was less than 30 points or 30 points or more) to determine if the type of fixation of the femoral fracture affected the rate of adult respiratory distress syndrome or mortality. Logistic regression models were used to analyze the data. The over-all occurrence of adult respiratory distress syndrome in the 453 patients who had a femoral fracture was only 2 per cent (ten patients). The rates of adult respiratory distress syndrome for the patients who had a thoracic injury but no femoral fracture (eight [6 per cent] of 129 patients at Center I, compared with ten [8 per cent] of 125 patients at Center II) did not differ between centers, suggesting that the institutions were comparable in their treatment of multiply injured patients. The occurrence of adult respiratory distress syndrome in the patients who had a femoral fracture without a thoracic injury did not differ substantially according to whether the fracture had been treated with a nail (118 patients) or a plate (114 patients). Likewise, the frequency of adult respiratory distress syndrome, pneumonia, pulmonary embolism, failure of multiple organs, or death for the patients who had a femoral fracture and a thoracic injury was similar regardless of whether nailing with reaming (117 patients) or a plate (104 patients) had been used. The use of intramedullary nailing with reaming for acute stabilization of fractures of the femur in multiply injured patients who have a thoracic injury without a major comorbid disease does not appear to increase the occurrence of adult respiratory distress syndrome, pulmonary embolism, failure of multiple organs, pneumonia, or death.

Correlation between the measures of impairment, according to the modified system of the American Medical Association, and function.

We performed a prospective study of 302 patients who had a fracture of the lower extremity. Our purpose was to determine whether there was any association between impairment ratings of the lower extremity, derived with use of the Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment by the American Medical Association, and measurements of task performance based on direct observation as well as the patient's own assessment of activity limitation and disability as recorded on the Sickness Impact Profile. The mean residual impairment of the lower extremity according to the Guides was 27 per cent one year after the injury. Only 130 subjects (43 per cent) could perform all five functional tasks without difficulty. Eighty-four subjects (28 per cent) reported functional limitations that resulted in a score on the Sickness Impact Profile that was more than one standard deviation from the preinjury norm for the sample. Impairment ratings according to a modification of the system of the American Medical Association correlated strongly with the performance of functional tasks (r = 0.57) as well as the patients' reported activity limitations as recorded on the Sickness Impact Profile (r = 0.55). Correlations were highest when measures of impairment were based on strength rather than on range of motion. The relationship between the impairment rating and function (as observed by an examiner and as reported by the patient) was not influenced by the location of the fracture or the receipt of disability compensation. Our results suggest that the American Medical Association developed a valid approach for the measurement of physical impairment after a fracture of the lower extremity. In our study, the anatomical approach of evaluation based on muscle strength that was described in the Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment was the most sensitive measure of impairment compared with the anatomical measure based on range of motion and compared with the functional and diagnostic methods for the rating of impairment. Until the diagnostic and functional approaches for the measurement of musculoskeletal impairment are refined, we recommend use of the anatomical approach when evaluating impairment after a fracture of the lower extremity.

A prospective evaluation of the clinical utility of the lower-extremity injury-severity scores.

BACKGROUND: High-energy trauma to the lower extremity presents challenges with regard to reconstruction and rehabilitation. Failed efforts at limb salvage are associated with increased patient mortality and high hospital costs. Lower-extremity injury-severity scoring systems were developed to assist the surgical team with the initial decision to amputate or salvage a limb. The purpose of the present study was to prospectively evaluate the clinical utility of five lower-extremity injury-severity scoring systems. METHODS: Five hundred and fifty-six high-energy lower-extremity injuries were prospectively evaluated with use of five injury-severity scoring systems for lower-extremity trauma designed to assist in the decision-making process for the care of patients with such injuries. Four hundred and seven limbs remained in the salvage pathway six months after the injury. The sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve were calculated for the Mangled Extremity Severity Score (MESS); the Limb Salvage Index (LSI); the Predictive Salvage Index (PSI); the Nerve Injury, Ischemia, Soft-Tissue Injury, Skeletal Injury, Shock, and Age of Patient Score (NISSSA); and the Hannover Fracture Scale-97 (HFS-97) for ischemic and nonischemic limbs. The scores were analyzed in two ways: including and excluding limbs that required immediate amputation. RESULTS: The analysis did not validate the clinical utility of any of the lower-extremity injury-severity scores. The high specificity of the scores in all of the patient subgroups did confirm that low scores could be used to predict limb-salvage potential. The converse, however, was not true. The low sensitivity of the indices failed to support the validity of the scores as predictors of amputation. CONCLUSIONS: Lower-extremity injury-severity scores at or above the amputation threshold should be cautiously used by a surgeon who must decide the fate of a lower extremity with a high-energy injury.

Predicting ambulatory function following lower extremity trauma using the functional capacity index.

This study evaluated the accuracy of experts' predictions of ambulatory function following lower extremity trauma using the Functional capacity index (FCI). Data from three orthopedic trauma studies designed to determine long-term function following specific types of lower extremity injuries were used to examine the extent of agreement between the reported and predicted ambulatory function of 921 subjects. Functional limitations reported by the cohort using a generalized health status measure and more detailed questions on lower extremity function were compared with those predicted by experts based on the injuries sustained. The overall agreement between predicted and self-reported FCI function for ambulation was relatively low (31%). In the majority of cases (80%), the disagreement differed by one functional level. Subjects were more likely to report worse function than predicted by the experts. Multivariate modeling identified different injuries, combinations of injuries, and patient characteristics that significantly influenced agreement. For example, subjects who sustained both a tibia and a femur fracture were three times more likely than subjects who did not sustain either fracture type to report poorer ambulatory function than predicted. Many challenges are faced in predicting long-term function following trauma. More empirical data are needed to inform the process. These data suggest that until the FCI can more accurately predict long-term ambulatory function following different lower extremity injuries, it should not be used for this purpose.

Orthopedic trauma surgeons' attitudes and practices towards bloodborne pathogens.

A survey was conducted to determine orthopedic trauma surgeons' attitudes and practices towards occupational exposures to bloodborne pathogens. The survey was distributed to orthopedic trauma surgeons either by mail or through participation at the annual 1993 OTA meeting or the 1994 update meetings. Of the 1,058 surveys distributed, 504 were successfully completed (48%). The majority of respondents were attendings (72%) who performed at least 100 orthopedic procedures annually. Of the respondents, 74% reported they were moderately to very concerned about acquiring HIV at work. Despite their concern, 42% reported not routinely wearing gloves when changing would dressings. Of the 340 respondents who have access to maximum barrier protection, 83% reported not wearing it to nail a femur fracture and 33% reported not wearing it when operating on an HIV+ patient. At an institutional level, almost one-third of those surveyed did not believe their facility promoted safe work practices. Facilities judged by respondents to promote safe practices were significantly more likely to have resources available and infection control policies in place compared to facilities judged not to promote safe practices. Orthopedic trauma surgeons need to improve their compliance with infection control recommendations. Further efforts by individuals and their institutions are warranted.

Effect of trauma and pelvic fracture on female genitourinary, sexual, and reproductive function.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To evaluate the impact of a pelvic fracture on a woman's physical, sexual, and reproductive functioning. DESIGN: Retrospective review. SETTING: Level one trauma center. PATIENTS: Two groups of female multitrauma patients: those with pelvic fractures (subjects) and those with extremity fractures but no pelvic fracture (controls). MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Of the 302 women eligible for participation in this study, 255 (80%; 123 subjects, 118 controls) were interviewed by blinded professional interviewers regarding genitourinary symptoms, sexual function, and reproductive history. RESULTS: Urinary complaints occurred significantly more frequently in subjects than in controls (21 versus 7%, respectively; p = 0.003), in subjects with residual pelvic fracture displacement > or = 5 mm than in those without displacement (33 versus 14%, respectively; p = 0.018), and in subjects with residual lateral (60%) or vertical (67%) displacement than in those with medially displaced fractures (21.4%) (p = 0.04). Although both groups reported increased rates of cesarean section, this increase was statistically significant only in the subject group: 14.5% preinjury versus 48% postinjury (p < 0.0001). Adjusting for previous cesarean sections, cesarean section was significantly more frequent in subjects with fractures initially displaced > or = 5 mm (80%) than in those with fractures initially displaced < 5 mm (15%) (p = 0.02). There was no difference in the incidence of miscarriage or infertility between the groups. Problems with physiologic arousal or orgasm were rare. Pain during sex (dyspareunia) was more common in subjects with fractures displaced > or = 5 mm than in those with nondisplaced fractures (43 versus 25%, respectively; p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: We found that pelvic trauma negatively affected the genitourinary and reproductive function of female patients. The increased rate of cesarean section in women after pelvic trauma may be multifactorial in origin and warrants further investigation.

Characterization of patients with high-energy lower extremity trauma.

PURPOSE: (a) to report the demographic, socioeconomic, behavioral, social, and vocational characteristics of patients enrolled in a study to examine outcomes after high-energy lower extremity trauma (HELET) and to compare them with the general population; (b) to determine whether characteristics of patients undergoing limb salvage versus amputation after HELET are significantly different from each other. DESIGN AND STUDY POPULATION: A prospective study of 601 patients admitted with high-energy lower extremity trauma to eight Level I trauma centers. PROCEDURES: Patients were evaluated during the initial hospitalization. They are being followed up for 24 months postinjury. Study patients are compared with the general population by using census information, population survey data, and published norms. Characteristics of patients undergoing limb salvage versus amputation are also compared. RESULTS: Most patients were male (77 percent), white (72 percent), and between the ages of twenty and forty-five years (71 percent). Seventy percent graduated from high school (compared with 86 percent nationally) (p < 0.05). One fourth lived in households with incomes below the federal poverty line, compared with 16 percent nationally (p < 0.05). The percentage with no health insurance (38 percent) was also higher than in the general population (20 percent) (p < .05). The percentage of heavy drinkers was over two times higher than reported nationally (p < 0.01). Study patients were slightly more neurotic and extroverted and less open to new experiences. When patient characteristics were compared for those undergoing amputation versus limb salvage, no significant differences were found among any of the variables (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, LEAP patients differ in important ways from the general population. However, the decision to amputate verus reconstruct does not appear to be significantly influenced by patient characteristics.

Determinants of use of outpatient rehabilitation services following upper extremity injury.

This study documents the utilization of outpatient therapy services following upper extremity injury and identifies factors that influence the use of services. One hundred twelve patients admitted to a hand center for treatment of upper extremity injury were followed prospectively for 7 months to determine their utilization of therapy services and their perceptions of unmet need. Eighty percent of the patients used therapy services following their injury Those who were more severely injured, were female, had health insurance, or obtained disability compensation made more visits than other subjects. One third of the patients reported that they did not have an adequate number of therapy visits. Subjects cited various reasons (e.g., lack of insurance, transportation difficulties) for unmet need. These findings suggest that the variation in utilization of rehabilitation services depends on not only the severity of the injury but other patient characteristics and resources as well.

Factors influencing outcome and length of stay in a stroke rehabilitation unit. Part 1. Analysis of 248 unscreened patients--medical and functional prognostic indicators.

A retrospective analysis of 248 patients with stroke (average age 67, range 17-98) admitted to a stroke rehabilitation unit over a sixteen month period showed that 80% of these patients were able to return home after an average length of stay (LOS) of 43 days. At discharge 85% of the group were ambulatory and 56% required no help in daily living activities. Severity of weakness on admission, long onset-admission intervals, the presence of severe perceptual or cognitive dysfunction or a homonymous hemianopsia in addition to a motor deficit were related to unfavorable outcome and increased LOS. The age of the patient, dysphasia or a hemisensory deficit in addition to weakness, or diabetes, hypertension, or ASHD were unrelated to the patients' functional status on discharge, discharge disposition, or LOS. Many patients with "unfavorable prognostic signs" made significant improvement after admission and were subsequently discharges. Thus, while the above findings may predict which patients can make maximal gains in a short term treatment facility, they also show that most patients, even those with "poor prognostic signs," can make enough functional improvement to be managed at home after a relatively short hospitalization.

Functional status following orthopedic trauma in young women.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the general health status and sexual function of women following serious orthopedic injury. METHODS: Women aged 16-44 who were treated at a level I trauma center between 1986 and 1992 for a fracture to the pelvis or lower extremity were interviewed by telephone. The interview included the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) supplemented by questions about sexual function. The SF-36 is a measure of outcome from the respondent's point of view and consists of 36 items representing eight health concepts. RESULTS: Of 289 eligible women, 233 (81%) were interviewed (123 pelvic fracture; 110 lower extremity fracture). Their mean Injury Severity Score was 17.9. Compared to age- and gender-standardized norms, study patients as a group scored significantly worse (lower scores) on all dimensions of the SF-36 except mental health (p < 0.05). Of the women interviewed, 45% reported feeling less sexually attractive due to their injury, and 39% reported a decrease in sexual pleasure. Women who reported arthritis that was attributed to their fracture had significantly poorer health outcomes than study subjects who did not. The most significant predictor of deviations from SF-36 norms was the presence of one or more comorbid chronic conditions. CONCLUSION: The results underscore the importance of considering comorbidities when evaluating health outcomes following major trauma. In addition, the relatively high rates of reported change in sexual function after injury argue for more attention to these issues in both clinical practice and outcomes research.

Outcome and cost for stroke patients in academic and community hospitals. Comparison of two groups referred to a regional rehabilitation center.

Patients transferred to a regional stroke rehabilitation center from academic hospital centers (124 patients) and from community hospital centers (315 patients) were compared for outcome and cost of treatment. The two groups were matched for Amended International Classification of Diseases diagnostic category, age, sex, distribution of weakness, types of neurological deficits, time from the onset of the stroke symptoms to admission to the rehabilitation unit, and the concurrence of major medical problems thought to contribute to cerebrovascular disease. There was no statistically significant difference in functional outcome or length of stay, but acute health care costs for patients treated in community hospitals were about 50% less.