Collaborative Implementation of Robotic Surgery Into an Academic Pediatric Surgery Practice.

INTRODUCTION: Robotic surgery continues to drive evolution in minimally invasive surgery. Due to the confined operative fields encountered, pediatric surgeons may uniquely benefit from the precise control offered by robotic technologies compared to open and laparoscopic techniques. We describe a unique collaborative implementation of robotic surgery into an academic pediatric surgery practice through adult robotic surgeon partnership. We compare robotic cholecystectomy (RC) and laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) outcomes, hypothesizing that RC will be equivalent to LC in key quality outcomes. METHODS: We evaluate 14 mo of systems development and training, and 24 mo of collaborative operative experience evoking a purposeful tiered case progression, establishing core robotic competencies, prior to advancing operative complexity. Univariate analyses compared LC versus RC. RESULTS: 36 robotic operations were performed in children aged 8-18 y, in a tiered progression from 24 cholecystectomies to 2 ileocecectomies, 2 paraesophageal hernia repairs, 1 anterior rectopexy, 1 spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy, 1 Heller myotomy, 1 choledochal cyst resection with roux-en-y hepaticojejunostomy, 1 median arcuate ligament release, and 1 thoracic esophageal duplication cyst resection. For LC and RC, there were no significant differences in procedure duration, discharge opioids, hospital readmission, or rates of surgical site infection or bile duct injury. CONCLUSIONS: Robotic surgery has potential to significantly enhance pediatric surgery. RC appears equivalent to LC but presents multiple additional theoretical benefits in pediatric patients. Our pilot program experience supports the feasibility and safety of pediatric robotic surgery. We emphasize the importance of a stepwise progression in operative difficulty and collaboration with adult robotic surgery experts.

Anastomotic Considerations in Diverticulitis.

Diverticulitis is a common indication for colorectal surgery, both in the acute and the elective setting. The anastomosis between the colon and rectum is a critical component of colectomy for diverticular disease and should be approached thoughtfully. This article reviews important surgical considerations when creating a colorectal anastomosis in the setting of diverticular disease, whether following the reversal of an end colostomy, during an acute episode of diverticulitis, or electively for chronic or complicated disease. Timing of surgery and preoperative assessment, minimally invasive approaches, and intraoperative maneuvers and considerations are discussed.

Peer Assessment in Medical Student Education: A Study of Feasibility, Benefit, and Worth.

BACKGROUND: Direct experience with medical procedures is an important component of medical school training, yet opportunities for medical students have dwindled for various reasons. To offset this, simulated procedures are being integrated into training. However, this comes with additional time commitments required of teaching surgeons regarding assessment of simulation. A solution to this could be peer assessment. We hypothesize that there will be no significant difference between peer assessment when compared to that of a teaching surgeon. METHODS: Third-year medical students were shown 3 simulated procedures by teaching surgeon and provided a grading rubric. Student performances were independently graded by peer assessment and by teaching surgeons. All peer assessment grades and surgeon grades were compared. RESULTS: Four hundred fifty-nine medical students completed the simulation procedures. Comparisons between the teaching surgeons and peer assessment evaluations demonstrated a 99% interobserver agreement for pass-fail designation and 98% agreement for individual data points (kappa = .78). Survey results demonstrated a significant increase in confidence in performing the tested items and comfort with peer assessment. DISCUSSION: This analysis demonstrates that the inclusion of peer assessment within medical school is highly comparable to teaching surgeon assessments.

Current U.S. Pre-Operative Bowel Preparation Trends: A 2018 Survey of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Members.

Background: The effect of an oral antibiotic preparation prior to colorectal surgery was first examined and exalted in the 1973 paper by Nichols et al. Since this commencement, enthusiasm for the oral antibiotic regimen has waxed and waned reflecting the literature focused on this topic over the past 40 years. Polling colorectal surgeons of define current practices has been performed at intervals throughout the years and has demonstrated a trend to decline in the practice. The most recent publication surveying U.S. practices was in 2010, which reported a minority, 36%, use of oral antibiotics prior to elective colorectal surgery; a marked downtrend from the 88% use described in 1990. Since this last survey, the colorectal surgery community has performed considerable research examining the benefit of oral antibiotic and mechanical bowel preparation. This manuscript evaluates the current use of oral antibiotics in colorectal surgery in the U.S. and how practice trends have developed in response to current recommendations in the literature. Methods: An electronic survey was created and distributed to U.S. colorectal surgeons to evaluate current opinions and practice trends. A total of 359 American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons members responded. A review of the recent literature pertaining to pre-operative bowel practices and outcomes was performed to compare with current practices. Results: A significant majority (83.2%) of respondents use pre-operative oral antibiotics routinely, and 98.6% routinely use mechanical bowel preparation. The use of a combination of parenteral antibiotics, oral antibiotics, and mechanical bowel preparation is reported by 79.3%. The most commonly employed oral antibiotic regimen is neomycin and metronidazole. The most common mechanical bowel preparation is polyethylene glycol (PEG). The most common parenteral antibiotics are cefazolin and metronidazole. There was no statistically significant difference in this practice by geographic region, Board-certified status, or practice setting. Conclusion: The majority of colorectal surgeons employ a combination of oral antibiotics, mechanical bowel preparation, and parenteral antibiotics prior to colorectal surgery. This is consistent across geographic regions, despite Board certification status or practice setting, and is reflective of the recommendations based on recent literature.

Modified Frailty Index Predicts Postoperative Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Radical Pelvic Surgery.

Patients undergoing radical pelvic surgery such as proctectomy or radical cystectomy are at risk of experiencing a variety of complications. Frailty renders patients vulnerable to adverse events. We hypothesize that frailty measured preoperatively using a validated scoring system correlates with increased likelihood of experiencing Clavien-Dindo grade IV complications and 30-day mortality and may be used as a predictive model for patients preoperatively. The NSQIP database was queried for patients who underwent proctectomy or radical cystectomy from 2008 to 2012. Preoperative frailty was calculated using the 11-point modified frailty index (MFI). Patients were scored based on the presence of indicators and categorized into two groups (<3 or ≥3). Major postoperative morbidities and mortality were identified and analyzed in each group. 10,048 proctectomy and cystectomy patients were identified. The MFI was found to be predictive of both 30-day mortality (P < 0.0001) and Clavien-Dindo grade IV complications (P < 0.0001). Receiver operating characteristic analysis demonstrated improved discriminative power of the MFI with the addition of American Society of Anesthesiologists class for both prediction of complications and 30-day mortality. An MFI score of ≥3 is predictive of postoperative morbidity and mortality. Providers should be encouraged to calculate frailty preoperatively to predict adverse outcomes.

Antihyperalgesic effects of vanilloid-1 and bradykinin-1 receptor antagonists following spinal cord injury in rats.

OBJECT: The authors previously discovered that genes for the bradykinin-1 (B1) receptor and the transient receptor potential vanilloid subtype 1 (TRPV1) were overexpressed in animals exhibiting thermal hyperalgesia (TH) following spinal cord injury (SCI). They now report the effect of TRPV1 (AMG9810) and B1 (Lys-[Des-Arg9,Leu8]-bradykinin) antagonists on TH in animals following SCI. METHODS: The rats were subjected to contusion SCI and then divided into groups in which TH did or did not develop. The animals from both groups were given either AMG9810, Lys-(Des-Arg9,Leu8)-bradykinin, or the drug-specific vehicle (control groups). Animals were tested for TH preinjury and at regular intervals after SCI by using the hindlimb withdrawal latency test. CONCLUSIONS: The administration of AMG9810 likely improves TH as a result of a generalized analgesic effect, whereas the effect of Lys-(Des-Arg9,Leu8)-bradykinin appears more specific to the reversal of TH. This information has potential usefulness in the development of treatment strategies for post-SCI neuropathic pain.

Permanent mesh results in long-term symptom improvement and patient satisfaction without increasing adverse outcomes in hiatal hernia repair.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to evaluate symptom relief, patient satisfaction, and safety of permanent mesh following Nissen fundoplication and hiatal hernia repair. METHODS: Patients who underwent Nissen fundoplication and hiatal hernia repair with permanent mesh (Crurasoft; Davol, Inc, Bard, Warwick, RI) between 2005 and 2011 were identified. A retrospective chart review was conducted. Long-term follow-up data were obtained via telephone interviews using a modified 5-point Likert scale. RESULTS: Forty-one patients were identified. Twenty-six patients (63%) had complete follow-up data. Mean follow-up period was 65 months (14 to 96 months). Symptomatic improvement occurred in 23 patients (88%). Twenty-three patients (88%) reported overall satisfaction with the procedure as either excellent or good, and 23 of 26 patients (89%) would undergo surgery again. Three patients (12%) reported hernia recurrence. There were no mesh erosions. CONCLUSION: The use of permanent (Crurasoft; Davol, Inc) mesh resulted in symptom improvement as well as patient satisfaction, and no mesh erosions were seen.