Hypoglycaemia is reduced with use of inhaled Technosphere® Insulin relative to insulin aspart in type 1 diabetes mellitus.

AIM: To evaluate the effect of final HbA1c levels on the incidences of hypoglycaemia in participants with type 1 diabetes treated with inhaled Technosphere® Insulin or subcutaneous insulin aspart, reported in alignment with the International Hypoglycaemia Study Group recommendations. METHODS: In the randomized, phase 3, multicentre AFFINITY-1 study, adults (N = 375) who had type 1 diabetes for ≥ 12 months and an HbA1c level of 58-86 mmol/mol (7.5-10.0%) were randomized to receive basal insulin plus either inhaled Technosphere Insulin or subcutaneous insulin aspart. This was a post-hoc regression analysis on a subset (N = 279) of the randomized AFFINITY-1 cohort for whom baseline and end-of-treatment HbA1c values were reported. Primary outcome measures were incidence and event rates for levels 1, 2 and 3 hypoglycaemia, respectively defined as blood glucose levels of ≤ 3.9 mmol/l, < 3.0 mmol/l or requiring external assistance for recovery. RESULTS: Participants treated with Technosphere Insulin experienced statistically significantly fewer level 1 and 2 hypoglycaemic events and a lower incidence of level 3 hypoglycaemia than participants treated with insulin aspart. The lower rate of hypoglycaemia with Technosphere Insulin was observed across the range of end-of-treatment HbA1c levels. Technosphere Insulin was associated with higher rates of hypoglycaemia 30-60 min after meals, but significantly lower rates 2-6 h after meals. CONCLUSIONS: Participants using Technosphere Insulin experienced clinically non-inferior glycaemic control and lower hypoglycaemia rates across a range of HbA1c levels compared with participants receiving insulin aspart. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01445951.

Options for prandial glucose management in type 2 diabetes patients using basal insulin: addition of a short-acting GLP-1 analogue versus progression to basal-bolus therapy.

Integrating patient-centered diabetes care and algorithmic medicine poses particular challenges when optimized basal insulin fails to maintain glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes. Multiple entwined physiological, psychosocial and systems barriers to insulin adherence are not easily studied and are not adequately considered in most treatment algorithms. Moreover, the limited number of alternatives to add-on prandial insulin therapy has hindered shared decision-making, a central feature of patient-centered care. This article considers how the addition of a glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) analogue to basal insulin may provide new opportunities at this stage of treatment, especially for patients concerned about weight gain and risk of hypoglycaemia. A flexible framework for patient-clinician discussions is presented to encourage development of decision-support tools applicable to both specialty and primary care practice.

Addition of exenatide twice daily to basal insulin for the treatment of type 2 diabetes: clinical studies and practical approaches to therapy.

BACKGROUND: Type 2 diabetes is a progressive disease that requires stepwise additions of non-insulin and insulin therapies to meet recommended glycaemic goals. The final stage of intensification may require prandial insulin, adding complexity and increased risks of hypoglycaemia and weight gain. AIMS: This review assesses the benefits and risks of adding exenatide twice daily, a glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist, in patients with type 2 diabetes who are currently treated with basal insulin, but have failed to reach their glycaemic goals. METHODS AND RESULTS: Based on data from published studies, exenatide has a number of actions that complement basal insulin therapy. Exenatide has been shown to increase glucose-dependent insulin production, suppress abnormal plasma glucagon production, slow gastric emptying, enhance liver uptake of glucose and promote satiety. A recently published randomised clinical trial reported that the addition of exenatide twice daily to titrated basal insulin provided greater glycaemic control than titrated basal insulin alone, and did so without an increase in hypoglycaemic events and with modest weight loss. Exenatide use was associated with gastrointestinal side effects. The recent randomised trial confirmed and extended data from a number of prior observational studies that demonstrated the efficacy and safety of insulin/exenatide combination therapy. Practical considerations for adding exenatide twice daily to ongoing basal insulin are discussed.

Liraglutide: effects beyond glycaemic control in diabetes treatment.

AIMS: To review the non-glycaemic effects of liraglutide, including potential improvements in body weight, systolic blood pressure (SBP) and pancreatic beta-cell function. KEY FINDINGS: Liraglutide induced weight loss of around 2-3 kg compared with weight increases of 1-2 kg with active comparators such as insulin glargine, rosiglitazone and glimepiride. Exenatide demonstrated similar weight benefits to liraglutide, but the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, sitagliptin, saxagliptin and vildagliptin, were weight neutral. Liraglutide was associated with decreases in SBP of 2-7 mmHg, whereas exenatide, vildagliptin and sitagliptin demonstrated SBP reductions of around 2-3 mmHg. Measures of pancreatic beta-cell function were improved with liraglutide vs. placebo, rosiglitazone and exenatide. However, DPP-4 inhibitors appear to have less effect on beta-cell function than glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to glycaemic control, liraglutide and the other incretin-based therapies offer additional non-glycaemic benefits to varying degrees. The ability of GLP-1 receptor agonists to provide modest, but clinically relevant improvements in body weight and SBP, and to potentially benefit beta-cell function make them an exciting therapeutic option for individuals with diabetes. In contrast, DPP-4 inhibitors are weight neutral and may have lesser benefits on beta-cell function.

Similar progression of diabetic retinopathy with insulin glargine and neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes: a long-term, randomised, open-label study.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: This long-term study was designed to further characterise the retinal safety profile of insulin glargine and human neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. METHODS: An open-label, 5 year, randomised (1:1), multicentre, stratified, parallel-group study conducted in the USA and Canada enrolled individuals with type 2 diabetes and either no or non-proliferative retinopathy (less than severe; Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study [ETDRS] level less than 53 in both eyes) who were treated with oral hypoglycaemic agents (OHAs) alone, insulin alone or OHAs with insulin for >/=3 months prior to study entry and a baseline HbA(1c) level of 6.0-12.0%. Patients were randomised by the investigator according to the centralised interactive voice response system to receive twice-daily NPH insulin (n = 509) or once-daily basal insulin glargine (n = 515). The investigator was not blinded to the treatment group to which each participant had been assigned. The main objective of this study was to compare the progression of diabetic retinopathy between treatment groups by analysing the percentage of patients with three or more step progression in the ETDRS retinopathy patient-level severity scale after treatment with either basal insulin. Masked, centralised grading of seven-field stereoscopic fundus photographs was used. RESULTS: Similarly sustained glycaemic control was observed in both the insulin glargine and NPH insulin treatment groups. Despite a slightly greater severity of diabetic retinopathy for the insulin glargine group at baseline, three or more step progression in ETDRS score from baseline to end-of-study was similar between treatment groups (14.2% [53/374] of insulin glargine-treated patients vs 15.7% [57/363] of NPH-treated patients); the difference in the incidence of progression was -1.98% (95% CI -7.02, 3.06%). Other measures of retinopathy-the development of proliferative diabetic retinopathy and progression to clinically significant macular oedema-occurred to a similar degree in both treatment groups. No other safety issues, such as unexpected adverse events for either insulin emerged during the 5 year study. However, NPH insulin treatment was associated with a higher incidence of severe hypoglycaemia compared with insulin glargine. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: This study shows no evidence of a greater risk of the development or progression of diabetic retinopathy with insulin glargine vs NPH insulin treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00174824 FUNDING: This study was sponsored by sanofi-aventis.

Comparison of carvedilol and metoprolol on serum lipid concentration in diabetic hypertensive patients.

CONTEXT: Vasoconstricting beta-blocker use is associated with a reduction in HDL cholesterol, higher triglyceride, total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol levels, whereas carvedilol, a vasodilating beta-blocker, has not been associated with these effects. OBJECTIVE: To compare in a randomized, double-blind study, the effects of the beta 1-blocker metoprolol tartrate with the combined alpha 1, beta-blocker carvedilol on serum lipid concentrations. METHODS: A prospective randomized, double-blind, parallel-group trial compared the effects of carvedilol and metoprolol on total cholesterol, triglycerides, calculated LDL, HDL and non-HDL cholesterol levels at baseline and after 5 months of therapy as a secondary objective in the Glycemic Effects in Diabetes Mellitus: Carvedilol-Metoprolol Comparison in Hypertensive (GEMINI) study. In this study, 1235 participants with type 2 diabetes and hypertension who were receiving renin-angiotensin system blockers were randomized either to carvedilol, receiving 6.25-25 mg twice daily, or to metoprolol tartrate, receiving 50-200 mg twice daily. If needed, hydrochlorothiazide and a dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker were added to achieve blood pressure goals. RESULTS: In the metoprolol tartrate group, triglycerides and non-HDL cholesterol increased and both the LDL and the HDL cholesterol levels decreased. In the carvedilol group, total LDL and HDL cholesterol decreased, non-HDL cholesterol was unchanged and triglycerides increased. Comparing the carvedilol and metoprolol tartrate groups, there was no statistically significant difference in LDL and HDL cholesterol levels, but there was a significantly greater decreases with carvedilol in total cholesterol [-2.9%, 95% confidence interval (CI) -4.60 to -1.15, p < 0.001], triglycerides (-9.8%, 95% CI -13.7, -5.75%, p < 0.001) and non-HDL cholesterol (-4.03%, 95% CI -6.3 to -1.8, p < 0.0006). At the end of the study, significantly more participants in the metoprolol tartrate group had had initiation of statin therapy or the statin dose increased than those in the carvedilol group (11 vs. 32%, p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with type 2 diabetes currently receiving a renin-angiotensin blocker, compared with metoprolol tartrate, the addition of carvedilol for blood pressure control resulted in a significant decrease in triglyceride, total cholesterol and non-HDL cholesterol levels. The use of metoprolol resulted in a significantly greater rate of initiation of statin therapy or an increase in the dose of existing statin therapy when compared with carvedilol utilization.

Factors responsible for impaired fibrinolysis in obese subjects and NIDDM patients.

Accelerated atherosclerosis is the leading cause of death in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM). Impaired endogenous fibrinolytic activity may accelerate atherosclerosis by exposing vascular luminal wall surfaces to persistent and recurrent thrombi and clot-associated mitogens. This study was conducted to further characterize endogenous fibrinolysis in lean and obese nondiabetic subjects and in NIDDM patients and to identify mechanisms responsible for the alterations identified. Obese and diabetic subjects had threefold elevations of plasma concentrations of plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1 (PAI-1) compared with values in lean control subjects. Despite the lack of significant differences in plasma concentrations of tissue-type plasminogen activator in the obese and diabetic subjects, both basal and stimulated endogenous fibrinolytic activities were decreased. The decreases were associated with increased activity of PAI-1 in plasma, in turn correlated with increased concentrations of immunoreactive insulin and C-peptide. These results are consistent with our previous observations demonstrating direct stimulatory effects of insulin and its precursors on cellular expression of PAI-1 in vitro and observations by others demonstrating decreased basal fibrinolytic activity in NIDDM patients. Impaired endogenous fibrinolytic activity could lead to prolonged or recurrent exposure of luminal surfaces of vessel walls to microthrombi and clot-associated mitogens that may accelerate atherosclerosis in hyperinsulinemic subjects.

Quantitative assessment of myocardial ultrasound tissue characterization through receiver operating characteristic analysis of Bayesian classifiers.

OBJECTIVES: This work proposes a self-consistent assessment methodology for quantitative evaluation of any combination of diagnostic features, with the immediate goal of quantitatively assessing the discriminating power in diabetic patients of features derived from ultrasound backscatter from myocardium. BACKGROUND: Four features from analysis of left ventricular myocardial ultrasound backscatter have previously been shown to be sensitive to potentially cardiomyopathic changes in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus who have no overt heart disease. The measured features were significantly different between such patients and normal control subjects, as well as among groups of such patients with and without systemic complications of the disease. The quantitative discriminating potential of the features was not assessed. METHODS: Multivariate classifier functions were constructed and analyzed by using the methodology of the receiver operating characteristic curve, which allows quantitative assessment of the discriminating power of these features, alone or in combination. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve--the true positive rate averaged over all false positive rates--was used as a summary measure of performance. RESULTS: In distinguishing patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus from normal control subjects, the most discriminating combination of ultrasound features for the detection of such changes in these patients yielded receiver operating characteristic curves with area measures of approximately 0.80; for such patients with retinopathy the measure increased to 0.90. This performance is comparable to that of many commonly used diagnostic tests. CONCLUSIONS: A self-consistent set of evaluation methodologies has quantitatively demonstrated the sensitivity of four ultrasound backscatter features to otherwise latent changes in myocardial structure that accompany the evolution of insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. The results are remarkable in themselves and suggest the potential of the features for the general field of cardiac ultrasound tissue characterization.

Abnormal myocardial acoustic properties in diabetic patients and their correlation with the severity of disease.

Although patients with diabetes mellitus may be afflicted by cardiomyopathy, its prevalence and nature are controversial. Studies have shown that fibrosis alters the acoustic properties of the heart in animals and humans and that the changes are detectable by cardiac tissue characterization with ultrasound. The present study was performed to characterize myocardial acoustic properties in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes to determine whether ultrasound tissue characterization could detect changes potentially indicative of occult cardiomyopathy. The magnitude of cyclic variation of myocardial ultrasound integrated backscatter and its phase delay with respect to the onset of the cardiac cycle in the septum and posterior wall of the left ventricle were measured in 54 patients with diabetes who had no overt cardiac disease. Conventional echocardiography documented normal ventricular systolic function in 96%. As compared with results in age-matched patients without diabetes studied previously, cyclic variation of integrated backscatter was reduced (4.6 +/- 0.8 vs. 3.6 +/- 1.4 dB; p less than 0.001). In addition, delay was significantly increased (0.86 +/- 0.09 vs. 0.99 +/- 0.15). The primary analysis of the data focused on differences among the diabetic patients. Reduction of cyclic variation of backscatter was greatest in patients with diabetes who had neuropathy (3.2 +/- 1.0 dB; p less than 0.001) as was the increase in delay (1.04 +/- 0.16, p less than 0.001 vs. values in patients without neuropathy). Retinopathy and nephropathy were associated with abnormal myocardial acoustic properties as well. Thus, abnormalities that may reflect fibrosis or other occult cardiomyopathic changes in diabetic patients without overt heart disease are readily detectable by myocardial tissue characterization with ultrasound and parallel the severity of noncardiac diabetic complications.

Retinopathy in African Americans and whites with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.

BACKGROUND: The development and progression of diabetic retinopathy in African Americans with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus is not known. METHODS: Two hundred subjects with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus with duration of diabetes 16 years or less at first visit were studied; 58 were African Americans and 142 were whites. All had gradable stereoscopic color fundus photographs (seven standard fields) from at least two visits (mean time between first and second visit was 4.1 years). Subjects with hemoglobinopathy or proliferative retinopathy or subjects who had evidence of treatment for proliferative retinopathy at first visit were excluded. Masked grading of photographs was conducted using the modified Airlie House classification scheme. RESULTS: African Americans were older, heavier, had higher systolic blood pressure (all P < .05), and marginally higher hemoglobin A1 (HbA1) values (P = .06) than the whites at first visit. African Americans had a lower rate of two steps or more progression from preexistent retinopathy (19%) than whites (43%). Progression to proliferative retinopathy or treatment was similar by race. Multivariate analysis predicting development oe progression of retinopathy, while controlling for length of follow-up, found higher HbA1 (odds ratio [OR] = 2.15), longer duration of insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (OR = 1.69), higher serum creatinine concentration (OR = 1.59), and white race (OR = 2.62) to be independent risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest a previously unsuspected reduction in the adjusted risk for development and progression of retinopathy in African Americans. The reason for this apparently reduced risk are not known.

Role of insulin in management of surgical patients with diabetes mellitus.

Because surgery is a likely event during the lifetime of patients with diabetes, health-care team members need to be aware of the metabolic problems that may occur during the perioperative period. Surgery, especially in the presence of general anesthesia, will produce a diabetogenic response. This is generally due to an elevation of counterregulatory hormones, although endogenous insulin is also suppressed. The excessive lipolysis and ketogenesis that can occur during surgery can have particularly deleterious effects for patients with diabetes. Thus, sufficient insulin must be provided during this period to suppress these catabolic processes. The major controversy regarding surgery and diabetes concerns the route of insulin administration. This article reviews the various treatment options for patients with insulin-dependent and non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, with particular emphasis on the role of insulin. Special situations, e.g., outpatient surgery, coronary artery bypass, and emergency surgery, are also discussed.

Change in metabolic control and functional status after hospitalization. Impact of patient activation intervention in diabetic patients.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a short intervention to enhance patient information seeking and decision making during hospitalization results in improved metabolic control and functional status in patients with diabetes mellitus. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A randomized clinical trial was conducted in which control patients received a comprehensive 3-day evaluation and educational program, whereas experimental patients received a 45-min patient activation intervention and a 1-h self-administered booster in addition to the program. Metabolic control and functional status were measured at baseline and 4 mo postdischarge. RESULTS: During their discharge discussions, experimental patients asked significantly more questions than control patients (7.4 vs. 3.0, P less than .001) and 4 mo later reported significantly fewer physical limitations in activities of daily living than the control group (P = 0.02). Improvement in metabolic control was statistically significant only for experimental patients (P = 0.02), although their glycosylated hemoglobin levels were not significantly lower than control patients' at follow-up. The intervention did not diminish physician satisfaction with patient interactions, although it may have increased physician frustration with responsibilities that competed with patient care. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the addition of a patient activation intervention to a comprehensive diabetes management program may substantially enhance physical functioning among adults with diabetes mellitus.

Self-care predictors of metabolic control in NIDDM patients.

The objective of this study was to evaluate whether the relationship between self-care behavior and metabolic control is comparable in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) on insulin and not on insulin. We studied 84 NIDDM patients hospitalized for an elective admission in Washington University's Model Demonstration Unit. At admission, patients reported the frequency of exercise, blood glucose monitoring, and meal skipping for the previous 2 wk. Metabolic control over the previous 8-12 wk was determined from glycosylated hemoglobin assays. In cross-sectional analysis controlling for patient sociodemographic and health characteristics, glycosylated hemoglobin levels were positively related to meal skipping (P = 0.0008) and negatively related to the frequency of blood glucose monitoring (P = 0.0025). Self-care behaviors explained 26% of the variance in glycosylated hemoglobin levels in NIDDM patients. Multivariate modeling demonstrated no significant interaction effects between insulin treatment and self-care on metabolic control. In conclusion, these findings support the clinical significance of self-care activities for metabolic control in NIDDM patients, particularly meal skipping and blood glucose monitoring.

Promotion and acceleration of diabetic ulcer healing by arginine-glycine-aspartic acid (RGD) peptide matrix. RGD Study Group.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness and safety of arginine-glycine-aspartic acid (RGD) peptide matrix in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This randomized placebo-controlled investigator- and patient-blinded prospective multicenter investigation was conducted at three institutional and three private U.S. clinics providing ambulatory care. Sixty-five diabetic patients with chronic full-thickness neurotrophic foot ulcers were enrolled. Six discontinued the study because of adverse events. RGD peptide matrix (Argidene Gel; formerly Telio-Derm Gel) was applied topically twice weekly for up to 10 weeks in patients who otherwise received standard care. Control group patients received topical saline as a placebo plus standard care. The primary method of assessment was the incidence and rate of ulcer closure. All patients enrolled were included in the data analysis. RESULTS: The percentage of patients whose ulcers healed completely in the RGD peptide matrix group (35%; 14 of 40 patients) was over fourfold greater (P = 0.02) than that in the placebo group (8%; 2 of 25 patients). By the study end point (either day of healing or week 10), 30 of 40 (75%) RGD peptide matrix patients had achieved > 50% ulcer closure compared with 12 of 25 (48%) placebo patients (P = 0.03). RGD peptide matrix also significantly (P = 0.03) increased the rate of ulcer closure over the 10 weeks of the study. CONCLUSIONS: RGD peptide matrix treatment promoted and accelerated the healing of chronic diabetic foot ulcers to a significant degree.

Effects of alprazolam on glucose regulation in diabetes. Results of double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effects of alprazolam on glucose regulation in anxious and nonanxious patients with poor glycemic control and establish whether regulatory benefits are related to anxiolytic effects of the medication. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Fifty-eight patients with poor glycemic control, 16 (27.6%) of whom had a symptomatic generalized anxiety disorder, were entered into a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 8-week trial using alprazolam (up to 2 mg/day) as the active agent. Generalized anxiety disorder was determined in accordance with Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders criteria, and anxiety symptoms were measured using the Hopkins Symptom Checklist. Glycated hemoglobin levels were used to determine glucose regulation. Compliance behavior was assessed using glucometers and medication monitors equipped with electronic memory. RESULTS: A statistically significant reduction in glycated hemoglobin level was observed in patients treated with alprazolam compared with those receiving placebo (-1.1 vs. -0.3%, P = 0.04). This treatment effect was not a function of differences in compliance behaviors. Anxiety symptoms decreased in both alprazolam- and placebo-treated patients with generalized anxiety disorder, but reduction in glycated hemoglobin level was not dependent on alleviation of anxiety. CONCLUSIONS: A short course of alprazolam improved glucose regulation in patients with a history of poor diabetes control. This effect was not directly related to concomitant changes in anxiety. Alprazolam treatment of anxious patients with poorly controlled diabetes may result in decreased anxiety and improved glucose regulation through independent mechanisms.

Reduction of glycosylated hemoglobin and postprandial hyperglycemia by acarbose in patients with NIDDM. A placebo-controlled dose-comparison study.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the safety and efficacy of three doses of acarbose (100, 200, and 300 mg three times daily) with placebo for the treatment of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) in patients maintained on dietary therapy alone. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This multicenter double-blind placebo-controlled trial was 22 weeks in duration. The trial consisted of a 2-week screening period, a 4-week placebo run-in period, and a 16-week double-blind treatment period. The primary measure of drug efficacy was the mean change from baseline in HbA1c levels. Additional efficacy variables included the mean change from baseline in fasting and postprandial plasma glucose and serum insulin levels. RESULTS: After 16 weeks of treatment, acarbose-treated patients had statistically significant reductions in mean HbA1c levels of 0.78, 0.73, and 1.10% (relative to placebo) in the 100-, 200-, and 300-mg t.i.d. groups, respectively. Significant reductions in fasting and postprandial plasma glucose levels, glucose area under the time-concentration curve, and maximum glucose concentration were also observed in acarbose-treated patients. Although there were no statistically significant differences among the 100-, 200-, and 300-mg treatment groups, there was a trend toward a dose-response relationship for most plasma glucose variables that were measured. Gastrointestinal side effects (e.g., abdominal pain, flatulence, and diarrhea) and serum transaminase elevations (e.g., aspartate aminotransferase [AST] and alanine aminotransferase [ALT] were more frequently reported in the acarbose-treated patients than in the placebo-treated control patients. Transaminase elevations occurred only at the 200-, and 300-mg dosages and were readily reversible on discontinuation of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Acarbose at doses of 100, 200, and 300 mg administered three times daily for 16 weeks significantly reduced HbA1c levels and postprandial hyperglycemia. Treatment with acarbose is a safe and effective adjunct to dietary therapy for the treatment of NIDDM.

Upper extremity impairments, pain and disability in patients with diabetes mellitus.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the severity of, and relationships between, upper extremity impairments, pain and disability in patients with diabetes mellitus, and to compare upper extremity impairments in patients with diabetes with non-diabetic controls. DESIGN: Case-control, cross-sectional design. SETTING: University-based, outpatient diabetes centre and physical therapy research clinic. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred and thirty-six patients with diabetes attending an outpatient diabetes clinic completed the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) questionnaire. A detailed shoulder and hand examination was conducted on a subgroup of 29 volunteers with type 2 diabetes, and 27 controls matched for age, sex and body mass index. INTERVENTIONS: None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: SPADI score, passive shoulder range of motion (ROM) and strength, grip strength, hand sensation, dexterity and limited joint mobility of the hand. RESULTS: Sixty-three percent (149/236) of patients with diabetes reported shoulder pain and/or disability [median SPADI score 10.0 (interquartile range 0.0 to 39.6)]. Compared with the control group, the subgroup of patients with diabetes had substantial reductions in shoulder ROM, shoulder muscle strength, grip and key pinch strength (P<0.05). Patients with diabetes had a greater prevalence of decreased sensation (26/27 vs 14/27) and limited joint mobility of the hand (17/27 vs 4/27) compared with the control group. Total SPADI score was negatively correlated (P<0.05) with shoulder ROM (r=-0.42 to -0.74) and strength measures (r=-0.44 to -0.63) in patients with diabetes. CONCLUSIONS: Upper extremity impairments in this sample of patients with diabetes were common, severe and related to complaints of pain and disability. Additional research is needed to understand the unique reasons for upper extremity problems in patients with diabetes, and to identify preventative treatments.

The beneficial effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition with captopril on diabetic nephropathy in normotensive IDDM patients with microalbuminuria. North American Microalbuminuria Study Group.

PURPOSE: To determine whether angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition with captopril reduces the progression of microalbuminuria to overt proteinuria in normotensive patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study was a prospective randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial involving 26 centers in the United States and Canada. One hundred forty-three subjects, 14 to 57 years of age, with IDDM for 4 to 33 years, blood pressure < 140/90 mm Hg in the absence of antihypertensive therapy, and persistent albumin excretion 20 to 200 micrograms/min were randomized to double-blind treatment with captopril 50 mg or placebo BID. Albumin excretion rate (AER), blood pressure, and glycohemoglobin were determined every 3 months, and creatinine clearance (CrCl) and urea excretion were measured every 6 months. RESULTS: Within 24 months, 6.0% (4/67) of captopril-treated subjects and 18.6% (13/70) of placebo-treated subjects progressed to clinical proteinuria, defined as AER > 200 micrograms/min and at least 30% above baseline (risk reduction = 67.8%, P = 0.037). AER increased at an annual rate of 11.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] -3.3% to 29.1%) in the placebo group, while it declined by 17.9% (CI -29.6% to -4.3%) in the captopril group (P = 0.004). CrCl decreased by 4.9 mL/min per 1.73 m2 per year in the placebo group, while it remained stable in the captopril group (0.9 mL/min per 1.73 m2 per year, P = 0.039 between groups). Ten subjects required treatment for hypertension; 8 in the placebo group and 2 in the captopril group. There was little correlation between the 24-month changes in mean arterial blood pressure and AER in either group. Glycohemoglobin and urinary urea excretion did not differ between groups. CONCLUSIONS: After 24 months of therapy with captopril, compared with placebo, normotensive subjects with IDDM experienced significantly less progression of microalbuminuria to clinical proteinuria, reduced albumin excretion, and preserved CrCl rate. The ACE inhibitor, captopril, was well tolerated.

Telmisartan plus hydrochlorothiazide versus telmisartan or hydrochlorothiazide monotherapy in patients with mild to moderate hypertension: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial.

BACKGROUND: Recent surveys reveal continuing deficiencies in the awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension. In many cases, failure to achieve blood pressure targets may be attributable to the use of antihypertensive monotherapy. OBJECTIVES: This study was undertaken to identify combinations of telmisartan, a new oral angiotensin II type 1-receptor antagonist, and hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) that might provide greater antihypertensive efficacy than monotherapy with either agent in the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension. It also examined the dose-response surface for the 2 drugs alone and in combination. METHODS: This was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study that employed all cells of a 4 x 5 factorial design. After a 4-week, single-blind, placebo run-in period, men and women between 18 and 80 years of age with mild to moderate hypertension (defined as mean supine diastolic blood pressure [DBP] between 95 and 114 mm Hg during the last 2 weeks of the placebo run-in period and systolic blood pressure [SBP] between 114 and 200 mm Hg immediately before randomization) were eligible to enter the 8-week, double-blind, double-dummy treatment period. Study comparisons were between once-daily telmisartan monotherapy (20, 40, 80, or 160 mg), HCTZ monotherapy (6.25, 12.5, or 25 mg), 12 combinations of these telmisartan/HCTZ doses, and placebo. The focus was on 2 combinations: telmisartan 40 mg/HCTZ 12.5 mg and telmisartan 80 mg/HCTZ 12.5 mg. The primary efficacy variable was change in supine trough DBP from baseline to the last evaluable measurement during double-blind treatment. Plasma renin activity and safety parameters, including treatment-emergent adverse events, physical findings, electrocardiograms, and serum electrolyte levels (which are known to increase with HCTZ treatment), were also assessed. RESULTS: Of 1293 patients screened, 818 (63.3%) were enrolled at 47 centers. Of these 818, 749 (91.6%) completed the study. The intent-to-treat population (randomized with > or = 1 postrandomization blood pressure measurement) consisted of 807 patients (98.7%). Telmisartan 80 mg/HCTZ 12.5 mg significantly decreased mean supine trough SBP/DBP by 23.9/14.9 mm Hg, a benefit of 8.5/3.4 mm Hg compared with telmisartan 80 mg and of 17.0/7.6 mm Hg compared with HCTZ 12.5 mg (both comparisons, P < 0.01). Telmisartan 40 mg/HCTZ 12.5 mg significantly reduced mean supine SBP by 18.8 mm Hg, a benefit of 6.6 mm Hg compared with telmisartan 40 mg and 11.9 mm Hg compared with HCTZ 12.5 mg (both, P < 0.01). This same combination significantly reduced mean supine DBP by 12.6 mm Hg, a benefit of 5.3 mm Hg compared with HCTZ 12.5 mg (P < 0.01), but was not significantly different from telmisartan 40 mg. Telmisartan 80 mg/HCTZ 12.5 mg was significantly more effective than telmisartan 40 mg/HCTZ 12.5 mg in reducing mean supine DBP and SBP (both, P < 0.05). The response surface and responder analyses confirmed the additive antihypertensive efficacy of the combination of telmisartan and HCTZ. All regimens were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Once-daily telmisartan 80 mg/HCTZ 12.5 mg was effective and well tolerated when used to reduce SBP and DBP in patients with mild to moderate hypertension. In addition to enhancing efficacy, this combination protected against potassium depletion, a common side effect of thiazide monotherapy.