Outcomes following major emergency gastric surgery: the importance of specialist surgeons.

BACKGROUND: The increasing subspecialisation of general surgeons in their elective work may result in problems for the provision of expert care for emergency cases. There is very little evidence of the impact of subspecialism on outcomes following emergency major upper gastrointestinal surgery. This prospective study investigated whether elective subspecialism of general surgeon is associated with a difference in outcome following major emergency gastric surgery. METHODS: Between February 1994 and June 2010, the data from all emergency major gastric procedures (defined as patients who underwent laparotomy within 12 hours of referral to the surgical service for bleeding gastroduodenal ulcer and/or undergoing major gastric resection) was prospectively recorded. The sub-specialty interest of operating surgeon was noted and related to post-operative outcomes. RESULTS: Over the study period, a total of 63 major gastric procedures were performed of which 23 (37%) were performed by specialist upper gastrointestinal (UGI) consultants. Surgery performed by a specialist UGI surgeon was associated with a significantly lower surgical complication (4% vs. 28% of cases; p=0.04) and in-patient mortality rate (22% vs. 50%; p=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Major emergency gastric surgery has significantly better clinical outcomes when performed by a specialist UGI surgeon. These results have important implications for provision of an emergency general surgical service.

Circumferential resection margins of rectal tumours post-radiotherapy: how can MRI aid surgical planning?

BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is known to have high predictive accuracy for circumferential resection margin (CRM) involvement of pre-treatment rectal tumours. This study aims to assess predictive accuracy of MRI for CRM involvement in rectal cancers post-long-course chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and in particular to understand how this information can influence surgical planning. METHODS: Forty-seven rectal cancers treated with CRT followed by bowel resection in one hospital since 2005 were reviewed for clinical, radiological and pathological characteristics. Using a validated pro forma, a radiologist blinded to final histology and original MRI report predicted CRM status from post-CRT MRI images. Results were compared to histological CRM status of final specimen, and differential analysis by type of surgical operation was performed. RESULTS: Overall accuracy of MRI for CRM involvement post-CRT was 72 % with a negative predictive value of 92 %. Abdominoperineal excision (APE) post-CRT was associated with non-significantly higher rates of histologically involved CRM than anterior resection (AR; 41 vs. 21 %) as were mucinous adenocarcinomas when compared to non-mucinous (56 vs. 21 %). Overall accuracy and positive predictive value were non-significantly higher for cancer treated with a standard APE than AR, and negative predictive value was high for both groups. CONCLUSIONS: MRI post-CRT has high negative predictive value for CRM status. Such information is of particular clinical relevance in low rectal cancers treated with APE as it can indicate when a standard surgical approach is likely to be sufficient.

Enoxaparin venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in bariatric surgery: A best evidence topic.

A best evidence topic in surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was: which is the best regimen of enoxaparin thromboprophylaxis for patients undergoing bariatric surgery? One hundred and twenty-five papers were identified using the reported literature search, of which four represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The authors, country and date of publication, patient groups, relevant outcomes and results of these papers were tabulated. All four studies are non-randomized cohort studies examining venous thromboembolism rates and major postoperative bleeding following varying regimens of Enoxaparin thromboprophylaxis. There is no level 1 evidence which significantly favors any particular thromboprophylaxis regimen. There is some evidence that extended duration of treatment of ten days after discharge significantly reduces the incidence of VTE compared to in-hospital treatment only, and that a higher incidence of post-operative bleeding occurs with a regimen that includes a pre-operative dose of Enoxaparin. With regard to dosage, for in-hospital treatment the higher dosage of 40 mg twice daily as opposed to 30 mg seems to significantly reduce the incidence of VTE without significantly affecting bleeding rate.

Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration versus pre or post-operative ERCP for common bile duct stones in patients undergoing cholecystectomy: is there any difference?

A best evidence topic in surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was: in patients with symptomatic gallstones and concomitant common bile duct (CBD) stones, is a single-stage surgical strategy (laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) with common bile duct exploration) preferable, or a two-stage procedure involving LC with pre or post-operative endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERCP)? Two hundred and six papers were found using the reported search, of which four presented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The authors, journal, date and country of publication, patient group, study type, relevant outcomes and results of these papers are tabulated. A recent large meta-analysis concluded no significant difference in the clinical effectiveness or complication rate of either strategy. Three recent smaller studies concurred with this conclusion; however each noted improved cost-effectiveness of the single-stage approach advocating its use as the superior strategy when local resources and expertise are available. We conclude that for patients with symptomatic gallstones and concomitant choledocholithiasis, a single-stage surgical procedure is equivalent to two-stage LC and ERCP in terms of clinical outcomes, is associated with a shorter overall hospital stay and may be more cost-effective. On this basis a single-stage procedure is recommended for management of symptomatic gallstones and choledocholithiasis where local resources and expertise permit.