Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País como assunto
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Knee ; 44: 142-149, 2023 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37611491

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Patient selection is key to the success of medial unicondylar knee arthroplasty (UKA). Progression of arthritis is the most common indication for revision surgery. Per-operative arthroscopy is a means of directly assessing the integrity of the lateral compartment. The aim of the study is to assess the long-term survivorship of UKA performed when per-operative arthroscopy is used as a final means of deciding whether to proceed with UKA. METHODS: We used per-operative arthroscopy as a means to confirm suitability for UKA in a consecutive series of 279 Oxford medial UKA. Our series of UKA with per-operative arthroscopy (Group 1) was compared to all Oxford UKA (Group 2) and all UKA in the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR) (Group 3). RESULTS: The 14-year cumulative percentage revision (CPR) was 18.5% (95% CI 12.7, 26.4) for group 1, 19.7% (95% CI 18.8, 20.6) for group 2, and 19.2% (95% CI 18.5, 19.8) for group 3. There was no statistically significant difference in the (CPR) for the entire period when group 1 was compared to groups 2 or 3. Progression of arthritis was least in Group 1 compared to groups 2 and 3; 3.6 versus 4.4 and 4.1% respectively. Following per-operative arthroscopy 21.6% (77/356) of knees underwent a change of surgical plan from UKA to TKA. CONCLUSION: In our practice, which includes per-operative arthroscopy, we have identified a reduced risk of revision due to progression of arthritis but no difference in overall long-term implant survivorship.


Assuntos
Artroplastia do Joelho , Prótese do Joelho , Osteoartrite do Joelho , Humanos , Artroscopia , Osteoartrite do Joelho/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento , Austrália , Articulação do Joelho/cirurgia , Artroplastia do Joelho/métodos , Reoperação/métodos
2.
J Arthroplasty ; 25(8): 1246-9, 2010 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20178889

RESUMO

Femoral nerve block (FNB) is an accepted mode of analgesia for lower limb procedures but has a documented complication rate. This study compared femoral nerve and fascia iliaca regional anesthesia for total knee arthroplasty (TKA), using fentanyl consumption as the primary outcome measure. Ninety-eight primary unilateral TKA patients were blinded and randomized into fascia iliaca block (FIB) (n = 51) or FNB (n = 47) groups. No significant differences were found in analgesia use (fentanyl and tramadol) at 12 and 36 hours in pain, nausea and range of motion between the groups. There was one case of paresthesia in the femoral nerve in the FNB group. Fascia iliaca block is as effective as FNB as part of a multimodal anesthetic regimen for TKA.


Assuntos
Artroplastia do Joelho/métodos , Nervo Femoral , Bloqueio Nervoso/métodos , Osteoartrite do Joelho/cirurgia , Dor Pós-Operatória/prevenção & controle , Idoso , Anestésicos Intravenosos/administração & dosagem , Anestésicos Intravenosos/uso terapêutico , Artroplastia do Joelho/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Fentanila/administração & dosagem , Fentanila/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Masculino , Entorpecentes/administração & dosagem , Entorpecentes/uso terapêutico , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Dor Pós-Operatória/etiologia , Nervos Periféricos , Estudos Prospectivos , Coxa da Perna/inervação , Tramadol/administração & dosagem , Tramadol/uso terapêutico , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa