Identifying and Addressing Functional Communication Challenges in Patients With Behavioral Variant Frontotemporal Dementia.

PURPOSE: We describe the communication challenges of four patients with a neurodegenerative disorder consistent with behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD), characterized by early behavioral and personality changes. By describing their clinical profiles, we identify common barriers to functional communication in this population and provide recommendations for how speech-language pathologists (SLPs) might contribute to minimizing them. METHOD: Four patients with bvFTD were selected from a cohort of patients with progressive communication impairments. Three of them returned for at least one follow-up visit. Case histories are presented along with the results of comprehensive speech and language, neuropsychological, and neurological testing. RESULTS: At the time of initial evaluation, patients were between the ages of 54 and 66 years and had been experiencing symptoms for 1.5-6 years. Consistent with their bvFTD diagnoses, all patients had prominent behavioral and personality changes that impacted communication. Patients 1 and 2 also had mild aphasia at enrollment, primarily characterized by anomia and loss of word meaning. Patients 3 and 4 both had apraxia of speech and moderate-to-severe aphasia at enrollment with prominent anomia and agrammatism. All four patients had impaired executive functioning and relative sparing of visuospatial skills; episodic memory was also impaired for Patients 2 and 4. Even though functional communication was progressively limited for all patients, none of them received regular support from an SLP. CONCLUSIONS: This case series adds to a scant, but growing, literature demonstrating that patients with bvFTD have communication impairments. SLPs are uniquely positioned to identify barriers to functional communication and to provide tailored strategy training to the patients and their care partners over the course of their disease. Systematic evaluation of the efficacy of treatment in this population would be valuable. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.25933762.

Combined assessment of progressive apraxia of speech brain microstructure by diffusion tensor imaging tractography and multishell neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging.

BACKGROUND: Progressive apraxia of speech (PAOS) is characterized by difficulties with motor speech programming and planning. PAOS targets gray matter (GM) and white matter (WM) microstructure that can be assessed using diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and multishell applications, such as neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging (NODDI). In this study, we aimed to apply DTI and NODDI to add further insight into PAOS tissue microstructure. METHODS: Twenty-two PAOS patients and 26 age- and sex-matched controls, recruited by the Neurodegenerative Research Group (NRG) at Mayo Clinic, underwent diffusion MRI on 3T MRI. Brain maps of fractional anisotropy (FA) and mean diffusivity (MD) from DTI and intracellular volume fraction (ICVF) and isotropic volume fraction (IsoVF) from NODDI were generated. Global WM and GM, and specific WM tracts were identified using tractography and lobar GM regions. RESULTS: Global WM differences between PAOS and controls were greatest for ICVF, and global GM differences were greatest for MD and IsoVF. Abnormalities in key WM tracts involved in PAOS, including the body of the corpus callosum and frontal aslant tract, were identified with FA, MD, and ICVF, with excellent differentiation of PAOS from controls (area under the receiver operating characteristic curves >.90). MD and ICVF identified abnormalities in arcuate fasciculus, thalamic radiations, and corticostriatal tracts. Significant correlations were identified between an index of articulatory errors and DTI and NODDI metrics from the arcuate fasciculus, frontal aslant tract, and inferior longitudinal fasciculus. CONCLUSIONS: DTI and NODDI represent different aspects of brain tissue microstructure, increasing the number of potential biomarkers for PAOS.

Primary Progressive Apraxia of Speech Caused by TDP-43: A Case Report.

Objectives: To introduce the first case in which primary progressive apraxia of speech (PPAOS) is associated with TAR DNA-binding protein 43 (TDP-43) instead of 4-repeat tau. Methods: This patient was identified through a postmortem autopsy. Following an initial diagnostic evaluation, he participated in 3 annual research visits during which speech, language, cognitive, and neurologic assessments were administered. Neuroimaging was also acquired. Results: Apraxia of speech was diagnosed at his initial visit with a comprehensive neurologic examination further revealing subtle motor findings in the right hand. At subsequent visits, agrammatic aphasia and motor symptoms consistent with corticobasal syndrome were evident. Cognition and behavior remained relatively intact until advanced stages. FDG-PET revealed hypometabolism in the right temporoparietal cortex and left premotor and motor cortices. There was also low-level signal in the right temporoparietal cortex on tau-PET. A sequence variation in the progranulin gene was identified (GRN c.1A>C, p.Met1). Pathologic diagnosis was TDP-43 Type A with an atypical distribution of inclusions in premotor and motor cortices. Discussion: This case report demonstrates that TDP-43 Type A inclusions in an atypical distribution can present clinically as PPAOS. The sequence variation in the progranulin gene and asymmetric temporoparietal cortex involvement were the strongest indications of the unusual neuropathophysiology prior to autopsy.

The yes-no reversal phenomenon in patients with primary progressive apraxia of speech.

Patients who have a yes-no reversal respond "yes" when they mean no and vice versa. The unintentional response can be made both verbally and with gestures (e.g., head shake or nod, thumbs up or down). Preliminary reports associate this phenomenon with 4-repeat tauopathies including primary progressive apraxia of speech (PPAOS), nonfluent/agrammatic primary progressive aphasia, and corticobasal syndrome; however, the significance and timing of this symptom relative to others are not well understood. Whereas some accounts associate yes-no reversals with other binary reversals (e.g., up/down, hot/cold) and attribute the reversals to disturbances of selection within the language system, others implicate more general inhibitory control processes. Here, we compared clinical and neuroimaging findings across 30 patients with PPAOS (apraxia of speech in the absence of aphasia), 15 of whom had a yes-no reversal complaint and 15 who did not. The two groups did not differ on any of the language or motor speech measures; however, patients who had the yes-no reversal received lower scores on the Frontal Assessment Battery and motor assessments. They also had greater hypometabolism in the left supplementary motor area and bilateral caudate nuclei on [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose PET, but only the right caudate nucleus cluster survived correction for multiple comparisons. We interpret these results to suggest that the yes-no reversal phenomenon is associated with cognitive abilities that are supported by the frontostriatal network; more specifically, impaired response inhibition.

Clinicopathologic and Neuroimaging Correlations of Nonverbal Oral Apraxia in Patients With Neurodegenerative Disease.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Nonverbal oral apraxia (NVOA) is the inability to plan, sequence, and execute voluntary oromotor movements in the absence of weakness. In the context of neurodegenerative disease, it remains unclear whether it is linked to a specific underlying pathologic, clinical, or neuroimaging finding. Thus, we aimed to assess the clinicopathologic and neuroimaging associations of NVOA. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of autopsy-confirmed patients previously assessed through an NVOA evaluation tool with a previously published cutpoint to screen for NVOA. We compared demographic and clinical characteristics and postmortem pathology between those who developed NVOA and those who did not. We also compared clinicopathologic characteristics in mild vs greater than mild NVOA and early vs late-emerging NVOA. SPM12 was used to assess patterns of gray matter loss in NVOA vs non-NVOA with age and sex included as covariates. RESULTS: A total of 104 patients (median age at symptom onset 63 years, 43% female) were included in the study. 63 (60.6%) developed NVOA. NVOA appeared at a median of 4.3 years from symptom onset. 29% developed NVOA within the first 3 years. Primary progressive apraxia of speech and the nonfluent variant of primary progressive aphasia were the most common baseline diagnoses in the NVOA group while progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) syndrome and logopenic progressive aphasia (LPA) were the most common in patients without NVOA. Atrophy of the left lateral and medial posterior frontal cortex was related to NVOA. The most common pathologies associated with NVOA were PSP (36.5%) and corticobasal degeneration (CBD) (33.3%). In patients without NVOA, PSP (26.8%) and other pathologies (26.8%) were the most frequent. 11% of patients with NVOA had persistently mild NVOA and were more likely to have baseline diagnoses of LPA, PSP syndrome, or semantic dementia. The most frequent pathologies in this group were Alzheimer disease and PSP. The pathologic associations of greater than mild NVOA were CBD and PSP. DISCUSSION: NVOA is present in several clinical syndromes. It is most associated with PSP and CBD. NVOA is a manifestation of left lateral and medial posterior frontal cortex damage rather than a particular pathology.