Advanced CT measures of coronary artery disease with intermediate stenosis in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis.

BACKGROUND: Coronary artery disease (CAD) and severe aortic valve stenosis (AS) frequently coexist. While pre-transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) computed tomography angiography (CTA) allows to rule out obstructive CAD, interpreting hemodynamic significance of intermediate stenoses is challenging. This study investigates the incremental value of CT-derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR), quantitative coronary plaque characteristics (e.g., stenosis degree, plaque volume, and composition), and peri-coronary adipose tissue (PCAT) density to detect hemodynamically significant lesions among those with AS and CAD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included patients with severe AS and intermediate coronary lesions (20-80% diameter stenosis) who underwent pre-TAVR CTA and invasive coronary angiogram (ICA) with resting full-cycle ratio (RFR) assessment between 08/16 and 04/22. CTA image analysis included assessment of CT-FFR, quantitative coronary plaque analysis, and PCAT density. Coronary lesions with RFR ≤ 0.89 indicated hemodynamic significance as reference standard. RESULTS: Overall, 87 patients (age 77.9 ± 7.4 years, 38% female) with 95 intermediate coronary artery lesions were included. CT-FFR showed good discriminatory capacity (area under receiver operator curve (AUC) = 0.89, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.81-0.96, p < 0.001) to identify hemodynamically significant lesions, superior to anatomical assessment, plaque morphology, and PCAT density. Plaque composition and PCAT density did not differ between lesions with and without hemodynamic significance. Univariable and multivariable analyses revealed CT-FFR as the only predictor for functionally significant lesions (odds ratio 1.28 (95% CI 1.17-1.43), p < 0.001). Overall, CT-FFR ≤ 0.80 showed diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of 88.4% (95%CI 80.2-94.1), 78.5% (95%CI 63.2-89.7), and 96.2% (95%CI 87.0-99.5), respectively. CONCLUSION: CT-FFR was superior to CT anatomical, plaque morphology, and PCAT assessment to detect functionally significant stenoses in patients with severe AS. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: CT-derived fractional flow reserve in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis may be a useful tool for non-invasive hemodynamic assessment of intermediate coronary lesions, while CT anatomical, plaque morphology, and peri-coronary adipose tissue assessment have no incremental or additional benefit. These findings might help to reduce pre-transcatheter aortic valve replacement invasive coronary angiogram. KEY POINTS: • Interpreting the hemodynamic significance of intermediate coronary stenoses is challenging in pre-transcatheter aortic valve replacement CT. • CT-derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR) has a good discriminatory capacity in the identification of hemodynamically significant coronary lesions. • CT-derived anatomical, plaque morphology, and peri-coronary adipose tissue assessment did not improve the diagnostic capability of CT-FFR in the hemodynamic assessment of intermediate coronary stenoses.

Coronary angiography after cardiac arrest without ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a network meta-analysis.

AIMS: This network meta-analysis aimed to assess the effect of early coronary angiography (CAG) compared with selective CAG (late and no CAG) for patients after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest without ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTE-OHCA). METHODS AND RESULTS: A systematic literature search was performed using the EMBASE, MEDLINE and Web of Science databases without restrictions on publication date. The last search was performed on 15 July 2022. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized studies (NRS) comparing the effect of early CAG to selective CAG after NSTE-OHCA on survival and/or neurological outcomes were included. Meta-analyses were performed based on a DerSimonian-Laird random effects model. A total of 18 studies were identified by the literature search. After the exclusion of two studies due to high risk of bias, 16 studies (six RCTs, ten NRS) were included in the final analyses. Meta-analyses showed a statistically significant increase in survival after early CAG compared with selective CAG in the overall analysis [OR: 1.40, 95% confidence interval (CI): (1.12-1.76), P < 0.01, I2 = 68%]. This effect was lost in the subgroup analysis of RCTs [OR: 0.89, 95% CI: (0.73-1.10), P = 0.29, I2 = 0%]. Random effects model network meta-analysis of NRS based on a Bayesian method showed statistically significant increased survival after late compared with early CAG [OR: 4.20, 95% CI: (1.22, 20.91)]. CONCLUSION: The previously reported superiority of early CAG after NSTE-OHCA is based on NRS at high risk of selection and survivorship bias. The meta-analysis of RCTs does not support routinely performing early CAG after NSTE-OHCA.

Comparison of patients with occlusive or hemorrhagic access site complications requiring reintervention after percutaneous transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Background: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) via transfemoral (TF) access is increasingly integral to aortic valve disease treatment, expanding beyond high-risk patients. Despite technical advancements, access-related vascular complications, occurring in approximately 10% of TAVI procedures, remain a substantial challenge. Objective: This study investigated the clinical and morphological characteristics of percutaneous TF-TAVI patients experiencing occlusive (OC) and hemorrhagic (HC) complications managed with surgical or endovascular reintervention. Methods: The cohort included patients from a Dutch and a German tertiary referral hospital, managed with TF-TAVI procedures between 2017 and 2021 that required reintervention for OC or HC. Demographics, comorbidities, procedural details, and preoperative imaging data were collected and compared between groups. Results: Among 109 TF-TAVI patients, 32 with OC and 77 with HC required reintervention. The OC group presented significantly smaller access arterial diameters (common femoral artery: OC 6.7 mm vs. HC 8.9 mm, p<.001; external iliac artery: OC 7.2 mm vs. HC 8.3 mm, p<.001; common iliac artery: OC 9.4 mm vs. HC 10.5 mm, p=.012) while the HC group presented higher tortuosity index (TI) (OC 1.24 vs. HC 1.30; p=.017). No differences were observed regarding baseline characteristics, vessel calcification or vascular closure device use. Conclusions: In patients requiring reintervention following TF-TAVI, smaller arterial diameters were associated with OC, while higher TI was linked to HC. These findings emphasize the importance of preoperative imaging in developing individualized prevention strategies.

Surgical Versus Interventional Treatment of Major Access Site Complications During Transfemoral TAVI Procedures at a Large Volume Center.

PURPOSE: Access-related vascular complications in transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) can be treated endovascularly or surgically. The aim of this study was to evaluate the short- and long-term outcomes of endovascular treatment compared with surgical repair for access-related vascular complications. METHODS: This retrospective study was performed from January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2020. All transfemorally treated TAVI patients in whom a surgical or endovascular treatment for an access site complication was needed were included. The primary outcome was the need for any related vascular re-operation. RESULTS: In total, 1219 transfemoral TAVI procedures were conducted during the study period. 19 patients suffered an access complication requiring endovascular treatment, while 54 patients required surgical repair. No differences were seen with regard to re-operations (endovascular 15.8% vs surgical 14.8%; p=0.919), wound infections (endovascular 0% vs surgical. 11.1%; p=0.129), and wound healing disorders (endovascular 15.8% vs surgical 29.6%; p=0.237). Patients undergoing endovascular treatment were discharged earlier (endovascular 11.2 vs surgical 14.9 days; p=0.028). After surgical repair, patients received significantly more blood transfusions than endovascularly treated patients (endovascular 1.00 vs surgical 3.1 red blood cell concentrate bags; p<0.001). No differences were found regarding the new onset of walking pain, rest pain, and ischemic ulcers during follow-up. CONCLUSION: In this retrospective cohort, endovascular treatment of access-related vascular complications of transfemoral TAVI procedures was safe and feasible. During the hospital stay, endovascularly treated patients received fewer blood transfusions and were discharged faster than surgically treated patients. No differences regarding clinical outcomes and re-intervention rates were seen during the follow-up. CLINICAL IMPACT: Given the in this retrospective study demonstrated safety and feasibility of endovascular treatment for major access-related vascular complications, along with the in-hospital benefits and absence of follow-up disadvantages compared to surgical treatment, endovascular treatment should be considered in cases of major access-related vascular complications in transfemoral TAVI patients.

Safety of Percutaneous Femoral Access for Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair Through Previously Surgically Exposed or Repaired Femoral Arteries.

OBJECTIVE: Percutaneous femoral artery access is being increasingly used in endovascular aortic repair (EVAR). The technique can be challenging in patients with previously surgically exposed or repaired femoral arteries because of excessive scar tissue. However, a successful percutaneous approach may cause less morbidity than a "re-do" open femoral approach. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of prior open surgical femoral exposure on technical success and clinical outcomes of percutaneous approach. METHODS: This study retrospectively reviewed the clinical data of patients who underwent percutaneous EVAR between 2010 and 2020 at 2 major aortic centers. Patients were divided into 2 groups (with or without prior open surgical femoral access) for analysis of clinical outcomes. Only punctures with sheaths ≥12Fr were included for analysis. The access and (pre)closure techniques were similar in both institutions. Primary end points were intraoperative technical success, access-related revision, and access complications. A multivariate analysis was performed to identify determinants of conversion to open approach and femoral access complications in intact and re-do groins. RESULTS: A total of 632 patients underwent percutaneous (complex) EVAR: 98 had prior open surgical femoral access and 534 patients underwent de novo femoral percutaneous access. A total of 1099 femoral artery punctures were performed: 149 in re-do and 950 in intact groins. The extent of endovascular repair included 159 infrarenal, 82 thoracic, 368 fenestrated/branched, and 23 iliac branch devices. No significant differences were seen in technical success (re-do 93.3% vs intact 95.3%, p=0.311), access-related surgical revision (0.7% vs 0.6%, p=0.950), and access complications (2.7% vs 4.0%, p=0.443). For the whole group, significant predictors for access complications in multivariate analyses were main access site (odds ratio [OR] 2.39; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.07%-5.35%; p=0.033) and increase of the procedure time per hour (OR 1.65; 95% CI 1.34%-2.04%; p<0.001), while increase in sheath-vessel ratio had a protective effect (OR 0.33; 95% CI 0.127%-0.85%; p=0.021). Surgical conversion was predicted by main access site (OR 2.32; 95% CI 1.28%-4.19%; p=0.007) and calcification of 50% to 75% of the circumference of the access vessel (OR 3.29; 95% CI 1.38%-7.86%; p=0.005). CONCLUSION: Within our population prior open surgical femoral artery exposure or repair had no negative impact on the technical success and clinical outcomes of percutaneous (complex) endovascular aortic aneurysm repair.

Multicenter experience of upper extremity access in complex endovascular aortic aneurysm repair.

PURPOSE: Upper extremity access (UEA) for antegrade cannulation of aortic side branches is a relevant part of endovascular treatment of complex aortic aneurysms and can be achieved using several techniques, sites, and sides. The purpose of this study was to evaluate different UEA strategies in a multicenter registry of complex endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR). METHODS: In six aortic centers in the Netherlands, all endovascular aortic procedures from 2006 to 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients who received UEA during complex EVAR were included. The primary outcome was a composite end point of any access complication, excluding minor hematomas. Secondary outcomes were access characteristics, access complications considered individually, access reinterventions, and incidence of ischemic cerebrovascular events. RESULTS: A total of 417 patients underwent 437 UEA for 303 fenestrated/branched EVARs and 114 chimney EVARs. Twenty patients had bilateral, 295 left-sided, and 102 right-sided UEA. A total of 413 approaches were performed surgically and 24 percutaneously. Distal brachial access (DBA) was used in 89 cases, medial brachial access (MBA) in 149, proximal brachial access (PBA) in 140, and axillary access (AA) in 59 cases. No significant differences regarding the composite end point of access complications were seen (DBA: 11.3% vs MBA: 6.7% vs PBA: 13.6% vs AA: 10.2%; P = .29). Postoperative neuropathy occurred most after PBA (DBA: 1.1% vs MBA: 1.3% vs PBA: 9.3% vs AA: 5.1%; P = .003). There were no differences in cerebrovascular complications between access sides (right: 5.9% vs left: 4.1% vs bilateral: 5%; P = .75). Significantly more overall access complications were seen after a percutaneous approach (29.2% vs 6.8%; P = .002). In multivariate analysis, the risk for access complications after an open approach was decreased by male sex (odds ratio [OR]: 0.27; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.10-0.72; P = .009), whereas an increase in age per year (OR: 1.08; 95% CI: 1.004-1.179; P = .039) and diabetes mellitus type 2 (OR: 3.70; 95% CI: 1.20-11.41; P = .023) increased the risk. CONCLUSIONS: Between the four access localizations, there were no differences in overall access complications. Female sex, diabetes mellitus type 2, and aging increased the risk for access complications after a surgical approach. Furthermore, a percutaneous UEA resulted in higher complication rates than a surgical approach.

A Stopped Pilot Study of the ProGlide Closure Device After Transbrachial Endovascular Interventions.

Purpose: To evaluate the feasibility and safety of the suture-mediated ProGlide device in closure of the brachial artery after endovascular interventions. Materials and Methods: From 2016 to 2017, a pilot study was performed using the ProGlide to achieve hemostasis after percutaneous access of distal brachial arteries >4 mm in diameter. In an interim analysis, the results were compared to a matched control group taken from a 60-patient historical cohort who underwent brachial artery access and manual compression to achieve hemostasis between 2014 and 2017. The primary outcome was access-related reintervention and the secondary outcome was the incidence of access-site complications. Results: Seven patients (mean age 67.9 years; 6 men) were enrolled in the study before it was stopped in 2017. Four patients experienced 6 access-site complications (neuropathy, hematoma, occlusion, and pseudoaneurysm). These resulted in 3 access-related reinterventions: surgical evacuation of a hematoma, thrombectomy of the occluded brachial artery, and surgical repair of the pseudoaneurysm. In the interim comparison to the 19 matched patients (mean age 61.9 years; 6 men), the ProGlide group had proportionally more patients experiencing access-related complications (57% vs 16% for manual compression, p=0.035) and resultant reinterventions (43% vs 11%, p=0.064). Based on this data the trial was stopped. Conclusion: Considering this experience, it is not advisable to use the ProGlide in transbrachial endovascular interventions due to the high incidence of complications and access-related reinterventions.

Percutaneous Axillary Artery Access in Complex Endovascular Aortic Repair.

PURPOSE: This study was designed to assess the feasibility and safety of percutaneous axillary access in complex endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) with use of a percutaneous closure device. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients undergoing percutaneous axillary artery access between 2012 and 2017 were included. Left percutaneous axillary access was the sole antegrade aortic approach used. Patient and intervention characteristics were documented. Mortality, procedural success, technical success, peri- and postoperative complications, and repeat interventions were examined. A total of 25 percutaneous axillary access procedures were performed in 23 patients. The mean age of the treated patients was 72.2 years, and 71% were male. Percutaneous axillary access was obtained for a variety of indications (chimney EVAR, thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair, thoracic EVAR, and type B dissections). Vascular access sheath sizes ranged from 6 F to 12 F. RESULTS: The procedural success rate was 96%. Technical success of vascular closure was 100%. The perioperative access complication rate was 8%: 1 dissection of the axillary artery and 1 stenosis occurred. No hematoma, hemorrhage, or neuropathies were seen. One access-related repeat intervention had to be performed. The 30-d mortality rate was 4%. CONCLUSIONS: Direct puncture and percutaneous closure of the axillary artery for complex aortic procedures is safe and feasible.

Transradial Approach for Aortoiliac and Femoropopliteal Interventions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: To present a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the transradial approach for aortoiliac and femoropopliteal interventions to the traditional transfemoral access. METHODS: A search of the public domain databases MEDLINE, SCOPUS, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library Databases was performed to identify studies related to the use of the transradial approach for infra-aortic procedures. Meta-analysis was used to compare the transradial to the transfemoral route in terms of procedure success, complications, procedure parameters, and hospital length of stay. Results are presented as the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: Nineteen studies containing 638 patients with transradial access for lower limb interventions were selected. Lesions were treated from the aortic bifurcation down to the popliteal artery. The mean technical success rate was 90.9%, conversion to a transfemoral approach was necessary in 9.9%, and complications were reported in 1.9%. The meta-analysis included 4 comparative studies involving 114 transradial and 208 transfemoral procedures. There was no significant advantage of either approach in terms of procedure success (OR 5.0, 95% CI 0.49 to 50.83, p=0.17), but the risk of developing a complication was significantly lower (OR 0.25, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.86, p=0.03) with the transradial approach. CONCLUSION: Transradial access for lower limb endovascular interventions can be performed with comparable technical success and a lower overall complication profile compared to transfemoral access.

Oral anticoagulation in patients with left ventricular thrombus: a systematic review and network meta-analysis with reconstructed time-to-event data.

BACKGROUND: Left ventricular thrombus (LVT) is associated with high rates of systemic embolism. Vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) are the only approved treatment for LVT. Although evidence suggests direct oral anticoagulant (DOACs) to be at least equally effective in general, the efficacy of individual DOACs remains unclear. METHODS: A literature search was performed in EMBASE, MEDLINE and Web of Science looking for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized controlled studies of interventions (NRSI) comparing individual DOACs to VKAs for the treatment of LVT. Individual patient data was reconstructed and incorporated in a Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) and a Cox frailty regression model. RESULTS: A total of 2545 patients across 19 studies (4 RCTs, 15 NRSI) were included. 1738 received VKAs, 581 received Rivaroxaban, 226 received Apixaban, 82 received Dabigatran and 2 received Edoxaban. LVT resolution was less likely with VKAs compared to Rivaroxaban in the time-to-event analysis (HR 0.66, 95% CI [0.49; 0.91], p = 0.01). There was no difference for other DOACs compared to VKAs. Rivaroxaban reduced ischemic stroke compared to VKAs (OR 0.18, 95% CrI [0.05; 0.49]), other DOACs did not. CONCLUSION: In this NMA, Rivaroxaban showed faster LVT resolution and consecutively lower odds of ischemic stroke than VKAs while Apixaban and Dabigatran showed at least equal efficacy. Given the quality and size of the available studies, these differences between individual DOACs should be acknowledged as hypothesis generating only. Future adequately powered randomized controlled trials are needed to assess possible time-varying effects between individual DOACs.

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention versus Optimal Medical Therapy in Patients with Chronic Total Occlusion: A Meta-Analysis.

Background/Objectives: Chronic total occlusion (CTO) is a prevalent finding in patients with coronary artery disease and is associated with increased mortality. Prior reports on the efficacy of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) compared to optimal medical therapy (OMT) were controversial. Following the emergence of recently published new evidence, a meta-analysis is warranted. The current meta-analysis assessed the effects of PCI compared to OMT in the treatment of CTO. Methods: A structured literature search was performed. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized controlled studies of interventions were eligible. The primary outcome was an accumulated composite of cardiac mortality, myocardial infarction and target vessel/lesion revascularization events. Results: Thirty-two studies reporting on 11260 patients were included. Of these, 5712 (50.7%) were assigned to the PCI and 5548 (49.3%) were allocated to the OMT group. The primary outcome occurred in 14.6% of the PCI and 20.1% of the OMT group (12 trials, OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.88, p = 0.005, I2 = 67%). Subgrouping demonstrated a consistent reduction in the primary outcome for the PCI group in RCTs (six trials, OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.99, p = 0.05). The primary outcome reduction was irrespective of the study design, and it was replicable in sensitivity and subgroup analyses. Advantages in other outcomes were rather related to statistical pooling effects and dominated by observational data. Conclusions: CTO-PCI was associated with improved patient-oriented primary outcome compared to OMT in a study-level meta-analysis. This composite outcome effect was mainly driven by target vessel treatment, but a significant reduction in mortality and myocardial infarction was observed, irrespectively. These findings have hypothesis-generating implications. Future RCTs with adequate statistical power are eagerly awaited.

Pretreatment With Unfractionated Heparin in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction­a Propensity Score Matching Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) are often pretreated with unfractionated heparin (UFH) before a primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). UFH pretreatment is intended to lessen the thrombotic burden, but there have been conflicting study findings on its safety and efficacy. We assessed the risks and benefits of UFH pretreatment with a retrospective analysis of registry data from the STEMI network of a German metropolitan region. METHODS: Data from patients with STEMI referred for PPCI from 2005 to 2020 were evaluated with an adjusted outcome analysis, including propensity score matching (PSM). The endpoints included the patency of the infarct-related artery (IRA) after PPCI, in-hospital mortality, access-site bleeding, and the peak creatine kinase (CK) level. RESULTS: We assessed data from 4632 patients with STEMI: 4420 (95.4%) were pretreated with UFH, and 212 (4.6%) were not. After PSM of 511 vs. 187 patients, the adjusted odds ratios for the various endpoints were (pretreatment vs. no pretreatment, with 95% confidence intervals): for impaired flow of the IRA, 1.01 [0.59; 1.74]; for in-hospital mortality, 1.46 [0.88; 2.42]; and for access-site bleeding, 0.59 [0.14; 2.46]. The peak creatine kinase levels were similar in the two groups (median, 1248.0 vs. 1376.5 U/L, estimated difference -134 [-611; 341]). CONCLUSION: UFH pretreatment was less frequently performed in STEMI patients who had undergone cardiopulmonary resuscitation. UFH pretreatment was not associated with increased access site bleeding, nor was it found to have significantly higher efficacy with respect to the relevant endpoints. The risks and benefits of UFH pretreatment should be weighed individually in each case, as evidence from high-quality clinical trials is lacking. Data from the existing literature suggest that no pretreatment is an option to be considered, as are certain alternative antithrombotic strategies.

Non-femoral focused transaxillary access in TAVI: GARY data analysis and future trends.

BACKGROUND: In patients not suitable for transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), several access strategies can be chosen. AIM: To evaluate the use and patient outcomes of transaxillary (TAx), transapical (TA), and transaortic (TAo) as alternative access for TAVI in Germany; to further evaluate surgical cutdown vs. percutaneous TAx access. METHODS: All patients entered the German Aortic Valve Registry (GARY) between 2011 and 2019 who underwent non-transfemoral TAVI were included in this analysis. Patients with TA, TAo, or TAx TAVI were compared using a weighted propensity score model. Furthermore, a subgroup analysis was performed for TAx regarding the percutaneous or surgical cutdown approach. RESULTS: Overall, 9686 patients received a non-transfemoral access. A total of 8918 patients (92.1%) underwent TA, 398 (4.1%) TAo, and 370 (3.8%) TAx approaches. Within the TAx subgroup, 141 patients (38.1%) received subclavian cutdown, while 200 (54.1%) underwent a percutaneous approach. The TA patients had a significantly lower 30-day survival than TAx patients (TA 90.92% vs. TAx 95.59%, p = 0.006; TAo 92.22% vs. TAx 95.59%, p = 0.102). Comparing percutaneous and cutdown TAx approaches, no significant differences were seen. However, more vascular complications occurred (TA 1.8%, TAo 2.4%, TAx 12.2%; p < .001), and the hospital length of stay was shorter (TA 12.9 days, TAo 14.1 days, TAx 12 days; p < .001) after TAx access. CONCLUSION: It may be reasonable to consider TAx access first in patients not suitable for TF-TAVI, because the 30-day survival was higher compared with TA access and the 1-year survival was higher compared with TAo access. It remains important for the heart teams to offer alternative access modalities for patients not amenable to the standard TF-TAVI approaches.

[Preclinical loading in patients with acute chest pain and acute coronary syndrome - PRELOAD survey]. / Präklinisches Loading bei Patienten mit akutem Thoraxschmerz und akutem Koronarsyndrom ­ PRELOAD-Umfrage.

BACKGROUND: Guidelines on myocardial infarction (MI) recommend antithrombotic and anticoagulatory treatment at time of diagnosis. MI with ST segment elevation (STEMI) is mostly a certain diagnosis. Acute coronary syndrome without ST segment elevation (NSTE-ACS) has diagnostic uncertainty and remains a working diagnosis in the prehospital setting. OBJECTIVE: Assessment of prehospital loading with aspirin and heparin depending on ACS subtype and pretreatment with oral anticoagulants. METHODS: The PRELOAD survey was a nationwide German study. STEMI/NSTE-ACS scenarios were designed and varied in pretreatment: I) no pretreatment, II) new oral anticoagulants (NOAC), III) vitamin K antagonist (VKA). Loading strategy was assessed and included: a) aspirin (ASA), b) unfractionated heparin (UFH), c) ASA + UFH, d) no loading. RESULTS: A total of 708 emergency physicians were included. In NSTE-ACS without pretreatment, 79% chose loading (p < 0.001). ASA + UFH (71.4%) was the preferred option. In corresponding STEMI scenario, 100% chose loading and 98.6% preferred ASA + UFH (p < 0.001). In NSTE-ACS with NOAC pretreatment, 69.8% favored loading (p < 0.001); in VKA pretreatment the corresponding rate was 72.3% (p < 0.001). In each scenario, ASA was the preferred option. In STEMI with NOAC pretreatment, 97.5% chose loading (p < 0.001); analogous rate was 96.8% in STEMI with VKA pretreatment (p < 0.001). ASA was the preferred option again. CONCLUSIONS: Prehospital loading was the preferred treatment strategy despite the diagnostic uncertainty in NSTE-ACS and guidelines recommending loading at time of diagnosis. Pretreatment with oral anticoagulants resulted in a strategy shift to loading with only aspirin. In STEMI patients, this indicates potential undertreatment.

Outcome of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Patients Stratified by Pre-Clinical Loading with Aspirin and Heparin: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis.

Background: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) has a high prevalence of obstructive coronary artery disease and total coronary occlusion. Consequently, these patients are frequently loaded with antiplatelets and anticoagulants before hospital arrival. However, OHCA patients have multiple non-cardiac causes and high susceptibility for bleeding. In brief, there is a gap in the evidence for loading in OHCA patients. Objective: The current analysis stratified the outcome of patients with OHCA according to pre-clinical loading. Material and Methods: In a retrospective analysis of an all-comer OHCA registry, patients were stratified by loading with aspirin (ASA) and unfractionated heparin (UFH). Bleeding rate, survival to hospital discharge and favorable neurological outcomes were measured. Results: Overall, 272 patients were included, of whom 142 were loaded. Acute coronary syndrome was diagnosed in 103 patients. One-third of STEMIs were not loaded. Conversely, 54% with OHCA from non-ischemic causes were pretreated. Loading was associated with increased survival to hospital discharge (56.3 vs. 40.3%, p = 0.008) and a more favorable neurological outcome (80.7 vs. 62.6% p = 0.003). Prevalence of bleeding was comparable (26.8 vs. 31.5%, p = 0.740). Conclusions: Pre-clinical loading did not increase bleeding rates and was associated with favorable survival. Overtreatment of OHCA with non-ischemic origin, but also undertreatment of STEMI-OHCA were documented. Loading without definite diagnosis of sustained ischemia is debatable in the absence of reliable randomized controlled data.

Acute Chest Pain­Diagnostic Accuracy and Pre-Hospital Use of Anticoagulants and Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors

BACKGROUND: Acute chest pain (aCP) can be a symptom of life-threatening diseases such as acute coronary or aortic syndrome, but often has a non-cardiac cause. The recommendations regarding pre-hospital drug treatment of patients with aCP are ambiguous. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted of 822 patients with aCP who were attended by emergency physicians. The cause of aCP was classified as follows: acute coronary syndrome without ST-segment elevation (NSTE-ACS), acute aortic syndrome, hypertensive crisis, cardiac arrhythmias, musculoskeletal, or other. The suspected and discharge diagnoses were compared, and the pre-hospital administration of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) and unfractionated heparin (UFH) was analyzed. Furthermore, the parameters that improved diagnostic accuracy were investigated. RESULTS: The positive predictive value of the diagnosis assigned by the emergency physician (EP diagnosis) was 39.7%. NSTEACS was the most commonly suspected cause of aCP (74.7%), but was confirmed after hospital admission in only 26.3% of patients. ASA was administered in 51%, UFH in 55%, and both substances in 46.4% of cases. A large proportion of patients received anticoagulants in the pre-hospital setting although the discharge diagnosis was not NSTE-ACS: ASA 62.9%, UFH 66.0%, both substances 56.5%. CONCLUSION: ASA and UFH are often given to EP-accompanied patients with aCP despite the low accuracy of diagnosis in the pre-hospital setting. Pre-hospital measurement of high-sensitivity troponin T (hs Trop-T) might improve discrimination between NSTE-ACS and other causes of aCP. This is important, as the current guidelines contain no clear recommendations for prehospital drug treatment in NSTE-ACS.

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation with different self-expanding devices-a propensity score-matched multicenter comparison.

OBJECTIVE: Several supra-annular self-expanding transcatheter systems are commercially available for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Comparative data in large-scale multicenter studies are scant. METHODS: This study included a total of 5175 patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVI with the ACURATE neo (n = 1095), Evolut R (n = 3365), or Evolut PRO (n = 715) by a transfemoral approach at five high-volume centers. Propensity score matching resulted in 654 triplets. Outcomes are reported according to the Valve Academic Research Consortium-3 (VARC-3) consensus. RESULTS: Moderate or severe paravalvular regurgitation (PVR) occurred significantly more often in the ACURATE neo group (5.2%) than in the Evolut R (1.8%) and Evolut PRO (3.3%) groups (p = 0.003). The rates of major vascular-/access-related complications (4.6%, 3.8%, and 5.0%; p = 0.56), type 3 or 4 bleeding (3.2%, 2.1%, and 4.1%; p = 0.12), and 30-day mortality (2.4%, 2.6%, and 3.7%; p = 0.40) were comparable. The rate of new permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) was significantly lower in the ACURATE neo group (9.5%, 17.6%, and 16.8%; p < 0.001). Independent predictors for 2-year survival were a Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) risk score ≥5%, diabetes mellitus, a glomerular filtration rate <30 ml/min, baseline mean transvalvular gradient ≤ 30 mm Hg, treating center, and relevant PVR. CONCLUSION: In this multicenter study, TAVI with the ACURATE neo, Evolut R, or Evolut PRO was feasible and safe. The rate of relevant PVR was more frequent after the ACURATE neo implantation, with, however, lower rates of PPI. Two-year survival was mainly driven by baseline comorbidities.

Optimal protamine-to-heparin dosing ratio for the prevention of bleeding complications in patients undergoing TAVR-A multicenter experience.

BACKGROUND: Despite major advances, transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is still associated with procedure-specific complications. Although previous studies reported lower bleeding rates in patients receiving protamine for heparin reversal, the optimal protamine-to-heparin dosing ratio is unknown. HYPOTHESIS: The aim of this study was a comparison of two different heparin antagonization regimens for the prevention of bleeding complications after TAVR. METHODS: The study included 1446 patients undergoing TAVR, of whom 623 received partial and 823 full heparin antagonization. The primary endpoint was a composite of 30-day mortality, life-threatening, and major bleeding. Safety endpoints included stroke and myocardial infarction at 30 days. RESULTS: Full antagonization of heparin resulted in lower rates of the primary endpoint as compared to partial heparin reversal (5.6% vs. 10.4%, p < .01), which was mainly driven by lower rates of life-threatening (0.5% vs. 1.6%, p = .05) and major bleeding (3.2% vs. 7.5%, p < .01). Moreover, the incidence of major vascular complications was significantly lower in patients with full heparin reversal (3.5% vs. 7.5%, p < .01). The need for red-blood-cell transfusion was lower in patients receiving full as compared to partial heparin antagonization (10.4% vs. 15.9%, p < .01). No differences were observed in the incidence of stroke and myocardial infarction between patients with full and partial heparin reversal (2.2% vs. 2.6%, p = .73 and 0.2% vs. 0.4%, p = .64, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Full heparin antagonization resulted in significantly lower rates of life-threatening and major bleeding after TAVR as compared to partial heparin reversal. The occurrence of stroke and myocardial infarction was low and comparable between both groups.

Vascular Access in Patients With Peripheral Arterial Disease Undergoing TAVR: The Hostile Registry.

BACKGROUND: The optimal access route in patients with severe peripheral artery disease (PAD) undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) remains undetermined. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to compare clinical outcomes with transfemoral access (TFA), transthoracic access (TTA), and nonthoracic transalternative access (TAA) in TAVR patients with severe PAD. METHODS: Patients with PAD and hostile femoral access (TFA impossible, or possible only after percutaneous treatment) undergoing TAVR at 28 international centers were included in this registry. The primary endpoint was the propensity-adjusted risk of 30-day major adverse events (MAE) defined as the composite of all-cause mortality, stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA), or main access site-related Valve Academic Research Consortium 3 major vascular complications. Outcomes were also stratified according to the severity of PAD using a novel risk score (Hostile score). RESULTS: Among the 1,707 patients included in the registry, 518 (30.3%) underwent TAVR with TFA after percutaneous treatment, 642 (37.6%) with TTA, and 547 (32.0%) with TAA (mostly transaxillary). Compared with TTA, both TFA (adjusted HR: 0.58; 95% CI: 0.45-0.75) and TAA (adjusted HR: 0.60; 95% CI: 0.47-0.78) were associated with lower 30-day rates of MAE, driven by fewer access site-related complications. Composite risks at 1 year were also lower with TFA and TAA compared with TTA. TFA compared with TAA was associated with lower 1-year risk of stroke/TIA (adjusted HR: 0.49; 95% CI: 0.24-0.98), a finding confined to patients with low Hostile scores (Pinteraction = 0.049). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with PAD undergoing TAVR, both TFA and TAA were associated with lower 30-day and 1-year rates of MAE compared with TTA, but 1-year stroke/TIA rates were higher with TAA compared with TFA.

Meta-analysis of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in combination with intra-aortic balloon pump vs. extracorporeal membrane oxygenation only in patients with cardiogenic shock due to acute myocardial infarction.

Background: Incidence and mortality of cardiogenic shock (CS) in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remain high despite substantial therapy improvements in acute percutaneous coronary intervention over the last decades. Unloading the left ventricle in patients with Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) can be performed by using an intra-aortic balloon pumps' (IABP) afterload reduction, which might be especially beneficial in AMI patients with CS. Objective: The objective of this meta-analysis was to assess the effect of VA-ECMO + IABP vs. VA-ECMO treatment on the mortality of patients with CS due to AMI. Methods: A systematic literature search was performed using EMBASE, COCHRANE, and MEDLINE databases. Studies comparing the effect of VA-ECMO + IABP vs. VA-ECMO on mortality of patients with AMI were included. Meta-analyses were performed to analyze the effect of the chosen treatment on 30-day/in-hospital mortality. Results: Twelve studies were identified by the literature search, including a total of 5,063 patients, 81.5% were male and the mean age was 65.9 years. One thousand one hundred and thirty-six patients received treatment with VA-ECMO in combination with IABP and 2,964 patients received VA-ECMO treatment only. The performed meta-analysis showed decreased mortality at 30-days/in-hospital after VA-ECMO + IABP compared to VA-ECMO only for patients with cardiogenic shock after AMI (OR 0.36, 95% CI 0.30-0.44, P≤0.001). Combination of VA-ECMO + IABP was associated with higher rates of weaning success (OR 0.29, 95% CI 0.16-0.53, P < 0.001) without an increase of vascular access complications (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.35-2.08, P = 0.72). Conclusion: In this meta-analysis, combination therapy of VA-ECMO + IABP was superior to VA-ECMO only therapy in patients with CS due to AMI. In the absence of randomized data, these results are hypothesis generating only.