RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Scrotal pain is a common presentation to the emergency department requiring prompt investigation and management to identify testicular torsion and increase the opportunity for testicular salvage. Using national data obtained from the NHS Improvement, we aim to identify key suboptimal areas in the acute diagnosis and management of testicular torsion with a view to learning from these and improving outcomes. METHODS: A freedom of information request was made to all 134 hospital groups in England and Wales that manage testicular torsion. Serious incidents experienced by these hospitals were analyzed to see whether those with pediatric emergency departments fared better than those without. In addition, a qualitative thematic analysis of the NHS Improvement National Reporting and Learning System database over a 12-year period (2007-2019) was undertaken, to identify common themes associated with orchidectomies and "near-miss" events in the pediatric population. RESULTS: Three hundred four patient safety incidents were returned and divided into 62 orchidectomies and 242 near-miss events. The most common factor in the orchidectomy group was individual factors (83.9%). Misdiagnosis of symptomatic testicle was not significant when comparing ED to specialist surgeons (odds ratio = 1.46, P = 0.3842). Atypical presentation resulting in orchidectomy was significant when comparing ED with specialists (odds ratio = 6, P = 0.0355). Near-miss events, not leading to orchidectomy, are often due to a wider variety of factors. A Mann-Whitney U test showed that there was no statistical significance in incidents when comparing general ED units caring for all ages with pediatric EDs in terms of incidents ( U = 807.5, z = -1.124, P = 0.261). CONCLUSIONS: There is a need for education in ED about atypical presentation of testicular torsion and examination of scrotum in cases of lower abdominal pain. It is also vital that specialist teams are cognizant of the standard operating procedures relevant to scrotal pain and testicular within the organization and the wider clinical network. Finally, there should be a drive for annual collation of data in urology and ED units with regards to testicular torsion as patient safety incidents may be underreported.
Assuntos
Torção do Cordão Espermático , Criança , Humanos , Masculino , Orquiectomia , Dor/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Escroto , Torção do Cordão Espermático/diagnóstico , Torção do Cordão Espermático/epidemiologia , Torção do Cordão Espermático/cirurgiaRESUMO
Introduction: Transperineal (TP) biopsy has recently replaced the transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) approach as the ideal method of biopsy in the United Kingdom with growing trends to adopt. To minimise transmission of COVID-19 during the first wave of the pandemic, the British Association of Urological Surgeons Section of Oncology issued guidelines reducing general anaesthesia (GA) procedures and initiate COVID-secure 'green' site diagnostics. As a result of these guidelines and reduction in clinical diagnostics trust-wide, we ceased all TRUS diagnostics and implemented a centralised, nurse-led LA TP biopsy service. Materials and methods: A waiting list was developed for those awaiting prostate cancer diagnostics across the network. A COVID-secure 'green' site was quickly identified with TP biopsies starting soon after. Quality improvement methodology was utilised and a run chart was used to show if changes were sustainable. Results: Successful implementation and centralisation of a TP biopsy service occurred with TRUS guided biopsies ceasing across all sites on 12 May 2020. The procedures were carried out by urology advanced nurse practitioners under local anaesthesia with a select few occurring under GA. Centralising the service in a COVID-secure manner freed up dedicated theatre sessions and personal leading to increased efficiency elsewhere. The service was robust and was maintained upon lifting of COVID restrictions. Conclusions: A centralised, nurse led LA TP biopsy service in a procedural unit was implemented successfully. The service has remained resilient upon lifting of restrictions and return to business as usual. This led to improved performance across trust by freeing up valuable resources and staff to undertake more duties. The service remains highly valued trust-wide.
RESUMO
Kidney stone disease can have a number of adverse effects on patients including quality of life. Studies assessing outcome measures in this area have largely been focused on objective assessments such as stone free rate. However, as part of the evolution to shift healthcare to a more patient centered position, patient-reported outcome measures have emerged as an improved tool to address this deficit. Key patient-reported outcome measures in Urology now include Ureteral Stent Symptom Questionnaire, Wisconsin Stone QoL Questionnaire, Cambridge Ureteric Stone PROM, Cambridge Renal Stone PROM, and Urinary Stones and Intervention Quality of Life. This article serves to provide an overview of these tools and help delineate their role in current practice.
Assuntos
Cálculos Renais/terapia , Medidas de Resultados Relatados pelo Paciente , Qualidade de Vida , Humanos , Cálculos Renais/complicações , Recidiva , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Stents , Inquéritos e Questionários , Ureter , Cálculos Ureterais , UrolitíaseRESUMO
Remote clinics have shown many benefits including patient safety, but if we look closer, does this move exclude certain groups of patients from accessing healthcare and promote health inequality?